/christian/ - Christianity

Religious discussions and spirituality

SAVE THIS FILE: Anon.cafe Fallback File v1.1 (updated 2021-12-13)

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 20000

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

Board Rules

(used to delete files and postings)

Asian Wife and "Tradition" Anonymous 05/05/2022 (Thu) 14:54:40 No.10229
Why do /pol/cels act like marrying a Christian Asian girl is against tradition? In Christian tradition, you are supposed to marry a Christian woman who is virgin and will submit to her husband, not a slut or infidel who will rebel against her husband's authority. If the choice is between an "agnostic" feminist white woman with multiple "partners" who will be the most untraditional wife ever and a Christian Asian girl who is chaste and wants to fulfill her role as a woman and wife, the /pol/cels would still claim the white woman is the correct choice in the name of "kids who look like me." Even some supposedly tradcuck Catholics will cite Tobit or some other apocrypha against marrying a chaste Asian Christian and settling for the white slut. Nobody can quote a relevant verse from the New Testament. From everything I can gather, there is no material or religious documentation from this millennia that says marrying a Christian wife of another race is against tradition. Not even liberals consider Asians and Europeans to be different and constantly make laws against both in the name of diversity for darker races, stating East Asians are adjacent to white people. The far right says East Asians are honorary Europeans. I know most of /pol/ has no truth to their words and just shill for ethnostates, but is there any legitimate and truthful documentation that states two Christians, a European and an East Asian, are going against tradition by marrying?
>>11850 nazis literally just copy what the they think Jews are doing. itd be hilarious if they werent so prominent and annoying
>>10229 I'll just remind you that if you marry an Asian woman most probably your sons will end up as mentally ill liberal Elliot Rodgers. Now kys and stop using Christianity as en excuse for your race-mixing fetish.
>>11855 just marry a person you love and trust to raise your kids. Idk why this is an issue we're discussing.
>>11855 Markiplier disproves your theory
>>11851 Except for the fact that the minorities are invaders and Jesus himself said. Matthew 12:29 "Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house." This also works on the national level as well. We are to defend our heritage because it's built upon Christian foundations, We can't do that if we mate with the negro. Look at places like Mexico or Brazil where miscegenation was allowed to run rampant. They've become dens of Crime and all types of unholy abominations. I don't believe we should hate the negro or the Asian, in particular but we need to draw a line when things get too much. Instead of trying to destroy each of the people groups that God lovingly crafted we should instead be focusing on preserving that which God made. It's the same reason why you should never breed a lion and a tiger.
>>11870 preserving your heritage has nothing to do with race mixing atleast not in America. In Europe youd be correct since 99% of Europeans with European heritage are white but in America its not the same. You have black people who have roots just as deep in this nation as your or I same thing with spanish (although technically theyre European) and to a lesser extent out west, Chinese.
>118 replies THE STATE
https://younggospelminister.blogspot.com/?m=0 Feminists are literal Satanists. >As you can see, it was common for the Devil, and demons, to be visualized as inherently unstable beings that conformed not only to no gender boundaries, but no natural boundaries either. The devil is the ultimate boundary breaking entity, which is really a good description of evil itself. Evil intent consists in the desire and intention to transgress the boundaries laid out by God himself. Indeed, one of the words for sin in the Bible is transgression, which literally means to transgress the boundaries of what the Lord says is good. Evil inherently transgresses all of God’s good boundaries. >But not only was the Devil represented by such boundary transgressing beings, he was also conceptualized or represented as a woman, or a serpent-woman. For instance, in one Christian work “Livre pour l’enseignement de ses filles (‘Book for the Education of his Daughters’, 1371–1372), the author, >“…Geoffrey attempts to instil in his daughters the lesson that women should defer to fathers and husbands in anything but domestic matters and makes his point by retelling how Eve broke this rule when she conversed with the serpent, ‘whiche as the Hystorye sayth hadde a face ryght fayre lyke the face of a woman’.”[10] >It may be strange for us to conceptualize a feminine Satan, because it is more common to view him as masculine, but this was a consistent image throughout Church history. >“…A more straightforwardly female Satan can be seen in the actually very common depictions of the snake in the Garden of Eden with a woman’s head on its serpentine body and sometimes also the breasts of a woman…Exactly when the notion of a female snake was established is difficult to say, but the earliest translation of the Bible into Latin rendered the word as serpens—feminine gender.”