>>10229 >Racemixing shilling this hard GLOW

>>10231 >racemixing Address the argument.

>>10231 What is wrong with marrying a Christian?

>>10231 ok fascist, mixed children are superior to their pure bred counterparts.

>>10242 Other races really want to have a white partner because that predicts child's success so I guess mixed children are superior in that way but there's nothing to gain for the white parent. I think people of color should just git gud.

>>10248 >there's nothing to gain for the white parent. A loving marriage with a Christian spouse and lots of children seems worth it enough, not by your godless heathen standards.

>>10249 Yeah absolutely with the mexicans worshipping dia de los muertos and blacks mixing their voodoo practices with christianity. Try harder or find yourself some feminist girlfriend.

>>10229 You really did fall for the perfect asian waifu vs evil white witch woman meme. Take some time off the internet.

>>10257 >fall for memes Have you gone outside? Are you under 30?

I'm tired of all your races. Please slow down for a minute.

>>10257 >>10259 the only reason why white women are portrayed as rebellious is because most of them grew up either fatherless or with a weak beta dad. Most Asian/Black/Arab/Latino fathers are more strict and thus contribute positively to the psychological development of the daughter. In contrast, white dads are either weak betas or nonexistent, causing psychological problems in their white daughters. White woman who grew up with a strong, commanding father are just as "submissive" as minority women.

>>10262 Islam lives rent free, in the $chizo's head.

>>10264 Every religion can be incorporated into schitzophrenic delusions.

This is just the opposite side of the >muh race camp.

>>10279 >>10277 >>10264 Nice samefag

>>10229 >Asian >wife >trad

>>10296 You're a retard.

>>10296 t.muslim

>>10293 I feel sad for the father having to deal with his daughter being a putrid whore and trying desperately to remove traces of it. At least there was some consequences for what she did. It's sad how easy it is for women to be unsalvageable whores.

>>10293 >posts a jew >calls it hapa Every. Single. Time. GET NEW CONTENT

>>10229 >it's the Asian tradwife meme look, i'm not saying you shouldn't marry a Christian woman you love if she's a different race from yours. what i am saying is that this weird obsession with Asian women so many anons have is bizarre and quite frankly seems like a thinly-veiled fetish. with the way some of you guys talk about them, you'd think the entirety of East Asia was some sort of Christian theocratic paradise, where all the women are waiting for some westerner to sweep them off their feet, but let's face-it, they are just as deep in the hole of materialism as many western countries and not all the women there are the super-models you think they are, nor the shy chaste virgin who are infinitely pure and blameless. plenty of them are just as corrupt as any other women of any other race, and the same can be said of the number of them that are upstanding and virtuous. my advice to you all is to stop being so autistic about race, and find partners based off of the qualities that actually matter.

>>10353 >plenty of them are just as corrupt as any other women of any other race You're right with the rest, but not with this. Society over there values certain things like purity quite strongly. So though there's just as many harlots, they at least have the decency to pretend they aren't harlots. They also want to be housewives as it's seen as a massive achievement rather than oppression, and they tend to be able to cook at least basic things because the idea that a woman is supposed to feed her man is big. They also tend to be thin, because the fat get bullied into getting thin or suicide. Now, they aren't doing any of this out of godly motives. They're doing it because they want to get Chad Thundercock, MD. But at least they're doing it.

>>10353 >find partners based off of the qualities that actually matter Most of that has to do with race and religion. White women are far a large not Christian at all, at least those of marriageable age. They go to parties, get drunk, fornicate, cheat, compete with men in careers, etc. etc. Asian women have the qualities that matter. There is no obsession, there is an observation that many see, but a lot, like you, like to lie and claim isn't there. >>10355 >they aren't doing any of this out of godly motives Some of them are. There is a significant population of Christians in East and Southeast Asia, AFTER excluding the Philippines.

>>10359 I miss Common Filth. Nobody else made tradcucks seethe like he did. Nobody else on the Right will dare attack white women. All simps.

>>10359 the body odor thing is caused by food consumption. According to Japanese Americans smell like cheese lol

this image speaks for itself

>>10366 Tattoos are definitely a warning sign in women.

>>10368 for sure

>>10365 Read the archived links in the image. Body odor for Asians is genetic and tied to a gene that produces dry earwax.

>>10359 >There is a significant population of Christians in East and Southeast Asia do you mean as a plain number, or as a percentage? because if it's the latter i find that doubtful outside of Korea

>>10370 is it specifically for asians?

>>10373 Christianity is spreading a lot in China. It's hard to tell the numbers though, as it is largely underground.

>>10229 GOOK IDOLATOR! YOU ARE A GOOK IDOLATOR!

>>10442 >spams half naked white women in wheat fields >calls someone else an idolator kek

>>10378 >>10379 forgive me if i'm wrong, but don't a lot of those churches tend to mix-in a lot of folk religion too, to the point where they only resemble Christianity superficially.

