/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

More

(used to delete files and postings)


Report Shills - Do your part!


Open file (78.34 KB 305x304 ClipboardImage.png)
QTDDTOT - Questions That Don't Deserve Their own Threads Blackshirt Board owner 09/06/2020 (Sun) 16:20:51 ID: 1e72a1 No.7682
If you have a one-liner question that won't generate much discussion and isn't related to moderation or requests, or want to post something of interest to /fascist/s but doesn't deserve a thread, post it ITT. That last thread went super fast. OLD THREAD >>5128 https://archive.fo/BiRxm
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/07/2020 (Mon) 04:46:06.
How many pictures do you have for QTDDOTDOQOTSODTTGQOTTQS fredz? :)
>>7687 I was going to make a special image for this one like I did with making that edit for the last one, but I didn't really know what to make so I just was lazy this time. I think I will prepare in advance for the next one and try to make something nice. The last thread was really quick compared to the first anyways.
What books would you recommend concerning power, leadership, and war?
How do I go about understanding how the economics in a fascist society work? Capitalism and communism seem to make a point of explaining their economic philosophies but I find things like Italian fascism and German national-socialism to be much more obtuse, at least at first glance.
It seems that Christianity is in a massive decline, what do you speculate could be the reasons for this?
>>7689 Don't forget the Archive.
>>7725 I think this is one area where we can apply what Giovanni Gentile said in “Origins and Doctrines of Fascism” on the topic of thought and action. In section 10 of this essay he says that Fascism is “not an explicated and definitive political doctrine, articulated in a series of formulae”. He goes on to say in the same section that Fascism — >”did not arise with a precise and determinate program. Often, having settled on an immediate goal to be attained, a concept to be realized, a course to be followed, it has not hesitated, when put to the test, to change direction and reject as inadequate, or violate of principle, just that goal or that concept. Fascism sought not to bind the future.” Of course, this does not mean that Fascism is utterly void of positive content, it means that we are flexible and do not see ourselves utterly bound by this or that alternative such as between so-called “capitalistic” and “communistic” measures. We have values we hold to, and from these proper economic measures can be made clear to us through experience, among these being the well-being of the nation as a whole in terms of national security, environmental health, unity of the nation, continued sovereignty and the like, the well-being of the families, workers, etc. With such values we would hardly want to introduce measures that undermine our own native industries or control over vital resources, so various forms of economic nationalism (protectionism and self-reliance to varying degrees, etc) follow almost as a matter of course. All of this is why Hitler said that his main concern was not to nationalize property, but to nationalize the minds of the people. Hitler did not hesitate to nationalize the property of capitalists who refused to serve the national interest. A good example of this is Junkers Aircraft and Motor Works. Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament and was removed from his position and the company was taken over by the state. It’s also worth checking about books like Mosley’s “Fascism 100 Questions Asked and Answered” or “Tomorrow We Live” for good overviews of the idea of the corporative state, where different industries and areas of expertise are harmoniously reconciled and represented in bodies of experts. >>7729 Good catch I’ll do that now and edit it in
>>7730 >rearmament I guess I understood why Hitler had to do that but if keys say Germany was not in a war, would Hitler allow Hugo to do whatevrr he wanted to?
>>7728 In reality it’s been dying for centuries, especially since the “Enlightenment”. More recently though I’d argue that the atomization and destructive of communities caused by the Industrial Revolution led to much of the decline. The individual found themselves disembedded from all norms and they were a law unto themselves, and as the masses at large became politicized for basically the same reasons and stressed over modernization, it gradually became discovered that norms, governments, social issues and the like could be questioned, changed or outright abolished. I’d also argue that autistic literalism from some Christians drove some away, and all of this was made worse through Jewish influence, who obviously see religion ultimately as a hindrance to their ultimate goals. Christianity is an instrument outliving its usefulness. Popsci and irreplicable sociology studies are their main tool today. What is has taken its place is leftism, which is essentially an even more cucked form of Abrahamic slave morality. Along with this we are left with wishy-washy stuff like “Moralistic therapeutic deism”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralistic_therapeutic_deism It will keep dying though. And something will have to fill the void. People are lacking meaning, and egoistic materialism does not provide it. >>7743 Within the confines of the law and so long as he is acting in the national interest, then yes I would assume that there would be much more leeway.
Should I pay attention to crop circles? Over the last 15 years, they have become more elaborate and cleaner but I cannot know if they aren't mere photoshops. If they are true, what could be behind this? Looks like giant printers could do that lel.
>>7696 Stuff Julian the Apostle read. He went from inoffensive bookworm to Emperor, winning battles against Germans.
>>7725 Try Feder.
>>7728 It sucks, that's why. It was ill minded and abusive.
>>7730 >Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament Traitor. He deserved much worse.
What the fuck is with the Chink shills done by (((White nationalists))) and (((nationalists))).
>>7757 If you're talking about just pictures you've seen online I wouldn't trust them at all. >>7762 What is your criteria for a "chink shill"
>>7764 People who think China is le based and redpilled and is going to save the world from muh liberalism.
>>7762 Likely case they are (((Duginists))) Jews and /or mutts who think that China and Communism is the ultimate case agaisnt "American or Anglo liberalism" or liberalism in general, despite the fact that liberalism and communism has been working together since World War I.
>>7765 In that case, I have to agree with >>7766. If you haven't read it already, check out this long article which covers China shills, Duginists, crypto-Communists and all other people of this ilk https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/05/18/alt-right-duginism/
>>7764 >What is your criteria for a "chink shill" Someone who thinks the Xi is either going to save the west or the world from ZOG and pozzed ruining the fucking world right now. I've seen these cucks on Twatter, 8kuck and nu/pol/ and they have been shilling China and make retarded excuses such as "Oh well they're just using them for economic resources and power that's all has nothing to do with the Jews establishing their government goyim." Or " muh china isn't a communist country." these niggers are annoying. >>7766 >Likely case they are (((Duginists))) Jews and /or mutts who think that China and Communism is the ultimate case agaisnt "American or Anglo liberalism" or liberalism in general Funny because aren't there reports of China literally accepting and sucking off the Jews giving them some power within the state and LGBT, BLM being supported by Chinkland?
Open file (448.98 KB 1250x954 china and israel.jpg)
Open file (317.70 KB 1242x1686 israel china.jpg)
Just show this to Chink shills.
>>7769 You forgot the the degeneracy going on within China such as the LGBT and niggers fucking chinks in chinkland.
>>7768 >>7769 The people who worship china only do it because e-celebs told them to do so. Right wingers are pretty cucked and retarded especially the ones who came from cuckchan /pol/, considering they are willing to believe anything at told to them by someone who claims to be a fascist or on their side or if it boosts their fragile and useless egos. The reliance and love of e-celebs and lying about Communism being "based" will not resolve our current trending issues it only makes us incompetent, ignorant, and weak. Anyone who thinks China, Iran, and Russia are on our side is a dishonest fool.
>>7779 The behavior of many people towards ecelebs has to be the clearest demonstration of the truth of the lemming phenomenon. Many of these ecelebs have certain terms that they are known for using, and they quickly spread among places like Twitter and Cuckchan. I'm sure there are other examples, but the one that comes to mind for me first is terms used by Keith Woods such as "racist liberal" and "cultural capitalism"
>>7781 >The behavior of many people towards ecelebs has to be the clearest demonstration of the truth of the lemming phenomenon. Yes, and depression along with constant everyday browsing of the internet and thinking that being "blackpilled" is a personality has contributed to this as well. If these fools would learn to think for themselves and take actions into their own hands then we probably wouldn't be in this situation today. >Many of these ecelebs have certain terms that they are known for using, and they quickly spread among places like Twitter and Cuckchan. I'm sure there are other examples, but the one that comes to mind for me first is terms used by Keith Woods such as "racist liberal" and "cultural capitalism" Ah yes I know of the infamous racist liberal strawman, but it's nothing but a buzzword to make you feel idiotic and that you aren't a true "fascist" or "White nationalist". In reality people like Keith don't understand what liberalism truly is and what it even means, they desperately need a scape goat, so they can continue to control the minds of idiots.
>>7785 Exactly, I've said the same thing in regards to being blackpilled. They're overly passive and emotional, and what they are lacking is a proper unity of thought and action. If they attempted even to a small extent to live out their beliefs, improve themselves, redpill others and do whatever they think should be done, I highly doubt they would be so blackpilled. The response to degeneracy and anti-White rhetoric should not be impotent anger, but growing determination. I used to be demoralized, but since I stopped caring what lemmings think, and since I have realized that waiting for a savior is cuck behavior, I have been overdosing on Whitepills, especially with the chaos going on in America.
A few questions and apologies if I come across as a retard (I am one). I was wondering if some anons could spoonfed me or other newfags when it comes to fascism and other stuff. What is Fascism? It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Is communism and Fascism the same thing and why do people like to say they're the same? What is wrong with libertarianism? And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. Again sorry I'm a retard.
>>7801 1/2 >What is Fascism? See >>5737 for one attempt at providing a concise definition of Fascism. I wrote that definition myself so I can try to elaborate if needed. >It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? A British Fascist who lived in the same era as Adolf Hitler, Mussolini and many other great Fascists named Oswald Mosley wrote in his book "Fascism 100 Questions Asked and Answered" that there is one Fascist movement, though it manifests in different expressions in each nation as a result of different cultures, conditions and racial characteristics. I don't think many here with disagree with that characterization, but with National Socialism the difference is the link with race. I don't want to say that the other Fascist movements weren't racially-based to an extent since they weren't Civic Nationalists who thought that just anyone could join the nation like one can a club, but in National Socialism we start to see an application of biological and racial science to the political and social realms with laws preventing miscegenation, positive and negative eugenics (elevating good elements and removing the bad), etc. Many of the ideas more particular to National Socialism can be found in German science at the beginning of the 20th century, such as the idea of Lebensraum, eugenics, etc. So Fascism and National Socialism overlap, but they are not identical. >Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Hitler was not a leftist. In Mein Kampf he frequently talks about hierarchy, and how ideas such as abolishing private property are insane. He acknowledges the plight of the working class at his time, but he realizes that their movement for better conditions was co-opted and used as a weapon against the state and society at large. This co-opted workers movement didn't strive towards social harmony and a united community of people bound together by blood, but social conflict, leveling egalitarianism and other destructive and unworkable ideas. Hitler wanted to reconstitute his people into a harmonious society of functionally differentiated people working together as an integrated, organic whole. Hitler was a socialist, but this was not meant in the sense of how leftists use the term today. The Socialism of National Socialism refers more to a communitarian-minded worldview. In a speech on July 28, 1922 Hitler said the following about how he envisioned Socialism: >Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation; whoever has understood our great national anthem, "Deutschland ueber Alles," to mean that nothing in the wide world surpasses in his eyes this Germany, people and land - that man is a Socialist. >Is communism and Fascism the same thing Not in the slightest. Communism is a materialistic political ideology which stands on the principles of materialism (everything is just matter bouncing around in the void), atheism, internationalism and the abolition of unjust hierarchies and exploitation. They view history as progressing towards some sort of moneyless, stateless utopia from the internal contradictions of capitalism. If you have ever heard a leftoid say that we're in "late stage capitalism", this means that they are saying that capitalism is about to implode due to its internal contradictions and issue in socialism, a stage which comes in Marx's historical scheme before communism. Gonna split this post up.
>>7801 >What is Fascism? It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? Fascism is different from National Socialism. I view NS as being something that uses Fascism as tool to reach it's goal of creating and sustaining a society based upon the Laws of Nature which directs us to preserve and if possible improve our race and to preserve its homogeneity. It does not use Fascism directly, just something akin to it, politically and government wise, they are based on similar foundations, as they arose at around the same time. Ultimately they are separate but related ideologies, Fascism is a system of the state without any inherent goal. National socialism has a goal, an endless and perpetual goal, first and foremost with the totalitarian state seen as a necessity and means to an end to preserve your people and promote their freedom, without letting them descend into degeneracy. >Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Hitler was a socialist, defined as one who puts the common good and thus, the happiness and betterment of his people, before all else. This is completely separate and in opposition to Marxist Socialism because Hitler, and Nature, viewed and dictate, respectively that private property is a necessity, as is the principle of free exchange on the economic front, though only if it doesn't conflict with the interests of the Nation. Hitler was never a leftist, as he viewed himself and his movement as above and wholly separate from the Left-Right False Dichotomy, as any true national socialist does. We are Third Position not on either the left or the right. If you tried to quantify NS within that dichotomy, not only are you boiling the ideology down to essentially nothing, you are discarding more than 90% of it's philosophy and meaning. 1/2
>>7801 2/2 > why do people like to say they're the same? Retards who don't read anything just throw terms around without knowing what they mean. This is why dumb boomers can simultaneously call Antifa thugs "communists" and "fascists". If one even scratches the surface they will see an ocean of difference, but for the average NPC this is too difficult. >What is wrong with libertarianism? It's too individualistic. Most libertarians spurn community and societal well-being for their selfish ends. We Fascists and National Socialists certainly do not tolerate parasites, but we are not against helping our fellow man when he needs it, and helping him back up on his feet. In contrast to libertarians we realize that society is made up of interdependent groups of people, and that the well-being of the society as a whole is good for the well-being of the vast majority of individuals. A balance of egoism and altruism needs to be found, and today we have strove far too far into egoistic individualism. Collective physical and mental well-being of society effects everybody alike. One's fortunes are dependent on the success of failure of the society at large. >And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. I'd say no to the first in light of what I have said above, but in regards to "nice guy NatSoc" I'm not entirely sure what you mean. If you're meaning "NatSoc who isn't a skinhead screaming about niggers constantly" than yes, there is such a thing and many people here would probably want to distance themselves from such a stereotype as well. If you mean a NatSoc that is compatible with the dominant sensibilities of the current society, than no, that will never be a thing and that is a good thing.
>>7801 >Is communism and Fascism the same thing and why do people like to say they're the same? This the other guy addressed. >What is wrong with libertarianism? And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. Libertarianism is wrong, because it's basic assumption of the world is faulty, or rather is an exercise in wish fulfillment rather than a way to live or something observable in nature. It's most basic component is the concept of the Non-Aggression Principle which, if violated, would somehow, with no or a minimal state, kill, or otherwise deal with, any who violate this Principle. It is essentially based on the faulty assumption of equality, it presumes all people want peace first and foremost and will avoid aggression upon anyone else. A simple glance at nature disproves this assumption at its core from the microbaterial level where all life is killing all other life in a constant struggle on up to the macro. Where plants fight a ceaseless battle for survival and nobody sees it, leading, finally to us, and other animals. Outside of our specially created enclaves that are as seperate from nature as possible,(which is bad in and of itself) and even within them, in many respects, we must struggle for existence, every day. So there is no libertarian Fascist or rather National Socialist, in this respect. Fascism and Libertarianism are similarly contradictory as few libertarians care about or for a state, and even among those who do, there is no tangible common bond between those who exist under their imagined state that can prevent conflict from occurring or create common ground upon which to mediate conflicts within the society. There is no nice guy Nat Soc, A True National Socialist is a revolutionary who seeks to uproot what we live under now and build something better and more natural in its place.
>>7768 It's the differential effect of Eastern Europe and China being less utterly cucked giving off the impression they're the solution. The secret sauce being that the most corrupt countries are actually going to be the first to rise. To stop this, kikes will throw Eurasia against us. Reminds me of one of the many prophecies about the Great Monarch who will fight against Russia.
>>7807 >There is no nice guy Nat Soc, A True National Socialist is a revolutionary who seeks to uproot what we live under now and build something better and more natural in its place. Well said, I like that much better than my attempted answer to that.
>>7771 Got memes?
>>7789 >overly passive and emotional Women.
>>7820 They might as well be women.
>>7802 >Many of the ideas more particular to National Socialism can be found in German science at the beginning of the 20th century, such as the idea of Lebensraum, eugenics, etc And influenced by French theories on race too, which is totally at odds with the egalitarian obsession pushed by Jews. I wonder what a Fascist France would have looked like. I admit, it's very hard to mentally project that kind of alt-history. Perhaps something very close to a kingdom closely tied to the Church, but did that ever work well considering the inner essence of Christianity? >German Socialism For US people it's a strange concept because Socialism is quickly associated to statist leftism with massively legalized theft and redistribution to all based on egalitarian values of which the essential function is the unrelenting advent of the dysgenic society. >Communism is a materialistic political ideology which stands on the principles of materialism (everything is just matter bouncing around in the void), atheism, internationalism and the abolition of unjust hierarchies and exploitation Yes, they sell it as social justice but the truth is that like all system that stem from Jewish minds, they purport to destroy just (legitimate and functional) hierarchies through a straight and rigorous application of collectivism, which is a socially and economically structured form of egalitarianism. >>7803 NS seems to be a Fascism with a solid racial foundation and a properly organized economical scheme. >>7804 >This is why dumb boomers can simultaneously call Antifa thugs "communists" and "fascists" And on the same fucked up trope, with antifas who call the ZOG's oligarchs "fascists". Every form of power is abuse to them, so it all goes into the fascist bag. Their reading is totally broken and they could never ever explain what fascism is. They just know that "it's bad". I'm not even making this up. >>What is wrong with libertarianism? >It's too individualistic. It's also too unaware of the working of money. When it comes to banks, they just step back into the past with a profusion of small banks, while pointing fingers at the "fiat money" or the evil "central banks", not even knowing that shit started to get real with Hitler entirely nationalized the German one. It was the final straw that broke the Jew's back.
>>7824 NS is far more complex than that though, as I see it. Fascism is an umbrella term for Totalitarian states, as well as an ideology in and of itself. Simply through a similar state structure NS falls under "fascism" but NS is greater than that alone it is more complete and has a goal and underlying principles that will ensure there is no, or at least minimal, tyranny within the state, for those it represents and protects while being overtly tyrannical and destructive to those outside of it's protection that attempt to harm or are harming those it's protects.
>>7824 >I wonder what a Fascist France would have looked like. There was a fascist France, although I would of loved to see a National Socialist France instead.
>>7824 >with antifas who call the ZOG's oligarchs "fascists". Exactly. For commies literally everything is fascist. The good thing though is that thanks to people like this who can't help but throw this term around willy-nilly, I was led to look into Fascism myself to learn what it really was, particularly due to the endless application of the term to ZOGnald
>>7764 A chink shill is one who says china numba one. The problem is that China is fucked up thanks to proxy kikes installing communism in their government. If Chinese people stop supporting the government and not have insectoid mentality and have some empathy for their fellow kin, then you can say that they're based. But remember, they're not.
Just got hit by another spambot attack. Fixing it now. Captcha is per post right now.
>>7824 >They just know that "it's bad" This is the result of decades of indoctrination following WW2, in which children since cradle are taught that the concept of totalitarianism and fascism are synonymous.
>>7827 So fascism is some kind of RPG summer kampf with no real plan? Twinkies for boudoirs? Or is it a cleaning tool that paves the way to the more organized NS system? >>7828 >F#FR Really? Please clear me up on history anon. >>7837 You're asking gooks to be non-gooks. Niggaz will send something into space before that ever happens. >>7885 Yep, noticed that. The power of Captain Tsha has been increased too. There's a problem though because the new code is not displayed in the floating window.
I saw an article on cuckchan archives that claimed that 80% of females preferred dark skin Whites because they found them attractive but unfortunately I couldn't save the article and can't find it do to the archive being completely gone for some reason. Is there any truth to this at all?
>>7828 >>7898 There never was a fascist France, the closet thing they ever got to that was the Nazi occupation and Vichy France, but Vichy wasn't fascist, they only took some fascist elements and idea and ideals and just became more authoritian.
>>7901 White women are loyal, don’t fall for Jewish sexual D&C.
>>7904 I'm not referring to blacks, I'm referring to medcucks who think they're a master race due to their we wuz kangzing Indo European civilizations. It specifically said "dark skin Whites".
>>7906 Oh, now that I read your post again I see my mistake. The only thing I have is this, but note that Match.com is owned by (((Gary Kremen))) so there is likely an agenda here
>>7907 Ok so how can I find this article, because I highly doubt this is even true and that this is further proof that Mediterraneans are just as retarded as niggers.
>>7909 I just put the headline in quotes and can’t find anything like that and I found the exact pic on iFunny. I think it’s medcucks making a bait pic here
>>7909 The article can't be found anywhere, but it's no surprise medniggers think that they're attractive when in reality the only think attractive about medcucks and specific groups like Italians are there women, while the men look ugly as fuck. Also match.com is not a good example of finding results considering it's pozzed and the site has reportedly have had two cases of sexual assault or rape. So, I'm thinking that this is fake and that Italians are struggling with the fact that they haven't been considered attractive since the 1910s.
>>7911 Correct if I'm wrong, but aren't Eastern and Northern Europeans considered the most attractive? This isn't said to boost our ego, because I generally don't care what women think what comes to attraction, but I think I heard from one Italian claiming that a lot of the women in the South preferred Northerns overall, but again he could be full of shit considering he got dumped for a man that lived in Milan.
>>7912 All I know is that most women prefer their own in group races and ethnicity, I don't know anything about Italians getting cucked. All I know is that Southern European are no way in hell attractive and that meds only knkw how to use male models to struggle with the fact that their race does not look like plastic surgery 101.
>>7914 >All I know is that most women prefer their own in group races and ethnicity I’ve heard both. I’ve simultaneously seen data that supports the fact that most people prefer partners of the same race, but I’ve also seen claims that Whites are universally more desirable as partners, such as this: >But of the 90% of the reported racial preferences, 89.9% are preferences for White people. So . . . that is bad. And I’m not just talking about White-on-White preferences. I’m talking about all my clients, only 55% of whom identify as White. https://theestablishment.co/yes-your-dating-preferences-are-probably-racist-e58ae2fd625d/index.html
>>7898 Fascism is a blank slate onto which you can project any ideal or ideology you want, it has no inherent end goal save perhaps the existence of the state and all within it, NS is fascistic but has a separate foundation and one closer to the truth.
>>7945 I've had similar thoughts. There is a lot of good in Fascism, but it has always felt like it is missing purpose or soul
>ordered a pinephone >it was a couple days late Was it intercepted by the NSA? Asking here so I don't have to explain to normies why the NSA would want to target me. How might I be able to verify the hardware hasn't been modified?
>>7968 I'm guessing it was delayed because of corona nonsense. But, I am sure anons in the security autism thread can help.
What do we do if this site dies? It's been super rough the last day or two. I think Neinchan would be bad for /fascist/
If we ever create a NS state would things like anime and Vidya be banned?
>>8007 Doubtful that those would ever be outright banned. At the very least we hope to make a society where young men are not *completely* wasting their lives away on soulless escapism and shitty video games.
>>8008 I don't want waste my time or my life on these things solely of course, but I would still like to watch them on my free time when I have nothing else to do.
>>8010 I really don't care, as long as it doesn't go agaisnt and supports NS ideals or is safely apolitical, but I would much prefer all entertainment being European and National Socialist.
>>8010 That’s basically my view of it. I have noticed an undeniable trend between obsessive interest in anime and degeneracy, but even I occasionally watch a show or play a game. It all depends on how much, and what type of shows one is watching. Wasting ones life is certainly a bad thing. I have nothing but regret when I look back and realize that I spent almost the entirety of my teen years sitting alone in my basement playing Xbox or PC shit, with no benefits gotten from that.
>>8011 Also this.
>>7999 No idea if BO has already a clearweb bunker in place. In case he did not, Neinchan is the only available bunker, and it's a good place to regroup. Stop spreading discord among our communities, that's what our enemies do.
Thoughts on making a /fascist/ film thread?
>>7904 Explain the first chart please, the one with red, orange, yellow and green squares.
>>7945 It's not so bland and we could refine it though. Fortunately Evola deeply criticizes the Italian version and provides a system that fits better with typical European culture. Its wide range opens up to a changes on a greater scale which lead to kingdoms and empires. Unsurprisingly, a pinch of more biological racism and a clearer and practical economical model brings it very close to NS.
>>8033 What did he had in mind for a better state?
>>8028 Go for it. >>8032 It is trying to represent the reply rate by females of various races to females of various races. I assume it refers to percentages. So looking at the chart it would say that White women respond to 29% of White men who send them a message on whatever dating site this is taken from. This graph seems to show that non-White females see White males as far more desirable than other males
>>8038 More Sol. >>8043 If that's the way it's meant to be read, then I don't see how the numbers show wywymen being particularly more racist than men. Their replies to White males is just 8% above them replying to niggers. That chart does not even show White males always getting the better scores in chances of replying by any women of any race.
>>8051 Whites are still the gold-standard on this chart with an average of 29.2% for their reply rate, compared with the worst, which to no ones surprise is poojeets 20.8%. I'd have to dig into the study though if there's anything deeper to it. Apparently it's from OkCupid.
Will /liberty/ and /monarchy/ ever come the webring?
>>8059 I hope they do. I think they'd be better off here on the Cafe in terms of both traffic and long-term stability.
Are Nazbols unironically gay?
>>8079 I think they've proven themselves subversive time and time again, truthfully.
>>8080 Yeah but are many of them homosexuals?
>>8082 Admittedly I don’t spend very much time in areas where NazBol types frequent, but I think there is an almost undeniable correlation between the more left-wing nationalists and various forms of sexual devinacy such as being a tranny or a homosexual. This is all in reference to online people only course.
>>8083 For Strasserists see: >>7102 Of course they’re not really Nazbols in a proper sense but there is enough overlap in their circles.
>>8079 >>8082 There was some Nazbol tards who openly admitted they were gay or a tranny, Also I think there was this one time on Twitter were this hashtag for spics referred to Nazbols openly admitting to be gay, and there might been some discords of Nazbol nigs doing degenerate shit despite hating on muh racist liberals. In reality Nazbol is gay and any idealology that comes from nu/pol/ or twitter is 100% going to be filled with faggotry, so don't be suprised.
>>8085 It almost seems like the more obscure and off-the-wall a given ideology is, the more likely it is to attract attention seeking gays and trannies who adopt it as yet another “identity”. What a surprise.
When one's main identity is solely based on one's anus, it begs to acquire a stronger one that seems based on political and principled motives. A certain level of absurdity mixed to edginess makes it a safe place but also something exotic and dangerous.
Is starting an argument the best way to disrupt productive discussion on an anonymous imageboard?
Open file (7.94 KB 250x232 soyboy wojack.jpg)
>>8219 >Is starting an argument the best way to disrupt productive discussion on an anonymous imageboard? No, posting soijacks and strawmanning everyone is
>>8220 Soijack is honestly the worst meme to exist, considering it ended up validating retarded man childs.
>>8227 I mostly hate it too, especially with what it evolved into. It was funny when it only get applied to certain types of posts (i.e. literal soyboy-tier stuff) but soon it get extended onto literally everything and every thread on Cuckchan is now greetexting some word in your post with a soijack attached to the reply. I hate "cope" and "seethe" as well.
>>8229 It was funny when we were mocking actually soyboys, but now it has become nothing more, but mockery of others who don't agree or like what you like. It's further proof that cuckchan is shit and ruins everything to exist.
>>8235 > It's further proof that cuckchan is shit and ruins everything to exist. They're stagnate at this point in creativity. They've been mentally enslaved by Pepe and Wojack. /pol/ is the saddest part. It's literally just a Trump cheerleading squad at this point. Thank God for places like /fascist/ and Nein.
>>8227 Especially on /tv/ chan. If you aren't a contrarian by their standards, it's instant soyboy. And yes I acknowledge the irony, but at least I know is Jew propaganda. Most people don't.
>>8243 No one cares what /tv/ thinks because it's filled with nothing, but retards who just cry about movies being shit without explaining why, or being vague with their reasonings. I remember when an anon posted a screenshot of the retards shilling Joker as if it's a movie that was made by White people and not faggot niggerpillers who act as if society has done all the worst evils to them.
Hi /fascist/. I just wanted to get your opinion on this video here: https://youtu.be/odGk84Uq1ws sorry if a bit too off-topic there are not many political boards as of now.
Is islam really the ultimate anti-liberal religion or is this another massive shill.
Open file (264.03 KB 720x867 islamic state.png)
>>8286 I admire a lot in Islam. This will trigger the spergs, but I think out of all the major religions out there today it has the most dedicated followers (on average) and the best social policies, many of which align with my own views already. They're bad on race though, of course.
>>8284 First time seeing this it looks interesting will give it a watch. >>8286 Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal nor is being anti-liberal a cool thing. The whole muh liberalism crap is to deflect that abrahamics and communism have both fucked over the world with their retarded beliefs and ideals. Islam is a universal religion that plays pretend to be against the Jews and Liberalism if it means they can't continue to create more inbreds and profit. Islam is no better than Judaism and the whole it's anti-Jewish is a big lie.
>>8287 >Best social policies Anon, Islam is not safe from western democracy nor is it's inbreds who fight for Allah just because a good example of social policies or outcomes coming from Islam. Places like Albania, Turkey, Tunisia, Cyrus, Guinea, and even the Ottoman Empire were all interested and devolved into the philosophies of Western democracy and liberalism. Is there any other good legitimate reason that isn't a made up fable?