[11] So, to marry a white woman that rejects her role as a wife and mother and who acts as a man truly is the farthest from tradition you can be. It is Satanic. >Indeed, according to J. B. Trapp “it was the most frequent way of representing the Edenic serpent from the late twelfth century until the late sixteenth century, when the human features of the creature disappear and it becomes, once more, only reptilian.”[12] This is interesting that the devil would be represented by feminine imagery, but again, note, the Devil is not a man nor a woman, Satan is a fallen spiritual being. The Devil is inherently in a different category. Even if you want to argue the Scriptures lean towards presenting him as male figure, note, the view that he transgressed all boundaries is inherent in his rebellion against God’s good boundaries and in his role as ‘The Evil One’. >The most famous image representing the Devil’s transgender nature is the Baphomet (figure 3). >Baphomet is a hermaphrodite figure, and one of the most recognized symbols of Satan in the last century or so. Baphomet was first visually conceptualized by French occultist Éliphas Lévi “in his book Dogme et rituel de la haute magie (‘Dogma and Ritual of the High Magic’, 1855) and elsewhere.”[14]
>>11879 >Note, we are not seeking here to establish precisely how Scripture describes the gender of the Devil. The point is to establish that a lot of historical Christian theology viewed the Devil as a being that transgresses all boundaries, and early feminists were inspired by this and took this idea and ran with it. They turned this transgender being into a liberator of women: >“Nineteenth-century feminists often felt they somehow had to deal with male chauvinists’ use of the story in Genesis 3. One way of doing so, which seems to have been quite widespread, was to turn the tale on its head, making Eve a heroine and the serpent benevolent.”[15] >The founding emphasis of feminism was rebellion against the long-established gender boundaries taught by the Scriptures and applied to Western society. No one really denies this, either, but most people are not aware of the full implications of these Biblical ideas. They do not understand how rejecting them unleashes Satanic forces on society. >From very early on proto-feminists and early feminists sought to break the gender boundaries of how women should be viewed in fiction or in public. An example of this is the son-in-law of the first feminist philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft, Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822). In his Revolt of Islam, which was dedicated to his wife Mary Shelley,[16] the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, Shelley incorporates both Wollstonecraft’s feminist and Godwin’s Satanic ideas, to present to the world a gender boundary breaking hero, Cyntha.[17] >The poem is filled with obvious Satanic imagery. The first part of the poem relates the tale of a woman giving aid to a fallen serpent referred to as the Morning Star, which was cast to the ground after being defeated by an eagle that represents what the people see as the ‘good God’. In Shelley’s story the ‘good God’ is the true arch enemy, >“This Fiend is the creator of death, earthquake, blight, and so on. His enemy the serpent is the benefactor of mankind and the enemy of all oppressors. When he once again resumes his combat with “God”, thrones will shake and ‘earth’s immense and trampled multitude’ will begin to realize its own power.”[18] >The serpent is the liberator in Shelley’s account. The women allies herself closely with this serpent, this “friend of the oppressed”. The next part of the poem recounts the tale of Cyntha and her brother. Cyntha’s story in some ways parallels the serpent’s. She >“…is the earthly messenger of Satan the liberator. This messenger propagates feminist ideas and defies gender roles. Cythna leads the final insurrection against the tyrant Sultan who is the villain of the tale, which is a quite remarkable role for a woman to be allowed to play.”[19] >Shelley presents Cyntha in the dominant role as leader in the rebellion against the patriarchal society. She, along with her brother, are both defeated and burned at the stake.[20] Yet her hope is that she will inspire other women to take up the call and take on the patriarchy themselves. Faxneld notes that Islam in this passage is symbolic of Christian society, which was a common technique in this era. John Locke does something similar in his Letter Concerning Toleration.
Open file (400.06 KB 797x1828 1586376881486.jpg)
>>11880 >Shelley’s intentions are clear. In The Revolt of Isalm Shelley was attempting to create a feminist counter-narrative myth to demonstrate ideological opposition to the dominant Christian view of gender roles.”[21] Shelley’s goal, as an advocate of feminism, like his parents-in-law, is to frame God and the patriarchy ordained by God, as the force of oppression, and encourage women to ‘realize’ that they can smash all gender boundaries. >“Shelley’s revolutionary Satanism is combined with what can, without much hesitation, be described as a feminist ideal. This is further reflected, for example, in how Cythna takes on a role coded as masculine, when she comes charging on a black steed, sword in hand, to rescue her brother. Shelley held a utopian vision that gender differences, ‘detestable distinctions’, as he called them in a letter, would ‘surely be abolished in a future state of being’.”