>>10446 Not sure what you're talking about. I was just making fun of the guy who keeps screaming idolator this idolator that.

>>10450 Sarcasm doesn't translate well in text.

>>10241 You can see all the guys look soft and not confident in themselves. This is the type that marries are girl outside his race. Subconsciously, or consciously, they believe they don't deserve better. They are not man enough for their own, but exactly on the same level as Asian men plus way more handsome. The underlying issues is that these men did not try hard enough to face their demons and abduct a young virgin white girl and instead downgraded with a race they have nothing in common with.

>>10454 >not man enough to tame a non-virgin white woman I see this cope every single day on /pol/. It is neither masculine nor responsible to marry a used up abortion factory that is a white woman. There are no virgin white women of marriageable age. https://deepstrength.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/doom-and-gloom-and-the-amount-of-attractive-christian-virgins-part-3/ >In conclusion, there are approximately 545,241 Christian women in the US aged 18-29 who regularly attend Church, aren’t overweight or obese, are virgins at marriage, and are currently single. This is approximately 2.15% of the 18-29 total women population (545,241 / 25,332,752). In the US total population it is .17% (545,241 / 320,090,000).

>>10455 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156853/ https://ifstudies.org/blog/sex-and-the-single-evangelical

>>10455 >There are no virgin white women of marriageable age. If you'd be actually Christian and go to church every Sunday you wouldn't be a glownigger posting from your basement. You are a kike or feel guilty for being a weak miscegenating excuse of a male.

>>10457 Why do you /pol/cels always post the same 10 images and act like you're competing? Why do you /pol/cels always resort to attempting to discredit people by saying they're glowniggers, kikes, asian men, hapas, or asian women? Why can you never address the argument at hand? Why can you never address your opponent as he is: a white man? Posting the same 10 images of ugly people and spamming (((Tenda, Elliot, and Kelly Baltazar))) as the resultant offspring of white men and Asian women is not convincing anyone. >be actually Christian We both know you're a LARPagan. We both know you're not married and don't have children, but you still defend white women on the internet against pages and pages of statistics and videos and social media confessions of them being the most anti-traditional women alive, save for blacks. You still have not once addressed the argument of tradition. You've merely attempted, poorly, to discredit and emasculate your opposition.

>>10471 You are quite deranged to pile all those pics on your hard drive. The argument at hand is that race-mixing is evil and should only be done if, let's say, you live in a country where it is accepted (Brazil) or where your hapa-breed is seen as superior (any Asian country) or breeding with the native women is the only means of populating the area (like the Conquistadores taking the native Mexican girls because there are no Spanish girls). All the pics you post show low-testosterone and insecure men, such as yourself, else you wouldn't be so emotionally invested in this non-topic. Faggot. You can post as many pics as you like, if you go outside for ten seconds you know that picrel is the reality, the rule. You gotta get some sun, touch grass and eat steak, you faggot.

>>10456 i love it when asians start talking about politics with engrish. funniest shit ever and incredibly true

>>10478 But if both people are hot then it's good?

>>10478 >racemixing is evil OP asked for New Testament verses showing that. You've done nothing but make claims without substance. Old Testament forbid mixing because to do so would mean your spouse would follow a different religion. Different tribes/races had their own false gods and idols. God wanted his people separate so that the prophecy of Christ would come to fruition.

>>10231 White women are very obviously inferior nowadays, in every way. They're not worth it.

>>10293 On average, compared to white girls, yes.

>>10229 >Why do /pol/cels act like marrying a Christian Asian girl is against tradition? Because the underground right that advocated going your own way even if it meant marrying an Asian was shunned by the Left for their stoicism and in a bid to reaffirm their identity as men, the underground right (sometimes called the "far right") replaced stoicism in the face of adversity with a machismo front that did not allow for compromise of any kind. It was perfectly normal for /pol/ types to advocate marrying Asian women prior to Trump and the Feminist push against happa males. >If the choice If you can't bring a woman into the faith your marriage was doomed from the start. She could be a Hindi for all I care the point remains that women will adjust to their man's environment so if their man doesn't have the balls to bring her into Christianity she's never going to respect you or your opinion for anything other than providing an income regardless of race or religion.

>>10353 >what i am saying is that this weird obsession with Asian women so many anons have is bizarre and quite frankly seems like a thinly-veiled fetish. It's a cultural gap between anons who were introduced to politics prior to 2015 involving marrying foreign women and anons who were introduced to politics after 2015. You wouldn't get it. It's not a fetish though. Most of the anons use Asian as the example but it was Ukrainian for the pre-2011 crowd and works the same way.

>>10359 >Asians have the qualities that matter It's about foreigners raised in subordinate cultures vs free expression cultures, anon. the [Asian] tag has little to do with it so much as the [foreign] and [subordinate] tags.