>>8288 >Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal Are we really going to pretend that Islam is concerned with the consent of the governed, human freedom or stuff like equality before the law? Of course there are Islamic liberals here in the US especially since Muslims overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, but if people actually followed the doctrine it'd be completely incompatible with liberalism it seems like. >>8288 is right though, too weak on race, which is what matters most.
>>8288 >Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal nor is being anti-liberal a cool thing. Why is Islam not antiliberal? I agree that the liberalism thing is quite misunderstood, but Islam is not liberal either, but it doesn't mean we should take inspiration or larp as them. >The whole Islam is anti-Jewish is a lie How so? A lot of people were shilling that it was anti-Jewish, but now we're say it's not?
>>8291 >Are we really going to pretend that Islam is concerned with the consent of the governed, human freedom or stuff like equality before the law? Islam is anti-equality when it comes to their patarichies and loyal zealots. It is still universal, just because you hate equality and humanism does not mean you're le based" China is against human rights and yet they still managed to create nothing more but Chinese bugmen. Also Muslims in the US are not the libshit or humanists faggots, North Africa and Iran has these faggots as well. >>8292 Islam is not anti-liberal, because it's way too universal, it's basically that whole idea that as long as they claim to be Islamic. look and act Islamic, then it's halal. Let's not forget that Islam is basically a Arabiac nationalism. >How so? A lot of people were shilling that it was anti-Jewish, but now we're say it's not? Because Muslims have protected and been more friendly to Jews since the Crusaders took Jersualem. They took pride of "liberating" it from the Christians and giving the lands back to the Jews. Hell, let's not forget that goat fuckers also were working with the kikes when they've invaded Spain and enslaved Europeans.
>>8290 I'm talking in an abstract sense here. What I praise is doctrines, not how actual sandpeople or non-Whites conduct themselves. Being against usury, alcohol, fornicators, adulterers, homosexuals, feminists is all based. I would punish many of these things in my ideal society as well. >>8292 The weakness with kikes is that they're able to convert. I've lurked in a few places over the years and listened to some lectures by radicals and they hate kikes and use triple parentheses just like us, but there's no racial side to it. An ethnic Jew who takes shahadah and practices Islam faithfully is a good Muslim brother in their eyes. Same issue as with Christianity.
>>8291 >too weak on race, which is what matters most. Wrong, it's not just race, but it's also their spiritualism as well. Dharma nation explains this perfectly on why Islam or any abrahamic religion is against concepts that fascist and the Aryans believed which is the natural law/order of the world is what should we should follow behind, which is something religions like Islam are completely against with their idea of dominion over nature, universalism, and race mixing. Islam is no friend to Europeans nor is it something we should admire at all considering the Aryans have done something that Islam has done as well, but in more contrast with natural law.
>>8293 >Islam is not anti-liberal, because it's way too universal Universalism predates liberalism as an ideology. You can be anti-liberal and universalist at the same time. Just look up some definitions of liberalism. They're irreconcilable if we're talking in ideal senses of the two systems. >Let's not forget that Islam is basically a Arabiac nationalism. How are you claiming that it is simultaneously universalistic and Arab nationalism at the same time? It's just typical universalistic cuckery: >Ahmad (22978) narrated from Abu Nadrah: Someone who heard the khutbah of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on the second of the days of at-Tashreeq told me that he said: “O people, verily your Lord is One and your father is one. Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab, or of a red man over a black man, or of a black man over a red man, except in terms of taqwa. Have I conveyed the message?” They said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has conveyed the message.
>>8296 >>8296 >Universalism predates liberalism as an ideology. You can be anti-liberal and universalist at the same time. Just look up some definitions of liberalism I don't think you understand that the problem wrong with liberalism is that it is universal. Universalism leads to concepts such as there is no such thing as race and that religion or what the elites what of you is the only thing that matters. Universalism has lead to things such miscegenation. You can't be truly anti-liberal without being anti-universal. >How are you claiming that it is simultaneously universalistic and Arab nationalism at the same time? Because Arabic nationalism and univeralism do not contracdict each otrher. The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam. but there is just an exception that no one should face prejudice for being different as long as they are Islamic and speak Arabic. Are we really going to forget that when the Arabs invaded Iran they literally enforced that Iranians had to speak Arabic along with the colonization of Egypt?
And more specifically I'm talking about moral univeralism which is the plague that affected the old world and the new.
>>8297 >You can't be truly anti-liberal without being anti-universal. If you hold to a belief system that aims to convert the entire world to anti-liberal principles, you are anti-liberal. >The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam That's not nationalism. >are we really going to forget that when the Arabs invaded Iran they literally enforced that Iranians had to speak Arabic along with the colonization of Egypt? Barely anyone in Iran speaks Arabic as a native language. CIA World Factbook lists Farsi, Azeri and other Turkic dialects, Kurdish, Gilaki, Mazandarani, Luri and Balochi before Arabic. Even Wikipedia says that native Arabic speakers are like 2% of the population They adopted the alphabet but kept their native languages.
>>8300 >If you hold to a belief system that aims to convert the entire world to anti-liberal principles, you are anti-liberal. Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? How can you claim to be so called anti-liberal when you accept liberal one of the major liberal principles? Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. >That's not nationalism. How is calling yourself a great people and upholding that everything Islamic that exist must contain Arabic influence not an example of Arabic nationalism within the Quran? >Barely anyone in Iran speaks Arabic as a native language. CIA World Factbook lists Farsi, Azeri and other Turkic dialects, Kurdish, Gilaki, Mazandarani, Luri and Balochi before Arabic. Even Wikipedia says that native Arabic speakers are like 2% of the population They adopted the alphabet but kept their native languages. Iran's language is heavily inspired by the Arabic language along with fact that the Quran and their government make it a requirement that the Quran must be read. Also Iran has something like 20% Arabic blood so your point make zero sense.
>>8301 >Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? How can you claim to be so called anti-liberal when you accept liberal one of the major liberal principles? Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. It's more of the fact that liberalism sees that individualism is something that is upmost important than anything else and Islam only sees that their religion is what is upmost important. This is when a cuckchanner would say "based" because Islam or any nation state rejects individualism, but in reality it does not mean you're setting yourself on the right path and Islam is most certainly not on the right path of anything.
>>8301 >Iran's language is heavily inspired by the Arabic language along with fact that the Quran and their government make it a requirement that the Quran must be read Heavily inspired? No. It’s clearly an Indo-Iranian language, and therefore classified together with Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, English and other languages. There’s undoubtedly some Arabic influence in vocabularly, but this should surprise no one. Through contact with other cultures and ideas vocabularly is exchanged, especially from a dominant culture to a lesser one. This is how English got inundated with French borrowings, and of course Latin and Greek ones as well. >Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. To state the obvious, anti-liberalism is the opposite of this. Islam values the family, liberals obviously do not given how they’ve paved the way towards its ongoing dissolution. >Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. Obviously. Scientific Naturalism, the Enlightenment and Jews are the main causes. >How is calling yourself a great people and upholding that everything Islamic that exist must contain Arabic influence not an example of Arabic nationalism within the Quran? Islam may say that Arabs have a good lineage or whatever nonsense, but they simultaneously say that Arab is not superior to non-Arab, black to White, etc – the only difference that matters to them is devotion to Islam. There’s no privileges, and the Islamic Ummah is more like a transnational civcuck nation than anything else, and there is nothing preventing Arabs from marrying whom they please. Even the most hardcore Salafist sites will affirm this. Some nationalism.
>>8079 It has nothing to do with them being Nazbols, it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. No wonder most of them identify as "transbian", turning their entire body to resemble women to use it as a glorified dildo/ona-hole for maximum « « C O O M » ». On the topic of troons, do you anons think it is possible to use troonery to curb shitskin populations?
>>8308 >it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. No wonder most of them identify as "transbian", turning their entire body to resemble women to use it as a glorified dildo/ona-hole for maximum « « C O O M » ». This. Trannies are creepy fetishists who get off on imagining themselves as a woman or looking like one. But regarding incels, there’s definitely an overlap. There’s the term “transmaxxing” for a reason. I think Cuckchan’s /r9k/ is the clearest demonstration of how inceldom can quickly degenerate into full on homosexuality, crossdressing and pinkpill-nonsense. That’s basically the entire board at this point. Anime to is likely a contributory factor as well, as there is substantial overlap in interests here. The idea that women live on “easy mode” or “tutorial mode”, and that they have it so much better and are constantly orbited by betas and fucked by alphachads can easily propel an incel to trannydom if he is particularly resentful of how women have it and blackpilled on his masculinity.
Open file (86.24 KB 635x645 1593069345-2.jpg)
Open file (133.48 KB 899x748 1589404312-0.jpg)
Open file (418.26 KB 1806x787 1593069345-3.png)
Open file (189.20 KB 1024x898 1589076112-0.jpg)
Open file (123.85 KB 1080x938 1589256237-0.jpg)
>>8309 >But regarding incels, there’s definitely an overlap. It's not a mere overlap, there is one thing in common with all troons, fags and Incels that is obsession with { [ ( S E X ) ] } and making sexual intercourse the centre of their identity. >Anime to is likely a contributory factor as well There is a reason why certain anons refer to it as tranime, that childish ADHD ridden garabge is designed to rot your brain and hook you up like drugs. Not to mention the androgynous appearance of many anime characters like Link. >The idea that women live on “easy mode” or “tutorial mode”, and that they have it so much better and are constantly orbited by betas and fucked by alphachads can easily propel an incel to trannydom >comparing life to video games You're right but i must ask, do you have Aspergers or happen to be from mexico?
>>8312 If he's from Mexico, can't blame him. Third world men also have the same problem. Their own women also gave up on third world men.
>>8314 Cope harder pajeet, your women were always massive sluts. How does it feel that they're cucking you for literal niggers >>8312 >>8309 >>8308 >Muh incels Who let the cucks and foids in
>>8315 How is he wrong? Third world women want other men from other races while White women are also doing the same. We just need to improve ourselves as men. Unless I misread the context.
Open file (222.73 KB 800x583 tutorial mode.png)
>>8312 >>comparing life to video games >You're right but i must ask, do you have Aspergers or happen to be from mexico? I didn't invent those terms, they're from /r9k/ memes. There's a reason why I put them in quotation marks, I was discussing how if one holds such views they can easily shift towards other more degenerate ones.
>>8304 >Heavily inspired? No. It’s clearly an Indo-Iranian language, and therefore classified together with Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, English and other languages. There’s undoubtedly some Arabic influence in vocabularly, but this should surprise no one. Iran's lanaguage is inspired by Arabs it's been diluted, many of the vocabs and words come from Arabic along with the fact that Islam changed the culture of the Iranians to something more Abrahmics than indo-European. Iran today is not like Persia was before Islam invaded. >Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. To state the obvious, anti-liberalism is the opposite of this. Islam values the family, liberals obviously do not given how they’ve paved the way towards its ongoing dissolution. Islam favors inbred and fucking animals, stop with this muh family shit it doesn't validate your religion or ideals. >Obviously. Scientific Naturalism, the Enlightenment and Jews are the main causes. Yes it was also the abrahamics who brought these ideas to the world. Non abrahamics completely rejected these type of viewpoints. Islam is not even agaisnt the ideas of univeralism, so this shill for muh based Islam needs to fucking stop. All abrahamics are bad period. >>8308 >It has nothing to do with them being Nazbols, it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. It's both, Nazbols aren't Incels, they're just communists who pretend that they're traditionalists. Incels and Nazbols are both degenerates. >nime to is likely a contributory factor as well, as there is substantial overlap in interests here. Anime isn't the contributing factor, it's depression, social media, and parenting issues. They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. The whole femboy shit is only encouraged by gays and trannies who run pedophile discords. >>8317 >How is he wrong? Third world women want other men from other races while White women are also doing the same. White women aren't doing the same.
>>8328 >Anime isn't the contributing factor, it's depression, social media, and parenting issues. They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. The whole femboy shit is only encouraged by gays and trannies who run pedophile discords. I'll never understand why /fascist/ or /pol/tards think that getting rid of anime is going to stop the issue. The crossdressing and tranny shit has been encouraged by gays for a while now even before they discovered anime in the masses. Nazbols and incels are gay, because they're depressed and sexually frustrated faggots who seclude themselves at home 24/7 browsing social media and porn without spending anytime in their life going outside and meeting others, so they can get rid of their anxiety that is setting them back. I wouldn't be surprise if fascists struggling with issue of anxiety and depression.
>>8328 >Iran's lanaguage is inspired by Arabs it's been diluted, many of the vocabs and words come from Arabic Stop embarrassing yourself. Iran is linguistically diverse, so when you say "Iran's language" you're not saying anything of substance at all. The vast majority of the population speaks languages which are easily identifiable as non-Semitic, typically Turkic or Indo-Iranian. No one denied Arabic influence in vocabulary, this was not even contested in the last post, what is dumb is calling it "inspired". >Islam favors inbred and fucking animals Hadith prescribe the death penalty for bestiality. This, again, is extremely easy for anyone to research. The only issue is with cousin marriage. If you're going to argue against something, you should at least know what they themselves say. https://sunnah.com/urn/1268810
>Stop embarrassing yourself. Iran is linguistically diverse, so when you say "Iran's language" you're not saying anything of substance at all. The vast majority of the population speaks languages which are easily identifiable as non-Semitic, typically Turkic or Indo-Iranian. No one denied Arabic influence in vocabulary, this was not even contested in the last post, what is dumb is calling it "inspired". Iranian cultures, because of Islam are not the same is what he is trying to say or should be saying. Islam has completely fucked over a lot of Iraniac lanauages and traditions due to the mass conversions of Persia and Central Asia. Today many of the beliefs, ethics, traditions, etc mostly come from Islam which also comes from Arabia. End of the story Islam fucked over Iran, just like they did with India bring their abrahamics beliefs and completely diluting what Dharma and the Vedic spirtualities were all about. >Hadith prescribe the death penalty for bestiality. This, again, is extremely easy for anyone to research. The only issue is with cousin marriage. If you're going to argue against something, you should at least know what they themselves say. It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ and its quite sad that you think that your desert religion that supposed tries to claim to be moral and ethic fails on every occasions in doing so. Islam still has an inbreeding problem cousin marriage or not there are Islamic countries with over 50% inbred rates soaring in their respective nations. Laws don't mean shit when it comes to Muslims who don't follow their own laws, just like how Saudi Arabia tried to claim they were banning child molestation, when the shit is still happening. https://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/bestiality.htm
>>8338 >It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ Seems like a stretch desu
>>7898 Anybody got that Picture that shows who all Hitler and the NSDAP considered Aryan?
>>8353 Are you talking about those Nuremberg Laws charts? Here’s a good reproduction of the German language one. The one thing to keep in mind with it though is that this is only for how Jews were to be distinguished under the law from Germans based on ancestry. I once read that Hitler was presented with two or three versions of the Laws. One that lax, one that was medium-strictness and one that was even more stringent than the one that we have today. Hitler chose the medium-level one. I will have to find the source sometime.
>>8355 No, it had a map, the background was blue, showed all of europe on it, in different shades, and had Questions and their answers on it. first and foremost being What europeans did the Nazi's think were Aryan?
Open file (638.14 KB 4000x2700 Aryan.jpg)
>>8356 It's this but apparently I saved the thumbnail not the whole image.
>>8356 Oh shit, is it this? The first one is what I think you may be looking for. The second one is by Madison Grant, and I included it mostly for comparison.
>>8359 The images posted in the wrong order.
Also have this, I see it’s on the thumbnail. I just don’t have the exact compilation you do.
>>8361 >tfw Ostisch-Nordisch-Ostbaltisch euromutt At least I’m not Dinarisch or Westisch honestly.
Open file (1.51 MB 4000x2700 Aryan.jpg)
>>8361 >>8362 Found it and replaced it in my folder
>>8364 Also related what proof do we have that the NSDAP did not murder slavs like the narrative claims, I have a lot of shit to sift through in my computer to find what I do have and figure it's a good place to ask here
>>8366 It’s lazy, but ask them what proof they have that Germany DID plan to mass murder all Slavs. They will be at a loss. Best you’ll get is “muh Generalplan Ost”, for which I’ve never seen any evidence like what Wikipedia describes, which describes mass-genocide and complete enslavement of all Slavs. Best to ask in response to that “where are the documents describing this?” It’s like with the Holocaust — where’s the order from Hitler or any higher up? It doesn’t exist. Best you’ll get is “muh Wannsee Conference” Another classic response will be “muh Hunger Plan” and stuff about Herbert Backe. Backe’s directives called for nothing but the favoring of the Germany Army in food supplies and requisitioning grain. They were in a total life-or-death war in hostile territory, why should they care about feeding civilians in cities? It’s not intentional murder, it’s directing and concentrating resources where it’s most vital for the Germans. It’s undeniable that Hitler planned to expand into the East, into Russia. This is said in Mein Kampf and his Second Book, and Germany desperately needed Lebensraum for a host of different reasons. In a “might makes right” world, there will be winners and losers, but nowhere did Hitler say that all Slavs should be killed. From everything that I’ve seen he favored relocation and deportation, especially beyond the Urals. Even in Table Talk (believe it its authenticity or not), Hitler never talks about mass-extermination. He talks about how Slavs should be made to work for the settlers that would come to the new territories from Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway. They’d be segregated from German towns but would have a use.
>>8368 Could this be said for all non-Whites?
Open file (22.97 KB 558x249 Regal Anarch 0.PNG)
Open file (58.84 KB 817x716 Regal Anarch 1.PNG)
Open file (94.90 KB 589x505 Regal anarch 2.PNG)
>>8364 It's some slavic dude, no idea where he actually lives, who is a "LibertAryan", his own words, on Telegram he delves into Aryan Spirituality and asked me to join his chat but believes somehow that Hitler killed shit tons of Slavs dislikes how he killed the Intelligentsia in places like Poland and unironically believes National Socialism is degenerate even though it took the entire world more than 3 years to defeat Germany under it. pics related.
>>8371 >>8371 As far as I understand it Hitler was only concerned with getting Lebensraum in Eastern Europe. His reasoning for this was that he foresaw that in the 20th century states with huge landbases and amounts of natural resources would come to dominate international politics, and if Germany was going to be independent and sovereign in the future, it would have to expand and get a large amount of land for itself. There were of course other reasons such as the land-shortage among farmers, and a general crowding of people and a lack of autarky, but the one described above was the main one. In the back of my edition of Otto Strasser’s book “Aufbau des Deutschen Sozialismus” there is included a purported dialogue between Strasser and Hitler that took place in the early 1930s that was apparently published by Strasser himself. In it there’s an interesting few lines in which Hitler rebukes Strasser’s anti-imperialism and says that Germany must align closely with England, and what will result from this is in time a Nordic-German dominion (think the word was Herrschaft) over Europe and — in association with America — the entire world. He goes on to say say that the protests in India are a rebellion of the lower Indian races against the superior English-Nordic race. He ends the section by saying that Nordics have the right to rule the world and that this right must be the lodestar of all German foreign policy. I can post the proofs of this stuff tomorrow if I can find the book. I don’t think he’s saying anything bad per se but Otto Strasser’s not trustworthy when it comes to anything Hitler-related.
>>8372 >and that is unforgivable [insert soy face] Unironically could not care less if he killed them all. Cry more is what I’d say >Nazism has proven itself to be a degenerate ideology because by the principles of Social Darwinism which it itself admired, it utterly failed and was conquered and is thus unsuitable for survival This could easily be demolished by pointing out that National Socialism draws from eternal social and biological laws and seeks to apply them to society and politics. So what, the German State got destroyed after years of firebombings and indiscriminate terror bombing and Russian rape gangs, but that doesn’t invalidate the source (i.e. Nature) that the NSDAP (in the sense that it was an ephemeral party) drew from in its doctrines. As Savitri Devi once said, you cannot de-Nazify nature. Racial differences still exist, eugenics still works, Natural Laws still exist, democracy is still a sham, Jews still control the world, might still makes right. One attempted and partial instantiation was destroyed, the creed itself is far, far more than just another “ism” that comes and goes. Not even sure why I responded like he was ITT but it’s at least good to get these things say for others to see.
>>8375 Thats not even the worst of it, he unironically thinks stealing jewesses to breed is a good idea, and there are jews in his chat one of which claims she is returning to the 60% Aryan heritage on average Ashkenazi jews have.
>>8338 >It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ You're the one falseflagging your own board to justify your attacks on /islam/, plus fascists are well known for their homosexuality and pedophilia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom >In 2008, Strom pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced to 23 months in prison, of which he served four months. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_League_(United_States) >The National Socialist League was unique in restricting its members to gay men. The group distributed membership applications declaring NSL's "determination to seek sexual, social, and political freedom" for Aryans.[5] It argued that gay men had a role in maintaining the "White race" and that they were meant to be a military and cultural vanguard. They summarized this position in their 12 point credo.
>>8373 But if Hitler didn't favour the Indians how come he and Bose were allied?
>>8375 Yeah, at the end, it's every man (or race) for himself (or itself). Alliances are in the bag of tricks after all.
>>8377 >y-you're falseflagging on /fascist/ to get people to go attack /islam/! >/islam/ is already as dead as fuck Take your pills
>>8378 I'd have to read up on it more, but it's possible by that time Hitler had unfortunately realized that Britain was never going to side with Germany in the war due to its government. In that case it would make sense to try to stir up shit in their colonies at that point. >>8379 Exactly. >>8376 What a shithole of a group kek
>>8377 Stay the fuck on your inbred board mudslime. Islam is shit and it won't save itself from globohono considering there are already LGBT shit in Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, etc. You can bring up fed and Jews larping as NS all you want, but it won't stop the fact that even Islam can't stop itself from losing against muh liberalism. Also Fascists aren't well known to be gay whatsoever because the globohomo loves to shit on Hitler and NS all fucking day while trying to shill Islam as a gay religion, which tbh they aren't incorrect about when you consider what the Turks did. Entire Islamic countries are becoming homo while feds and Jews need to larp as NS to make it seem that National Socialism is gay.
>>8429 The NS """""movement"""" can't be gay because it doesn't exist.
>>8431 Which is why I said Jews and feds larp as NS. We don't truly have a movement and it's hard to have one without Jews trying to infiltrate it. Most of those "National Socialists" groups are nothing more but pawns of ty government so they can embarrass and mock NS. Mudslime here once against ousted himself as the faggot who was shilling homosexuality on here, how gay do you have to be to do that?
Open file (158.26 KB 813x979 heil girl salute.jpg)
>>8432 >>8431 We desperately need a good National Socialist movement. It shouldn't be that hard to get a good movement founded on these principles that isn't full of completely garbage-tier individuals. Nothing else can fix our problems
>>8437 I'm working on it, Moving to Ohio in a month to begin learning skills I need for self-sufficiency, and hopefully have at least a small group within a couple years then I'm getting my own house.
>>8445 Ohio you say? Well, that's convenient. I'm an Ohiofag actually. I think there are actually one or two others I've interacted with here on /fascist/ alone so it seems like this state is fertile territory.
>>8287 >anti-We We had that too in Europe until Jews and Masons decided that kings had to be a thing of the past and went to kill most of them or ridicule them to such figurative stances that they're now neutralized. Islamic moderates or liberals are watered down Muslims. The problem being that watered down Islam does happen for Muslims, but when it gets hardcore, it conveniently hits all countries but Israel (and some very rich and modern countries like Oman and Saudi palaces). >>8293 >China is against human rights and yet they still managed to create nothing more but Chinese bugmen At least they put their exploding mudslimes in wagons. >>8297 Liberals are best understood as destroyed of sane restrictions. They wrap it in pleasing appeals to more liberty and joy until it's too late and they either eat their own hat or grab the power and turn into tyrants. Now, whether this ties automatically into universalism is another issue even if the usual definitions of universalism carry a heavy amount of denial of hierarchy on things such as race or culture. >>8300 >>The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam >That's not nationalism. Debatable. It might not be strictly enforced, but clearly alluding to the holiness of a nation (people) and a sacred land really comes very close to nationalism with a hint of theocracy too. >>8304 >Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. On that last part, it really depends on where you live. One's liberal is not the same as an other's. Besides, liberals today actually ask for more laws in favor of individualism and against oppression that comes from systemic racism, patriarchy, etc. They only wanted less laws when these laws still were "trad" enough. They don't care about true freedom at all.
>>8308 So Charlize Testosterone has gone full dyke. Dang. And that thing with adopting gooklets or nigglets FFS. >>8309 >transmaxxing >mfw when spending too much time on webs yet being surprised by new degenerate lexical term >>8312 >There is a reason why certain anons refer to it as tranime, that childish ADHD ridden garabge is designed to rot your brain and hook you up like drugs. Not to mention the androgynous appearance of many anime characters like Link. Yes. Even real males are presented like pretty boys, with pointy chins that girls have too, etc. >pic related, anime DIE Fair criticism, there's a flood of that shit. Globohomo finds its way everywhere. And mouthflaps. >>8322 That one condition on womyn is PATCHEEYAKEE!!!! >>8328 >They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. Dude, a lot of anime today is downright terrible and often verging on pedo softporn with insufferable high pitched voices. Many nip girls even think they must emulate these shrieks when having sex. The considerably debased portion of anime contributes one way or another to the problem, even if it's more a symptom than a primary cause. If this becomes successful, it begs for more shit to be produced and that skews the perception people have of a given medium, also as what they will have access to. And obviously Jews will have a field day pushing for degenerate material and pc/neutered translations. >>8338 >End of the story Islam fucked over Iran, just like they did with India bring their abrahamics beliefs and completely diluting what Dharma and the Vedic spirtualities were all about. Pajeets are very resentful about Muslims, all for very good reasons. They should be a culturally and spiritual pushback. >>8355 >Nuberg Laws Anything that says Jews can't lead your country is horribly antisemtic and oppressive and extremely strict and genocidal now gimme those shekels! >>8359 >pic: most of Europe = Alpine Hey, that's a very generalized scheme by Madison Grant. >>8363 So you're Fubarish or what? >>8364 >small text isn't small enough. >>8368 Let's go for some D&C here. Were most Russian greatest achievements accomplished by people who had some non-Slav blood in their veins aside from the Slavic one? In other words, can pure Slavs do something or is the Aryan nigger meme based on some tangible reality? >>8372 >Regarch Anal >Germany was nearly alone against all superpowers it lost so obviously they sucked and their ideas sucked too Is it possible to suck more at real history than that? >>8377 >plus fascists are well known for their homosexuality and pedophilia. leblankface.jpg
>>8377 >fascists are known for their homosexuality and pedophilia Ironic a mudslime calling us pedophiles. but its actually the opposite. Fascism is hated because of how anti-homosexual it is. Instead of coming here and being a massive retard you could read up on what fascism is and what they advocate against. to come to conclusions about fascism based on a bunch of Americans is retarded.
>>8377 Don't muslims have that Bacha Bazi shit going on in the middle east?
>>8474 That’s some Afghan custom. Apparently it’s not uniformly liked: >>7783
>>8447 Yeah near Colombus actually, I wish it were farther out but money is the prime issue here after all. I was going to reach out here once I had been there a few months and see if we could all meet at a gun range somewhere in Ohio, I need to sharpen my skills on that front especially.
I want to know why /islam/ is dead yet we still have fags here constantly shilling for Islam. Are they really that desperate for White converts to purify their inbred gene pool?
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/17/2020 (Thu) 03:31:54.
>>8478 >>8447 >>8445 If this board ever spawns a group it would be extremely based. I’d love to hear Jews kvetch about /fascist/ and a related “hate group”
>>8393 I wouldn't say every race for itself. If we were going down that route, how come this image board is open to other races? It's just a conflict of interest really.
>>8429 Islam may be right on things like usury and whatnot but it literally teaches them to be hostile and radical for fuckall reasons. Even if Islam were to be anti globalist and anti Jew totally, it's a good idea to not make it radicalise it in the White mind. Islam is just kill kill kill.
>>8487 In nature, it truly is every race / group for itself, except for when it is more beneficial for groups with overlapping interests to form alliances against a stronger other. This principle doesn’t really apply to imageboards.
>>8488 Oh the irony of posting this on /fascist/. Besides that you're wrong.
>>8494 How so?
Open file (19.75 KB 1001x334 image.png)
Hey BO, you haven't logged into the bunker for a while?
What are your favorite philosphers and why?
>>8497 Even though I visit Nein a lot, I usually don't log in because there are no new posts or anything. I saw your post when I was there a minute ago though and logged in, so the message should be gone now.