[22] >‘Detestable distinctions’? Shelley’s open and explicit goal is of a future feminist society where gender distinctions are seen as evil and are abolished completely. Sound familiar? It’s not an accident that this was inspired out of Luciferian ideas, because as we saw both Christian theologians and early feminists saw Satan as a gender bending being. >Christians often try to argue that the move for equality in society was the result of biblical influence. However, one thing is certain, the Scriptures do not teach equality (cf. read more here). Critics of the Bible see this clearly, including Faxneld, and feminists, >“The topic of women’s status within the early church has been debated for a long time. Looking at scripture itself, it is easy to find several passages that give strong support to the subordination of women, such as the aforementioned 1 Timothy (2:11–15) but also Titus 2:3–5, Ephesians 5:22–33, Colossians 3:18, and 1 Corinthians 14:34–36. Phrasings like ‘Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord’ (Eph. 5:22), and the ways in which they have been used to serve patriarchal ends, make it easy to see why some feminists would later view God as the protector of patriarchy (and, occasionally, Satan as an ally in the fight against it).”[23] >The Bible is clearly patriarchal, that is, supporting of leadership by men and it rejects the pretentions of equality. Because of this, feminist approaches to Scripture have flicked between rejecting it outright, rejecting it as modified, and in modern “evangelical” circles, explaining it away as culturally outdated, irrelevant or superseded.
Open file (379.64 KB 1080x1080 1563740465338.jpg)
>>11874 Imagine the screeches on /pol/. This is a good thread.
>>11882 No post with "/pol/cels" in it or any other variation of "incels" which is short for involuntary celibate (but is really just a politically correct generic insult for retards who are afraid of even saying retard because it's "offensive" to retards) as if you should be a fornicating degenerate is a good thread.
>>11884 It's not a baseless insult. Some people are genuinely ugly and have terrible personalities leading to inceldom. The media has weaponized the term, though. https://youtu.be/IuqHwaO75Ec
>>11886 Those people should have become monks but Protestantism is anti-monastic for no good reason.
>>11886 You're such a fucking retard for using a satanic subversive social engineering buzzword that promotes fornication.
>>11894 Incels worship sex, anon. Have you ever been to /r9k/? You're thinking of volcels.
>>11895 not him but the word incel usually gets thrown around by fornicaters as a pejorative. they've essentially co-opted it
>>11855 >I'll just remind you that if you marry an Asian woman most probably your sons will end up as mentally ill liberal Elliot Rodgers. Now kys and stop using Christianity as en excuse for your race-mixing fetish. OP probably gets payed to do this so he/she doesn't care. I don't even know why we keep wasting our time on this garbage thread. Mods should just lock it.
>>11886 >>11895 >Have you ever been to /r9k/? Y No this is the /christian/ board >inceldom >incel "incel" is an oxymoron. Because you can't be involutary voluntary sexless. Celibacy is a choice >volcels >voluntary voluntary celibate That's just a run on sentence.
Open file (1.24 MB 1084x702 elliot rodgers.png)
>>11882 >Imagine the screeches on /pol/. No that's just screams from gunshots coming from a crazy hapa. And everyone's doing it. >bumping a bait thread
>>11905 No this is /pol/
>>11916 Wrong.
Open file (3.76 MB 4143x4143 1653358176609.jpg)
Open file (51.70 KB 1360x1104 1609172920017.png)
>>11903 >>11906 Why do you repeat reddit talking points and then act like OP is a shill? Biracial White-Asian individuals are less likely to have a mental illness than monoracial whites. Monoracial Asians are the least likely to have mental illnesses out of any other race. Monoracial whites are the most likely to have mental illnesses, only surpassed by Ashkenazi Jews. Biracial White-Asian individuals are half or less as likely as monoracial whites to have a mental illness. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30547212/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30594752/ https://robobees.seas.harvard.edu/files/sdlab/files/alvarez_et_al._-_2019_-_raceethnicity_nativity_and_lifetime_risk_of_men.pdf https://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/Assets/PDF/FINAL_Mens_Health_Data_Brief.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26198764/ Frequently spammed propaganda by anti-WMAF posters fail to include this data in an attempt to frame the offspring of WMAF as having high mental health risks. https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health >Zane and Berger did not look at the mental health of non-Asian Americans. Biracial White-Asian individuals have as good or better chances of finding a mate as monoracial whites. Anti-WMAF posters always use Elliot or some other jew as propaganda. https://archive.md/nXOse#selection-677.0-681.264 >We found that three multiracial groups received a “dividend effect.” Asian-white women were viewed more favorably than any other group of women by white and Asian men, beating out women of the same race or ethnic group. Asian-white and Hispanic-white men were also afforded “dividend” status by Asian and Hispanic women respectively. Asian and Hispanic women responded more frequently to the multiracial men than to either their coethnic men or to whites. >Although white women did not prefer Asian-white men to white men, they did respond to this group as frequently as to white men. This is in practice a multiracial dividend, because white women responded to monoracial Asian men as infrequently as they did to blacks. >>11919 No, this place is definitely a /pol/ adjacent. The same non-argument accusations and attempting to discredit people instead of actually answering OPs questions. Same LARPing and butthurt. I haven't seen a single answer to OPs question of tradition in the whole thread. Not one. Just people getting mad and calling him names while trying to get his thread shut down.