And to think /christian/ couldn't get any lower than it already has. I can see why Christianity is dying now, if this is the state of its believers.

>>10585 Go back to your honeytrap.

I personally prefer black girls.

>>10587 Just quit embarrassing yourself with shit-tier takes based on Judaic universalist fantasies and we won't come here to laugh at (You) and (Your) retardation.

I used to be a /pol/cel but then I met some Mestiza girl online who hates feminism, wants to homestead and wants babies so I’m gonna see where this ends up. Wife + babies > muh race

>>10588 based, tbh racemixing is the only reason i returned to Christianity.

>>10585 >Oh no!! Christianity doesn't worship race! How will we stop the evil jews, never mind the evil that i do, it's the jews we must stop! MY side is soo oppressed even though Federal agents from stormfront indoctrinated image boards and Jews also control neo-nazi groups as well.

>>10593 >Federal agents from stormfront indoctrinated image boards ?

>>10591 That's not a good reason to return to Christianity lol. You can care about only dating your race and be Christian there is nothing in the bible that says you have choose one or the other. >>10590 Almost all the Latina women in in my family found a white husband, and two Latino men in my family found a half white or fully white woman, both of which are overweight while the Latina women are petite, thin and attractive, this isn't a majority but are white women really that bad of a state? >>10585 >I can see why Christianity is dying now It's so funny when people say this. Yeah, it's dying, it's only one of the most popular religions in the world, the bible itself is the most well known books of all time.

>>10596 https://medium.com/@MKultrawoke/the-truth-about-the-alt-right-a-destruction-by-facts-and-logic-e3d07f27e8cb It's kind of leftist, and /pol/ will dismiss the sources as Jewish (as if Jews or mainstream news outlets can't be correct) but the facts are there.

>>10597 >are white women really that bad of a state Many of them are. Tons of white girls in their early twenties are fat with double chins, wearing skin-tight clothing, having tattoos, and are vain, entitled and repulsive. Feminist ideology and social media have completely ruined them. And even if you find a good white woman, odds are is that she will not want lots of children, or she will want to work, or she will divorce rape you, etc. They are simply not very feminine.

>>10598 No, that article is shitty and all over the place. Milo Yiannopolous, Roger Stone, Alex Jones, and Steve Bannon have nothing to do with the alt right. The Breitbart crowd just tried to co-opt the alt right, while the alt right attempted in vain to ride the coattails of the Trump movement.

>>10580 You're not supposed to marry a non-believer, anon. If you can convert someone before marriage, fine. But you walk a tight rope being in a relationship with someone who may or may not become Christian.

>>10588 a man of good taste i see

>>10588 >>10591 >>10602 Divorce is likely. There's a reason this thread is about Asian women specifically.

>>10600 There is some controversy about what is alt-right, but it covers more than just racialist view points it also includes conservative view points at the time. Milo Yiannopolous speeches and writings often ridicule Islam, feminism, social justice, and political correctness, he also supported Donald Trump. Roger Stone sought out the proud boys for his security, and worked with trump on his campaign, he came up with "Make American Great Again" and pioneered provocative troll marketing. As for Alex Jones the article says that most in the alt-right would disagree with saying that hes in the alt-right, but he has had a popularizing influence in the conspiracy truther movement regardless if hes CIA controlled opposition and has had trump on his show. The article goes into this, but there is a wide variety to the alt-right that goes beyond just racialist politics.

>>10599 >Feminist ideology and social media have completely ruined them. All Christians should emulate the Amish and disassociate with the world at large on a community level.

>>10597 >this isn't a majority but are white women really that bad of a state? Western ones, yes. Not all of them, but enough of them that it's like searching for a unicorn.

>>10601 >But you walk a tight rope being in a relationship with someone who may or may not become Christian. If you love someone then you can convince them to become Christian. If you don't, you didn't truly love them.

>>10605 >but he has had a popularizing influence in the conspiracy truther movement Can it really be called a "conspiracy" when most of his conspiracies have been proven as facts or the evidence overwhelmingly supports them being true?

>>10598 >linking to a commie rag Go back to leftypol.

>>10605 The alt right got its name from Richard Spencer's old site Alternative Right and was popularized by boards like /pol/. Being 14/88 wasn't a requirement, but some degree of racialism is. It was a big tent, but race realism was always one of the core tenets. Out of what remains of the old alt right, Affirmative Right gives a pretty close view of what much of the early alt right was like. Colin Liddell supports nationalism but is against Hitler dickriding and whtewashing the Nazis, and his site is effectively a rump of Alternative Right after Spencer took the site back from him and Andy Nowicki (going off what I remember). Way back before Richard Spencer was paling around with autistic LARPers like Matt Heimbach, I remember seeing at least one neo-Nazi shitting on him in the comment section of one of his old sites. The old alt right was home to people with a lot more nuanced views than "GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW," but the racial egalitarianism that the Bannon/mainstream MAGA contingent promoted was diametrically opposed to what the actual alt right believed.