>>8494 >>8496 Definitive answer to this problem: even ideologies or belief systems that are harmful to our people when taken as a complete system contain elements which are objectively good and that have been present in numerous healthy societies, White and non-White throughout history. If one does not follow the Natural Order at all, they will literally die or rapidly degenerate. Everyone follows it to an extent, even Abrahamists. I have elements of shared beliefs with Islam when it comes to usury, alcohol, patriarchy, faggots, adultery and premarital sex, but this is by no means unique to Islam or Abrahamism. We shouldn't settle for following the Natural Order in a way that's merely partial though. There are harmful elements in Islam >>8488 says, and therefore it is a false religion and Whites should never follow it. If one wants a real "based" society that shares many of the same issues, look at the Law Code of Manu.
>>8504 yes, the message is gone. thank you for the reply.
Open file (308.71 KB 732x558 hitler nietzsche bust.jpg)
>>8478 As long as you aren't in Columbus it's not bad. Certain parts of Columbus are a complete shithole full of niggers, or even worse, Somalians. Some of the suburbs are getting blacked. And yeah if lads ever want to do something we could look into it at least. >>8480 It would be entertaining, to say the least. >>8500 I'd like to read more by him when I get time, but I enjoy what I've read from Nietzsche so far, specifically when it comes to slave and master morality, the idea of perspectivism, his attacks on Christianity, life-affirming / life-denying worldviews, etc. I don't agree with him completely though, I'm closer to Hitler than anyone, so it's more a case of me using a lot of Nietzsche-influenced concepts in my posts. I'm also a fan of some of a lot of the Sophists as a group. They disagreed on tons of different points, obviously, but I like their distinction between what exists by nature, and what exists by human convention. I talk about that a lot too.
IWhy would Hitler be the reincarnation of Vishnu when he was a christ-cuck?
>>8513 >when he was a christ-cuck? He wasn't though
>>8516 I mean yes he was, he literally revived Christian faith in the German people and had made agreements and contacts with the pope.
Open file (69.80 KB 780x431 christcuck.png)
>>8522 None of that is evidence of Hitler being a Christian. There's much more compelling evidence that he wasn't a Christian, firstly in that he surrounded himself with anti-Christians like Himmler, Rosenberg, Bormann and like. The whole idea of Positive Christianity in the first only guaranteed freedom of religion within the bounds of the state and so long as it was not viewed as wholly contrary or harmful to the German people. This was pragmatic and he would have gotten nowhere if he had went out against Christianity in full-force. Besides the people he surrounded himself with, there are numerous attestations of Hitler viewing Nature as his source of values, or as divine in some way. This can be seen in Mein Kampf, and this can be seen in some of the quotes below: Christina Schroeder (Secretary of Hitler) >“He had no kind of tie to the church. He considered the Christian religion an outdated, hypocritical and human-ensnaring institution. His religion was the laws of nature.” Goebbels: >"The Führer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay." Otto Dietrich in his memoir said that Hitler "Talked of providence but "personally was sharply hostile to Christianity and the churches" (154) and that Hitler “was convinced that Christianity was outmoded and dying. He thought he could speed its death by systematic education of German youth. Christianity would be replaced, he thought, by a new heroic, racial ideal of God" (156). August Kubizek says the following in reference to Hitler’s Vienna years: >“For the entire period that I knew Adolf Hitler, I do not think he ever attended mass. He knew that I went every Sunday with my parents. He did not try to dissuade me, but said occasionally that he could not understand it of me. [...] one day he came to me in great excitement and showed me a book about the Church witch-hunts, on another occasion one about the Inquisition, but despite his outrage over the events described in these books he avoided making a political statement on the matter. Perhaps he thought I was not the right public for him.” >“He could not imagine for himself a finer existence than that lived by these radiant heroes of early German history. He identified himself with the great men of this vanished epoch. Nothing appeared more worthy of the struggle than a life like theirs, full of brave acts of great consequence, the most heroic life possible, and from there to enter Valhalla and so become an immortal of myth, joining those already present whom he so venerated. This strange, romantic perspective of Hitler’s thinking should not be overlooked. In a world of harsh political reality, the tendency will be to reject these youthful musings as fantasies, but the fact remains, despite everything at this time of his life, that Adolf Hitler’s personality dwelt only in the truly pious beliefs to which the German heroic sagas had introduced him.” Him being an important patron of the Nietzsche archive and posing in pictures with him also says a lot, see >>8508.
>>8525 How is none of this evidence of him being Christian he literally prayed in the church and revived Christcuckoldry in Germany and many NS were Christians as well. He was no way in hell anti-Christian when he only helped the Catholic Church. Table Talks cannot be taken as a fact of Hitler's religious views nor any pagan NS should be taken seriously when they are biased against Hitler. Also liking someone who's anti-Christian does not = anti-Christian. Christcucks love Hellenic philosophers and their ideas, but despise their religion and viewpoints.
>>8528 >Table Talks No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Everyone cited in my post intimately knew Hitler for years in varying parts of his life. And they didn't just know Hitler, they knew and interacted with Hitler out of the public eye. >He was no way in hell anti-Christian when he only helped the Catholic Church >revived Christcuckoldry in Germany and many NS were Christians as well You're just straight up lying at this point. Revived Christianity? Over 61.7% of Germans were Protestants in 1933, 32.5% Catholic. Of course there is going to be tons of Christians in the NSDAP in a country that is 95% Christian in the 1930s. By 1939 records say that 59.4% were Protestant and 33.2% Catholic. We see a decrease in Protestants here due to more becoming non-denominational God-believers of various kinds, Gottgläubig. Gottgläubige were nearly 4% of the population by 1939. Also it's important to remember that Catholics didn't support Hitler. All he promised to do was not persecute them outright in the Reichskonkordat, as had happened in the past under Bismarck. Clearly the Catholic Church was not pleased about what happened in Germany in the years after that due to the fact that "Mit brennender Sorge" was put about by Pius XI in 1937, where the pope cries about racism and confessional schools being closed down by the government. http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/deu/JEW_RELIGIONZUGEHTABELLE_GER.pdf >Christcucks love Hellenic philosophers and their ideas, but despise their religion and viewpoints. Christcucks claim that they were teaching truths in some areas, that's why they appropriated their shit and repackaged it for the goyim to win them over. See Justin Martyr in particular You're laughably wrong.
>No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Table talks is one of the primary sources of Hitler being so-called anti-christian, the other people claiming he's not Christian is based off nothing but mere claims. >You're just straight up lying at this point. Revived Christianity? Over 61.7% of Germans were Protestants in 1933, 32.5% Catholic. Of course there is going to be tons of Christians in the NSDAP in a country that is 95% Christian in the 1930s. Statistics doesn't matter, Hitler revived and built up churches that had a lack of attendees. The NS state increased the amount of attendees during church per citizens which brought back the traditional and old christian household back into Germany which is what Weimar destroyed. Also you're lying out your ass you seem to forget that when Hitler was winning the elections, the vast majority of Catholics voted for him one of the reasons why Hitler almost won the election in Weimar was because of the Catholic church, Hitler wasn't anti abrahamic. Read Hitler and the Vatican, the pope Pius XI literally refused to condem Hitler. >Christcucks claim that they were teaching truths in some areas, that's why they appropriated their shit and repackaged it for the goyim to win them over. Except they didn't repackage of all it, they excluded some of the spiritualities of philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, etc. Some even fully admitted they knew that many of Christianities' early philosophers were non abrahmaic, but they went with it anyway. Hitler was fond of Nitschze and yet he has done nothing to rid of it like Nitschze suggested it in his book, because reading someone book and taking inspiration from then doesn't mean you agree with them on everything.
If I can find that bitchute video, it would fully explain that Hitler widely had connections with the church wasn't anti-christians or not a christian like you buffoons claim.
Once I read godhood do you guys think my animu waifu will finally exist?
>>8533 >statistics don't matter!!11! >statements from multiple people who knew him personally don't matter and can't be trusted!1! Fucking cringe
Open file (38.26 KB 438x263 balliet waifu.PNG)
>>8535 We will find out in time, fren. My gut tells me yes
>>8534 This is the video you're talking about. I don't know why NS pagans and Christians hate each other so much, Hitler honestly doesn't seem anti Christian at all although he does seem to have some sympathy with paganism to certain extents similar to J. R. R. Tolkien. I can understand the Criticism of Christanity, but I still think we should get along to stop international Jewry and bring a place for our people. https://www.bitchute.com/video/kXy43n9IYz83/[
>>8538 >I don't know why NS pagans and Christians hate each other so much Christians are useful idiots for Jewry
>>8536 >>statistics don't matter!!11! Literally over half the users here. Another quarter don't understand how de-contextualization can create misleading statistics abused for political propaganda, incidentally creating a subjective false reality that makes outside communication harder, increasing isolation and group re-enforcement the same way as cults often do on purpose.
>>8540 Wtf I love ethnic replacement and Jews now
>>8522 Those went sour pretty quick and didn't last long. Any concession to Christianity were done in the non-negotiable context of "Positive Christianity", which was likely a last resort attempt at uncucking this religion one more time for the current generation of Christcucks (of then) until they'd be replaced by younger people who would progressively be integrated into a much more kin-centric Pagan worldview.
>>8538 NS Christians don't exist, not one single person who claims to be such can be anything but Christian, and if they are truly NS, they aren't Christian as Christianity denies the Laws of Nature the two positions are contradictory and as such one is either one or the other, So NS hate Christians because they are tools of the jew, and they oppose the rebirth of our original spirituality.
>>8533 >>No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Table talks is one of the primary sources of Hitler being so-called anti-christian Could you cope more please? Anon posted totally valid sources that have nothing to do with the TT. Drop the red herring at once. >Statistics doesn't matter, Hitler revived and built up churches that had a lack of attendees. Statistics totally matter. >The NS state increased the amount of attendees during church per citizens which brought back the traditional and old christian household back into Germany which is what Weimar destroyed. And that's easily explained as it was much easier to do. The real project on the other hand would be completed over generations. >Hitler wasn't anti abrahamic Yes and his God was YHWH. >Read Hitler and the Vatican, the pope Pius XI literally refused to condem Hitler. What does it prove? Hitler didn't hunt down Catholics nor did he prevent them from holding their faith. >Hitler was fond of Nitschze and yet he has done nothing to rid of it like Nitschze suggested it in his book, because reading someone book and taking inspiration from then doesn't mean you agree with them on everything. That argument can only be stretched that much. A strong support for Nietzsche has far more implications than a cursory appreciation of some ideas. >>8534 Triggered much? Why would Hitler destroy Christianity when it had a strong potential to bring people back into a form of spirituality for the present time? He was pragmatic on this. The strategy was to combine the faith with the racial propaganda. Over time, any conflicting idea within Christianity would be shunned. In a way, they were toning down all the problematic elements by pushing the racial and manly message over a Christianity that had no other choice but kneel.
Open file (209.12 KB 512x512 suit pepe laugh.png)
>yeah guys, the man who put race at the center of his worldview and believed in Darwinian struggle, the Laws of Nature, and eugenics was tooootally a Christian!
>>8547 >Muh cope >Muh triggered Stay the fuck on cuckchan, you stupid niggers are the worst fascist to exist and too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. >could you cope more please? Anon posted totally valid sources that have nothing to do with the TT. Drop the red herring at once. >Anon >Implying you aren't the samefaggot The sources are still retarded and has no validality, a person saying something does mean it's true. I've seen a British christcuck claim NS were gay based off on mere claims are you going to believe that too retard? >Statistics totally matter. Ah so those fake stats about killing six gorillion and 20 billion slavs also matter as well? >Yes and his God was YHWH. >No arugment >What does it prove? Hitler didn't hunt down Catholics nor did he prevent them from holding their faith. If you read the book from Deschner, God and the Fascists: or Stingl, Gott segne den Führer along with the book I just mention it explains why Hitler worked with the church in the first place and that was mostly because he was already a Catholic himself just like most of the other NS were. If Hitler was anti-Christian then why weren't there any plans that came directly from him 100% no bullshit, that he intended to replace Christianity? Over the next 8 years he has only made Germans to be as spiritualistic over Christianity as they were in the Holy Roman Empire. If you seek to rid of a religion you don't build numerous of churches and encourage everyone to go to church. Hell he even banned occult groups such as Thule Society and other pagan groups from within Germany. >That argument can only be stretched that much. A strong support for Nietzsche has far more implications than a cursory appreciation of some ideas. <Christian platoinists had to be Hellenic because they strongly supported his ideas as well. >Triggered much? Why would Hitler destroy Christianity when it had a strong potential to bring people back into a form of spirituality for the present time? He was pragmatic on this. The strategy was to combine the faith with the racial propaganda. Where was your proof for this buddy? You seem to know Hitler so much but literally have offered nothing but your mere mentally challenged assumptions of what Hitler wanted or was.
>>8549 Calvinists and Lutherans believe and practiced eugenics. The United States particularly was filled with Lutherans and Calvinists who openly practiced eugenics in the United States (I think there were some cases in Scotland. England, Sweden, and Germany as well) to obtain attractive, smarter, and stronger children for farming, competitions, military, etc whatever the reason may be. The christcucks can indeed practice and believe in things, usually its just Catholics and Eastern Orthodox who despise eugenics, Darwinism, and the Laws of Nature, because it goes completely against their theologies, but the other sects don't as whole or at all reject these sciences or the idea of the laws of nature.
>>8535 I hope so anon. If I'm correct I think it's possible for a God to make it a reality or I think I heard from someone that it's possible to become beyond powerful than a lesser God and you can maybe become a omnipotent one.
Open file (16.43 KB 917x161 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (336.75 KB 1128x609 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8555 >too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. Maybe you're too retarded to seriously engage. >The sources are still retarded and has no validality Only because they don't fit your shill narrative. If Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer all echoed extremely similar things independently in their writings and testimonies about Adolf Hitler you can't just dismiss them because they don't your fit your head-canon. > I've seen a British christcuck claim NS were gay based off on mere claims are you going to believe that too retard? You try to pull this little trick twice in a row, I see. Someone mentions that statistics matter, and then out of nowhere you say "OH YEAH I BET YOU THINK HOLOHOAX STATS MATTER TOO" or "OH YEAH YOU BELIEVE HITLER'S CLOSEST ASSOCIATES SAID HE WASN'T CHRISTIAN, HA WELL SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER INTERACTED WITH HIM SAY THEY'RE GAY AS WELL. You're a joke, my friend. >Deschner Totally doesn't have an axe to grind. >Hell he even banned occult groups such as Thule Society and other pagan groups from within Germany. Hitler wasn't pagan.
>>8555 >Stay the fuck on cuckchan, you stupid niggers are the worst fascist to exist and too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. Seethe.
>>8558 >>8555 On the subject of Karlheinz Deschner he also appears to have hated Christianity as he wrote ten volumes on it's Criminal History dedicating most of his life to that work, that still has not been translated into English outside of what I provide here.
Any reason why >>708 is a bumplocked thread?
>>8564 Bump-limit is set at 500 posts. Unlike 8chan I'm unable to anchor threads at will. I'd really have no problem raising it to 750 if people would want it.
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/18/2020 (Fri) 00:36:52.
>>8558 >Only because they don't fit your shill narrative No it's because they're vague and they have no proof whatso ever I also liked how you didn't answer my questions at all. >Only because they don't fit your shill narrative. If Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer all echoed extremely similar things independently in their writings and testimonies about Adolf Hitler you can't just dismiss them because they don't your fit your head-canon. Expect I'm not dismissing them because they disagree with me I'm dismissing them because they are full of shit and don't explain or prove that Hitler was an not a christian. If you're dumbass would learn to read and stop being a stupid mutt nigger maybe you could understand what I'm getting at. >You try to pull this little trick twice in a row, I see. Someone mentions that statistics matter, and then out of nowhere you say "OH YEAH I BET YOU THINK HOLOHOAX STATS MATTER TOO" or "OH YEAH YOU BELIEVE HITLER'S CLOSEST ASSOCIATES SAID HE WASN'T CHRISTIAN, HA WELL SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER INTERACTED WITH HIM SAY THEY'RE GAY AS WELL. No you fucking imbecile, point here is that the stats come from the fucking shitlibs you believe stats that come from them, why should I believe in the shit they say when they're the same faggots who lie about the NS state today? >Hitler wasn't pagan. Where did I say or implied he was? >>8559 >Seethe If you're going to use buzzwords then don't actually become the word you don't even understand.
>>8567 You have zero reason to reject them. You're really grasping at straws here.
>>8568 >You have no reasons to reject them >Y-y-you're just grasping for straws, >Still hasn't brought any evidence to validate their claims At this point you're just skimming through what I said and acting like a monkey nigger.
>>8555 You just wasted those trips, you complete passive waste. >people who spent a lot of time with Hitler or who literally lived like 24/7 next to him didaint know no shit about Hitler >>Statistics totally matter. >fake stats don't so all stats don't >Hitler cafoli A Catholic follows what the Pope says. Period. >Holy Roman Empire & Christianity Another can of worms. Let's just leave it out for the sake of keeping this discussion focused and simple. >Where was your proof for this buddy? Literally the fact that it's exactly what he did? Allow Christianity to coexist alongside a movement that was not merely political but religious too, which the closer you got to the core of its structure, its elite and topmost elite, was precisely veering towards the folk and pagan. The values defended by the volkish movement were completely at odds with the drivel found in core parts of the Bible. There in the NS comprehension of the world and the needs of the Germans' survival stood the following truths: seek revenge, resist evil, hate and destroy your enemy, protect your land and assets, racial difference does matter and niggers and kikes are terrible creatures. All of that should already give you a strong hint of what was in works if you could just lift your blinders for a minute, christcuck.
>>8556 Pure Christian dissonance. Aside from sodomites, all creatures of God deserve Love.
>>8558 >book review >Constantine and frens were anti-kike HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>8566 >heavy threads that surpass their natural buoyancy do actually sink So we have a physics engine here! Holy sh-
>>8567 >Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer >I'm dismissing them because they are full of shit mysides.jpg
>>8570 >>8574 >No argument >No argument Still waiting for that proof, either prove it or shut the fuck because you're just proving my point that 4cucks are mentally retarded.
>>8570 >Another can of worms. Let's just leave it out for the sake of keeping this discussion focused and simple. Perfect an example of somone who can't fucking read.
>>8575 >>8576 >please rabbi Yeshua save me from this evil anon! Reddit, try it.
>>8575 >>8576 Will you just shut up? you repeatedly did exactly as they have said, Hitler closest confidants came out and directly contradict your narrative, he was thoroughly Anti-christian and his actions ,at the state level, bear it out he was educating the youth of Germany to be in opposition to Christianity, did his goal of reeducating the German people require him to deal with and perhapos help some churches? yes but he also burned a great many within Germany as well as did Himmler, and who didn't stop him? Karlheinz Deschner while an very accomplished scholar was a liberal and while he lived in NS Germany and if I remember correctly was even a member of the NSDAP, he was far from privy to the thought in the inner circles of NS Germany. the people who were all point one fact out that Hitler was Anti-Christian, not that he was violently opposing it, as some, including myself, these days wish to, but that he wished for his people to discard it, as it is not of them, nor is it a healthy religion for them to follow.
>>8578 >Samefagging No they fucking don't you retard, his closet confidants don't mean shit it's not fucking proof. he wasn't anti christian either prove it or shut the fuck up. PROVE IT OR TAKE THE FUCKING LOSS YOU STUPID FAGGOT.
>>8581 >accusing people of samefagging without evidence. A new low
>>8581 Who's fucking samefagging? I've contributed since the beginning of the thread and am but one person and have had no other ID's ITT nor have I used TOR as I couldn't care less what ZOG knows or doesn't they won't stop me from doing what I wish to do. It's been proven beyond a reasonable doubt with the Table Talks on top of multiple confidants of Hitlers outright fucking telling you he was, he was a devoted follower of Nietzsche and required members of the NSDAP and SS Specifically read his works, as well as Alfred Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth century and his own Mein Kampf where he criticizes both Pagans, mostly the intellectualists among them, and Christians quite harshly, but he does spend a good portion of time on specifically Christianity within it. Hitler was Anti-Christian and under the Christian definition definitely a Pagan get the fuck over it, and return home White man or continue to serve your jewish overlords, I care not which just remember that if you do the second, you will be dealt with(in minecraft) like all the others.
Open file (2.48 MB 5064x1440 pagan hitler.jpg)
Open file (3.07 MB 2955x2500 pagan NSDAP.jpg)
Open file (355.84 KB 689x527 natsoc pagan.png)
Open file (285.08 KB 351x750 pagan hitler.png)
Open file (1.37 MB 1904x1672 nazi pagans.jpg)
>>8581 PAGANU BEAMU~
Open file (126.83 KB 943x691 How awake are you.png)
>>8581 Also go read The West's Darkest Hour blog, there's no reason that mudblood should have a better grasp on these things than you and most other Whites, tsk tsk. Don't come back until you're level 11
I actually wanted to post that very article, fuck, am I in good company here!
>>8591 Believing anything under level six is honestly embarrassing in the current year
>>8591 I'm not sure of anyone here who believes in Level 10.
>>8586 >>8588 You made the same retarded mistake of tagging me twice along with the same petty arguments you are two faggots behind one retard who still hasn't offered any proof. >>8591 Holy autism
Open file (37.42 KB 800x450 Hitler.jpg)
>>8591 This looks like a retarded cult lmao
>>8595 Replace (males) with (Anglos) and that should help you along. The last bit is the hardest, but it's the only way to make anime real.
>>8602 > but it's the only way to make anime real. What?
>>8600 I tagged you twice on purpose as I was responding to both of those posts second the proof you asked for is here >>8590
>>8595 I'm almost there, halfway between 9 and 10.
>>8605 Same here
>>8591 Level 11 is true gommunism No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis
The Lion. I cannot simply find the video anymore by using an search engine. Is there anyone here with it?
i mise maguca.org
>>8591 That one is retarded when it gets into the OP edit. Civ bad? Zionism is the Jews' program for world control. The error is to think it's just for nice and poor Jews to have their own little country. No, the National Socialist Reich saw through it and and Mein Kampf deals with this too. Post 6 lvl is also a lot of D&C. 14-88 author Wodensson was literally born in the trashiest of the White trash family one could find. See what he became! You never know whence the next great man will come.
>>8615 >Civ bad It depends what sense this is meant. Current civ is horrible for Whites and humanity at large. It should be destroyed in favor of a more nature-centered society. Basically Vargpill / Ecofascism. And you’re right about Zionism. The true Zionist program is laid out in the Old Testament — “for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.”
>>8622 >It depends what sense this is meant. The author doesn't bother with such loops and moves. Without civilization we're not better than niggers.
>>8632 >Without civilization we're not better than niggers We'd still be innately superior to them in many ways, let's be real, not that I am opposed to civilization in total
Anyone recommend which bhagavad-gita I should read? >>8535 Isn't the waifu thing agaisnt karma? Carving the perfect woman to mate with is nothing more but pleasure? Even gods can lose karma you know.
Open file (936.40 KB 441x662 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (514.30 KB 385x588 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8635 >Anyone recommend which bhagavad-gita I should read? You can't go wrong with pic related. I've heard it remarked that Prabhupada's translation is a bit idiosyncratic, but I thought it was a good edition. Not necessary, but I always recommend for texts such as these that people pick up another edition to compare with it if they can afford it.
>>8637 Can you confirm that these aren't teaching any bullshit?
>>8639 What exactly do you mean by bullshit? Like kikery or just general pozz?
>>8640 >Like kikery or just general pozz? Yes, or anything misleading and spouting universalist shit. I can't tell you how many books I've read from modern academics, who are secularists have claimed Hellenism and Norse is gay, because of several mistranslations
>>8643 The first translation is definitely not by a secularist. He's basically a theocrat who's well-known for some very politically incorrect remarks about women, gays, blacks, jews, Hitler and a variety of other topics. The one issue I do have with him though is that it is very obvious that he is angling towards a certain interpretation of the text which aligns with his variant of Gaudiya Vaishnavism and its huge focus on Krishna. I also got a vibe from reading his purports that he puts almost after every verse that he is fairly literalistic about what he says. I've heard a similar criticism in reading about ISKCON in general (which by the way has been totally taken over by Jews and is subverted since his death). My copy of the book includes both the transliterated Sanskrit word-by-word and then his English translation, but sometimes it doesn't match up directly, meaning that he took some liberties in what exactly he was conveying, which is one of the main reasons I own multiple translations. I like the guy and think that he was based, but I definitely have a few issues with him. Maybe some of the people who are better read on these matters could explain these things to me if they are misunderstandings on my part, but what I've said here is just the general vibe that I have gotten. For the other translation, it seems fairly straight forward and academic (in the good sense of the term). Some footnotes are provided in the back but besides that it's just straight Bhagavad Gita. The introduction was pretty good too. It discussed the meaning and implications of Dharma, the three gunas and other stuff that are discussed throughout the Gita. I have not detected any noticeable pozz. Now, when you say universalism, I assume you're referring to universal applicability. Hinduism is universal in the sense that they believe that what they believe is true for the entire world, but there's no real imperative to spread it to every nigger and shitskin on Earth. Even with this said though, the Bhagavad Gita is extremely clear that the castes were created by Vishnu, and along with the fact that it doesn't take much of a stretch to see that the Gita warned against race-mixing (see >>8354), many of the worst side-effects of spiritual equality are avoided. Since this is what is put forth from the idea of the self as a sort of spiritual core, as seen in 5.18: > The truly learned, with the eyes of divine knowledge, see with equal vision a Brahmin, a cow, an elephant, a dog, and a dog-eater. This doesn't mean equal treatment, it refers to the fact that this "truly learned" individual recognizes that all of these things mentioned above are atman at their most fundamental level. The physical natures are still extremely diverse and not identical in any way, and have different dharmas. It's not as bad as Christkikery, but it's worth pointing out that we can find stuff such as this even within Hinduism. That's one of the main reasons that I don't believe it.
>>8644 I see, thank you
>>8635 >Isn't the waifu thing agaisnt karma? Carving the perfect woman to mate with is nothing more but pleasure? I don't think it's goes against karma and not all pleasure will ruin your karma. Some pleasures are acceptable. but all I know is that hyper-sexualization and too much lust will indeed lower your karma.
>>8635 >>8647 >Even gods can lose karma you know. >lower your karma Careful, anons, all karma refers to in its true sense is "action". There is no good or bad in this sense, and it applies to all actions with ethical awareness, good or bad. Where good and bad come into account is when we start discussing the fruits of karma, or karma-phala. These can manifest either in one's same life, or in future rebirths as higher or lower forms of life, or on a more hellish or heavenly realm of existence. Ultimately though, the goal is said to be to transcend all karma and achieve moksha. The Gita says that one can and should act in the world but now in pursuit of rewards (2.47), not to cling to the fruits, positive or negative. Basically, Krishna is a pussy for seeing inaction as a solution for the problems of action that he foresees in the battle ahead of him. All of this is why he says that one should act, but with insight into the nature of clinging, the fruits of the actions, etc. Arjuna should fulfill his dharma as a kshatriya and slaughter his enemies, acting in yoga the entire time. One who performs duty without attachment is unaffected by sinful actions. This is what Savitri Devi is referring to when she talks of the detached violence of the Man Against Time, who is a yogi
Is it possible to become equal and Godly as Vishnu, Brahma, and/or Shiva?
>>8659 Considering Vishnu, Brahma, and Shiva are gods I think it's only possible to become Godly, but not become God yourself. There is a mantra for them I think that can make you as equal as them, but I don't that it makes you as Godly as them.
>>8678 >Are gods Meant are God
>>8633 In potential maybe, but if you're reduced to living in a barely neolithic way, your weapons will not give you an edge over what the apemen will use against you. Bronze age is already a good background for nascent and strong civilizations. That's a stage apemen cannot even get into by themselves. As I used to say, Whites are civilization. Denying this is denying a fundamental aspect of what we are.
>>8678 >Equal to god but not as godly as them Please, may you explain this apparent contradiction?
>>8681 What he is asking is that is it possible to become equal to God. You can become A God, but you cannot become as powerful nor can you be God himself.
>>8678 >>8679 This is my view as well.
>>8683 You can identify with Vishnu who is an omnipotent and omniscient God, but as far as identity what does that mean to identify equal to Vishnu?
Also, do you really have to chant ten million times to obtain the qualities of Gods like Vishnu? Or are there other ways or things you have to do to become like the most powerful Vedic gods?
>>8694 >>8697 I'm just getting into Dharma, so don't rely on me for all the information because a guru or someone here who might have the knowledge of a guru could explain to you how everything works. But I think it means you obtain the qualities of Vishnu, but not his power as a whole, although I could be wrong, but I think the Bhagavad-gita states that you can't really become that powerful.
>>8683 >>8694 You can be reborn as a deva or devi (I'm going to be using these terms because saying God and god / goddess is confusing here, unfortunately), because they are, like humans, said to have the same TRUE spiritual self as human beings, i.e. atman. They're ultimately subject to death and rebirth as well on a grand scale, they too originate from God and are dependent on God for their very existence. There's a hierarchy and it flows from the top. One good example of this is Brahma (never to be confused with Brahman / the Absolute). Brahma is analogous to the Demiurge. He carries out the function of creation, but Brahma too is "merely" a limited, bound jiva (soul) just as are the rest of living beings in the material cosmos. I'm not sure if he is necessarily material, but I have heard him described as "pure intellect". Brahma's said to die. He lives for something like trillions of earth years
>>8700 >TRUE Not sure why that is in all caps, ignore it, there's no special emphasis on that.
https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-become-like-god-Vishnu?share=1 This is only info I could find about what you're referring to anon.
