>>1944 done sorry kid, not my board to mod

>>1962 He's a well-known disengenious faggot from tvch, report sage hide and ignore.

There are many kinds of Jews, but generally they don't follow the Old testament in the same way that Christians follow it.

>>1950 For real, what do you mean by evil?

>>1950 We should denounced the evil kikes, the usurpers of the true Israelites, the Ayran Race. Anyone who falls for their "we wuz israelites n sheet" is retarded. Death to the Edomites, death to the jews.

Is it really worth going to hell for being a Marcionite because le evil Torah?

I forgot to put the word "addict" after the word dopamine, sorry. -May God bless you all.

>>1993 I would say try to remove anything that causes you to sin, go to church and talk to your pastor or priest. I will pray for you.

Also you don't have to and probably shouldn't put your name and first letter of your last name in the name field.

>>1711 >Son of Man Usually, this refers to a Human, not God. See distinct references to the "Son of God" and "Son of Man." >We don't worship New Jerusalem I don't see how this applies to the Saturn conspiracy being wrong or incompatible. Yes, we do not worship Saturn. Saturn is Satan, and we do not worship Satan. >We don't worship the Christain cross No, but the cross is the symbol of our God, isn't it? We don't pray to nor adore the cross itself, but the meaning it carries. Nobody worships symbols, they worship their meaning. If you consider that the Crucifix represents Christ and his enlightening, then the folded up equivalent could, and should, easily represent a negation of that enlightening. To clarify: I am not a Catholic, nor do I align immensely in any belief of such a theory, but I have long known about the symbolic representation of the Cube, Hexagon, and Saturn itself in its various forms. I think that _if any_ planet would represent the Godly antithesis, it would be Saturn. The Muslim tomb of Muhammad being a black cube, the Jewish worn black cube, and the intricacies of the Talmudic star all seem to conveniently line up in a distinctly anti-Christian manner.

>>1948 >I don't see how this applies to the Saturn conspiracy being wrong or incompatible. The reason it's pointed out by Saturn conspiracy theorists is to imply an indirect worship to Saturn/Satan instead of God. >but the cross is the symbol of our God, isn't it? The cross is ancient, it was used by not only Saturn, but also the pagan god Tammuz. >Nobody worships symbols, they worship their meaning. True, but It's kind of difficult to pin point the spiritual aspects of symbols, but there is power to invoke or ward off demons in symbols, as well as sigil magic. However i don't know very much about it. Does idolatry stop being idolatry if you're using the symbol to pray for God? If you worship God on a pagan alter does it offend God? The Satanists reverse what is holy to get the attention of the devil. If you have any books on this subject or The Saturn Conspiracy/symbolism i'd love to hear them.

>>1094 If a man could be saved without ever reading, seeing, or even knowing a Bible, then surely. Ages ago, this was common, if not standard. How many Chinese in the year 250 do you think read or even knew of the Bible? Yet, because the church is Universal, and because God rules all things, someone could never even hear the word "Christ" and still come to understand the proper path to follow. Surely, the time before Christ did not simply deny all men into Heaven.

>>1949 >Yet, because the church is Universal, and because God rules all things, someone could never even hear the word "Christ" and still come to understand the proper path to follow. While this is a heartening and intuitive thought brother, it seems to me that it trivializes Christ's necessity to the world.

Celibacy is a more perfect state of living than being married and having children. St. Paul talks about it and Our Lord Himself was celibate. If you're calling Him and lots of saints h*mosexuals because le evropa 88 you will be damned. You're not different from the jewish pharisees if you put politics over Our Lord by your post. I wonder if jews and /pol/fags end in the same Hell circle, two faces of the same coin.

>>1978 Comparing yourself to Jesus in terms of power is already wrong, ignoring that dudes have hormonal urges to release their biological fluids just adds to the disingenuous nature of forgetting we are but men.

>>1978 Where do /leftypol/ fags go?

>>1980 It's not about muh powerlevels, it's about virtue. The Apostles were celibate on the likeness of Christ and later the bishops are celibate by succession of the Apostles, it is a required virtue for those leading His Church. It is difficult to gain only by nature, yes, but God is above nature. But polfags don't believe in God, they make their idols and anti-idols, and brand their temporal or materialist causes as christianity. >>1989 Maybe somewhere better, it's worse to be lukewarm than cold afterall.