>>10598 always thought it was interesting how many of their infographics look the same

>>10611 The Bible wouldn't say dont marry an unbeliever if it was so easy, anon. You sound like someone from /pol/ saying someone is weak.

>>10619 You are weak if you can't convince a woman who allegedly loves you to come to Christ. That has nothing to do with /pol/.

>>10617 >and was popularized by boards like /pol/. You mean by Hillary's terrible shilling campaign that completely blew up in her face.

>>10623 Perhaps I should go back a step. There is nothing wrong with being weak, but it's important to understand your own limits. This is perhaps a generational gap as younger Christians think it is "bad" to be weak instead of understanding your limits if you happen to be weak. A weak man shouldn't be dating someone who is not a Christian and should look for a more subordinate wife if he desires a spouse. A strong man can convince his woman. That is all I'm conveying.

>>10626 No, that was when all the civic "nationalists" started coming in and calling themselves alt right when they had no clue what it meant.

>>10630 Yes, popularizing it as a concept divorced from its original meaning.

>>10614 >no argument, just an ad hominem Where is the lie? >>10612 I think you mean if it can really be called a theory if there is overwhelming evidence.

If you happen to marry an asian woman, sure. If you're fetishing them, then that;s weird and you should stop. /thread.

>>10601 Wtf emperor Constantine was persuaded to embrace christianity by wife.

Reminder that God specifically made Eve because the other peoples weren't considered worthy wives for Adam. Your hatred for white women will never change that.

>>10242 They are not. Another example where they are not would be the medical issues that arise when mixed children require medical transplants and donations and the very limited donor pool with which they are compatible. You cannot seriously expect that there aren't going to be medical hiccups when, with racemixing, you cut-corners and do what natural evolution has done over tens of thousands of years in the span of time that humanity has had airplane travel. gr8 b8 thread btw

it's threads like these that make me wonder if i'm the only remotely normal person on this board.

>>10635 this

>>10644 So what he was pagan before that and the opinions of women didn't matter for their time.

>>10654 You are among your own. We are all perfectly sane.

>>10229 I believe that Christianity is the best way to promote national coherence and preservation. Not by banning race mixing or being race centered. I believe those things just happen as a result of apostasy and degeneracy. Basically if a man feels safe in his moral decent community, there will be plenty of oppurtinity for him to build a life within that community, rather than to chase a woman across the globe whom he can't relate too as well. >>10231 Being against racemixing is like crying about someone removing an apple from a rotting basket of apples.The whole interacial black man white female phenomena is not the cause of degeneracy, it's a reaction to it. White women are not in love with black men so much that they are doing all this. It's that they are playing on the fantasies of nazis. Women only interact with black men to piss off their degenerate nazi countrymen/friends/relatives who fantasize about white women ideolizing them. It's like a girl who has sex with guys to get back at her father. It's not that white girls are being brainwashed to love immigrants. It's that they hate you and want to piss you off. >>10248 White people are not superior in any way because of some intrinsic quality. White people are superior because they are Christian and have a Christian culture and tradition. Take that out of the equation, and they are stupid, delusional, perverted, and filled with hate. Idk what metric matter to you about "predicting success". Any success predicted is out of Christian influence. Definitelly in eternal affairs, but also practical affairs, like raising good children, mental stability, etc... Conclusion: >race mixing is a rare phenomena that occurs as last measure >race mixing in the mainstream is a hateful reaction to degenerate nazi fantasy and not the initial cause of degeneracy >Value of white man lies in his Christianity, without it, he is valueless

>>10652 >evolution I hope you're joking. >transplant Europeans have problems with transplants withbother Europeans. Dumb argument.

It's surreal to see people who have no contact whatsoever with the east think that (more) developed nations have women who don't play the same games as europeans.

>>10874 I'm married, my wife is a Christian from East Asia and never traveled before meeting me, and all the stats anon posted corroborate my experience. Asian women are just better. All of us can't be wrong, anon. Maybe in a few decades or something things will change, but for bow it is what it is. The past 600 years of exploration and colonization doesn't seem to indicate things will change, though. The last 3000 years of literature and history suggest white women have always been this way too and the degenerate era of feminism we're dealing with isn't just something kikes have done. Read Cato on the Oppian law. It goes back and back farther.

>>10799 >>Value of white man lies in his Christianity, without it, he is valueless The white man is a creation of God you heathen

Someone just asked this question on /pol/. I'm assuming it was one of you.