Open file (37.59 KB 655x584 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8702 Good answer from this guy
>>8700 I think what he is asking is that is it possible to be reborn as an all-powerful being.
>>8713 That's what I was trying to deny, albeit in a somewhat roundabout way.
What are your thoughts on the founding fathers of America? It seems that Hitler really admired America and it's foundations the ideas of eugenics, but were the founding fathers really something that fascists can admire? >>8698 >>8700 Eh, you sure? I always thought it was possible to become all-powerful, but just that you couldn't become as powerful as God. You know you have tremendous power, but you can never have as much power or at least rich a level that God is on.
>>8736 The Founders were severely astray. Firstly, they were a pack of Freemasons drunk on Enlightenment memes like autistic rationalism, Christian Deism and the like. Unfortunately their minds were still polluted with Christian teachings. Pure Deism need not be like this. The separation of church and state was also another step in the wrong direction that has led us to where we are at today. Religion is all-encompassing, not some "private" affair. Freedom of speech and press was a mistake as well and has eventually permitted Jewish megacorporations to subvert us. Also whether or not the Founding Fathers wished to apply their egalitarianism to non-Whites isn't important either, all men are created unequal and this is the simple reality of Nature. Not all members of the White race are equal to each other, nor are all humans at large. A little leaven leavens the whole lump. >We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed Literally all pozzed. I wonder how I would even edit this.
>>8618 That's not it. The one you linked was once called "Hitler was right" on jewtewb before the mass aggressive censorship. "the lion, he's the king of the jungle, he doesn't wanna move, so the jackles and hyenas start barking at him" Till one the the lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody
It looks like /monarchy/ finally kicked the bucket since 8moe is dead (good on your part, /fascist/). Not that it matters for me. I left before it happened on self-imposed exile after ban faggotry and didn't feel like dealing with anarcho-monarchists ancaps much. I want to make my own board and post stuff there in peace. Still in exile and want a place to call home and LARP in peace. Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board?
>>8742 I still respect some of Jefferson's influences like Rousseau to a degree.
>>8751 >Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board? Be aware you might get yourself a ghost town, i found that the only way to grow a board is to have a pre-existing community or herd users from other parts, and the latter is a shamefur activity to do. Have a theme easy on the eyes, be conscious you might be the only guy posting for weeks. Although with your theme you probably will get 3 or 4 former posters, moderation should be as off-hands as possible and if you can don't even post with the BO tag, when there's few users someone appearing in control is almost immediately antagonizing unless it's an emergency; public BO personas only work with tons of anons posting.
Open file (766.00 KB 1380x1559 grace stop thinking.png)
>>8751 I swear to God I click on that stupid image every time even here unconsciously expecting a spoiler >Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board? Luckily there is not too much of a learning curve in operating and running one. When I made /fascist/ originally on 8chan I was clueless, but it didn't take long for me to figure out how to do everything. Regarding advice though, this poster here >>8756 is spot on with a lot of what he says. As BO I generally try to remain behind the scenes and as unobtrusive as possible. Some people might be able to guess who I am, but I'm typically not actively tagging myself as BO or announcing that I'm BO in many other threads. I do this for a few different reasons, (1) I think that people would treat me differently if I was openly posting with the BO tag in every thread, and (2) it's just annoying and you'd feel like you have to be on your toes constantly. Moderation should definitely be pretty laid-back most of the time too. That's what I've done here and I've never really had any major issues with it, though I might get too lax sometimes, so avoid both extremes. Too lax and discussion becomes difficult, and too strict users will get upset and leave if you start running some sort of Stalin-esque /leftypol/ type board. Also it will probably definitely be a little slower when you start off unless you get some /monarchy/ guys in with you. I'm sure some people from /fascist/ would crosspost to so I don't think you'd have to worry about your board being stillborn or anything. I hope you're able to get it.
>>8698 chibi vishnu
>>8713 the kind of god emperor stuff we need now
>>8754 examples? like?
>>8754 Rousseau was right about primitive people, though to think that they were atomized individuals is completely wrong
>>8767 > Rousseau was right about primitive people Just look at Detroit.
>>8736 >I always thought it was possible to become all-powerful, but just that you couldn't become as powerful as God. You know you have tremendous power, but you can never have as much power or at least rich a level that God is on. those are called siddhas (perfected ones), they acquire these powers (called siddhis, meaning perfections) from yoga and austerities (fasting, nofap, meditation, etc). our lives are too short and our environment is too polluted and we are too sinful overall to accomplish that stuff in kali yuga.
>>8776 >those are called siddhas (perfected ones), they acquire these powers (called siddhis, meaning perfections) from yoga and austerities (fasting, nofap, meditation, etc). our lives are too short and our environment is too polluted and we are too sinful overall to accomplish that stuff in kali yuga. Eh. as long I can make my waifu real, but of course I don't mean only for pleasure,
I've been curious about how the Aryans used to bred with someone within their bloodlines just like most royal families did back then to continue their purity or assume a powerful political position for their royal family within a country (diplomacy). How potent is inbreeding and was mating with a relative such as your sister or first cousin acceptable to the Aryans?
>>8776 >no life = powa Not sure if the Kelly Yooga is sole responsible here.
>>8767 Rousseau was right about *White people
>>8788 >no life = powa im not sure what you mean by that. >>8780 i remember reading a story in bhagavata purana bout a lonely yogi in the woods who did just that. he used his powers to create a wife, then he made himself into a young man. the wife wanted a house so he used his powers to manifest a house as well, and then he ended up having children and had to use his powers to fulfill their desires too. eventually almost all his merit was used up on this and he realized he wasnt happy. he abandoned them all and went back to his practice. i forgot to mention, there is a vedic story of a being who did intense austerities for a long time, became extremely powerful and ruled the universe to the extent that he conquered the lower regions, the middle regions, and the heavens and all the gods feared him because he was absolutely unable to be killed. his name was hiranyakashipu, look him up, great story.
>>8797 That story you mention about the man manifesting himself a waifu sounds really funny, it seems like even yogis sometimes had the desire for a waifu. I will have to look have to find it here soon and let anons know where to find for themselves. Everything I've read in the Bhagavata Purana so far (mainly excerpts here and there) has been very enjoyable, I really need to read it in whole some time, I have a some three volume set even.
>>8797 Do you happen to know the name of that yogi? I tried to do a bit of searching and read about Kardama and Devahuti, but the main differences are that Devahuti wasn’t created, and that Kardama didn’t turn himself into a young man Unless I missed this. There is a similarity in that Kardama manifests a massive vimana with his yogic powers and eventually returns to meditation and austerities after having several daughters and a son, which was Kapila
Is it worth it to vote for main party candidates when it's painstakingly obvious no one is fascistic by any stretch of the imagination? Does it hurt or help the general cause of Fascism to do such? I'm tempted to not even bother because all you do in this country is vote for people in the hopes they'll do what they say they'll do, rather than voting for actual policy to carry through, but then I read stuff like this https://archive.is/lZSPi If you don't have time to read the article, it's from zerohedge and discussing how Trump desired 5 billion from tiktok to fund education. Stuff like this is what tells me that Trump seems to want to help but ultimately doesn't want to smash the heads necessary to ACTUALLY help. Ergo, I dunno, is it worth encouraging him with a vote until he finally figures it out or should I just write him off as an ultimately lost cause, too nice to do what will have to be done to actually help out?
>>8807 >is it worth encouraging him with a vote until he finally figures it out or should I just write him off as an ultimately lost cause, too nice to do what will have to be done to actually help out? He’ll never be encouraged by votes. Politicians think of you like cattle. You exist to give them votes, and as many votes as possible, this is why they debase themselves in front of every demographic on the planet, and why Republicans will increasingly support homosexuality, trannies, pedos, etc in the future. A single vote is basically a drop of rain in the ocean. Trump is almost certainly a lost cause. He may have pushed rhetoric to a place that we are able to exploit a bit better, but his solutions – solutions he can’t even actualize – are bandaids over a gaping wound of problems. The wall is one example. It’s useless if immigration is not stopped in total. Trump loves third-worlders pouring into America so long as they come LEGALLY. He operates entirely on economic logic and has no concern for race or anything we value. Trump’s speech about this commission sounds like a major improvement from what we have now in our schools and universities, but this here speaks for itself: >The 1619 Project, he said, “rewrites American history to teach our children that we were founded on the principle of oppression, not freedom. Nothing could be further from the truth. America’s founding set in motion the unstoppable chain of events that abolished slavery, secured civil rights, defeated communism and fascism and built the most fair, equal and prosperous nation in human history.” https://archive.fo/T1Are Now there’s obviously the reply that I’m being TOO puritan with my beliefs, i.e. “if Trump’s not a Nazi you’re wasting your time!” and it’s true that if I had to choose one or another I would choose Trump, and would prefer things such as semi-cucked “patriotic education” over the full-on Marxist stuff that we have today. I think both parties are heading towards the same (((destination))) at differing speeds and ultimately they will achieve nothing for us, for fascists, but I won’t actively discourage anyone from voting. I don’t think it makes you a cuck or anything if you want to vote, but don’t be under any illusions about it doing much.
>>8811 Yeah, basically. It's really an argument between (theoretically) turning the heat up faster or slower. Ironically, with the lack of response to the riots, Trump may be the go-to option to turn the heat up rapidly anyways so people will hopefully wake up and see things are real bad faster.
thoughts on Derrida's deconstructionism and can the right and third position use it to their advantage?
>>7728 its not, actually
>>8832 Among White people it is. Church attendance is down, irreligiousness / apathy to Christianity is growing, etc. The place it is really growing is in Africa. https://www.amren.com/news/2018/12/christianity-next-christendom-philip-jenkins/
The only ones who shill Christianity are: A. Niggers, women, opioid addicted flyovers, Beaners, Trump voters. Midwits and dimwits and trash. B. Dishonest atheists who want a tradition to legitimatize their stances so they latch onto shit like We Wuz Hebrews. C. Combo.
>>8805 >Do you happen to know the name of that yogi? he wasnt named in the story. there wasnt a specific forest or region he lived in either. sorry i dont know any names or context clues to make it easier to find the story. defintly wasnt kardama because the story would have named him. there are an innumerable amount of yogis who have practiced in forests and mountains and obtained great powers and strange adventures.
Decent list, but you forgot jews.
>>8886 >>8892 Jews mostly play bad cop while having their golems shill for Christianity. Low-brow antisemites see the Jews as having allegedly "rejected Jesus as the Messiah" and wholeheartedly shill for Jesus thinking that this Jew is the ultimate anti-Jew and incarnate God. The J-woke goy thinks that he has found the ultimate Trump card, but due to the Jews' 4D chess he's really fallen into his ultimate trap. Jews also use Christianity as a form of control over Christian goyim, using the example of their precious rabbi to browbeat them - "JESUS WAS A SOCIALIST AND LOVED EVERYONE!"
>>8883 Thanks, anon, I'm sure I'll run into it eventually and be pleasantly surprised to have run into it.
>>8906 I was kind of speaking historically, and if I recall the pope is an ethnic jew as well.
To you Vedic niggers, are you really going to try to sing a mantra one million times just to become more spiritual for some hindpoo gods?
>>8960 /fascist/ is mostly pajeets so yes.
>>8977 (((1)))
>>8977 No, Whites here have finally begun to take back a long-neglected part of their racial heritage. Pajeets will have it pulled from their poo-stained hands
>>8980 Poo in the loo.
Did the national socialists prefer left or right wind economics? By that I mean did they do more nationalization than privatization? Were they actually socialist or was it just in the name?
Open file (424.93 KB 473x308 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9019 The Socialism of National Socialism refers more to a communitarian-minded worldview. In a speech on July 28, 1922 Hitler said the following about how he envisioned Socialism: >Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation; whoever has understood our great national anthem, "Deutschland ueber Alles," to mean that nothing in the wide world surpasses in his eyes this Germany, people and land - that man is a Socialist. >By that I mean did they do more nationalization than privatization? Hitler said that his main concern was not to nationalize property, but to nationalize the minds of the people. Hitler did not hesitate to nationalize the property of capitalists who refused to serve the national interest. A good example of this is Junkers Aircraft and Motor Works. Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament and was removed from his position and the company was taken over by the state.
>>8960 Real Vedic stuff isn't exactly "Hindu", you know.
>>9019 Profit wasn't forbidden as long as you did what you could to support the nation. Abusive behaviors (typical capitalism) was curtailed: problematic companies were partially or totally nationalized. The only acceptable socialism, no matter how this term is irksome to many, could be said to protect the people, the land, the culture and the spirituality (faith for most, Wisdom for a few). The choice of words and socialism itself remain problems to many regardless of political bent.
I'm new here. Is there a very safe way for a Tor user with a vanilla Win10 computer to still start a thread with a dataless picture in the OP? In fact, can Tor users even start a thread at all?
>>9031 Tor users can do anything normal posters here can do, such as posting images, making threads, etc. We have an onion link for Anon Cafe as well: tew7tfz7dvv4tsom45z2wseql7kwfxnc77btftzssaskdw22oa5ckbqd.onion/fascist/ With images I'm less sure though, I'll leave that to a more tech-inclined anon. If you were posting anything that is a picture that you've taken for some reason there are ways to make sure there is no exif data on there
>>8960 Become a Buddhist
Open file (220.20 KB 671x590 Nietzsche 2.jpg)
>>9035 The Buddha was a decadent, his philosophy a product of his own decadent and pessimistic mind. There's a reason why some Japanese nationalists have attacked it for weakening people just like we do with Christianity
>>9037 Transcendentalism is not interchangeable with "decadence". I have some issues with Buddhism myself, but to call Buddha "decadent" is an absurdity. It's also telling of your (lack) of understanding on this issue that you post Nietzsche, who had a rather high opinion of Buddhism. Quoting from memory "Christianity promises everything, and delivers nothing, Buddhism promises nothing, and Delivers everything."
>>9043 >who had a rather high opinion of Buddhism. He says that it was more realistic and truer than Christianity but in The Anti-Christ he says that Buddhism is a religion "for the end and exhaustion of civilization" (section 22). Likewise in The Will to Power he calls Buddhism a form of passive, weary nihilism and a sign of weakness.
>>9035 Or just stay an Astaru, hellenic, celt, etc. If you don't want to sing a mantra for a billion times you can stay a pagan.
>>9050 >If you don't want to sing a mantra for a billion times Why do you guys keep saying this as it's the worst thing about the Vedic? You don't have to chant it ten million times just enough times that you are spiritually enlighten.
>>9049 He called it a religion for races grown old and sensitive, not a sign of weakness per se. There's quite a bit of nuance at play in his interpretation of Buddhism. Becoming old and dying is also part of the natural order. Regardless, referring to any ascetic, self-denying tradition as decadent is flagrantly absurd. That doesn't necessarily mean that tradition is "true", but that is a separate issue.
>>9051 Because it literally is, do you not understand hinduism or the Vedics at all? You literally have to sing it millions of times just to be gifted or come closer to the gods or even become so called spiritually enlighten.
>>8566 >Push bump-limit to 750 I see no issue to this and think it should be done. Threads might be sinking just because people discard anything that is not on the top line in the catalog, even if they're accepting new replies.
>>9033 >picture cleaning tool That could be useful too. Any idea?
>>9055 I have just changed it, but it appears that the bumplocks have not been removed from the already-bumplocked threads. I just asked on /meta/ about this. Unfortunately unlike with 8chan, both here and on Julay I am unable to anchor or un-anchor threads. It's a very strange thing to lack ability to do. >>9056 I know it's possible to do in Photoshop. Maybe Gimp as well but I don't use that as much so I couldn't tell you. A really lazy way to do it if you don't care about quality too much is to just screenshot the image and post the screenshot.
>>9052 It's possible I have a mistaken view. Where I have a problem with Buddhism is when it gets too pessimistic and borders on being anti-life. Sure, a lot of the things mentioned in the first Noble Truth such as birth, aging, dying, feeling pain, loss, etc can result in suffering or make life hellish, but these are not inherently so. It is all in how one reacts to the impressions. The Natural Order simply is, I don't assign good or evil to it. It doesn't seem like the Buddha did necessarily either, honestly, at least from the one sutra I just consulted for this post. I am certainly not against self-control or self-mastery, but when it results in confining the best and brightest away in monasteries never to reproduce, or to cuck people with the idea of karma, is where I see more harm than good. Too much pessimism results in weirdos like Schopenhauer. Regarding Nietzsche again though, this is what he said in The Will to Power in passing: >It's opposite: the weary nihilism that no longer attacks; its most famous form, Buddhism; a passive nihilism, a sign of weakness.
>>9053 You don't say it one million times in one day, you say it 108 times every day. You say one mantra for about an hour then speak it again the next day. Of course you can't speak all mantras throughout your entire lifespan because that's impossible.
>>9059 >It's a very strange thing to lack ability to do. Yes, it's very weird. This anchor attribute might not be hard to find in the thread's file, but that's not something someone should manually fiddle with without knowing exactly what to do with the file, outside of the admin/BO interface. That does not mean it cannot be manually tweaked though. I suppose the admin/BO would need to add a test thread with the anchor attribute on true and see if this can be edited safely without destroying the thread's content. Dunno. >pic edit Ah yes, will have to look into it. I notice that threads here, on the average, have more replies than on 8kun. I hope it won't attract glowniggers and other board wreckers.
>>9061 >You don't say it one million times in one day, you say it 108 times every day. You say one mantra for about an hour then speak it again the next day. No, but you need to still say it up 10-30 million times just to finish a mantra depending on what it is. If you do the math that takes about four years per fucking mantra before going on the next. Imagine having to do the most powerful and known mantras in the each hindpoo theology, you will be over 50-80 years old before you can finish them all or get the ones you want to finish.
>>9064 The fuck are you talking about?
>>9064 I have no clue what you're on about, honestly. I've heard 108 just like >>9061 said.
>>9064 I hope you're trolling because this is not mantras work.
>>9069 Read the above posts >>9072 I'm saying that it takes too long for a mantra and too much practice. >>9073 Then how do they work?
>>9074 You record them on tape, press play and go for the fridge to grab a beer and relax.
>>9074 >I'm saying that it takes too long for a mantra and too much practice. Instant-gratification zoomer with the brain of a goldfish detected
>>9074 You do a mantra for an hour and then repute the next day. You're supposed to feel calm and spiritual from the medidation you fool. You find it too hard, because you're too lazy or probably find it too complicated. Each mantra is not needed to be done for a billion times for you to become a calming and enlighten. Doing it for a month or a year per mantra is enough. >>9077 >Zoomer >>>/cuckchan
Open file (5.38 MB 2480x3508 82931691_p0.png)
Is Kiara Sessyoin a goddess I should pray to?
Open file (450.45 KB 1066x754 tsugumomo kiriha.jpg)
>>9081 Any anime goddess will do! 祈りましょう~
are there any esoteric hitlerists here who are into serrano?
>>9060 I've only read Twilight of the Idols, Beyond Good and Evil, The Antichrist and bits of Thus Spake Zarathustra, so whatever I read must've come there. We pretty much agree, I just see karma as the working principle of the natural order. And I place life-denying but disciplined ways of life in a different category than than ways of life that are both life denying and undisciplined. Though it seems to me that Mahayana and Chen/Zen did much to curb the issues most fascists would have with the original message.
What's your thoughts on autarky and what do you think would be a suitable economic system for NS?
>>9037 Then what form of Buddhism isn't shit? I heard good about Zen or does that suck too, because it's too life denying?
>>9102 I definitely support autarky. A nation which can’t provide for itself in a time of need is a slave to others. This is why small nations will always irrelevant pawns of those with large areas of land and rich natural resources. Hitler understood this, and this is why he wanted to expand east.
>>9102 Autarky is an intrinsic part of economic nationalism, not only it helps a country maintain its sovereignty, but it also gets rid of what is arguably the greatest economic threat to the west, cheap labor, which is something that keeps the wages of our workers low or outrights leads to unemployment and the rise of the service jobs economy, therefore the first act of increasing the purchasing power of the worker is to increase the number of national industries, some say that those national products will be more expensive, and they will be, but they ignore the fact that the money spent on national products goes to national workers, the money stays in the country and is spent on other national products, fueling the economy instead of supercharging our enemies like china, india and japan and increasing international debt. Autarky is something that is treated as a beast by liberals, because it put the powers of international finance in check, by making so that national credit is only allowed to be spent financing the national economy, it comes at the cost of the profit of bankers who are more than willingly to throw money at third worlders at the expense of our own industries
>>9109 While autarky is great and all, it is still weaker than international finance and still has a hard time fighting agaisnt it.
>>9100 Life deyning is life denying, discipline or not. In fact, if you're going to deny life, why even embarrass yourself with discipline? To God's eyes you're useless, so do not waste His time and be reckless in your hatred of what you were given, the gift of life.
Open file (75.47 KB 674x506 schopenhauer 2.jpg)
>>9112 >if you're going to deny life, why even embarrass yourself with discipline? Many forms of life-denial are founded around asceticism and and ceasing to "suffer". Discipline is seen as a necessary part of this. For example Schopenhauer believed that as material creatures we strive towards certain egoistic ends. Basically the struggle for existence. We hunger, lust, desire, etc and we attempt to fulfill these desires. Competition with other striving individuals towards these ends creates suffering, and even the striving itself is a form of suffering, because one who strives only does so from a lack of contentment or sufficiency of some kind. So Schopenhauer, for this reason and more, says that life is shitty, vacuous and full of suffering. To denial the will to life through asceticism, to deny one's own nature, is the way to a state of peace, serenity and a lack of anger, fear, hate, lust, etc. In contrast, Hitler affirmed the will to life. He founds his entire political worldview in the Zweites Buch on the self-preservation instinct and the will to survive and reproduce, and how politics is the progression of the struggle of a people for existence.
>>9111 Unless you want to invite colored labor into our countries, then it's something absolutely necessary to keep our industrial might
>>9102 An ideal, but not very realistic for most countries and the cost to obtain autarky can easily prove more than a nation bargained for
>>9112 >Life deyning is life denying, discipline or not. In fact, if you're going to deny life, why even embarrass yourself with discipline? Because there will always be a certain portion of the population that will desire to "get off the ride". If there isn't a non-destructive and basically decent path to do so (Buddhism, for example), they will find a subversive, destructive path instead, one that will probably involve "fixing" your society, turning to drug culture and sexual "liberation", egalitarianism, worship of the "other", race guilt and so on. If you had to have either a "weather underground" style hippie, or an austere, disciplined Buddhist monk as your neighbour, which would you prefer? And before you object, this isn't something you can purge from society, like a subversive race element such as the jews. At most you can curb the tendency in this direction somewhat by inculcating a culture that assigns moral value to struggle. This urge is something that arises out of the human condition, and tends to arise most frequently and severely in the more intelligent and sensitive races. How often do you hear of blacks having an existential crisis? They aren't smart enough to realise the predicament they're in.
On a side note I see an invasion going on at 8cuck, with shills flooding threads with defeatist messages. Worst of all, they call these messages White pills.
>>9150 /pnd/ is absolutely terrible.
>>9150 >>9144 >>9130 Have you taken the brown pill yet, mateys? It's a tough pill to swallow! The brown pill was founded in 1999 by Sir Reginald Brownpill, who presents and narrates the attached video. Forget red and blue pills, brown pills are the way of the future. Video related. Please leave your questions, comments, and concerns below about this radical new paradigm of thinking! Swallow the brown pill today! Red pills are for fedora fucking wearing faggots, blue pills are for the ignorant masses. Ignore the other le epin /pol/ maymays, this one is the real deal.
>>9186 Fuck off, /a/ was right to ban you.
>>9188 Did this happen on /a/ too?
>>9111 Autarky isn't weaker than international finance, what its weaker than is international cooperation between (((COMMUNISM))) and (((CAPITALISM))).
>>9189 Yeah, he's been spamming on PWL and ZZZ too because he's butthurt about meido banning him.
Don't both reporting the post, it's going to stay up, I was testing it earlier and the unique posts option requires that the post be on the board actively to work. Just gonna keep it there
>>9191 Imagine getting so butthurt that you spend days and hours posting a man eating shit. I'd hate to spend my time doing that.
>>9150 Does anyone under fifty even use 8kun?
>>9204 Ironically enough for anyone under fifty who does use 8kun I only hear them mention it to complain how bad it is.
>>9150 /pnd/ is filled with nazbol cucks, who think le china is based and le redpilled and some commie retardation is going to save the White race.
>>9190 Autarky does not work for everyone, and resources are severally limited. It is weaker than than international finance, this is not to say autarky is a bad or shouldn't be used, but to acknowledge its weaknesses.
I'm not a fag or anything, but I just want to get /fascist/ confirmation on this because I've seen some "White nationalists" on (((twitter))) (American Krogan), come to this agreement. Would you accept White homosexuals, trannies, etc in a White ethnostate?
>>9226 >Would you accept White homosexuals, trannies, etc in a White ethnostate? Absolutely not. These people are sick and corrosive to anything beautiful, wholesome or normal in human societies. Also twitter is full of queers
>>9226 >Would you accept White homosexuals, trannies, etc in a White ethnostate? No I would not >Why? Because homosexuality goes against the Aryan spirit. It is something un and anti natural. Gays are hedonistic enjoy receiving or giving anal to each other, only out of pure pleasure and their hatred for everything natural and traditional. I've seen many gays who openly and are proudly anti-White and have admitted themselves they hated nature and traditional values, because they know these go against their fake sexuality. That's one of the reasons why you see so many gays Jews and (((satanists))) today.
>>9226 Allowing gays in an ethnostate defeats the purpose of what an ethnostate is for and about.
>>9229 This. We will take the family as the building block in a life-affirming natalist culture. Homos and trannies are perversions of this ideal
>>9226 At the very least, we would not support homosexual "rights" and clearly oppose anything equally absurd. Certainly, all our cultures would be geared towards shunning homosexuality. Homos and trannies would be under large pressure, forced to keep quiet. Some would either commit suicide or flee to live outside of our domains. We would keep an eye on insidious fags trying to land a job in the upper levels of a company's or organization's hierarchy because we know they would be entitled to push for homo acceptance and would also try to recruit more homos, along trying to find spots where young boys are available. Himmler had a good speech on this and it's largely spot on. >Precept 35 >Homosexuality is a crime against Nature. All Nature declares the purpose of the >instinct for sexual union is reproduction and thus, preservation of the specie. The >overpowering male sex drive must be channeled toward possession of females, as well as >elements such as territory and power, which are necessary to keep them.
>>9226 Absolutely not. That is basic subversion, first they make you question the obvious, them it don't look so obvious anymore and if you keep hearing that time and time again you will start to tolerated such absurdity. Here is a video explaining the concept a little better, there's also the lectures of Yuri Bezmenov. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W53XVChC76c
>>9239 > That is basic subversion, first they make you question the obvious Well said. I was thinking the same thing, the very fact that questions such as these is a sign of extreme decadence in our societies. Very good video by the way, I recommend all anons take the time to watch it. I have never heard of this guy, and since he has like 86 subs I'm not surprised. I'll have to see if he has more stuff somewhere. >>9238 >At the very least, we would not support homosexual "rights" and clearly oppose anything equally absurd. Ideally, this is all that would be necessary. Today we are so deep in the mire that I often feel as if an over-correction will be necessary. Very strict enforcement, and hopefully through education and mass media it would only take a generation or so to repair the minds of our people. Luckily unlike the Jews, who are fighting against Nature, we exalt the Laws of Nature, the natural way. Once we get the means, the fix should not be as hard as one may think Nice Lane quote
Do you guys have books on slavic mythology? I almost only see germanic books.
So, I know this is the weird to ask but does anybody else have a fully actualized subconscious self, that manifests when one is sleep walking? >>9264 That would probably be better to ask in the Aryan Religion Thread.
>>9264 My collection is quite pitiful personally. I just posted two things in the pagan thread though that might be of a little bit of interest to you >>9271 . I forgot to mention that in the Russian Primary Chronicle we can find a few mentions of pagans, but since it was written by a Christian I didn't find it very believable. I can't remember exactly what it said but it was something about human sacrifice / child sacrifice.
>>9272 Thanks for the referene. I'm just starting out to educate myself on the esoteric and mythological.
>>9276 No problem, anon. There's definitely a lot of good stuff to find on here so you're in the right place it seems.
When doing right-click on a PDF file's name, is there a way to actually have the file's name instead of the chan's gibberish faux reference?