>>1031 It is the middle class foregoing having children. There was a graph of a survey, which I unfortunately don't have right now, by household income that was a U shape. Poor people are having many children (because things can't get worse or the government will pick up the slack) and so are the wealthy. The people for whom children would be the most significant decrease in standard of living are not: high prole/low middle class skilled laborers. Almost every religion holds celibacy in high regard, Christianity no exception, but at the end of the day you need laymen to feed the NEET monks and mystics.

>>1708 >Do real ethnic Jews even exist anymore as a distinct group? I don't think so, except in the sense that you still have saved ancient Jews like Paul the apostle, who are not dead today according to biblical cosmology. I think the early Christians, which became the people of God as it says in the New Testament (Romans 9:24-26, Galatians 4:28-31, 1 Peter 2:9-10 KJV), had all their emphasis on being "in Christ," who was the one seed of Abraham (Galatians 3:16) and born of the Spirit (born again) rather than saved by their own physical heritage. The only people who still emphasized physical heritage did so only because they denied the pre-eminence of Jesus Christ. Such as the pharisees. However, ironically, these groups were actually descended from Edomites (see the origins of the Herodian dynasty), and the religion of pharisaism or talmudism was mostly adopted by other pagan peoples in later times. So despite claiming to be Jews, these people have basically no real relationship with the ancient Jews. But despite their constant lies on this account, they do still represent a "spiritual succession" from the pharisees, as Jesus forewarned us in John chapter 8 when He rebuked the scribes and pharisees of His day as being of their father, the devil, who is the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning. Later in the book of Revelation we have more prophecies of the so-called "synagogue of Satan" which say they are Jews, and yet, they are not. The existence of modern Judaism today is a proof of the fulfillment of that very prophecy. Namely, people who always say they are Jews, but in actuality they are unrelated to the Biblical Jews. They're the synagogue of Satan, and everything they say is a lie that turns the truth on its head. Often times, they try their hardest to do the exact opposite of what is right. This is why they promote sodomy, extreme promiscuity, and abortion, among many other mental illnesses that they often promote today through hollywood and other media. As it says in the book of Isaiah, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"

>>1708 Yes, modern 'Jews' are their own distinct ethnic group. Khazar theory is bunk, the ancestors of modern 'Jews' mixed with Anatolian Turks, then went to Iberia and Italy, then went to France and Germany, and then to Poland and Russia. That is a weird mix and that's why they can do gene testing for citizenship in 'Israel'. If you mean the old actual real Jews, not really.

>>1091 >>1448 >I don't want to add more pressure into this, but i want to ask: If jews can be saved after all their dastardly acts, can Satan himself be saved if he somehow realizes his mistake? after all he perfectly knows God's presence but was swayed by a massive ego. I believe he's not an independent evil individual but a "nature" element that tests special people and their faith, most cases of people who have said to encounter him claim he just tempts but does not blackmail or cause misdeeds towards third parties without the testing subject's interference, like a counter "karmic" device from the subject's own desires, even Job implied so. So yes or not?

>>1727 >Yes, modern 'Jews' are their own distinct ethnic group. Khazar theory is bunk, the ancestors of modern 'Jews' mixed with Anatolian Turks The point is it doesn't even matter. They could be saved just like the rest of us if they bothered to drop the false ideology. It's just ironic that they so happen to be wrong about the one thing they are relying on.

All the nations on Earth will accept Him before the end of times, and the jews will be the last nation to convert. Our Lord speaks about this on Matthew XX.

Is this what you are talking about? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliny_the_Younger_on_Christians

>>1712 >>1969 >Be Christianity >Most persecuted religion in Rome >a few centuries past >become official Roman State religion >then become the only religion >eventually become the most Christian state on planet earth (Eastern Roman Empire and Vatican respectively) >Land that belonged to Rome still has the highest amount of Christians in Europe to this day Funny how life turns out

>>1969 No. It's already been suggested in other places I asked. Perhaps it was an account of how early Christians lived in the earliest communities or something. I just remember it described how happy and forgiving Christians were with their neighbors and such.

He also makes these type of one sentence threads >>1240 and leaves without an answer. Just general random stupidity

>>1238 >one of those posts is mine

>>1356 Some people can get hit in the cross fire and get wrongfully accused. Although I was right about the majority of them. Example of a new post by that idiot can be seen here >>1868

>>1860 >>1865 Basically, when the spaceshit mod isn't spamming imageboards that are actually active, he's spamming his own ded imageboards that have illegal content inside of them. In order to report anybody who uses it. So, don't go to any random urls being posted anywhere around here

>>1238 Oh that guy. Every imageboard has had to deal with that spamming kike OP. Just report his dead imageboard when they show up so a moderator may delete all of it