WMAF really is the future. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuqHwaO75Ec

>>11005 >He thinks Asians don't do trashy dancing >He actually believes that Asians aren't even worse at being whorbs

>>10455 >>10229 >I see this cope every single day on /pol/. This is not /pol/ >Why do /pol/cels act like marrying a Christian Asian girl is against tradition? We are not /pol/ >I know most of /pol/ has no truth to their words and just shill for ethnostates You are not posting inside the /pol/ board. /pol/ exists rent free in your head /thread

>>11750 >This is not /pol/ Right, totally , absolutely. This board was made by a weeb /pol/ Christian to discuss Christian culture and not Jesus.

>>11750 This board is as /pol/ as it's going to get, complete with resident pagan LARPers and mudslimes attempting to subvert Christianity.

>>11810 Yes, but there are certain beliefs in /pol/ that don't work with Christianity like hate.

>>11812 Oh is that a fact? Malachi 1:3 "And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness" If God hates Esau then clearly we are allowed to hate. otherwise you commit blasphemy by declaring God a sinner. We are to forgive always and too show mercy whenever we can but to say we are unable to hate is completely asinine. We are to hate Murderers, Pagans, Atheists, Sodomites. Of course we are to try and convince these people to change their ways but without hatred of these things we will never destroy them. The love of God is built upon a foundation and we are to try and save as many people as we can. Proverbs 8:13 "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate." The enemies of God are influencing this migration crisis because they want to destroy Europeans this is a fact whether you like it or not.

>>11826 retarded post

>>11829 Matthew 5:22 "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." That's not very christian behavior of you.

>>11826 God also loved Esau, we are to love not hate. God specifically tells us not to hate. >The enemies of God are influencing this migration crisis because they want to destroy Europeans this is a fact whether you like it or not. If God only cared about Europeans he would have been more clear about it, and he wouldn't have brought salvation to all the gentiles. Do you believe the elite don't effect everyone else?

>>11845 You kind of stick out like a sore thumb, friend. It's quite easy to track your racism across the various threads. Just curious, do you think this dead dog you keep beating somehow justifies your claim that Whites shouldn't defend themselves against those out for their destruction? TBH you sound like some kind of scheming Jew after all this time at your little project.

>>11845 >Do you believe the elite don't effect everyone else? this is the hardest point to try and beat through /pol/'s head. When all the white people are gone do they really think the same things wont happen to whoever replaces them?

>>11848 Lots of people here are anti-/pol/ not just me, so you're assuming a lot by connecting posts. Even if i was the only one, i don't care because this is /christian/ not /pol/, both belief systems are incompatible. >Just curious, do you think this dead dog you keep beating somehow justifies your claim that Whites shouldn't defend themselves against those out for their destruction? What a biased response of something i never said, whites don't need protection they're an elite race like the Jews. You're basically white jews, nazis only wish they would be as ruthless or as merciless as their "enemies".

>>11826 >>"The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate." >The enemies of God are influencing this migration crisis because they want to destroy Europeans this is a fact whether you like it or not. The Bible doesn't say to hate minorities just for being minorities.

>>11850 nazis literally just copy what the they think Jews are doing. itd be hilarious if they werent so prominent and annoying

>>10229 I'll just remind you that if you marry an Asian woman most probably your sons will end up as mentally ill liberal Elliot Rodgers. Now kys and stop using Christianity as en excuse for your race-mixing fetish.

>>11855 just marry a person you love and trust to raise your kids. Idk why this is an issue we're discussing.

>>11855 Markiplier disproves your theory

>>11851 Except for the fact that the minorities are invaders and Jesus himself said. Matthew 12:29 "Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house." This also works on the national level as well. We are to defend our heritage because it's built upon Christian foundations, We can't do that if we mate with the negro. Look at places like Mexico or Brazil where miscegenation was allowed to run rampant. They've become dens of Crime and all types of unholy abominations. I don't believe we should hate the negro or the Asian, in particular but we need to draw a line when things get too much. Instead of trying to destroy each of the people groups that God lovingly crafted we should instead be focusing on preserving that which God made. It's the same reason why you should never breed a lion and a tiger.

>>11870 preserving your heritage has nothing to do with race mixing atleast not in America. In Europe youd be correct since 99% of Europeans with European heritage are white but in America its not the same. You have black people who have roots just as deep in this nation as your or I same thing with spanish (although technically theyre European) and to a lesser extent out west, Chinese.