>>9359 I can't find a way to do it any differently
Nein down? Don't know where else to ask than /fagscist/
>>9385 same here bro, cant do nothing besides waiting I guess
>>9385 >>9386 Already back
Open file (1.59 MB 901x1865 Bhagavan_Vishnu.jpg)
I asked this question back in the old thread, but meant to question differently. Why don't we have equivalents of Vishnu, Shiva, Brahaman, etc in Hellenic, Roman, Astaru, and celtic? Why are gods like Shiva and Vishnu considered to be do powerful? Is it because the Dravadian corrupted the Vedic or something?
>>9399 The development of many of these gods and their assorted traditions is a complete mess if we are to lend any credibility to scholarly work on this stuff. Referring to Brahma in particular, he’s basically a demiurge-like figure so I don’t see him as particularly unique or unusual, but what is most telling otherwise about potential innovations in the Vedic religion is that the Whitest pagan people in Pakistan – the Kalash – still revere Indra as the supreme god and are a far closer to European paganism than what developed on the subcontinent. Granted their tradition has remained somewhat primitive and unphilosophical, but the fact still stands. See >>9362.
why do Fascist boards require less moderation than Marxist/Socialist/Leftist boards?
>>9409 Communists online act just like they do in real life. This is why /leftypol/ is the online equivalent of a Stalinist dictatorship. They just crush all dissent at the slightest provocation and purge wrongthinkers. Communists can't handle debate or opposing opinions. For us on the other hand, there is nothing really that will ever offend us, or shatter our worldview from a few naive questions alone. Communism is torn to shreds by the most basic of inquiries, sending them floundering. We don't have this problem. In order to prevent the situation on leftist boards, the dissidents need purged and erased as soon as possible. Half the time they hardly even debate at /leftypol/, they spam soyjacks and call you a "glowie" or "fed". /fascist/ and related boards are benevolent fascist dictatorships forming a harmonious Volksgemeinschaft /leftypol/ is a top-down Stalinist state
>>9409 Either because our board is more non-active than leftypol or because fascists are more open to debate and argue their points more articulately than leftoids. Leftists require circlejerks where no one can debate or disagree with you to shill their fake and gay idealology. >>9412 Fellow reminder that Stalinists are degenerate
>>9420 >because fascists are more open to debate and argue their points more articulately than leftoids I wished they'd come here and try to debate sometimes (as long as they don't shit up the board), but like you said they require circlejerks. The few times leftoids have come here it has been fun.
Open file (98.35 KB 2048x3048 tan-0-censored.jpg)
Hi im from /loomis/. I saw >>>/loomis/835 and am started drawing your tans, because you seem like a bunch of alright guys. (You won't get me to unironically draw porn though.) First Question: How to the legs of the aryan one look like? Or what is she wearing? Second Question: From which country is the caramel colored tan?
Open file (3.71 MB 3640x3308 grace and aurelia.png)
Open file (3.06 MB 2392x4100 grace.png)
>>9438 The request for the porn was from a troll trying to fuck with the board, so don't worry, we don't want porn anyhow. >From which country is the caramel colored tan? Brazil. She's supposed to be part of this party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Integralist_Action Now when you say the Aryan one, are you talking about the girl that a guy rendered up a month or so ago as a White alternative to the non-White one or are you talking about Grace, the board-tan of /monarchy/ who is often pictured with Integralist-chan?
>>9440 I meant the blonde one with the violet uniform. II'll just come up with something for her legs and feet.
>>9442 Yeah you might have to, I don't think we have any pictures of her below the knees. Same with Integralist-chan (the non-White one). I'm sure you'll come up with something good. I'm interested to see what you come up with in the end.
Open file (67.05 KB 850x511 1572189272.jpg)
Are pitbulls anti-White? This picture's from >>9405.
Open file (2.94 MB 720x480 pitbull btfo.webm)
>>9446 Pitbulls are the nigger of the dog world, and have a reputation for being very violent and leading to many really bad bites or dog attacks. Niggers often own them too. Some places have banned pitbulls for this reason, and the logic goes that because pitbulls are banned for their violence and nigger-tier behavior, so should actual niggers.
>>9409 Because we're all sockpuppets of the Greater BO Atman.
>>9442 Boots with silver buttons and fur lel
>>9466 >>>/loomis/876 I've already finished it.
>>9472 Really nice job!
>>9475 >>>/loomis/878 is a slightly improved version.
>>9494 >>9472 It looks really good, anon, thanks for the OC
A concern I have with fascism (and totalitarian states in general) is they seem like they can be slippery slopes. Squeezing tighter and tighter until people have *no* freedoms at all, despite assertions that the totalitarian state is meant to *preserve* freedoms for its people. Could be, and very likely *is*, that I'm just not understanding what totalitarianism is and am going off of what I've been told over my life. So what is it? What is totalitarianism in truth and how close am I to right with my assertions? If I am right, why choose it when you eventually have no freedoms at all? I understand it's to safeguard against degeneracy, regardless of what that is, but the question is a good one I think.
Open file (216.88 KB 1280x855 Nuremberg rally 1934.jpg)
>>9684 >What is totalitarianism in truth It is a community in which divergent interests are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the State. It's yet another term which has been twisted and warped by enemies of Fascism, just like the term "Fascist" itself. It basically refers to the idea of an organic state, or a state composed of differentiated elements all glued together by a common overarching sense of purpose or direction. Today we have "differentiation without unity", but what we are looking for is "unity in difference" - between classes, between the sexes, age-groups, nation and individual, etc. This type of view can be seen as a solution to the atomization and degeneracy of today. > If I am right, why choose it when you eventually have no freedoms at all? This depends on what exactly is meant by 'freedoms'. I don't think anyone here would like to live in an overbearing surveillance state that spies on your every move and runs the country like it's an open-air concentration camp. Correct me if I'm wrong, anons, but that sounds like hell. What I do want is a state that ends the constant Cultural Marxist subversion within our nations, reconstitutes a sense of community and belonging within the people, one that eliminates all which is truly harmful to our well-being and health, and that takes steps to build us up rather than tear us down and prepare us for more and more degradation. I don't know why this is necessarily impossible to achieve without a power creep that is harmful to us. Looking at the Third Reich, I don't see anything that was ever done to harm the people, and it seems like everything they ever did was exclusively in the benefit of the people when viewed at the level of the whole before the individual parts.
Thoughts on Bronze age Pervert?
>>9724 I've heard /lit/ describe BAP as essentially a watered-down version of Nietzsche. I'm somewhat curious about the book, but I'm afraid of wasting my money on what could ultimately just be viral-marketing and eceleb shit. Have you read it, and is it actually good?
>>9726 I haven't read up on him, but only heard of him. All I know is that he's a supposed wants to bring a bronze age mentality or something along with the encouragement of working out.
>>9727 That along with the alleged Nietzschean influences is what I have heard as well. I know that one can find an epub of it online, I'll have to check it out Apparently it's written in some sort of caveman speech too.
Open file (77.21 KB 300x100 1591981071355.png)
does anyone here have good photoshop skills? i made this banner with mspaint, i had to cut out and move the nigger upwards, but a better image would be to put a black sun behind the head of king parikshit, some red lense flare in the eyes, and the sword actually chopping the head off the nigger kali. this image is a depiction of the A R Y A N KING parikshit, meeting the demon kali as a sudra and raising his sword to kill him. kali begs for his life, parikshit spares his life, and later it is perhaps due to the influence of kali that parikshit becomes cursed to die. although he acheives spiritual liberation because of this, its noted in the story that this is a great tragedy, because the king is the protector of the whole world and parikshit was described as conquering the world and uniting it (including the land of bharata, AIT??). because parikshit died, the line of kings died and now the jews run rampant without punishment as it is the kshatriyas who are tasked with protecting the people. the banner should depict king parikshit actually swinging the sword, decapitating kali, with the black sun beind his head as a symbol of our new awakening to arise and end the kali yuga.
>>9737 That would be a great image, but for my level of skills probably impossible for me. I'll have to play around and see what I can do though, but I wouldn't expect anything.
>>9737 Wait so the current Indians are worshipping the wrong gods? They're worshipping gods that will murder them when the gods come back, supposedly?
>>9752 If you’re referring to the name “Kali”, it’s important to remember that Kali the demon is different from Kālī the goddess. Now regarding whether modern Indians worship the wrong gods – it’s possible that something like this has occurred. Many of the original gods that have European counterparts have been downplayed and replaced by gods which have no obvious European counterparts like Shiva, Vishnu or Krishna (the latter’s name literally means “black”). As myself and other people here have pointed out in the past, it is interesting to note that the isolated Kalash ethnic group in Pakistan – many of the members of which have very White features and complexion – still worship Indra as the supreme god to this day, as well as practicing fire rituals, sacrificing animals and having an important purity / impurity distinction like many European pagan religions. See: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/KalashaReligion.pdf
>>9752 No. Parikshit showed nigger kali mercy and spared his life, then later due to the influence of kali on the word parikshit was cursed to die by a young and unwise brahmin boy whose father parikshit insulted out of a misunderstanding >>9755 This discussion has been blessed by the faithful kalash poster. Reply to his post or your ancestors will racemix with niggers and worship nigger gods instead
>>9763 I see. But I think the gods would look at the current Indians today and kill them all, no?
>>9755 Preserve my family from racemixing, Kalash poster!
>>9033 >>9056 >picture cleaning tool 1) Use a format that can't include EXIF metadata (such as bitmap or plain .txt) 2) Use exiftool to clear the metadata (install exiftool and run exiftool -all= file.jpg from command-prompt/terminal emulator.) ProTip: use cygwin or msys2 to get exiftool on Windows, on Loonix you can just run (Xubuntu and Debian/Devuan) apt-get install libimage-exiftool-perl or (Gentoo) emerge exiftool The exact command and the name of the package depend on the Linux distribution you use. exiv2 can also be used to clear some metadata but it can't always clear everything. P.S. Your Goyphone always at least puts the name of the model and manufacturer on the pictures you take with it (and some times even the GPS coordinates are included!)
Open file (70.59 KB 399x524 Linkola.jpg)
Does wavy/curly hair like Linkola's come from African genes? Asking because my hair is similar and I to my knowledge I don't have African ancestors.
Open file (532.97 KB 396x557 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9818 I'm no expert, but I highly doubt it. African hair is completely different from the type that White people have, and very different from what you see on black-White mongrels.
>>9818 All I know is that NIggers and Indians usually have curly hair, although I have legit seen some jews with curls as well.
Open file (1.72 MB 2300x4025 1568592403425.jpg)
>>9818 I'm sorry but this is a dumb question.
>>9825 Also here’s Marcus Aurelius and Hadrian
>>9729 I get the feeling the author is not a native English speaker, his writing kinda reminds me of slavposting. That said I only briefly skimmed through a few pages so far.
>>9825 >>9827 These are meds tho, not Whites
>>9831 Well the meds conquered and raped enough Whites that black hair is now considered White, so not sure what your point it.
>>9831 I was going to type a reasonable and coherent reply to you but you can't even be bother to spell words correctly so I'm just going to call you a fag. Fag.
>>9831 Meds were far more Nordic in antiquity. This is an undeniable fact.
>>9831 Those were Nordic elites in Rome, they were White, Hadrian included. >>9835 No med has ever conquered anything when he wasn't led by a nordic/germanic indo-european man, quit lying.
>>9835 >Well the meds conquered and raped enough Whites that black hair is now considered White, so not sure what your point it. No they didn't the medcucks failed to rule over the Whites, they failed in Germany for example and the Whites they took over only ended up becoming the rich elites or a part of the Roman army. >>9837 >>9838 What pure Nords have curly hair?
>>9842 >What pure Nords have curly hair? I don’t know if calling them “Nordic” would be the most accurate way to say what the other anons are trying to say, I’d say that phenotypically, there were many more people in the ancient Mediterranean with Nordic-esque features than exist today. Something happened, not sure what.
Anyone worried about the sheer amount of "BASED" people who are irredeemable freaks? I know we're usually postured far, far away from anyone surface level, but its starting to get scary. A large amount of 'traditional catholic', 'J-woke', 'racist', 'homophobic' people turn out to be total irredeemable losers, almost as degenerative and repulsive as the people they so ironically make fun of. I have about 100 twitter bios screencapped showcasing this phenomenon. Very prevalent in the 'Groyper' sphere.
>>9847 Am I worried? I can’t say I particularly am because it doesn’t surprise me at all. Anyone who devotes an inordinate amount of time to chasing e-clout on social media, especially when it’s some sort of LARP identity like tradcaths, is likely to be a weirdo. I’m sure most of them are teens who got introduced to redpill content within the last or so. Who shows up in real life and their quality as individuals is what really matters. Most of the stuff that goes on online is literally irrelevant. I’d like to see five examples of this though for a good laugh though
>>9847 >I have about 100 twitter bios screencapped showcasing this phenomenon. You answered your own question and the answer is twitter. Twitter is filled with the worst type of people on the internet. It's not just groypers types, but I've seen the wignat faggots who still shill Richard Spencer and won't accept that people like Keith Woods are faggots. Along with RW twitter shilling figures and ideaologies such as Dugin and Nrx, needing to change their idealology and stance on things every year, and misunderstanding Kaczinsky with the whole anprim stuff. Twitter is much more worst than other social medias for they are filled with people who are incredibly retarded or degenerate no matter the political spectrum, they are also one of the reasons why 4cucks is such cancer now. If you want my advice ignore these queers and don't open a twitter or delete it as soon as possible and only use it to get info that is useful. Twitter will suck the life out of you and turn you into a massive faggot.
>>9849 >misunderstanding Kaczinsky with the whole anprim stuff I haven't gotten the chance to read Kavzinsky's book, but I'm guessing he didn't want anprim or didn't want to larp as a caveman?
>>9853 He actually wrote an entire essay BTFO’ing Anprims, which makes it especially funny when people describe him in this way. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-truth-about-primitive-life-a-critique-of-anarchoprimitivism
>>9855 So in other words as always, these idiots never read the book they praise so much.
Open file (73.23 KB 828x810 mail voting ted.jpg)
>>9856 Pretty much. My theory is that most people pick up ISAIF and read the part on leftists, conclude that Ted is "based" and then pretend they know all of his ideas from there.
>>9684 If you were born in the 40s you might not ponder such things: back then, people were educated according to much more severe rules. It has become very hard to picture the kind of society where less is more, with better restrictions actually squeeze people in the right direction. Take ALL the laws that today oppress us and imagine they were flipped opposite of what they are today: as many restrictions but against those who try to destroy us and our cultures. I reckon that there is a problem with this totalitarianism, where the state is definitely too invasive to my tastes. But on the other hand there has to be a strong authority, as temporary as it may be, to counter the degeneracy. If this point is made clear, I think people could accept the restrictions for a while, especially if they are fair and actually help the nations get healthier. We just want to avoid pushover regulations that take people by the hand and leave them in a state of utter infancy (not that the mass is inherently different to that when taken at large). There are people who will reject authority and it is understandable: they're not necessarily dangerous to society although they would not even lean towards hard right politics. Religion provided those rules for centuries and it worked rather well. The issue is that t was restrictive on what people could say and explore in new fields of science. A balance must be found and a reduction of statism would be welcome. Therefore, it should be the people who convert by themselves but that a fable as here and there, strong agitators speaking in our name must rise, priors of the new Aryan order. A state trying to brute force people into a new paradigm feels unnatural and wrong, yet most societies were managed exactly this way. As the society will radicalize and come closer to the arousing tensions that could not avoid the climactic release of energies calling for the unleashing of terrible forces of destruction, such strong orders are bound to make themselves known and struggle for power. Then, assuming we win, these questions will not even be relevant anymore because we will be living another era of totalitarianism and people will most likely have better things to think about than if they have lost the opportunity to say f*** in their songs.
>>9847 Slaves have a very simple binary mind, just say something they agree with and they will start shouting « BASED » at the four winds, do the opposite and they will call you a cuck. They can't process complex emotions and project this over everyone, they can only envision someone completely and exactly filling one of either mold, which is why they either get very angry when someone they liked says something they don't agree with, or deny it and try to come up with excuses. You will see another expression of this mentality in this board too, users who act like the caricature of a generic Fascist. Just stop paying attention to slaves, this will clear-up your worldview and make you less angry.
>>9862 >Just stop paying attention to slaves, this will clear-up your worldview and make you less angry. Best advice right here, honestly. The herd-animal mentality is not limited to the left or to normalfags alone. Most stuff people put out is not worth wasting one's time on. Natural slaves absolutely exist.
>>9766 Would likely kill a great many of them or make sure that many generations cannot reproduce. Sort of eugenics. Now, all of them? Not necessarily, but perhaps reduced to such minuscule numbers that they become semi-tribal and become a inoffensive people. >>9818 >>9822 They have very kinky hair that looks like buttocks hair or worse. Graceful curls is simply something they do not have. Levantines have wider curls but their hair is of another texture altogether.
>>9838 Achaean and Doric groups that came from North of the Black Sea were indeed of that Nordic stock. They dominated a more mixed people. Failing to assert their dominion through numbers, they got swamped and their blood faltered to the point it's entirely lost today. Further Islamic invasions sealed the deal. One can speak of the race of the spirit all one wants, if there's not a proper genetic ground, it's all for naught.
>>9847 >woke This word is getting used in a way that's less and less relevant to our side of politics. I'm also not surprised that this super niche world of extremism we live in and barely maintain alive is also a bin for all types of outcasts. At least their mind speaks the truth so they can be useful in a way or another.
>>9864 Just cut off the medical and food aid to them, impose and embargo and wait for their countries to experience a massive population collapse. Of course there will be overly altruistic humanitarians who will say "we can't watch that happen", but the response only has to be: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCd6qisIFKo
>>9849 You can filter a lot and make lists. There are good accounts on blubird too. They're lagging behind in the censorship department. Facebook and Youtube, plus other friendly companies also managed by kikes or leftists such as Cloudflare and Visa are far more vicious.
>>9855 I stopped reading after the first paragraph. Despite having nothing to loose, he's still unable to name the jew behind the wrapped definition of progress. Was tech bad when Germans were managing it? Certainly not. They were not going for the slave-wage society we live in wherein we have to pay for parasites, freeloaders, migrants in and out of our nations, national debt, taxes for an ever growing army, floods of politicians who live the comfy life, etc. I guess the entire foundation of his "doctrine" is to never move beyond the level of remote tribal peasantry, so that even power is properly divided across vast territories, preventing kings from arising and therefore attracting the usual (((tapeworms))). That's wishful thinking.
Open file (154.06 KB 253x391 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9869 Kaczynski, Ellul, Linkola and all tech-critical thinkers have useful insights, but I don't know if I'd accept any of them in total. I like aspects of Spengler's discussion and critique of technology. He rightfully acknowledges that the life of the free-moving animal is struggle, and that technics [technology] is the tactics of life, or the process utilized in that struggle for existence, either against others, or Nature. It should not be confused with tools. Now that we know that over time the increasingly sophisticated brains of humans allowed them to first out-compete other species, and then later Whites through superior technology and brainpower were able to begin out-competing inferior forms of humans. We were able to coordinate ourselves through laws, moral codes, state institutions, communications, etc, allowing for better organized and more advanced forms of group. Through this process, civilized White humans undeniably became the evolutionary victors and triumphed over weaker, less rigorously-organized subhumans. Might is right. Where I think all of these thinkers are right though, is that a piling up off too much technologization and rationalization, along with the conditions of modern life, is harmful to humans and is actually a major source of decadence today in our societies. Weaker, softer humans are the products, and this has gradually been growing worse ever since the onset of the Industrial Revolution. Jews certainly cannot be discounted for their role in what is happening in our societies, but when discussing the problems caused by over-technologization alone it's no surprise that Ted or others don't mention them. Though, to take a broader view of the situation, it's of course insane to not touch on the JQ. They are a hostile group whose survival strategy is accomplished through mimicry, cunning and long term subversion of the host population. If anything they are making existing problems worse, far worse.
>>9873 You can always fall back onto Faye's archeo-futurism, perhaps updated to iron out the oddities. It's like 99% of noble nupeasants and a few super-cities with stuff, vat babies and lazorz.
>>9891 I really need to check out that work, I've heard good things about it.
>>9873 Also, Germans were pushing hard for /fit/. Maybe there's a need for a soft mandatory form of physical engagement? Civilian contribution to certain works. A new culture of ages of trials young people must go through. Is it possible to have screens yet not turn into lardasses? >no JQ talk It's even more baffling considering that their way to victory is to push us into blatant dysgenism. I also think that having experienced the deplorable modern way of life, many people, including vast amounts of normies, are actually considering cutting down on the use of tech: not to erase it, but to reduce it to a more essential quantity. The forced covid-19 quarantine also had a few positive effects.
>>9873 >They are a hostile group whose survival strategy is accomplished through mimicry, cunning and long term subversion of the host population. >Might is right The way you describe the jews sound like you're saying they're against all nonjews instead of just White people. But "might makes right" makes it seem that Whites MUST conquer everything in the world.
Open file (22.58 KB 507x380 Blazing-Sun.jpg)
what is happiness? how is happiness acheived? what is the philosophy of happiness? is happiness the meaning of existence? how can the state make people happy?
>>9901 See you for the 9999 quads, bot.
>>9898 I definitely think that Jews are against all non-Jews. I don't think, though, that they work against all people in the same ways. The Jews pose themselves as friends of non-Whites, but ultimately it'd be hard for me to say that the Jews really care about the fortunes of non-Whites. They're not driven by pity or distress at the historical misfortunes of non-Whites, I think they want to use non-Whites as a tool against Whites. They set themselves up as saviors, play into the worst instincts of non-Whites like envy, hatred, materialism and the like, and indoctrinate them into this sort of leftist slave morality where the oppressed and inferior are the good, and where privilege (biological, economic, etc) is the greatest evil. It's no surprise that non-Whites eat this stuff up, it gives them power, it allows them to express their resentment against Whites. So the non-Whites are filled with an insatiable lust for (((social justice))) and become golems of the Jews, and are invited in and allowed to run rampant in our own countries. In the process the non-Whites are assimilated into globohomo and turned into consumer golems as well. They want Whites to be mixed race consumer cattle too. >But "might makes right" makes it seem that Whites MUST conquer everything in the world. I don't know about "MUST" but there is nothing wrong with the idea in itself.
>>9907 Yids only work fur Yids. There main enemy is the Whitemen.
>>9926 Exactly. Without us in the way, Jews would have almost no problem against the other races.
what will be the pre-cursor to the ethnostate to come?
>>10004 The precursor to an ethnic state will be the first group that is able to manifest IRL that has a significant amount of people in it and power. Then our only problem will be getting a monopoly on force within a given area.
>>10006 How will that first group manifest? How will its leaders survive the typical character assassinations and demonizations? How will its members come together and operate without the current power structure/brainwashed majority attacking them (getting waco'd)? How can it survive infiltration? I think the first answer to all of these lies first with decentralized anonymous distribution of effective propaganda.
Why are so many fascist agaisnt monarchism? I know the aristocrats or royalists were faggots, but how does this negate the liking or support of fascists supporting monarchism or hierarchical governments? Does it completely go agaisnt fascism as an idealology?
>>10081 We're not against hierarchies at all, but one of the reasons I can think of why fascists are so against monarchism is because it's more of a oligarchy rather than a government where the leader leads the the nation, similar to how the Alpha wolf leads the wolfpack. Monarchism since the medieval period has cared more for who has the most money rather than who is well suited for being the leader of a nation or you know who is more of the Alpha male who could lead a country and it's inhabitants to victory, prosperity, evolution, etc which is what National socialists believe in when it comes to a government. Not only that National Socialism is more ideological than monarchism, while a fascist monarchist state is a possibly, but it would be very unorthodox and the government will have to be centered around the philosophies and ideas of fascism and fascists meaning the royalists will have to be created and believe in the ideals of fascism itself, which will be a bit difficult to establish.
>>10081 We are not against Monarchy as a whole, we are against Monarchy as it is viewed today and as it was conceived under Christianity. We would prefer having powerful families made up of the Natural elite and leaving room for new families to rise and old families to fall aka Clans in a similar way to old Germanic tribal ways and the Scottish and Celtic ways. Families who rule territories with a title akin to king who pick a High King from among themselves and limit this High Kings power. Monarchy in and of itself is not the problem, Absolute monarchy is, and Constitutional Monarchy does not fix that whatsoever because that creates a different problem altogether.
>>10083 >Not only that National Socialism is more ideological than monarchism, while a fascist monarchist state is a possibly, but it would be very unorthodox and the government will have to be centered around the philosophies and ideas of fascism and fascists meaning the royalists will have to be created and believe in the ideals of fascism itself, which will be a bit difficult to establish. Then why not establish National Socialism as a religion where the government is designated around that? >>10084 >We are not against Monarchy as a whole, we are against Monarchy as it is viewed today and as it was conceived under Christianity. I can see what you mean considering the church was literally important than the king and royal families themselves. >We would prefer having powerful families made up of the Natural elite and leaving room for new families to rise and old families to fall aka Clans in a similar way to old Germanic tribal ways and the Scottish and Celtic ways. Families who rule territories with a title akin to king who pick a High King from among themselves and limit this High Kings power. Right but, I hope you aren't agaisnt a high king ruling as powerful and personal as Antontine-Nerva dynasty did (Trajan, Hadrian), but of course I mean without the whole twink shit.
>>10085 >Then why not establish National Socialism as a religion where the government is designated around that? Savitri Devi also suggested that as well, so I'm guessing you take inspiration from her on this idea? Also such an idea sounds nice, but it would take a lot of thought and understanding of the Aryan religion to establish it as a religion or at least Astaru as whole.
>>10085 The roman Empire had it's own problems and I don't buy that Hadrian was a faggot either and he was so based that I would forgive that anyway. As for allowing a High king to be very powerful, yes i would but only if the need was pressing akin to the Dictator title of Ancient Rome but it needs limits and checks so that it cannot be used to undo our race.
>>10081 We completely support hierarchical governments. My main problem with monarchism as most people are familiar with it is that I don’t think power should be kept within a single family. We want the best of the best to rule, and they should be found, cultivated and empowered. Besides that, there’s less difference than one would think. Many of the arguments used by monarchists for the rule of a single man are quite on point as far as I’m concerned, such as pic related, and with how the monarch is discussed in Aristotle’s politics. At the end of the day I’m mainly against installing a king as some new institution. If I was Japanese I’d be supportive of a monarchy to an extent — the emperor and his family are intimately tied in with Japanese culture, history and tradition. >Then why not establish National Socialism as a religion where the government is designated around that? That’s what should be done. The division between religion and politics is entirely artificial, and I’ve said before that the Natural Order is something that Whites should be viewing with religious reverence. As a concept it’s certainly less black-and-White than traditional religions, but I think it would be a firm foundation. I don’t really actively support the artificial institution of something like Asatru for the state, but at the very least a government in accordance with Nature, much like what Hitler aimed for, albeit with a slightly more religious foundation. Whites would also begin to learn about Antiquity and their beliefs much, much more, and they would be exposed to pagan stories, themes, symbolism and ideas. In many ways National Socialism was the rebirth of a European pagan spirit already.
>>10074 It’s hard to say how a successful group will eventually manifest, but I think what it will take is an actually worthy leader coming around. The inevitable question is “and who is that leader?” — this is obviously something unaswerable, and shouldn’t at all be a factor to keep people away from doing anything. Fascism’s not about sitting around on your hands until some “new Hitler” savior graces us with his presence. One will arise organically through IRL activity. Avoiding demonizations and character assassinations is impossible. The leaders will survive through having an Übermensch-tier iron will and self-discipline, i.e. they won’t be people who sperg out or make an ass of themselves constantly and won’t be engaged in degenerate vices that make them an easy target. Of course the Jews will still attack though, they always do. Some of these questions I don’t know how to answer honestly. What course would be best to take would depend on exactly how you’re being fucked with. I fully expect any group that gets too big to be Waco’d, to have assassinations carried out on them, to be COINTELPRO’d, infiltrated, demonized, etc.
>>10086 >>10087 >>10088 I see well thanks for clearing things up
Open file (9.61 KB 584x183 ClipboardImage.png)
Nein down for anyone else?
>>10218 It's available for me.
>>10219 Same for me too now. There was a period of like twenty minutes where it didn't load and gave me that error. But a few minutes after I sent that message it started working normally again (figures).
nobody here is going to come out and argue for atheism. we all see the value in having religion, but lets be honest, how many of your are really just atheists?
Open file (25.79 KB 600x750 tips.jpg)
>>10230 In the past I was vehemently anti-religion and atheistic, but today I am much less so. I did take the time to read several books on arguments for God and learned about a handful of major religions, but none of them really gripped me. Reading about the arguments for a theistic God didn't do much more than introduce doubt into what was formerly a firmer form of atheism. I began to think it was possible that there was a God (in a deistic sense), but it's never been a total affirmation or total denial. Sometimes I kind of space out and wonder why anything even exists at all or if it's really just chance that landed us here, but I never really reach an answer. I know my Dawkins-tier atheism of the past was cringe and childish though. Today I closest to a naturalist. The way I refer to nature and its laws could probably be interpreted as pantheistic by some, but I'm not sure. I see myself as in line with Hitler.
