>implying I don't have an imageboard on my local network where I'm the only user
its for dev purposes and image transfer, but it's not bad
>they are more often than not poopy irrelevant wojaks and avatars
No offense intended; browse better imageboards. There's one that's been up and famous since '07 and you can count the wojak-derivative images on one hand. Maybe two hands if you include threads still up from 2014.
(And yes, they don't have a /pol/ board. All politics in one thread, which is mostly dead. It's unintentionally an honorary /comfy/ site)
>isn't plaintext UTF-8 enough?
I'm not going to say a perfect
-chan, as a graphics person, but it wood rank berry highly provided enough content and users existed.
>I genuinely never see anyone posting wojaks outside of the big chans though.
To overgeneralize, I notice three crowds of alt. imageboard users; those there for niche interests, those there for less moderation (often politics-related, drama-related or wojak-related) and those there to escape 4chan's increasingly monotonous anti-culture.