>118 replies THE STATE

https://younggospelminister.blogspot.com/?m=0 Feminists are literal Satanists. >As you can see, it was common for the Devil, and demons, to be visualized as inherently unstable beings that conformed not only to no gender boundaries, but no natural boundaries either. The devil is the ultimate boundary breaking entity, which is really a good description of evil itself. Evil intent consists in the desire and intention to transgress the boundaries laid out by God himself. Indeed, one of the words for sin in the Bible is transgression, which literally means to transgress the boundaries of what the Lord says is good. Evil inherently transgresses all of God’s good boundaries. >But not only was the Devil represented by such boundary transgressing beings, he was also conceptualized or represented as a woman, or a serpent-woman. For instance, in one Christian work “Livre pour l’enseignement de ses filles (‘Book for the Education of his Daughters’, 1371–1372), the author, >“…Geoffrey attempts to instil in his daughters the lesson that women should defer to fathers and husbands in anything but domestic matters and makes his point by retelling how Eve broke this rule when she conversed with the serpent, ‘whiche as the Hystorye sayth hadde a face ryght fayre lyke the face of a woman’.”[10] >It may be strange for us to conceptualize a feminine Satan, because it is more common to view him as masculine, but this was a consistent image throughout Church history. >“…A more straightforwardly female Satan can be seen in the actually very common depictions of the snake in the Garden of Eden with a woman’s head on its serpentine body and sometimes also the breasts of a woman…Exactly when the notion of a female snake was established is difficult to say, but the earliest translation of the Bible into Latin rendered the word as serpens—feminine gender.”[11] So, to marry a white woman that rejects her role as a wife and mother and who acts as a man truly is the farthest from tradition you can be. It is Satanic. >Indeed, according to J. B. Trapp “it was the most frequent way of representing the Edenic serpent from the late twelfth century until the late sixteenth century, when the human features of the creature disappear and it becomes, once more, only reptilian.”[12] This is interesting that the devil would be represented by feminine imagery, but again, note, the Devil is not a man nor a woman, Satan is a fallen spiritual being. The Devil is inherently in a different category. Even if you want to argue the Scriptures lean towards presenting him as male figure, note, the view that he transgressed all boundaries is inherent in his rebellion against God’s good boundaries and in his role as ‘The Evil One’. >The most famous image representing the Devil’s transgender nature is the Baphomet (figure 3). >Baphomet is a hermaphrodite figure, and one of the most recognized symbols of Satan in the last century or so. Baphomet was first visually conceptualized by French occultist Éliphas Lévi “in his book Dogme et rituel de la haute magie (‘Dogma and Ritual of the High Magic’, 1855) and elsewhere.”[14]

>>11879 >Note, we are not seeking here to establish precisely how Scripture describes the gender of the Devil. The point is to establish that a lot of historical Christian theology viewed the Devil as a being that transgresses all boundaries, and early feminists were inspired by this and took this idea and ran with it. They turned this transgender being into a liberator of women: >“Nineteenth-century feminists often felt they somehow had to deal with male chauvinists’ use of the story in Genesis 3. One way of doing so, which seems to have been quite widespread, was to turn the tale on its head, making Eve a heroine and the serpent benevolent.”[15] >The founding emphasis of feminism was rebellion against the long-established gender boundaries taught by the Scriptures and applied to Western society. No one really denies this, either, but most people are not aware of the full implications of these Biblical ideas. They do not understand how rejecting them unleashes Satanic forces on society. >From very early on proto-feminists and early feminists sought to break the gender boundaries of how women should be viewed in fiction or in public. An example of this is the son-in-law of the first feminist philosopher Mary Wollstonecraft, Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822). In his Revolt of Islam, which was dedicated to his wife Mary Shelley,[16] the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, Shelley incorporates both Wollstonecraft’s feminist and Godwin’s Satanic ideas, to present to the world a gender boundary breaking hero, Cyntha.[17] >The poem is filled with obvious Satanic imagery. The first part of the poem relates the tale of a woman giving aid to a fallen serpent referred to as the Morning Star, which was cast to the ground after being defeated by an eagle that represents what the people see as the ‘good God’. In Shelley’s story the ‘good God’ is the true arch enemy, >“This Fiend is the creator of death, earthquake, blight, and so on. His enemy the serpent is the benefactor of mankind and the enemy of all oppressors. When he once again resumes his combat with “God”, thrones will shake and ‘earth’s immense and trampled multitude’ will begin to realize its own power.”[18] >The serpent is the liberator in Shelley’s account. The women allies herself closely with this serpent, this “friend of the oppressed”. The next part of the poem recounts the tale of Cyntha and her brother. Cyntha’s story in some ways parallels the serpent’s. She >“…is the earthly messenger of Satan the liberator. This messenger propagates feminist ideas and defies gender roles. Cythna leads the final insurrection against the tyrant Sultan who is the villain of the tale, which is a quite remarkable role for a woman to be allowed to play.”[19] >Shelley presents Cyntha in the dominant role as leader in the rebellion against the patriarchal society. She, along with her brother, are both defeated and burned at the stake.[20] Yet her hope is that she will inspire other women to take up the call and take on the patriarchy themselves. Faxneld notes that Islam in this passage is symbolic of Christian society, which was a common technique in this era. John Locke does something similar in his Letter Concerning Toleration.