>>10230 I was an atheist at a 6.9 on Dawkins retarded scale, Now I still consider my self a 6.9 on that scale for Christianity, while I am figuring out what fits for me in the Non-Abrahamic yet Dharmic worldview of National Socialism, I hold as my chief concern the 14 words making those and the pursuit of their goal the center of my being while venerating the Ancestors in my thoughts and on my walks through nature my next step on that front is to find out what rituals were used to worship and commune with them, but I firmly believe they are around and guiding me and others like me to what we truly need.
I feel like everywhere has been kind of slow lately.
Open file (1.04 MB 1069x1455 IMG_20201008_141632.png)
>>10232 Same, i'm leaned towards more of a cosmotheist like approach, life and existence alone is more than the semitic fraud jews and their cuck believers tell us such marxist-materialist, nihilistic atheist paper thin blank statements suh as "we are just a worthless clump of cells" that is simply mental terrorism done to demoralize. To think there is no other life than us among billions if not trillions of stars is equally retarded, intelligent or not. There are so many questions unanswered only the White race has the capacity to evaluate and discover and to explore. the subhumans never care about such questions in detail. Their intellect and genes, their entire outlook are too primal and basic. We must embrace our destiny and become masters of the universe again. The swathe of subhumanity must not win. I find the question so interesting why in our world's basic natural phenomenons tend to replicate into even the microcosmos, even in function such as how mere atoms function in similarity to space and solar system. For whatever reason there is that tendency for patterns to replicate in form and function in nature in completely different macro and micro-cosms.
The founding fathers of America today, would be fascist is what I would say. They seem to be well enough aware of the church and their enslavement of the minds of Whites. I heard that many of them were very critical of Christianity in ways, thus why some of them were deists. But they were still too liberal on their foundations of America. I don't blame them either, I think the reason for their liberal ways was because they saw something wrong with the monarch of Great Britain and the Roman church and how it enslaves Whites and really didn't have a choice, but to support liberalism for they saw in the monarchy of GB. It's also possible that they saw that liberalism was the best way to fight against this collectivism of the nu-west and why endorsed individualism and classical liberalism, although I could be wrong and anyone here is welcome to correct me, because I'm not an American.
>>10278 I loosely consider myself Cosmotheist as well. I think it offers a very compelling and interesting view of our destiny as a people, and of nature itself. When I first began to look into Cosmotheism, I for some reason interpreted it as having an end-goal, or a final point when no higher evolution or development would be possible. This is clearly an error, and probably an unwitting Abrahamic influence that I was holding onto. I read something from Nietzsche that said something to the effect that if the universe had an end goal, it would have to have been reached (i.e. assuming that the universe is eternal and has always been changing, one would have expected it to have reached its final form already). This is a nobler view in a way though. Before our race is an infinite flight of stairs that we only have to begin climbing, further and further up, forever. We either sink back into the mud with the other mudmen, or we begin climbing, shedding off the dead weight as we go. And I agree, modern-day Jewish science needs to be wiped out. It is a legitimator of hedonism, nihilism and acting like a subhuman. Your mentioning of the "worthless clump of cells" is one meme we're all aware of, just as is another that they push, which states that the universe is just gonna disintegrate and die one day from entropy. It's as if they've taken the Abrahamic model of creation and the end of time and merely removed heaven and hell. It's just a nihilistic blip before absolute nothingness again. >I find the question so interesting why in our world's basic natural phenomenons tend to replicate into even the microcosmos, even in function such as how mere atoms function in similarity to space and solar system. For whatever reason there is that tendency for patterns to replicate in form and function in nature in completely different macro and micro-cosms. It's not quite the same, but you should look into some of the stuff that 19th century biologists talked about with hierarchies of individuality, "cell states" and the like. Many of them believed and quite openly expressed their conviction that multicellular organisms were composed of harmoniously operating "states" or "communities" of more elementary individuals like the cells of our bodies, operating under a division of labor and forming a greater more complex whole. And then above the level of organisms like you and me, they talked about "superorganisms" where all the units of a colony function basically as harmonious and perfectly altruistic and interdependent units in a greater whole, unable to survive outside of this pattern, introducing doubt into whether they were truly "individuals" in the sense that we think of them. Fascinating stuff.
>>10281 They would be on our side, I have no doubts. They founded a country where only White men with property could vote at the very beginning. Gradually this right was whored out to the masses. Soon every White man could vote, then niggers could vote (theoretically), and then women could vote, and now they lowered the voting age to eighteen, and now they want to drop it to sixteen in some places! What the Founders had in mind was much, much closer to ancient Greek ideals of constitutional government where a small amount of citizens voted on decisions and were represented in government. Not every subhuman was seen as worthy of his voice being heard. Undoubtedly they viewed slavery as part of the Natural Order. We know Thomas Jefferson wrote stuff about how blacks were subhuman animals, and of course many of the Founders themselves owned slaves. Where they went most wrong was on the idea of "inalienable rights" and other nonsense. Rights don't exist in this sense. They are granted by the state and have utility only within this framework. Another fatal flaw of theirs is the idea that "all men are created equal" - this here is a large part of what has completely undermined our country, these five words, this obviously false phrase. Deism theoretically could be very good at discerning what we believe, with its downplaying of revelation and view on natural law, but unfortunately it seems like they were still too steeped in Christcuckery and bad experiences with the church
Just wondering, has anyone noticed this book being written up by someone on /k/, and what are your thoughts on its content: https://anon.cafe/k/res/2682.html#6374
Is there any truth that Hitler in his early days or throughout his entire life he was a leftist and most National Socialists were also left leaning?
>>10326 No, Hitler was never a leftist, and this is clear enough from Mein Kampf, where he talks about him and many students around him already being filled with nationalist feelings from a young age: >When collections were made for the youth Mark German League and the School League we wore cornflowers and black-red-gold colours to express our loyalty. We greeted one another with Heil! and instead of the Austrian anthem we sang our own Deutschland uber Alles, despite warnings and penalties. >[...] >Of course, I did not belong to the luke-warm section. Within a little while I had become an ardent ‘German National,’ which had a different meaning from the party significance attached to that term to-day. >I developed very rapidly in the nationalist direction, and by the time I was fifteen years old, I had come to understand the distinction between dynastic patriotism and völkisch nationalism, my sympathies being entirely in favour of the latter even in those days. Mein Kampf's also full of stories about him arguing with leftists and Jews in Vienna, and even independent accounts of the young Hitler, such as Kubizek's account, portray him as remarkably similar politically, obsessed with reading Germanic sagas, and showing and explaining to his friend all of the degeneracy that infected the city. This was before even WWI, so years before he had any involvement in politics. There was a faction of more left-leaning National Socialists (the way they are described is more "Third Positionist" than anything), but they were obviously purged in 1934 violently and Hitler never liked them. Even they can't be described as leftists, though
What is the no bullshit take on Chakras? If it has any substance to it, than I see it as absolutely necessary to apply.
>>10349 i havent really cared much about them. they so popular that theres too much bullshit around them to sort through. theres ancient texts on them but i think they disagree with eachother. one redpill is that chakras supposedly line up with major nerve plexus's in the body. i still pretty much ignore them and dont think about them for the above reasons though.
>>10349 The ancient chinese concept of Dantians (used in Qigong and Tai Chi) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dantian (focus on the sub-navel Dantian/Chakra) also see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meridian_(Chinese_medicine), and >>10445
>>10281 >The founding fathers of America today, would be fascist is what I would say. Not necessarily. Counting for the equivalent of political inflation, i.e., placing them in their spot according to that which they occupied on the political spectrum back then, and seeing their ranks full of Masons, there is nothing sure about this. They are, after all, people who also knew about the existence of many races of men on this earth, but nevertheless claimed that we were all equal. Being afraid of an impure monarchy is one thing after all, but it would not excuse the greatest cuckoldry of all on the racial question.
>>10239 >I was an atheist at a 6.9 on Dawkins retarded scale, Now I still consider my self a 6.9 on that scale for Christianity I'm sorry for you. You went from flawed and asking for proof to blindand semitic in mind. Good job.
BO must be proud. This board has really become a salon of the toppest qualitish. ____________ .... Has anyone ever heard of, or paid attention to the numerous prophecies about the Great Monarch? I was surprised to learn how much material there is relative to this strange figure, some who think it's pro-Catholic, some who think it's actually the opposite. I wonder if it relates to the Fisher King too, although both seem to be separate.
>>10689 the last time i read about stuff like that was on the old 8pol.
>>10689 >BO must be proud. This board has really become a salon of the toppest qualitish. I'm just glad I wasn't alone in wanting a good place for threads like we have here. I can't believe that this place has been around for nearly two and half years now
>>10674 No I gave, Christianity due consideration and discarded it due to it's semitic origin and the harm it and it alone has done and continues to do to our people my mind is quite open and I am willing to change my opinions but the fact is every thing more added onto the christian pile ends up making it seem more semitic no matter what it is.
>>10674 Moving away from Dawkins-tier atheism to anything else is a step up in my mind. I used to feel so big-brained spouting off about that stuff, but once that gets boring and you actually sit down and learn about religions, you realize how under-informed you really were on many matters, and that the "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" mindset is limited. I'm basically an atheist - not out of any specific desire, just because I literally can't find any compelling evidence to think otherwise - but it shouldn't be propagated to the masses. Religion has more benefits than shortcomings, and this was one of first things I realized when I became redpilled. It's also interesting how 95%+ of atheists statistically vote for White genocide and other Jewish policies.
Is there any good book on why freemasonry is bad? I would like to brush up my knowledge about the freemasonry in general and their influence to the society.
>>10674 Also how the fuck do you get Semitic from National Socialist?
>>10709 I’ve got just the book for you >>4422
>>10713 Thanks!
https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/10/slovakia-leader-of-nationalist-party-sentenced-to-four-years-for-giving-1488-euro-checks-to-poor-families/ >Marian Kotleba, head of the People’s Party Our Slovakia, was standing trial after he presented three poor families with checks for 1,488 euros in 2017. The number 1,488 has a symbolic meaning for racial-nationalists: “14” for the “14 Words” of David Lane — “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children”; and “88” for “HH” (“H” is the eighth letter of the alphabet) for “Heil Hitler.” I think I'll side with Georg here when he says that these hacks are hopeless. I'd have thought that, at the very least, read people on this very far side of the political spectrum would know what 88 refers to when even wikipedia does.
>>10778 It really seems like they're cracking down in Europe everywhere right now with all this stuff going on with Golden Dawn, NRM and now Kotleba's party. It might be a good idea to get a fascist news thread up since this stuff is explicitly relevant to our board.
Why the hell do nazbol and Nrx niggers keep shilling North Korea as the perfect or a desired state, when the country does not tolerate Christianity or most religions?
What would be the appropriate economic model for fascism and National Socialism? >>10807 >Why the hell do nazbol and Nrx niggers keep shilling North Korea as the perfect or a desired state, when the country does not tolerate Christianity or most religions? Yellow fervor and I'll not understand the love of NK. The organic family state and cult personality has been a thing that existed since before WW1, I think Russia, Prussia, France, and Italy had these ideas implemented, so Juche is not really needed as an inspiration although it can be used as a lesson and strengths and faults.
>>10807 Actually Christianity isn't tolerated here bc it's Abrahamic or whatever. But for me, it's just that they kill their citizens over small shit. Sure they have a great beautiful culture but I'm definitely sure there's a lot of fucked up stuff happening behind the scenes. NatSoc Germany had more freedom than NK. Besides I'm pretty sure some anons (if an NK like state was created just for Whites) would probably be executed bc of some slip up they do like - >Oh you like a certain media >Oh you dislike a certain part of a culture Like you can't have your own opinion basically.
>>10808 It's obviously autarky, although the goal is to reach total autarky, which unfortunately impossible at the moment.
Open file (16.82 KB 139x170 1596646823065.jpg)
Any ex-weebs here? It was great for me until I realized I was just running away from reality and filling it with consumerism. I used to spend my time reading manga and light novels and chinese wuxias too, then I'd watch anime later in the day or at night because I had school/work. I was never autistic about it, in fact I was pretty embarrased by it. Now I barely watch anime or read manga, and when I go to places where it's discussed I either feel despair or anger, because I realize these are running away from their problems too.
>>10817 Unless you fell into the depths of gay/pedo/furry degeneracy, sounds the same as wasting your time with any consumer hobby more than anime specific
>>10819 >Unless you fell into the depths of gay/pedo/furry degeneracy I was self aware enough not get involved in that shite >sounds the same as wasting your time with any consumer hobby more than anime specific I think Otakuism is special in the since that it not only is hobby, but becomes a lifestyle, in the way that nation and culture should fill
>>10817 I used to watch and spend more time with anime, but I don’t do it as much anymore. Once one learns about what the old Japan was like you start to realize that most anime is soulless. Plus, everyone I’ve seen *openly* anime here in the US is fat, ugly and off-putting. I mainly watch it to get some listening in to practice my Japanese comprehension nowadays.
>>10785 Mm yeah. It's been in the air for quite some time now but BO is right that this ain't /pol/ either, it's more doctrinal. Looks like we need a news general. Kikes are pushing for more tyranny. Not sure it's going to serve them on the long run. They cannot keep it. They had more leverage when acting according to Huxley but now they are going into Orwell at full speed. I'm in pain seeing all these good people thrown in jail. They did that a lot in the USA against WNs, and in Europe against revisionists. The pressure increases. The underground force grows against what has become a crime; the defense of White lives. The Jews are coming out. it will be their undoing.
>>10841 I think a single news thread would be good so long as it did not attract too many outsiders and shit up the board. This isn't a totally novel idea for here, we had one at one point on 8chan. My only issue would be what to do with the Weimerica thread, which is already sort of a news thread. Maybe I could make a news cyclical, lock the Weimerica thread and direct people to the news thread, and then enforce news in there. That way we could cover all chimpouts, kikery and fascist / WN developments in one spot so that this place is able to keep on topic outside of that. Let me know what you guys think.
>>10846 Forgot tag
Would the Iron Guard let a Romanian who isn't christian join? For example a modern Romanian who doesn't identify with kike worship but still agrees with most of the Iron Guard's beliefs, how would you deal with that?
Open file (16.10 KB 317x472 Codreanu.jpg)
>>10914 The Iron Guard was of course very religious, but according to a good book I own called "Holy Legionary Youth" by Roland Clark "legionaries had a diverse range of religious views - some were committed Orthodox believers, whereas others cared little about organized religion". He also mentions a 1937 police report where it was estimated that 1.2% of legionaries were ordained priests, to give you an idea of how packed with believers this movement was. Seems small, but more than 1/100 people in a nationwide movement being ordained priests seems surprising to me. It would probably not be smart if one were in this movement to start talking about Christianity being kike worship though. They'd probably fuck you up, regardless whether it was true.
>>10914 Perhaps but you would have been surrounded by devout and radical Christians and any pagan view (or else) would have been close to heresy. In a way, I think this explains why from a metaphysical point of view, a movement cannot win: victory is only possible if you purify yourself, but how could you aspire to such a thing by remaining a Christian in love over the corpse of a dead rabbi? >>10919 >He also mentions a 1937 police report where it was estimated that 1.2% of legionaries were ordained priests, to give you an idea of how packed with believers this movement was. Seems small, but more than 1/100 people in a nationwide movement being ordained priests seems surprising to me. It's very good. In a church, you can have at full capacity between 50 to 150 people who follow the words of one single priest. It's a solid ratio.
Thoughts on reactionaries?
>>10966 Pointless cowards who seek to save a ship that cannot be saved, kill them all f(in minecraft).
>>10919 What kind of pagans would even join the Iron Guard in the first place? Would it be Slavic or Greco-Roman? >>10966 >Thoughts on reactionaries? They're massive faggots that I would debate are just as gay as liberals. They're alos one of the reasons why the fascists failed to save Europe from the Bolsheviks and liberalism by working with them, stirring shit up or becoming an obstacle from preventing men like Mussolini and Hitler from doing what they had planned.
>>10966 Idiots who think the cause of most of the world's issues comes from the Enlightenment Era, think that anything that isn't a christian monarchy is liberal, atheist, or satanic, denies biology and cares less for nature unless it supports their ideological viewpoint, and "nationalists" who love shilling clergies more so than the nation itself. They're useless idiots and anyone who think they're like fascists or anything fascist are idiots.
>>10971 To me, anyone who appreciates his race and culture (regardless of what race he is)and puts them first, is a good man. I hate the politicizing of everything.
>>10968 >What kind of pagans would even join the Iron Guard in the first place? Would it be Slavic or Greco-Roman? Who knows with Romania. I think they're less directly related by blood to Romans than they are just Romanized Dacians. I know that was a Indo-European group, but I can't say anything more about them really. Either way, I doubt any pagans really existed there at that time. The real place of revival was in Germanic countries. >>10966 They're useless. I don't even think they exist offline in any relevant fashion whatsoever. >>10972 >I hate the politicizing of everything. The real redpill here is that everything is political. This type of idea is associated with leftists, but we are wrong not to acknowledge this truth as well. This fact is especially true in modernity, I wouldn't say that it has always been the fact that everything is political, at least to the average person, but either way, as long as we are faced with enemies who operate in this manner, we are obliged to do the same.
>>10967 >>10968 >>10971 >>10980 I didn't expect so much hostility against them.
>>10993 >I didn't expect so much hostility against them. How could you not. They're useless fags who masturbate to the crusades, while endlessly bitching about how, the world is going to shit because "people have abandoned God", while then completely ignoring the issues of race and nation.
>>10980 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalmoxianism The Zalmoxians most likely, they are apparently a revival of the Thracian and Dacian traditional beliefs.
>>11010 Interesting. I was unaware of any attempt to revive this religion in Romania. I wonder how they address some of the claims that Herodotus reports concerning Zalmoxis. He reports a claim said by the Greeks that Zalmoxis was a man who basically scammed the people into believing he was a god: >I am told by the Greeks who dwell on the shores of the Hellespont and the Pontus, that this Zalmoxis was in reality a man, that he lived at Samos, and while there was the slave of Pythagoras son of Mnesarchus. After obtaining his freedom he grew rich, and leaving Samos, returned to his own country. The Thracians at that time lived in a wretched way, and were a poor ignorant race; Zalmoxis, therefore, who by his commerce with the Greeks, and especially with one who was by no means their most contemptible philosopher, Pythagoras to wit, was acquainted with the Ionic mode of life and with manners more refined than those current among his countrymen, had a chamber built, in which from time to time he received and feasted all the principal Thracians, using the occasion to teach them that neither he, nor they, his boon companions, nor any of their posterity would ever perish, but that they would all go to a place where they would live for aye in the enjoyment of every conceivable good. While he was acting in this way, and holding this kind of discourse, he was constructing an apartment underground, into which, when it was completed, he withdrew, vanishing suddenly from the eyes of the Thracians, who greatly regretted his loss, and mourned over him as one dead. He meanwhile abode in his secret chamber three full years, after which he came forth from his concealment, and showed himself once more to his countrymen, who were thus brought to believe in the truth of what he had taught them. Sounds suspiciously like the same scam Jesus pulled on a few hundred years later. In the end though, Herodotus remained inconclusive. >>11005 The Crusades were the original “die for Israel”
Edited last time by FashBO on 10/21/2020 (Wed) 05:14:54.
>>10993 I second this >>11005 How could you not expect us to hate the retards who oversimplify everything down to MUH GOD and solely blame the enlightenment when the elightenment was partially, until neo-christianity took it over thanks to the french, an awakening of Our Innate Racial spirit, it's just sad that Martin Luther ruined the near complete victory paganism had the chance to have back in the Renaissance, truly fitting that his name graced the nigger MLK whose bullshit talks and murderous "dreams" led to so much violence.
I want America to die so bad. Even though, I'm American. It's like a badge of shame to me, this nation I'm supposed to call my own engages in spying on foreigner, spreading degeneracy, sucking of Jewish cock, bombing and attacking random countries for profit and constantly lies and brainwashes it's own citizens. I wouldn't mind if someone went to DC and shooting at politicians(in minecraft of course)
>>11014 >The Crusades were the original “die for Israel” Add Varg's own video that does a nice summary of how antipagan it was too. What's your opinion of Anglin? RenegadeTribune literally hates him. By now DailyStormer doesn't prove anything valuable beyond being a mere aggregator of certain news which are then filtered through Anglin's weirder and weirder Christian and pro-Trump view. Latest defense of MIGA Trump has been this: dstormer6em3i4km.onion/as-western-economy-forcibly-imploded-by-coronavirus-hoax-chinese-economy-grows-4-9/ >China is now the undisputed dominant world power. There is no denying it. In a decade from now, the world will be unrecognizable from now. It will be dominated by the Chinese instead of the Jews. >Which, you know – I’m okay with. Okay? >But I’ll tell you: I’d rather have the anti-war and peacenik figure Donald Trump in charge than the lunatic warmonger Joe Biden. All else being equal, with the deep state Jews trying to start a war with China, I would rather have Trump. >Trump is the first president since Jimmy Carter who didn’t start a new war in his first term and actually ended wars. If soldiers are not fighting foreign wars, then they are brought back to face a new kind of terrorism, White terrorism. Besides, those wars are bleeding the US, which needs to die anyway. Vote Biden, vote for chaos.
>>11025 I've never been a fan of Anglin or the Daily Stormer, honestly. I don't understand the Trump-shilling, the Christianity-shilling or especially China-shilling like this. I only look at the Stormer every few months and I've seen pro-China stuff like this before. I'm not sure why so many people like Keith Woods shill for China.
>>11033 >I'm not sure why so many people like Keith Woods shill for China. Because Keith Woods and morons like him are nazbol shills. They perceive that America is the leader and empowering globo homo and zog along with their retarded bitching of liberalism and complete denial of the fact that communism has been in bed with Jews and liberalism since the early 20th century. They unironically think that china is a fascist state, despite the fact they were created and helped by Jews and Americans along with the President of Chinkland supporting Israel and China supporting LGBT shit. This mostly is the fault of morons by the name of (((Dugin))) and his retarded idea of a Euroasian Empire. Anyone who thinks that China is le based and le repilled is likely a Jew.
Open file (90.46 KB 882x605 jews in china.jpg)
Open file (448.98 KB 1250x954 china and israel.jpg)
>>11056 It's hilarious that there are people who try to paint China as "fascist" in anyway. I mean, the info that modern China is basically a product of Jewish ideologies is right out there in the open for anyone to find. One would have to be willfully blind to deny these things, especially if they associate themselves with nationalist / third position politics. Though, it's well-known that Keith Woods, Richard Spencer and other Duginists are all controlled opposition nazbols promoted to intellectually stultify White Nationalists and Third Positionists, leading them down false paths.
What are your thoughts on a constitutional monarchy? Just to note that a constitutional monarchy is basically a monarchy with the inclusion of a parliament and it does not have to have to come with a constitution. >>11057 >It's hilarious that there are people who try to paint China as "fascist" in anyway. Those fools are subversives, they do this on purpose and probably because they're Jews or just useful or useless idiots who think that liberalism will just magically go away if we put more Jews in power >Though, it's well-known that Keith Woods, Richard Spencer and other Duginists are all controlled opposition nazbols promoted to intellectually stultify White Nationalists and Third Positionists (((Richard Spencer))) I think identifies as a fourth positionist now. I don't what the hell it means but that's just further proof he isn't our friend at all. I find it funny how at this time of the election where all the Jewish banks, corporations and voters are literally shitting on Trump and voting for Biden, he also happens to be one of those faggots who also happens to hate Trump and ridin on Joepedo submarine.
>>11005 >>11018 Because knowing the current events of the world right now and the liberal elites, I thought we might have gotten over our past differences and sought after a single enemy.
>>11024 Anon, America has already collapse and is it dead, the current situation it is in is the collapse it's just that leftists want to eliminate anyone who will prevent it or change it from being a Jewish shithole.
Open file (55.97 KB 459x646 Esoteric_Hitlerism.jpg)
What do you anons think about Esotericism?
>>11064 I'm not particularly interested in organized religion, but it seems alright
>>11064 It's interesting. I enjoy Savitri Devi and reading about various /x/-tier things, but I don't know how much I truly derive from them.
Edited last time by FashBO on 10/21/2020 (Wed) 19:34:04.
>>11065 >>11068 Is there anything you guys have learned from esoteric circles are pretty interesting? One of the things I've found is that supposed CIA documents that claim things like supernatural abilities are possible, although it coming from the CIA I remain skeptical. https://archive.is/PrJEP https://archive.is/ui94v
>>11069 >One of the things I've found is that supposed CIA documents that claim things like supernatural abilities are possible I wouldn't doubt something like that exists, but I'd have to see it to believe it.
>>11061 Apparently you missed the memo that the motherfuckers now know as "neo-reactionaries" were allied with Hitler et al. in the past against the jews and doing so bit him National Socialism and the various fascist movements(some of which were reactionaries) in the ass, leading to what we have now weimar 2.0 across the entire Aryan world, so no being that they are the reason we are fucked allying with them against our common enemy, the jews, is folly, for they are themselves Jews not only in blood much of the time but in thought from their Kike mind virus known as Christianity so, if they are Aryan in truth either they will fall in line or they are dealt with in the same way so many millions of others will be.
Open file (13.56 KB 966x168 ClipboardImage.png)
Kek I guess everyone is stopping by due to the downtime.
Is there any possible way to make civilization better and more friendly with nature?
>>11095 Yes, but it won’t be popular with the masses and will involve extremely radical measures. Pentti Linkola grasped this. http://www.penttilinkola.com/pentti_linkola/ecofascism/
>>11069 The unusual abilities do exist, touching on many domains stretched between the physical and the mental. If you can find it, for example, there's a montage of a man in Asia who was visited by a group of American scientists who wanted to verify the claim that the man could channel electricity at will. The montage ends with, first, the story telling how the man who had a dream of his displeased master about the revelation so he decided to stop all procedures, and then concludes with a different story which shows men training in the control of some invisible force field (ki) and would prove very intriguing if true. Obviously the main part of the video is rather factual, but it's hard to assess the validity of the second and much shorter one. I have also experienced physical things which science would be incapable of explaining. But when it comes the CIA, it's complicated because they are motivated by rather evil purposes. On the topic of CIA files, there is the one about the astral projection (sort of) done by a man who visited Mars and who managed to get a quick glimpse, a faint echo of what was happening a million years ago over there, at the end of his experience that features the tale of a massive destruction caused by a large body traveling through the system; something we should be used to, between the numerous comets that have filled myths over time (serpents of fire, taurus, etc.) and the extrasolar planet that science is starting to consider more seriously. A million years is a lot too and could easily explain how after a considerable amount of devastation, anything remotely approaching ruins would be seriously damaged by sheer erosion and the powerful winds. It goes without saying that as this pertains to what many would call fringe material, a lot of absurdities, unverifiable claims and plain lies will be found there too.
>>11111 wow nice get
>>11111 First quints, nice.
>>11111 Most of what people claim they can do is bullshit. >oh look I can do the electricity >check it out I can make a page turn telepathically James Randi knew how to deal with these fucks.
>>11142 I understand and I'm a big skeptic too, but the video goes beyond that. The people came with scientific tools, they had a camera, they recorded stuff. It was complicated because the devices had issues recording the electric current whereas the scientists expected it to be an easy thing to measure. As always, one must be cautious with this. In the video, there's a blonde woman with short hair, holding the big microphone (you know, the hairy one used for high quality video production), and between her reaction to the electric shock and that of the other men, it could very well be real. Could be hogwash too, with the team pretending being shocked, but then they were very good actors. I remember that they said to visit the man (who wasn't bald) to see about his ability to generate heat in his hands. The issue being that there are tons of fraudsters too. So unless you verify on your own with people you trust, you can never know for sure. The worst offenders being the "empty force" clique.
>>11142 James Randi was a fat fedoralord and you even speaking of him well outs you as one too. You need to return to reddit.
Are old threads moved to an archive of some sort?
Open file (58.83 KB 662x375 del.PNG)
Open file (8.67 KB 532x301 del 2.PNG)
>>11187 Once they go off the catalog? No, I think they're gone forever once they reach that point if no one has archived them offsite through the usual means. As BO I have an archive option, but it seems to lock the thread and remove it to somewhere. I've never touched that button honestly. So it's always good to save periodically threads you like.
Does anyone know why Jews are such a powerful group since the Babylonians and Achemendids? They are a group that is always favored by those who seek to change everything considering Alexander the Great, Julius Ceasar, Cyrus of the Achemendids all had a favorable view of them or heavily depended on them. Is it because they know how to accumulate a large sum of resources or something?
>>11191 Dang. We got a good number of rich threads which are nearing the bottom which have 200+ answers.
>>11261 I just rearchived some stuff at the bottom that needed updating. I'll look if I can increase the size of the catalog too. EDIT: We should be able to hold 100 threads in the catalog now, so what is at the bottom now has plenty of time before it is archived.