>>11925 >nih.gov >kike-as-kike-can Conveniently enough, I would wager most of those totally-unbiased-and-not-at-all-(((funded))) """studies""" just so happen to 'conveniently' leave out the mental duress of the people group being targeted by destruction (for well over 100 years now) by those self-same, self-serving TPTB, huh Anon?
Open file (58.24 KB 500x600 754575475458.jpg)
Just marry a nip with mostly jomon features or straight up some ainu girl and you good to go. It's barely racemixing at that point.
>>11927 The only power that matters is Jesus.
>>10447 I mean if it saves them then amazing!! but thats also not goode for them to mix folk and Christianity..
funny thread Marry who you love if they are Christian before you met them just take into account they will be buillied for being a hafu
bump for /pol/
Open file (1.36 MB 1107x2048 1633285485663.png)
/pol/ is just a big LARP anymore. Full of simps and the godless playacting like they are some viking or roman warriors.
>>12328 Your spreading sodomite propaganda in order to "own the nazis". The equivalent of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Open file (400.06 KB 797x1828 1586376881486.jpg)
Open file (247.41 KB 936x908 1564352139812.jpg)
Open file (144.95 KB 1110x497 1476049666385.png)
>>12333 You dont even know who you're attacking. You think everyone who isnt you is some bunkertranny. I'm farther to the Right than /pol/.
>>12346 I'm clearly attacking Anonymous :^)
>>12346 Why do you hate white people so much, rabbi?
>>12353 Have you heard in the protocol of learned elder of zions that supposed anti semites are actually controlled by Jews. It's similar reasoning to that. Also why promote paganism if it was inherently dangerous to world Jewry? Think about it for a second. Stan Lee a Jew brought the comic book hero thor who was based on the Norse God thor. Including their most recent attempt at promoting this garbage in the form of the northman which was helped along by a Jew. At this rate the only thing I actually trust is the bible. You can make the case that Miscegenation is wrong, Because of the fact of the numerous complications that come with the birth of mongrels. Look at similar cases which are banned like incest which is the closest comparison you can make. Because the result is a child that's damaged genetically. In fact if you want to know what's good for you. Look at the consequences of doing something that's considered sinful in the bible. Sodomy you get AID's and other diseases, Fornication gets you numerous STD's, Adultery completely destroys a relationship, Murder is obvious, Drugs have numerous negative affects associated with them depending on the kind of drug(The word sorcery comes from the word used for drug in greek) Sin is destructive to yourself and to others. Remember the two greatest commandments were Love the lord thy God with all thy heart, mind and soul and Love thy Neighbour AS THYSELF. Now if you hate the fact that you're white then you really aren't loving yourself are you? Pride is a thing but pride is placing your own needs over the needs of others and completely ignoring the needs of others.
>>12367 >You can make the case that Miscegenation is wrong Show me in the New Testament
>>12387 He can't because it isn't true, just like many other beliefs that people have concerning the scriptures.
>>10628 All women are supposed to be in subjection to their husbands, not roaring harridans that need tamed.
>>10229 > /pol/cels Go back, sodomite freak.
>>12490 Get an argument or go home.
>>12515 >debate my shitty troll spam Unironically get killed by God's will.
Open file (1.68 MB 2250x3287 1654533578304.jpg)
Asian women are a blessing from God. Absolutely the best wife material.
I'd glad this is one of the biggest threads on /polchristian/ my favourite yellow-pilled based board.
>>12872 Indeed. Good thread.
Why does this thread have so many posts?
>>13058 Because it draws the ire of /pol/ and the fake Christians that twist Scripture to conform with their worldview. Notice not one person in this thread has answered OP. They just ridiculed him and even wished him death.
Reminder that Alessandro Valignano (and Marco Polo for whatever that is worth) declared the Nipponese to be "white". They only ceased to be "white" due to nutty Victorian pseudo science classifications.
>>13060 That's nice an all, but isn't this a fetish thread? Wmaf is a sexual fetish. Its fine if you happen to like an asian woman and get married, but specifically fetishing them seems sinful to me.
Open file (665.01 KB 750x1334 1618676515480.png)
>>13658 >fetish thread Did you read the thread at all? Did you even read what OP was asking?
>>13634 Japanese Korean, and Chinese were all considered white until science became secularized.

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms

no cookies?