>>11880 >Shelley’s intentions are clear. In The Revolt of Isalm Shelley was attempting to create a feminist counter-narrative myth to demonstrate ideological opposition to the dominant Christian view of gender roles.”[21] Shelley’s goal, as an advocate of feminism, like his parents-in-law, is to frame God and the patriarchy ordained by God, as the force of oppression, and encourage women to ‘realize’ that they can smash all gender boundaries. >“Shelley’s revolutionary Satanism is combined with what can, without much hesitation, be described as a feminist ideal. This is further reflected, for example, in how Cythna takes on a role coded as masculine, when she comes charging on a black steed, sword in hand, to rescue her brother. Shelley held a utopian vision that gender differences, ‘detestable distinctions’, as he called them in a letter, would ‘surely be abolished in a future state of being’.”[22] >‘Detestable distinctions’? Shelley’s open and explicit goal is of a future feminist society where gender distinctions are seen as evil and are abolished completely. Sound familiar? It’s not an accident that this was inspired out of Luciferian ideas, because as we saw both Christian theologians and early feminists saw Satan as a gender bending being. >Christians often try to argue that the move for equality in society was the result of biblical influence. However, one thing is certain, the Scriptures do not teach equality (cf. read more here). Critics of the Bible see this clearly, including Faxneld, and feminists, >“The topic of women’s status within the early church has been debated for a long time. Looking at scripture itself, it is easy to find several passages that give strong support to the subordination of women, such as the aforementioned 1 Timothy (2:11–15) but also Titus 2:3–5, Ephesians 5:22–33, Colossians 3:18, and 1 Corinthians 14:34–36. Phrasings like ‘Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord’ (Eph. 5:22), and the ways in which they have been used to serve patriarchal ends, make it easy to see why some feminists would later view God as the protector of patriarchy (and, occasionally, Satan as an ally in the fight against it).”[23] >The Bible is clearly patriarchal, that is, supporting of leadership by men and it rejects the pretentions of equality. Because of this, feminist approaches to Scripture have flicked between rejecting it outright, rejecting it as modified, and in modern “evangelical” circles, explaining it away as culturally outdated, irrelevant or superseded.

>>11874 Imagine the screeches on /pol/. This is a good thread.

>>11882 No post with "/pol/cels" in it or any other variation of "incels" which is short for involuntary celibate (but is really just a politically correct generic insult for retards who are afraid of even saying retard because it's "offensive" to retards) as if you should be a fornicating degenerate is a good thread.

>>11884 It's not a baseless insult. Some people are genuinely ugly and have terrible personalities leading to inceldom. The media has weaponized the term, though. https://youtu.be/IuqHwaO75Ec

>>11886 Those people should have become monks but Protestantism is anti-monastic for no good reason.

>>11886 You're such a fucking retard for using a satanic subversive social engineering buzzword that promotes fornication.

>>11894 Incels worship sex, anon. Have you ever been to /r9k/? You're thinking of volcels.

>>11895 not him but the word incel usually gets thrown around by fornicaters as a pejorative. they've essentially co-opted it

>>11855 >I'll just remind you that if you marry an Asian woman most probably your sons will end up as mentally ill liberal Elliot Rodgers. Now kys and stop using Christianity as en excuse for your race-mixing fetish. OP probably gets payed to do this so he/she doesn't care. I don't even know why we keep wasting our time on this garbage thread. Mods should just lock it.

>>11886 >>11895 >Have you ever been to /r9k/? Y No this is the /christian/ board >inceldom >incel "incel" is an oxymoron. Because you can't be involutary voluntary sexless. Celibacy is a choice >volcels >voluntary voluntary celibate That's just a run on sentence.

>>11882 >Imagine the screeches on /pol/. No that's just screams from gunshots coming from a crazy hapa. And everyone's doing it. >bumping a bait thread

>>11905 No this is /pol/

>>11916 Wrong.

