>Goddamit, just say that you want a harem and leave it at that
no, i dont want a harem.
>no need to drag fascism into this
do you know the name of this board?
>You are like leftists trying to link every aspect of life into 4th-dimensional radical feminist theory
No. not even an argument.
>it does not make your issue any more important
polygamy vs monogamy is an extremely important issue in the destiny of a nation. you are a retard if you cant understand how this is relevant to fascism or why we should be discussing this on a board named /fascist/. you do know that this is the facist board, right? this isnt /pol/, its /fascist/.
>There aren't any European societies which had both meaningful marriage and open polygamy.
i highly doubt that, but still not a reason to shun polygamy. this isnt really an argument its just monkey see monkey do logic. the point of this thread should be to understand the pros and cons of each side and what their longterm effects are, not use herd mentality to prop up a position that you are emotionally but not rationally invested in, like you.
>Tell that to Romans. More importantly, women have always been kept in check with threats of shaming and exclusion. If their community found out about them getting fucked by unapproved males they would have their standing within society be damaged.
so why not approve the fucking by marrying sexually and reproductively viable women with high tier men who have the resources to support them? why should we waste such a precious resource by locking it away in a monastery just because faggots like you are irrationally invested in monogamy?
>All women are sluts unless they get too old/fat/have some dysfunction in their body. Prostitution is merely how unowned women act for resources/protection while the men around them get more access to passable women.
there will be no prostitution in the ethnostate. if the problem is unowned women, why not marry them to appropriate men who have the resources to support and make use of such a precious resource, reproductively viable women? what kind of sick fuck are you that you would rather turn the excess women into prostitutes instead of lawfully wedded wives who will raise children by high tier males? what the fuck is wrong with you?
>FYI, societies with open polygamy prostitution by the way.
are you implying prostitution doesnt happen in monogamous societies as well? on one hand you say that the only solution with excess reproductively viable women (the ethnostates most precious resource btw) is to turn them into prostitutes or shut them away in monasteries, and then you say that prostitution is a polygamy thing. you make no sense. you make no argument.
>The point of monogamy is ruling males making an alliance with other males to regulate female sexuality
how is this different from polygamy? its not, unless you are still arguing the retarded trope that in a polygamous society marriage will be thrown out the window (it wont). a polygamous society would still be an alliance between men to regulate the sexual behavior of women.
>This brings societal cohesion since the men can trust each-other to not try to muh dik's each-other's women.
this is not a function of monogamy, this is a function of marriage.
>Women are always on some level automatically opposed to monogamy
i doubt it. whores are a symptom of a degenerate society. polygamy means that men can have multiple wives but the women can only have one husband, just incase you didnt understand that.
>The likes of you
and just what is the likes of me? what are you implying faggot?
>have never named an example of a society
i dont have to, thats not the point of this thread and whether or not something has been done before is not the way we should be making decisions. we should understand things rationally and how they work and be able to make decisions that why, not on a monkey see monkey do herd mentality basis. start arguing anytime faggot.
>with open polygamy
what is open polygamy supposed to mean to you?
>having higher societal cohesion than its polygamous neighbors.
open polygamy vs polygamy? i thought this was about monogamy vs polygamy. what kind of a shitty word game are you trying to turn this into. fuck off with your shitty points and your reddit spacing.
>The ones who peddle polygamy live in the delusion that the men who'd benefit the most from polygamy are genius millionaire STEM Lords made from sheer muscle rather than crime lords or treacherous cultists like Mormons or entertainers or drug dealers. Even someone like Jeff Epstein.
baseless accusation, not an argument.