Edited last time by FashBO on 10/23/2020 (Fri) 14:40:18.
>>11191 >>11261 ive had this idea brewing in my head for awhile, that its not good enough we all come here and congregate and talk, because all our talkings vanish in the air. a library of fascist literature is being accumulated and shared, and its all a great bunch of thought, but what about the thoughts that are created here? there could be great ideas and concepts being shared here that arent in the existing old fascist literature. there needs to be a sort of curated archive of the whole board that can summarize the discussions and topics happening here. a record of noteworthy conversations and ideas being shared.
Is trans-humanism a possibility or just a meme?
>>11349 Transhumanism (along with ideas like "the singularity") is heavily promoted by Jews like Ray Kurzweil. Make of that what you will. Jewishness aside, I have zero doubt in my mind that any and all types of technological integration between humans and machines will result in nothing but the complete golemization of the human race. I don't know about you guys, but I would sooner die than be implanted with microchips, things like neuralink or even more invasive forms of technology. Inevitably they will be subject to the control of a tiny number of elites who control the production of this technology, and who wield control over it.
Did Aristotle really see that the Greeks were an ideal people because they possessed a medium skin-tone?
>>11061 >Because knowing the current events of the world right now and the liberal elites, I thought we might have gotten over our past differences and sought after a single enemy. You are mistaken, because reactionaries are like the liberal version of conservatism with their whole universialists shit and anti-racism crusades.
>>11363 He says that too White of a complexion is a sign of a coward, explicitly associating this with the paler skin of a woman, also calling the other extreme of being black a sign of cowardice. The tawny intermediate is associated with lions and their natural hue. Now, lions aren’t exactly that dark of an animal. No darker than a White person naturally tanned from the sun. I think even today being *too* pale / White is often ridiculed. I’ve heard stuff like “you look like a ghost, get some sun!” or descriptions of too pale of skin being “sickly” — I don’t necessarily associate this with anti-White programming. Being too pale is unhealthy and some sun-exposure is good for one. Especially back in the past when was often working and outside on average far more than today, super pale men would likely have seemed unusual. https://archive.org/details/worksaristotle00arisuoft/page/n70/mode/1up Also worth noting that Kikepedia (for what it’s worth) reports that for the last 70+ years this work is only dubiously attributed to Aristotle himself.
Anyone hear something about some sort of conference about reinforcing "family values" or something of the sort? I heard some kvetching on the electric Jew, it said something about a virtual meeting between representatives of the US, Hungary, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Uganda, and many other countries. I heard the hilarious line "while talking about 'traditional family', they only made mention of the union between man and woman, as if that's the only kind of traditional family". It supposedly happened today, I can't find it.
>>11370 Here, I managed to dig it up. I hadn’t heard of this: https://archive.fo/yAwPG >The United States joined Brazil, Egypt, Hungary, Indonesia and Uganda on Thursday to co-sponsor a nonbinding international antiabortion declaration, in a rebuke of United Nations human rights bodies that have sought to protect abortion access. >Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar participated in the virtual signing ceremony. The Geneva Consensus Declaration aims to promote women’s health, “defends the unborn and reiterates the vital importance of the family,” Pompeo said at the ceremony. >Though the document does not directly address same-sex marriage, the only co-sponsors to have legalized it are Brazil and the United States, while the text’s language affirming the family as “the natural and fundamental group unit of society” has clear meaning for countries that restrict LGBT rights. Among the co-sponsors, the Egyptian government targets LGBT people in a “systematic fashion,” according to a recent Human Rights Watch report, and in Uganda, gay sex is punishable by death. >In addition to the six co-sponsors, 26 countries, including Belarus, Saudi Arabia and Poland, have joined as signatories. Some funny kvetching in there about how this is “against women’s needs” as well. Maybe they shouldn’t slut it up if they’re not ready for children. You know, I wish these declarations actually meant something. The family is already atomized into near oblivion in America
>>11367 It doesn't make sense to call pale skin "immobile" seems to me Aristotle is just being retarded. So basically he supports an intermediate skin color, so does that mean that Ancient Greece was medcuck or he just supported tanning? >Also worth noting that Kikepedia (for what it’s worth) reports that for the last 70+ years this work is only dubiously attributed to Aristotle himself. I still find it weird that we have nothing of context of what the Ancient Greeks saw in terms of apperance as the "perfect Greek".
>>11382 In the Iliad, how is achilles described? that is likely one form of what is known as the "perfect greek".
>>11383 I don't remember much, but all I know is that Achilles was described as yellow haired.
https://mythology.stackexchange.com/questions/3247/what-did-achilles-look-like He was described as blond or reddish-blond haired while having a snow-White skin. So either Aristotle is being misrepresented here or he's being retarded, especially considering he's trained Alexander the Great a White skinned man.
>>11384 >>11383 Achilles: >She stood behind him, and seized the son of Peleus by his fair hair, appearing to him alone. No one of the others saw her. Achilles was seized with wonder, and turned around, and immediately recognized Pallas Athene http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hom.+Il.+1.197&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134 Menelaus: >First go to Pylos and question goodly Nestor, and from thence to Sparta to fair-haired Menelaus; for he was the last to reach home of the brazen-coated Achaeans. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hom.+Od.+1.285&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136 >Helen dishonoured the couch of golden-haired Menelaus. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Hesiod,_the_Homeric_Hymns_and_Homerica/The_Catalogues_of_Women Rhadamanthus: >But for thyself, Menelaus, fostered of Zeus, it is not ordained that thou shouldst die and meet thy fate in horse-pasturing Argos, but to the Elysian plain and the bounds of the earth will the immortals convey thee, where dwells fair-haired Rhadamanthus, and where life is easiest for men http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hom.+Od.+4.564&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136 Odysseus: >But come, I will make thee unknown to all mortals. I will shrivel the fair skin on thy supple limbs, and destroy the flaxen hair from off thy head, and clothe thee in a ragged garment, such that one would shudder to see a man clad therein http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hom.+Od.+13.398&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136 >She withered the fair flesh on his supple limbs, and destroyed the flaxen hair from off his head, and about all his limbs she put the skin of an aged old man http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hom.+Od.+13.431&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136 Dionysus: >And golden-haired Dionysus made brown-haired Ariadne, the daughter of Minos, his buxom wife: and the son of Cronos made her deathless and unageing for him http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Hes.+Th.+947&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0130 Helen: >goodly Alexander, lord of fair-haired Helen, had smitten him with an arrow http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134%3Abook%3D8%3Acard%3D78 >Was it not for fair-haired Helen's sake? http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134%3Abook%3D9
What is the fascist position on science? Eco-fascists will say it has to be controlled as it causes the degeneration of society, but wondering if there are any sciencefags here. The third reich had "aryan physics" which bashed relativity and quantum mechanics, for being "jewish physics". How much influence should the state have over science, or in this example, physics?
>>11484 Fascism is certainly not anti-science. One good way to show this is to look at the idea of Futurist art, which was very much associated with (Italian) Fascism, which was a type of art which focused on speed, machines, violence and technology, among other things. Also, while Giovanni Gentile condemns the intellectual or academic disconnected from the real world, he is quick to clarify that "Anti-intellectualism does not mean, as some ignorant Fascists seem to believe, that they are authorized by the Duce to dismiss science and philosophy". National Socialism too is a very scientifically-rooted form of ideology. Many of the ideas that characterized the movement originated from scientific discussions of the late 19th and early 20th century. Friedrich Ratzel, a geographer and ethnographer, coined the term "Lebensraum". Ernst Haeckel was a prominent popularizer of evolutionary theory and eugenics, which of course would be extremely important insights into Nature that Hitler would later focus on. These are just two examples out of many, but without the pioneering discoveries of the 19th century, there would be no National Socialism as we understand it. In one sense, National Socialism is the application of these eternal biological truths to the social and political realms. I consider myself an ecofascist, so what I think is that science doesn't necessarily cause the degeneration of society, but what does is the autistic view of science today as some sort of ersatz religion that will bring about progress towards some sort of utopian future. Much of technology brings more harm than good, and it is this would should be controlled to a degree for various reasons. In and of itself, I don't have the slightest problem with the idea of select people learning about the natural world, but when it's a small step from this, to the modern form of "science" where men in White lab-coats justify your total submission to their dictates with some vague appeals to "science". Science isn't everything. It can't tell us everything, we shouldn't build our lives completely around science either. Hope that helps.
>>11485 >"Anti-intellectualism does not mean, as some ignorant Fascists seem to believe, that they are authorized by the Duce to dismiss science and philosophy". I feel like some people here don't take this onboard and just dismiss science without bothering to try and understand / learn it. >In one sense, National Socialism is the application of these eternal biological truths to the social and political realms. Didn't Rockwell say that National Socialism is the inevitable end product of evolution? > the autistic view of science today as some sort of ersatz religion that will bring about progress towards some sort of utopian future Retards who believe in transhumanism, that sort of thing. > Much of technology brings more harm than good, and it is this would should be controlled to a degree for various reasons. I guess it'd come down to the individual piece of technology. I agree that some technology is utterly worthless and causes social degeneracy (abortions being the obvious example). But I would still hold onto a lot of technology being useful if used properly. > to the modern form of "science" where men in White lab-coats justify your total submission to their dictates with some vague appeals to "science". Lab coat priests. Same shit to get you to submit to their drivel but the specific seasoning of the shit is different. >Science isn't everything. It can't tell us everything, we shouldn't build our lives completely around science either. Agreed, basing society on science would just lead to constant unrest as one theory is thrown out for the next one that aligns with the data better, etc. >Hope that helps. Thanks. Seen posts being anti-science and so was curious.
>>11487 >I feel like some people here don't take this onboard and just dismiss science without bothering to try and understand / learn it. That quote is more referring to a misunderstanding of what Gentile means by "anti-intellectualism". Basically it means that Fascism is based on action rather than intellectual pilpul disconnected from life. It's a living doctrine, meant to be lived, not discussed endlessly in the way of Marxists and their texts. I know what you're talking about though, some of those posts are probably mine kek. >Didn't Rockwell say that National Socialism is the inevitable end product of evolution? I do know he said the following: "Slowly, bit by bit, I began to understand. I realized that National Socialism, the iconoclastic worldview of Adolf Hitler, was the doctrine of scientific racial idealism — actually a new religion for our time . . . ”" Rockwell certainly saw National Socialism as a type of eternal truth or wisdom.
Are any of these true?
>>11507 >created /pol/ arguments There is no diversity in truth. Just because a Jew says the sky is blue doesn’t mean they’re wrong. I’ve gotta say though, some of those statements are misleading. I’d have to research all of these in-depth to see what they really said, but here’s what Kikepedia says: Gisèle Littman: >She has also popularized the Islamophobic conspiracy theory Eurabia in her writings about modern Europe, in which she argues that Islam, anti-Americanism and antisemitism hold sway over European culture and politics as a result of collaboration between radical Arabs and Muslims on one hand, and fascists, socialists, Nazis, and antisemitic rulers of Europe on the other. Muslims are collaborating with anti-semitic European governments, Nazis and fascists? What planet is this kike living on? Max Nordau: >Nordau did not coin the expression or the idea of Entartung [Degeneration], which had been steadily growing in use in German speaking countries during the 19th century. The book reflects views on a degenerating society held by many people in Europe at the time, especially throughout the Austro-Hungarian Empire. >The irrationalism and amorality of philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche and the flagrant anti-Semitism of Richard Wagner were seen as proof to Nordau that society was in danger of returning to an era before the Enlightenment. Oy vey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degeneration_(Nordau)
>>11507 Unlikely, but even if true, what would it matter?
Is it possible for rural areas or agarian cities to beat big and/or industrial cities?
>>11516 >Agarian cities Meant agarian towns
>>11516 >>11517 Beat in what sense?
>>11507 Do the parallels of Israel to NS Germany escape you? Although it is obviously without any of its spirit, they merely inhabit the shell of the idea for survival, like the shapeshifters always have. But this is one of the easiest ways to realize they all know exactly what they're doing and deserve no mercy.
>>11520 I have a qn - other races are trying to survive just like Whites and kikes. But why do kikes deserve no mercy? Are there other races who should be on deathwatch like kikes?
>>11507 >that post Well shit lads. Some jews have said somethings that are right. I guess its time to pack it all up and go become degenerate marxists. A broken clock is right twice a day, sky is blue, etc. >>11521 I'd argue its due to how kikes infiltrate and subvert rather than just trying to survive. Hell, they don't want to just survive, they want a world jewish empire and to subjugate all other races. That's a lot different to other races who don't (or can't) infiltrate a civilization and destroy it from within. Kikes are a special case because their religion encourages betrayal and subversion of their host nation.
>>11518 Is it possible to out to defend yourselves from them, advance and innovative ideas, basically anything that can get a nation to depend on agarian communities rather than urban industrial cities.
Open file (8.79 MB 776x432 jews slaves torah.mp4)
>>11521 >But why do kikes deserve no mercy? Are there other races who should be on deathwatch like kikes? The problem with Jews goes back literally millennia. Time and time again the same series of events repeats itself in which Jews are allowed in, they subvert, and then they are booted out the door, only for the cycle to repeat itself again. No matter what we have done, the Jews have come back, and as time has passed, they've grown ever stronger and more influential. They seem to be incapable of not being a malevolent and harmful influence towards others, especially Whites. Either we kill them all, or they will kill us off, as they are actively doing as I type this. They are a type of human parasite, it's the only way I can think of describing them. They are cunning, devious, masters of mimicry and deceit, who will, if let into your group, suck it dry. There's literally nothing worse on this planet than Jews.
>>11525 Nations already depend on agrarian communities. Cities are extremely fragile. If the food stopped flowing in daily, everyone in the cities would starve and die in droves. Cities (and this is more true the larger the city) are basically tumors on the nation. There are increasingly even whole countries which can't sustain themselves from their own living-space. This is the soft power of the countryside that many fail to realize.
>>11349 Depends on what you mean by this. Bodies boosted with tech? More or less possible. Brain into a computer? Might very well lead into a soulless existence. >>11367 >no tan? you simp basement dweller MGTOW who hasn't seen iron in his entire life! you belong in Hades where people never encounter the glare of the sun on battlefields! Swede tan I guess.
>>11383 >how is achilles described? dead
>>11406 >thy thou Could we just dumb this down a notch please? For burgers' sake.
>>11549 Fuck you I don't need it dumbed down you prick.
>>11530 This isn't what I am look for as an answer. I meant is it possible for agarian communities to out qualify, cities? You know can you have no or minimum cities with a nation and mostly agarian communities. Imagine the USA having only two cities, would it still be a powerful nation?
>>11367 Physiognomonics is said to not have been written by Aristotle.
>>11597 >Imagine the USA having only two cities, would it still be a powerful nation? weaponized niggers would make the USA very powerful. the niggers over there are already destroying their country, imagine if the americans rounded up a few thousand niggers and dropped them in the middle of china. probably be more effective than nuclear weapons. simple as.
>>11507 Wasn't there some Jewish philosopher who also that freedom and happiness consists in the constant increase of one's power, and that freedom consisted in having the sheer power to do what you wanted? Pretty based, can't lie.
>>11597 >Imagine the USA having only two cities, would it still be a powerful nation? It could hardly be a nation of it's size without at least one big city to manage each region. Cities aren't just big trading posts, they're administrative and industrial powerhouses, and how the countless rural communities stay in contact with each other.
An anon mentioned a fictional book about a peaceful islamic takeover of Europe, one where one of the leading causes was a backlash against feminism and people voting against it with islam to put them in their place even though they fell to islam. I don't remember the name or if there was a pdf of it though. Does someone know of it?
>>11617 Pretty sure it's 'Submission' by Houellebecq
>>11549 I'm a burger, and dumbing down texts is cancer. reducing things to the lowest common denominator is just another means of subversion and sabotage of culture.
>>11645 Then stop using English then, the whole thing has been going down the drain for centuries already. Outdated syntax is just making matters less palatable to modern minds in a severe need of conversion.
>>11650 moderate use of archaic forms should be easy for any educated person to read. and there's nothing wrong with English. it's our native tongue for better or worse, and while it has been mongrelized quite a bit, it still has well-defined grammar and style.
>>11619 would you recommend it?
>>11662 (I’m the same poster) I haven’t read it, but the anon’s description of it in another thread at least made it seem like an interesting book. I’ll probably read it in the future but not anytime in the near future
What are some good search engines for anonymity and privacy?
>>11675 One of Searx instances or hosting your own. It's open source written in Python.
Should I make a thread that concerns and relates to philosophy and philsophers?
>>11702 Wouldn't hurt, we'll see how it does.
Does anyone here admire the Roman Empire? Because I can't understand the obsession with everyone wanting to be like the Roman Empire instead of being creative and improving their culture without the Roman and Greek influences. I have always personally seen the Romans and Greeks as degenerate who sacrificed their heritage and culture for income, which makes them less of fascist and even European. They're also beloved by liberal or reactionaries.
>>11755 The Greeks already perfected and talked about almost everything worth talking about. It's unironically been pretty much downhill from there.
>>11756 >The Greeks already perfected and talked about almost everything worth talking about. Like what?
>>11760 Sex and war. And sex.
>>11755 Libs and reacs can corrupt anything with their warped optics. Is it surprising when leftists can spin effin Nietzsche in all directions?
>>11760 Philosophy, art, epic literature, drama, etc. >>11781 Nietzsche's easier to spin than you'd think. He's important and everyone here should read him, but his focus on perspectives and immoralism make him easily adaptable.
>>11756 >It's unironically been pretty much downhill from there. Especially the Byzantines who fucked everything up pretty much.
For the sake of a good joke, I wish the /fng/ had been called FASH NEWS . . .
What is your viewpoint of liberty?
Open file (60.10 KB 600x400 breker.jpg)
>>11919 Freedom and liberty are just the capacity to act. There's of course the idea of "negative liberty" or the lack of external constraints on one's actions that is most precious to liberals - this is definitely one type of freedom, but it is no sort of God-given right. Negative liberty is derived from might alone. Negative liberty is only achievable if you have the power to remain free from all constraints on your will. Might gives you the right. I wouldn't say that this the highest goal though for the individual. Civilization is not founded on the complete lack of constraints, especially for the common man, but rather on order, discipline, morality / altruism. The more important type of liberty is "positive liberty", or gaining self-mastery over one's self. Taming the desires, to daily self-overcome, to become imperturbable. It is easy to see how this would feed into the potential of being free in the negative sense. The man without internal control is the greatest slave of all, unless we are to call the man who is "free" to indulge in his whims and vices, hopelessly addicted and self-harming, truly "free". This type of idea goes back to the Greeks, who understood this. Positive liberty is quite easy to inculcate into the population as well through laws, incentives, propaganda and education, making a healthier, happier, more self-controlled community. This might sound paradoxical, but where negative liberty is the most desirable is with the state viewed as a unit, as a group. The state should have complete liberty on the world-stage against others. This right is again obtained through might alone. To view the state as an organism will make this make the most sense. Just as our individual bodies are composed of millions of harmoniously-working and functionally-differentiated cells, so are nations composed of millions of individuals working together as a nation. If the cells of one's body spent all of their time attacking each other and refusing to work together, the body would soon become sick and die. Same with the nation. Inner harmony maximizes outer power projection, ensuring freedom. Freedom / liberty is power.
>>11755 >. I have always personally seen the Romans and Greeks as degenerate who sacrificed their heritage and culture for income On the contrary, they spread their culture and heritage all over Europe through conquest. Their mistake was relying too much on slavery and thus creating a lazy and degenerate native population.
>>11924 Interestingly enough, there are certain types of slave-making ants in nature which exhibit various forms of degeneracy and behavioral decay due to evolving more and more to be reliant on the work of other ants. Some are even completely helpless in surviving without other species of ants to do work for them. They're little better than dependent parasites at that point, like more like (((ants))) than ants. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyergus This tendency towards degeneration is exactly what we see when humans become too reliant of slaves to do everything for them. Parasitism is well-known to lead to the degeneration of a species until it loses everything that doesn't help it parasitize others, just look at Jews
>>11921 >The state should have complete liberty on the world-stage against others Can you elaborate on this?
>>11937 >Can you elaborate on this? I reject any idea of international law. It is a means towards the supranational integration and homogenization of the nations of the world. International law will inevitably lead to situations in which the nation is put into situations that are contrary to its interests and survival. These types of laws too usually lead to a idea of the permanency of borders as well. Nations are NOT just borders, borders are just imaginary lines on a map - contrary to what leftists mean when they say this about borders, the truth is that the nation isn't a fiction, it's a living reality, something that grows, expands, shrinks, perishes depending on the fluctuations of its fate. As the nation grows in population, more living space is needed to maintain the Volk. If a nation wants to be able to self-determine its own future, and to truly be free, they must possess the might, and might comes numbers, technology and resources. Possessing control over these things too is vital, so as to not be at the whims of other nations, races or groups. Alliances should only be maintained so long as they are beneficial. Hitler believed this as well. No permanent alliances. The concepts of good and evil exist because humans occupy a position that is somewhat in-between two levels of organic individuality, between individual and superorganism. With a lone wolf, each effect of its action touches upon its individual self alone. Even if succeeds, the advantage does not extend to others. Even if fails, others are not inconvenienced. When it is strong, it prospers. When it is weak, it perishes. It neither receives favors from others, nor becomes entangled with anyone. In such a situation you can hardly speak of "good" versus "evil". The solitary wolf is beyond good and evil. The same applies with ants and bees, who work so harmoniously among themselves that each individual unit of the whole is merely confined to doing as a single group what other animals, which lead solitary lives do as a single individual. Thus there is no real morality here, it's totally amoral and instinctual. Humans are not lone wolves, nor are we bees, and altruism is no more than the integrating instinct in man which makes higher groups possible. There is both healthy altruism, which extends to kin and neighbors, and there is destructive altruism, as is practiced by leftists, and comes at the expense of the altruist themselves. When the result of an individual's actions confer advantages to the group, it is called "good". When it is bad and individual actions damage the whole group, it is evil or bad. Notice how nothing judged as "moral" is ever damaging to society or others. It's the natural integrating instinct that creates higher more complex unities of human beings. Universal ethics are gay. The rudimentary superorganism of humans is not a social being. It seeks its own well-being before all else. It is a lone wolf struggling against others for existence. The primary level of struggle actually occurs between races, not individuals.
>>11945 Basically the truth everyone on Earth (non-Whites mostly bc they're in trouble if the Whites turn the tables) can refuse to acknowledge.
>>11949 Sadly it seems to be the case towards all of the Laws of Nature. They can deny them all they want, but they will not change.
My second cousin is 1/8th Mongol. Should he be purged in the day of the rope?
>>11959 yes why did you even have to ask? they're a literal mongoloid
>>11959 Yes.
>11959 >implying its your second cousin kill yourself mongoloid
>>11960 This. >>11959 Sorry your cousin is a subhuman. Any honorable White Nation will put them in the oven.
Open file (17.64 KB 474x488 ropeable.jpeg)
>>11959 That's more than one drop.
Open file (272.95 KB 600x750 zyklon pepe.png)
>>11959 Unless you mean Mongol in the sense of a White Borjigin, otherwise I'm sorry to break it to you, anon, he'll probably be sterilized
>>11978 Imagine living in a world where governments advise people on degeneracy like this.
>>11959 Honorary Aryan?
What music genres are jewish in origin?
>>12039 Jazz. And I am guilty of listening/liking it.
>>12039 I don't know about Jewish in origin, but it's quite clear that nearly all mainstream music today and for the last last few decades has been completely in the hands of the Jews. I've actually worried about the subconscious effects of prolonged exposure to this degeneracy before. Messages paired with music enhance memorability and can often become intrusive thoughts. They want you to have no thoughts, only nigger mumbling in your mind. https://www.bitchute.com/video/45oWqDd7Bvg0/ http://www.renegadetribune.com/great-jewish-rocknroll-swindle-part-13/ http://www.renegadetribune.com/great-jewish-rocknroll-swindle-part-23/ http://www.renegadetribune.com/great-jewish-rocknroll-swindle-part-33-act-2/
>>12042 I always think the illuminati conspiracies are a dumb smokescreen
>>12045 >I always think the illuminati conspiracies are a dumb smokescreen They are. It’s also the favorite term of people too afraid to say what it really is – the Jews. Also, people who call out Freemasons are closer to the truth, but they’re still missing what is really as clear as day.
Open file (1.78 MB 928x8800 Expulsion_List.jpg)
>>11521 When some species gets expunged this many times, there should be something seriously wrong with it. It should really harm its hosts to be hated this much.
>>12039 >What music genres are jewish in origin? Its less the music genres and more the jewish influence on the entertainment industry as a whole and that began already in the 19th century. Common profession for Jews Pre-Holocaust was being prostitutes and pimps. Many Jews were also Alcohol producers. In the 19th century prostitution in Western countries was predominantly done in bars, with the bar owner taking a cut from the prostitute. Normal women weren't allowed into bars and if they did, they were beaten up by the prostitutes. Now if you are good in history, you already know that the 19th century had coincidentally a massive problem of alcoholism and other drug abuse(another common job for Jews Pre-Holocaust was being a "Doctor"). Now before the invention of Audio Recording, the common Bar was also the place where the most "Artist/Entertainers" hung around to earn their money, trying to sell their singing, paintings and writing to the patrons of the bar. Back then being an "artist" means belonging to the lowest class of people, because if they didn't became famous and gained rich fans to sponsor them they didn't have a steady income. And that is how the Jews got their foot into the door of the Western Artist Communities and Entertainment Industries. Artist and Entertainers are bottom feeders and by having the (drug/prostitution) money and controlling the venues, they could dictate which kind of genres become popular and what content they had. Look up any African-American genre that became popular with White people in the 20th century. Most White people didn't have any close contact with Niggers and if you remember what has been written here about African Slavery in the USA, the people who owned the most Slaves were also Jews. Most of these music genres existed already for years and decades and White people as a whole didn't give a fuck about it. So even after Slavery was abolished, it was the Jews that hung around Niggers the most and so it is not surprising that the people who promoted these African-American genres and dictated their content were rich Jews.
>>12042 on the old site, we had a thread about entartete musik. the music industry is famous for being exploitative and pushing out formulaic products. >I've actually worried about the subconscious effects of prolonged exposure to this degeneracy before. this applies to many forms of popular media, not just music. personally I started looking at hardcore porn when I was 13, I can only wonder how it's affected my mind over the years.
>>12066 Are you referring to the modern day nigger rap or the yesteryears of jazz and singing done by blacks back then?
>>12068 >this applies to many forms of popular media, not just music. Definitely, this is why I try to avoid all of it as much as possible. Even if one does not intend to be affected, who knows what it does. The genius of advertising and propaganda in general is that it makes the recipient feel as if they are assenting to the message on their own free will, but I think that the people behind these are hardly appealing to the intellect, but much lower and more primal instincts. In general, if you spend your time wallowing in filth, you yourself will become filthy Also here's a cap from that thread you mentioned for anyone else who's interested.
Open file (4.89 KB 249x287 ClipboardImage.png)
What's up with Bitchute? Did they get shoah'd?
Open file (11.86 KB 525x129 ClipboardImage.png)
Ok, apparently they have been deplatformed.
>>12091 >>12092 Just yesterday some Jewish website put out an article saying that “UK Lawyers for Israel” was seeking to get Bitchute banned, and even Jewgle just removed it from their store the other day. Yet another coordinate effort to shut it down
>>11925 >Interestingly enough, there are certain types of slave-making ants in nature which exhibit various forms of degeneracy and behavioral decay due to evolving more and more to be reliant on the work of other ants. Some are even completely helpless in surviving without other species of ants to do work for them. They're little better than dependent parasites at that point, like more like (((ants))) than ants. They probably have a copy of Das Kapital somewhere in their hill. >>11945 Well said. The only international order that should be at play would be something akin to Templars, letting cities come up with their own culture and local laws, but trying to influence things on a larger scale when certain topics definitely require a management that transcends what a mere city or even larger area is capable of handling. I think some kind of "soft empire" is the idea here, if that makes any sense. Strong on what matters, then literally unconcerned by plenty of other matters. We know that with a proper religion that includes all the right values, it will influence culture and dictate to people what kind of schools and academies they need and want, shaping the mental template of future leaders of all states. The United States and European Union do exactly the contrary of that with their soviet-like centralization and police state mentalities that infringes in all meaningful little liberties while making sure that what truly matters to a people remains entirely corrupt. It takes on the inverted pyramid model.
>>11959 Contrary to the stupid answers you get by complete retards and (((people))), it is obvious that an eighth of such blood could easily be lost. Whatever remains of this alien blood will not survive the next generation if exposed to White DNA anyway. A quarter would have been problematic but by experience, an eighth is almost like lost anyway. I'm pretty sure he doesn't even look anything Asian, does he? To give a solid example, if he were to be living with a White woman and had kids, although it's likely he may not be allowed within sacred White lands, his kids would be clean enough to have the right to ask for such a privilege.