>>11903 >>11906 Why do you repeat reddit talking points and then act like OP is a shill? Biracial White-Asian individuals are less likely to have a mental illness than monoracial whites. Monoracial Asians are the least likely to have mental illnesses out of any other race. Monoracial whites are the most likely to have mental illnesses, only surpassed by Ashkenazi Jews. Biracial White-Asian individuals are half or less as likely as monoracial whites to have a mental illness. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30547212/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30594752/ https://robobees.seas.harvard.edu/files/sdlab/files/alvarez_et_al._-_2019_-_raceethnicity_nativity_and_lifetime_risk_of_men.pdf https://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/Assets/PDF/FINAL_Mens_Health_Data_Brief.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26198764/ Frequently spammed propaganda by anti-WMAF posters fail to include this data in an attempt to frame the offspring of WMAF as having high mental health risks. https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health >Zane and Berger did not look at the mental health of non-Asian Americans. Biracial White-Asian individuals have as good or better chances of finding a mate as monoracial whites. Anti-WMAF posters always use Elliot or some other jew as propaganda. https://archive.md/nXOse#selection-677.0-681.264 >We found that three multiracial groups received a “dividend effect.” Asian-white women were viewed more favorably than any other group of women by white and Asian men, beating out women of the same race or ethnic group. Asian-white and Hispanic-white men were also afforded “dividend” status by Asian and Hispanic women respectively. Asian and Hispanic women responded more frequently to the multiracial men than to either their coethnic men or to whites. >Although white women did not prefer Asian-white men to white men, they did respond to this group as frequently as to white men. This is in practice a multiracial dividend, because white women responded to monoracial Asian men as infrequently as they did to blacks. >>11919 No, this place is definitely a /pol/ adjacent. The same non-argument accusations and attempting to discredit people instead of actually answering OPs questions. Same LARPing and butthurt. I haven't seen a single answer to OPs question of tradition in the whole thread. Not one. Just people getting mad and calling him names while trying to get his thread shut down.

>>11925 >nih.gov >kike-as-kike-can Conveniently enough, I would wager most of those totally-unbiased-and-not-at-all-(((funded))) """studies""" just so happen to 'conveniently' leave out the mental duress of the people group being targeted by destruction (for well over 100 years now) by those self-same, self-serving TPTB, huh Anon?

Just marry a nip with mostly jomon features or straight up some ainu girl and you good to go. It's barely racemixing at that point.

>>11927 The only power that matters is Jesus.

>>10447 I mean if it saves them then amazing!! but thats also not goode for them to mix folk and Christianity..

funny thread Marry who you love if they are Christian before you met them just take into account they will be buillied for being a hafu

bump for /pol/

/pol/ is just a big LARP anymore. Full of simps and the godless playacting like they are some viking or roman warriors.

>>12328 Your spreading sodomite propaganda in order to "own the nazis". The equivalent of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

>>12333 You dont even know who you're attacking. You think everyone who isnt you is some bunkertranny. I'm farther to the Right than /pol/.

>>12346 I'm clearly attacking Anonymous :^)

>>12346 Why do you hate white people so much, rabbi?

>>12353 Have you heard in the protocol of learned elder of zions that supposed anti semites are actually controlled by Jews. It's similar reasoning to that. Also why promote paganism if it was inherently dangerous to world Jewry? Think about it for a second. Stan Lee a Jew brought the comic book hero thor who was based on the Norse God thor. Including their most recent attempt at promoting this garbage in the form of the northman which was helped along by a Jew. At this rate the only thing I actually trust is the bible. You can make the case that Miscegenation is wrong, Because of the fact of the numerous complications that come with the birth of mongrels. Look at similar cases which are banned like incest which is the closest comparison you can make. Because the result is a child that's damaged genetically. In fact if you want to know what's good for you. Look at the consequences of doing something that's considered sinful in the bible. Sodomy you get AID's and other diseases, Fornication gets you numerous STD's, Adultery completely destroys a relationship, Murder is obvious, Drugs have numerous negative affects associated with them depending on the kind of drug(The word sorcery comes from the word used for drug in greek) Sin is destructive to yourself and to others. Remember the two greatest commandments were Love the lord thy God with all thy heart, mind and soul and Love thy Neighbour AS THYSELF. Now if you hate the fact that you're white then you really aren't loving yourself are you? Pride is a thing but pride is placing your own needs over the needs of others and completely ignoring the needs of others.

>>12367 >You can make the case that Miscegenation is wrong Show me in the New Testament

>>12387 He can't because it isn't true, just like many other beliefs that people have concerning the scriptures.

>>10628 All women are supposed to be in subjection to their husbands, not roaring harridans that need tamed.

>>10229 > /pol/cels Go back, sodomite freak.

>>12490 Get an argument or go home.

>>12515 >debate my shitty troll spam Unironically get killed by God's will.

Asian women are a blessing from God. Absolutely the best wife material.

I'd glad this is one of the biggest threads on /polchristian/ my favourite yellow-pilled based board.

>>12872 Indeed. Good thread.

Why does this thread have so many posts?

>>13058 Because it draws the ire of /pol/ and the fake Christians that twist Scripture to conform with their worldview. Notice not one person in this thread has answered OP. They just ridiculed him and even wished him death.

Reminder that Alessandro Valignano (and Marco Polo for whatever that is worth) declared the Nipponese to be "white". They only ceased to be "white" due to nutty Victorian pseudo science classifications.

>>13060 That's nice an all, but isn't this a fetish thread? Wmaf is a sexual fetish. Its fine if you happen to like an asian woman and get married, but specifically fetishing them seems sinful to me.

>>13658 >fetish thread Did you read the thread at all? Did you even read what OP was asking?

>>13634 Japanese Korean, and Chinese were all considered white until science became secularized.