The average IQ on this board is dropping sharply. >>11960 >why did you even have to ask? they're a literal mongoloid Don't be stupid. 1/8th means he's far more aryanoid (to borrow your phrasing) than mongoloid.
>>12045 The Illuminati were a real group and it's quite pathetically funny how these cockroaches were exposed. Their legacy certainly endures. Of course today almost anything called Illuminati in "serious" circles can be swapped for Jews. >>12066 noted Jazz and disco. As usual when Whites go into a genre they uplift it, sometimes mutts can do something good and even sometimes an exceptional nigger might shit a catchy pop tune, but for the most part it's all been made popular because Jews promoted them so that, through radios, our ancestors were exposed to sounds that would otherwise never ever leave the frontiers on the cities the artists operated in. Jews pimped them too, paid for their tours, etc.
>>12091 >>12092 >>12094 >>12096 Jews control the major centers of finance and IT. So when they want to cut the money supply and the tech support, you're done. We literally can't have our ways without our banks, our technology companies, but the moment we'd clearly push for a "conservative" tech front (which would actually hide a very antisemitic network), they'd do everything to close it down and they'd get what they want, unless we could somehow manage to operate in extremely pro-White states. The other solution is crypto and complete p2p sharing, but kikes push for pollution by cp on those.
Open file (63.83 KB 375x500 hapa2.jpg)
Open file (29.74 KB 450x600 hapagirl.jpg)
Asian / White mixes are a coin-flip if we're gonna be real here. Half-breed hapas can either look fairly White at first glance (girl in my pic), or they will inherit the worst features of Asians (see Elliot Rodger). By the time someone is 1/8th Asian I think it would be fairly difficult to tell unless you were explicitly told. Being 1/8th non-White is still over ten percent though, I don't think that should necessarily be overlooked. Phenotypical expression will show only the slightest traces of nonWhite ancestry. Only when we start hitting 1/16th and over I give more leeway, then you would the fourth generation removed from the non-White ancestor, and it would probably be very difficult to even tell. I can't even find pics of Hexadecaroons
>>12173 The issue is that this mix either gives the aspect of a White with a mild down syndrome, or with jew-like beady eyes. Notice that many nips have the round bulbous jew nose. Chick on the left would certainly have an easier time blending in. Mixing should be kept to a minimum or always spread so as to have White intrude into non-White areas, not the reverse.
>>12174 I agree. Any mixing at all is a tragedy. We will have to be strict, even if it will exclude some who look fairly White. It might be "unfair" but we won't be able to proceed on a project of this scale by approaching these matters on a case-by-case basis. A firm line will need to be drawn, and everyone who is above or below a certain percentage will be excluded. This is the future of our people we're gambling with her, and we will not sacrifice the future of our race to mongrels who will pollute the gene pool. I will leave what exact number that should be to racial scientists rather than just throwing out random numbers. >Mixing should be kept to a minimum or always spread so as to have White intrude into non-White areas, not the reverse. Do you mean bleaching?
>>12175 "Bleaching" doesn't work, it's a race mixing propaganda. The reality is south america.
>>12179 It's a question of numbers. But, in last resort, if there are Whites who want to destroy their own genetic legacy, let them complete this madness outside of our domains!
>>12200 >>12179 Bleaching is theoretically only destructive if you don't have White offspring as well. With the Spanish in South America, there was a shortage of European women, and so we see Spanish men settling down with native women, which leads to the entire continent almost becoming filled with mestizos. If they had been having White children and simultaneously progressively bleaching the native population, and ensuring that the mongrels produced don't have children with those lower them then (pure blooded shitskins), then very gradually it might be possible to considerably Whiten the population. My feeling is that it would still be a slightly inferior stock after something like this was accomplished though. To be real though, this is slightly impracticable unless you want White men being organized into massive rape gangs
>>12173 >By the time someone is 1/8th Asian I think it would be fairly difficult to tell unless you were explicitly told. This. I actually know a girl is literally 1/8th chinese and she has dirty blonde and light brown eyes she's also coalburner
>>12200 >let them complete this madness outside of our domains! It never works like that. It creates a chain where they bring their kids back to their homelands, or the grandchildren, etc., have trans-national family get togethers that end up in more racemixing and immigration. >>12203 Yes it's theoretically not destructive if you ignore all real-world constraints. Even your thought experiment completely ignores the massive population of shitskin men.
What's the "true" reasons for why the Roman Empire collapsed? I see catholic and Romanboos alike and even stormniggers claim that Rome simply fell to immigration of the Northern Euros, but I find that to be bullshit considering the Romans didn't mind having foreigners working their economy and supporting their military.
>>12273 It was less of "immigration" from Northern Euros than invasions of migratory nations of people like Visigoths, Vandals and other Germanic peoples. On top of that, my guess would be that they just got too big as an empire and overstretched too. In the ancient world especially controlling such a massive amount of land with poor communications would be quite the feet, especially if facing outside pressure. Christianity likely plays a part as well, as native traditions were totally attacked and undermined by the Christian emperors who co-opted this slave religion and began to impose it from above >The ruin of Paganism, in the age of Theodosius, is perhaps the only example of the total extirpation of any ancient and popular superstition; and may therefore deserve to be considered as a singular event in the history of the human mind. The Christians, more especially the clergy, had impatiently supported the prudent delays of Constantine, and the equal toleration of the elder Valentinian; nor could they deem their conquest perfect or secure, as long as their adversaries were permitted to exist. The influence which Ambrose and his brethren had acquired over the youth of Gratian, and the piety of Theodosius, was employed to infuse the maxims of persecution into the breasts of their Imperial proselytes. Two specious principles of religious jurisprudence were established, from whence they deduced a direct and rigorous conclusion, against the subjects of the empire who still adhered to the ceremonies of their ancestors: that the magistrate is, in some measure, guilty of the crimes which he neglects to prohibit, or to punish; and, that the idolatrous worship of fabulous deities, and real daemons, is the most abominable crime against the supreme majesty of the Creator. The laws of Moses, and the examples of Jewish history, ^1 were hastily, perhaps erroneously, applied, by the clergy, to the mild and universal reign of Christianity. ^2 The zeal of the emperors was excited to vindicate their own honor, and that of the Deity: and the temples of the Roman world were subverted, about sixty years after the conversion of Constantine. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/gibbon-decline28.asp
>>12273 there were both political and economic causes. politically: the Republic breaking down and transforming into an Empire meant excessive power concentrated at the top. it also meant very unstable succession of power, with many Roman Emperors being assassinated. Roman Citizenship was originally restricted, and became too widespread with the Edict of Caracalla. the Crisis of the Third Century was the beginning of the collapse, and Diocletian's reforms only delayed the inevitable. economically: too much emphasis on raubwirtschaft, ie exploitation economy. plundering and enslaving worked for awhile, until Rome expanded to its effective limits, after which this was no longer sustainable. there was a corresponding neglect of industry and innovation, for example, Romans had the technology for watermills and windmills, but watermills were very underutilized and windmills were unknown; it was only the new social world of Medieval Europe that made extensive use of these technologies. all this ties into the Roman reliance of slavery to get things done, which created a 'high level equilibrium trap', in which the standard of living was good enough to cause complacency. there was also excessive spending on luxuries and conspicuous consumption, which drained the supply of precious metals which propped up their currency. debasement of coinage led to inflation, undermining the whole system. the völkerwanderung and employment of Germanic barbarians as mercenaries certainly played a role, but that was after the breakdown had already occurred due to the causes above. keep in mind, the Fall of Rome was really only the fall of the Western half, the Eastern half lived on another thousand years as Byzantium (although it was Christianized in the process).
How fake and gay was the cold war, the rivalry between the US and Soviet Union, and was the Soviet Union really this so-called communist trad empire?
Open file (615.47 KB 2000x2000 capitalism and communism.png)
>>12290 It's about as fake and gay as the opposition between Democrats and Republicans in American politics, so pretty much fake and gay, with squabbling over methods and speed of change. Capitalists are merely driving in the slow lane, while still advancing slowly and steadily. We see this with the progressive enfranchisement and granting of equal rights to non-Whites in the United States in particular, and with "Women's Liberation". All of this was more or less already done in the Socialist world decades before it happened in the West. I can't doubt the existence of real rivalry at a certain level, but whether at the supranational level, i.e. above the particular governments of the United States and the USSR, there was true conflict, I have more doubts. It might even be that the Jews deploy multiple methods in order to run a form of ideological / organization "natural selection" in order to see what is the best means to meet their goals. This is just wild speculation now though. The rivalry was small enough, however, that when a state like the Third Reich came to power however, all pretensions of conflict were ended, and the Capitalists and Communists joined forces to kill the Third Reich and massacre, rape and degrade its population. Only with a common enemy do the superficial differences vanish. It's also important to note that everyday life was not that different in a Socialist state versus a Capitalist state. Populations in both were composed of soulless wagecucks working in factories and various businesses. They earned a wage, and then lived out their miserable lives very much the same. In function there is very little difference between privately-owned means of production, and state-owned means of production, "worker ownership" rhetoric is fictitious. It's the same relationship, except for in the Socialist system the profits are allegedly being used for the interest of "the people".
>>12233 >It never works like that. It creates a chain where they bring their kids back to their homelands, or the grandchildren, etc., have trans-national family get togethers that end up in more racemixing and immigration. Only if kikes decide, which is self defeating because this operation would never ever see the light of day with kikes on top. With Whites, it can work. We say no mixing in our countries, go fuck outside but if you do it, you're stuck outside. PERIOD.
>>7725 Paul Einzig wrote a book about a certain part of the Italian Fascist economic story, "Economics Of Fascism"; i'm talking exactly about the corporate state part. It's an approximation on your question but you might want to check that out. Cultured Thug made some videos about it, too. >>9907 That's right.
Are Turks White, or they are semites?
>>12322 Neither.
>>12322 Depends on which Turks, you're talking about, because the cockroaches in Turkey are a mixture of European, Central Asian and Mediterranean, while the true Turks are Central Asians who are mostly mix of Asian and European.
>>12322 In the Western areas (coast or near Istanbul and closer to Greece), the higher class tends to be very White. Turks took in many slaves, they had Janissaries, they also took control of many cities that were of Grecian culture although they tended to count more and more Hellenized non-Whites. For a long time Byzantium (and later called Constantinople) was a cosmopolitan major city but as with the Muslim invasion, the White people who would have been living there got immediately submerged. I considered this city where Europe could be considered to be effectively stopping, assuming we could: 1. Reclaim it and establish a no man's land 200 km beyond it. 2. Secure the whole Bosporus channel. 3. Expel any human not White enough (and an elite of Northern leaders, warriors and craftsmen would be installed there too). 4. The tiniest Muslim reference would be erased, no matter the "loss" in art.
What is homo-fascism and why is it a thing?
Open file (795.38 KB 1280x720 faggots btfo.webm)
>>12379 Homosexuals are degenerates who can't help but insert their freakish sexual proclivities into every aspect of their life, therefore we see shit like this. Think of gays you've been unfortunate enough to have to be around for any amount of time. Even if you can't tell they're gay, they are surely going to tell you
>>12381 It's a bunch of gay retards who have never read a fascist book, have researched the spiritualities and ideals of fascist such as Mussolini and Hitler, and try to larp as fascist likely because they think it looks cool. There is no such thing as homo-fascism, homosexuality goes completely agaisnt fascism. My guess is that it originated on cuckchan or twatter.
>>12385 It's only gotten worse with things like Twitter and Cuckchan, but I think that there were homos even before the Internet who appropriated the aesthetics for edgy reasons. Link related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_League_(United_States) For real eyebrow-raiser, click on the leader of the group's name in the article, and see how it is says that his real name is unknown. It wouldn't surprise me if it was a Jew. Either way, these aren't Fascists or National Socialists. Their deviance has nothing to do with it, and actively harms our movement. Today we often see trannies online try to insert themselves as well.
>>12379 >What is homo-fascism and why is it a thing? Homo-fascism isn't a thing, it's just a live-action role-play likely sought out to mock Fascist for their hatred of gays. Fascism has always seen family values as something upmost importance within a society, so don't fall for Jewish memes. >>12385 >It's a bunch of gay retards who have never read a fascist book, have researched the spiritualities and ideals of fascist such as Mussolini and Hitler, and try to larp as fascist likely because they think it looks cool. There is no such thing as homo-fascism, homosexuality goes completely agaisnt fascism. My guess is that it originated on cuckchan or twatter. It might also be a mockery of how gays cry and act like victims to everything, but they have so much representation through the state and corporations just like how fascists wanted to use a combination of both. >>12388 >For real eyebrow-raiser, click on the leader of the group's name in the article, and see how it is says that his real name is unknown. It wouldn't surprise me if it was a Jew. Funny thing is, that I think a lot of gay fash are either part Jewish.
>>12379 It's what happens when you don't instaban/instagas fags. Same applies to other lifestyle degenerates who worm their way into the fray
>>11755 To be honest the Romans are indeed overrated, the Roman republic and Empire were only ever a thing and was prevented from collapse was because they had rich and powerful elites who could afford almost anything at the time. The Romans were only ever a powerful civilization, because they mostly spent their budget on the military and had enough soliders from different places across the world to defend their richest provinces along with the decent commanders l, who had who brought Rome to its height. Rome was a place that knew that money = power, unlike the Greeks who saw that philosophy was the best knowledge and source of power that existed, until that failed due to the creation of democracy and generally Ancient Greece seeking income rather than life-achievements.
>>12388 ;-) > trannies online try to insert themselves . . . . . .
>>12448 Dilating regularly is important. Let that serve as a reminder. Wouldn't want their axe-wound to close up, would we?
I got a bit of a problem. I truly believe ethno-nationalism is the foundation for strong nations and completely support it, and that civic-nationalism is doomed for failure, the problem is, I am a mutt. 3/4 White, 1/4 American native. I cannot take modern society anymore. The degeneracy, the consumerism, the broken families, the pedophilia, and all of the other BS jews love to propagate. If a happening actually occurs, can I contribute in some capacity? Or should I just go live in the woods or something?
>>12494 >If a happening actually occurs, can I contribute in some capacity? You could volunteer for castration/sterilization and become a Warrior in the happening, it's the only way I, personally, would let you continue to exist in the ethnostate at all, I have some small portion of native genes as well, I think 5 or 6 generations back, if not further, or at least that's what my family claimed, I don't trust the DNA tests enough to get one. That family being her since the time of the pilgrims it seems likely that at least one member did at some point, to me, it doesn't matter, I have a Nordic Phenotype, light brown hair and eyes, and my brother is blonde and steely blue although he is an idiot and a lemming in full. >Or should I just go live in the woods or something? You can do this, but you better be very good at hiding.
>>12494 If you want to contribute then kill jews. Don't wait. If so great. If you won't do that then fuck off with your bullshit question.
>>12507 You are so powerful and masculine. Can I touch your muscles? >>12494 You could not be a citizen in our purified countries but I could easily imagine we'd also create "safe" zones for respectable non-Whites... for a while, assuming you could manage them. You'd be welcome to displace even more mutt people further out. The American continent is wide enough to have you carve out a safe area. There is a kind of nationalistic movement already, close to Canada I think, that regroups people with a mix of White-reds. But cut the shit with the American-native stuff, there is nothing native about red Asians: archeology proves it and even tales kept by some tribes prove they once lived alongside White people in very distant times, and either cooperated with them or killed them (it's the rule, no need to be bitter).
>>12520 Your first response seems kinda gay.
Is it true that Mussolini did not care for race before the Third Reich became a major player?
>>12494 I can relate as I'm a mutt as well but much like the other anons who responded to you suggested, people like us should not be partaking in a White ethnostate. I agree with this anon the most >>12520 . I've always believed that the future of the North American continent would be a confederation with countries that are inhabited with various groups of people like a country for Whites, Negros, Mutts, and Indians. You could even make the claim that this did exist at one point with that being the Indian reservations.
>>12552 At least not in the sense that they had stringent racial laws, especially against Jews. I think it was due to the influence of the Third Reich that they finally began to restrict the influence and rights of Jews within Italian society (i.e. forbidding marriages between Jews and Italians, keeping them out of government and other important positions, etc). One might wonder why Italy didn't have laws like this until the late 30s, but my guess is that when you live in a White country in the 1920s and 30s, you really didn't even have to think of restricting miscegenation, it wasn't like America where you had millions of negroes and Whites living in the same cities. I don't think we could say that Mussolini just did not care for race at all.
>>12494 I don't think anyone in this thread went too far but I would like to offer some advice. Usually when you confess to such a thing there will be subverters who will go all out telling you to kill yourself, that you are a mutt and must be exterminated, you can be no true fascist, etc, the typical jewish tactics you may be familiar with. All in all, as long as you fight the good fight, most intelligent people will accept you as long as you don't advocate for or attempt further miscegenation. Good luck!
>>12616 That can be applicable to any on-White except jews.
>>12616 This makes me wonder how you'd define one of the jews. Is it anyone with the blood in them, no matter how small or large an amount, or only those that are demonstrably apart of that ethnic-religion? I've heard a lot of stuff about people with jew blood in the SS that considered themselves primarily Germanic and held the kikes in utter disdain. Not really sure how true that is.
Open file (199.85 KB 500x384 eugenics.jpg)
Open file (269.45 KB 335x531 2_1.jpg)
>>12494 Kiddo, anything above 1/16th non-european blood is too much. At that point, you have obvious non-White traits like low, narrow forehead. That, combined with a brachycephalic head, is a dead giveaway. I am sorry, but the taint is too much. If it's directly paternal, it will never be bred out. You will have praire nigger Y dna to remind you of the degeneracy of your ancestors forever. I recammend a vasectomy. It saves the gene pool, but leaves your manhood intact. >>12507 I have seen Anglo Canadians who are 1/16th. While still phenotypically and behaviorally European, they don't look like they are from England. Rather, they have a more Baltic/Slavic appearance. Mongoloid DNA skewed my cousin's phenotype from a germanic to a Slavic appearance, all because my degenerate uncle liked Blondes with high cheekbones. Small amount of non-White DNA does not delete someone from White per se, but it does ruin the genetic potential of a population if the admixture is widespread. Sure, you will have a high Civilization, but you won't invent as much as Western Europe. The reason why Northwest Europe was the most inventive is because most Whites were absolutely pure. The further South and the further East you go, non-White admixture goes up, specifically mongoloid and Semite admixture from the Huns, Mongols, and Moors. The only way the Slavs and Meds could keep up with Germanic and Celtic Whites is if they practiced a stringent eugenics program for IQ and beauty, to select out the Moorish and Mongol traits.
>>12628 Mischlings are a coin flip really. They either manifest the Eternal Jew to the highest degree, or the Aryan spirit will shine through. Bobby Fischer is a good example. For Jews, it’s important that they be rooted out in whatever way possible. Synagogues need closed down, kosher slaughtered banned, non-medically necessary circumcisions banned, etc. This will clean them up quick on the religious front, but this can’t be the extent of the measures taken. Anyone with more than 10% specifically Ashkenazi or broadly Jewish descent should be branded a Jew and treated as such. It sounds strict, but these people need utterly destroyed, otherwise how many millennia will this cycle continue itself?
>>12628 You can be 1/128th Jewish and be considered Jewish, so long as the line is directly maternal. If not, they'll consider you a filthy Aryan vermin that needs to be exterminated, even you are mischling with paternal ancestry.
>>12494 >>12628 I think the Nuremberg Laws are as good a standard as any. they considered 7/8 White, 1/8 jewish to be Aryan for most purposes (the SS wanted either pure ancestry going back to the 1700s or a Blood Certificate). 1/4 jewish was 2nd degree Mischling, 1/2 jewish was 1st degree, any more was considered Juden. 2nd degree Mischlings were allowed to marry Aryans (because their children would be considered Aryan), while 1st degree Mischlings were more restricted. any Mischling who participated in the Jewish religion and/or married a Jew would be classed as Jewish. personally I think the Reich's plan was to miscegenate and absorb the 2nd degree Mischlings, then figure out 1st degree later.
>>12635 I wish we had access to the alternate versions of these laws. I have read Hitler ordered the bureaucrats he charged the proposals for these laws with to present him four variations of the laws, ranging from a strict version A to a mild version D. Hitler ended up choosing the most mild proposal, only amending the fact that it would only apply to full Jews, which he saw as too lenient.
>>12631 >Anyone with more than 10% specifically Ashkenazi or broadly Jewish descent should be branded a Jew and treated as such. It sounds strict I refuse to believe that someone for example with 90 percent Nordic genes should be irredeemably lost because he's perhaps 10 percent jew. Maybe it can be genetically engineered out in really bad cases but it's our blood that is the stronger one. If anything, even a small amount of nordic genes should lift an individual up and we shouldn't forget that much genetic material of modern jews is absorbed from other populations. Take Ivanka for instance, married a kike but her genes are still 100 percent Nordic if she left the tribe tomorrow, if I'm not supposed to believe in some fairy-tale where her genes were altered the moment she started fucking Kushner.
>>12643 It’s entirely possible that I’m being overly cautious when it comes to kikes. Ultimately things like this would be best left to eugenicists and biologists to research and to provide informed policy proposals to be implemented that ensure the health and integrity of the nation.
Thoughts on Huey Long and the concept of Every Man a King?
>>12630 I am of polish and either Irish welsh or british descent on one side my fathers, and the other is all Anglo/Irish with some Swedish in there for good measure. I am pretty sure the only way you could tell I have any Heritage other than pure White would be the ease with which I tan. Though those of Nordic phenotype, whether Red nordic or Scandinavian, go one of two ways on that as I have heard, they either darken easily in the sun, or burn like fried chicken. So, maybe it wouldn't be a hint.
>>12639 interesting, I hadn't known that. my point is, if it's good enough for the Third Reich, it should be good enough for us. so if you apply Nuremberg classification to race in general, that would make >>12494 a 2nd degree mix-breed who's still permitted to breed with Whites.
>>12669 Hitler made mistakes, that was one of them, we should be stricter much stricter.
I've heard the argument before that Hitler somehow prevented people from voting against him or something like that, and that's why he had so many votes. It sounds like bullshit but what exactly does it refer to? Surely it's not completely pulled out of nothing.
>>12669 Numermberg laws were used to remove citizenship from kikes not to authorize interbreeding with shitskins. Niggers were sterilized.
>>12673 Agreed. Today we possess the knowledge for much deeper insight as well. >>12678 Well, they never held elections in the democratic sense where Hitler would run against someone, obviously. This should be obvious and I'm sure no one here has a problem with that. National Socialism doesn't believe in (((democracy))). The one thing that they did use though is occasional referendums to gauge the opinion of the people on various matters such as Germany leaving the League of Nations, Hitler receiving supreme power, whether they approved of Austria being incorporated into the Reich, etc. All of these had extremely high turnout levels and overwhelming support of Hitler's policies and decisions, ranging from 90-99%. Kikepedia said it's all rigged and was intimidation, but when I see the faces of the people watching him in crowds, or the genuine enthusiasm he seemed to generate in general, and how the German people never gave up the fight against the Allies until the very end, I unironically believe it.
Open file (153.90 KB 1024x1024 1592662794340.jpg)
>>12689 I think the argument was usually in response to this graph. I also felt the last 3 bars on this are misleading since it's hard to imagine 44% support turning into 92% within a year, so I was curious what the whole thing is about. >how the German people never gave up the fight against the Allies until the very end It's not hard to imagine why if Hitler was anything like we believe he was. We passively know things are complete shit right now, but it nearly brings a tear in your eye when it really hits you how much better everything could be.
>>12698 All other political parties were banned in July 1933, this is why we see every other color disappear between March and November 1933 in that chart. So it's slightly misleading when looked at without knowledge of history. The NSDAP became the sole option, but at this time too Hitler was just beginning to accomplish his superhuman achievements such as liberating Germans from unfair treaties like (((Versailles))), and pulling them out of the depths of the Great Depression. It's likely that there was much enthusiasm for Hitler, especially due to the fact that the Communists were threatening to tear Germany apart. National Socialism is of course an organic political philosophy that views the Volk as an organism, a single community of different parts integrated into a greater whole. It doesn't attempt to tear apart the nation and wage war between the various parts, it seeks societal harmony. Democracy and multi-party states are antithetical to this. What Codreanu said here is pertinent: >Nothing frightens Jews more than a perfect unity in others: the unity of feeling in a movement, in a people. That is why they will always be for "democracy" which has but one advantage, and that one for the nation's enemy. For democracy will break up the unity and the spirit of a people, which, faced with the perfect unity and solidarity of judaism in Romania and the rest of the entire world, once divided into democratic parties, thus fragmented, will be defeated >it nearly brings a tear in your eye when it really hits you how much better everything could be. It really does. Hitler is quite possibly the greatest man to have ever lived.
How are the w­hi­tes any better than the jews? If you value race and think every race should strive to dominate, therefore fuck jews, that makes sense. But arguments that jews are powerful, ultra-capitalist, exploitative, invasive subverters is thoroughly hypocritical. Of course, 'whit­es' and 'jews' are stupidly broad generalizations anyway. You aren't King Henry or Bezos or Hoover or Biden or ....
>>12703 >If you value race and think every race should strive to dominate, therefore fuck jews, that makes sense. Yes, this is the position of 99% of people here. >But arguments that jews are powerful, ultra-capitalist, exploitative, invasive subverters is thoroughly hypocritical. There is nothing wrong with warning against a rootless tribal clique of ultra-capitalist, exploitative, invasive subverters who seek to totally degrade and enslave us into goy cattle
>>7682 As a newfag but an ardent defender and believer of fascism, what should I know about this board?
Open file (141.21 KB 1300x898 aipac us elections 2.jpg)
>>12703 >But arguments that jews are powerful, ultra-capitalist, exploitative, invasive subverters is thoroughly hypocritical. I don't see any hypocrisy here. Even if you meant that Whites are also like this, it could still be argued from the perspective of "our team" - we want to be the ones exploiting and dividing, not the Jews. This is perfectly reasonable.
Open file (91.16 KB 735x406 fascist julay.PNG)
Open file (181.54 KB 869x421 fascist garlic.PNG)
>>12711 We've existed for about two and a half years. We started out on 8chan and eventually landed here earlier this year. The board has gotten more oriented towards National Socialists over time, as well as Pagans / Savitri Devi-types, but is by no means exclusively oriented towards them, as can be seen at the people who will sperg out over the fact that we are willing to discuss fascist movements from all over the world. We're kinda slow, but the quality : post ratio is generally a lot higher than some place like /pol/ so it makes up for it. We've gotten mentioned by the media a few times, but there are not many shills. Hope to see you around, newfren
>>12711 That this board has non-White users in it. Some are okay with this. Some are not.
>>12714 I think it is very overexaggerated at times
>>12703 >>12704 >Wojack >A cringe wojack made by leftists You have to go back and never return.
>>12704 >this is the position of 99% of people here. Not really, the position here is pro-Ethnoglobe. It makes sense because White supremacy is logic-based.
>>12716 I don't get what you mean.
>>12719 He means that the number of non-White posters is exaggerated, i believe.
>>12718 What part of 'Union of all races and all peoples' do you not get?
>>12724 What part of all Brazilians on the server must die, do you not get?
>>12719 What >>12722 said. There are two or three non-White posters at most, and the most obvious one (the Mexican guy) only posts here sporadically in the first place. Otherwise this board is consistently NatSoc / pro-White discussion. >>12724 Brazilian Integralism isn’t even a form of nationalism. Multiculturalism doesn’t work. Integralist-chan would be better off if she went back to live in the jungle with Kuruminha, otherwise she’d end up popping out some mestizos in a favela
>>12718 I don’t think ethnoglobe and what that anon said 99% of people support here are necessarily incompatible. I support ethnoglobe myself for a variety of reasons, primarily to do with the environment and technology, but if we timker with the wording just slightly in >>12703 ‘s post so that instead of reading “If you value race and think every race should strive to dominate“ it reads “and *know* that every race *will* strive to dominate”, it’s totally compatible since we are changing a statement of value into a descriptive statement about Nature. All individuals, all races, strive for their furtherance and survival, and ultimately this leads to struggle, in which the strongest will survive. Ethnoglobe is the position in which you end the struggle against subhumans once and for all
>>12725 What about non-Brazilian non-jew non-niggers?
>>12729 What part of Ethnoserver, do you not understand?
>>12724 >What part of 'Union of all races and all peoples' do you not get? I don't think you realize that you're just supporting a fascist form of multi-culturalism. If intregalist chan wants to be allowed to live then she would have to breed White, die, or go back to amazon forest and be shit flinger along with her native cousins.
>>12757 >a fascist form of multi-culturalism That makes me wonder if it can really even be considered Fascism. Fascism is of course nationalistic by definition. If anything, a Brazilian Integralist would be advocating for a form of multinationalism within the single state of Brazil, or some form of ethnopluralism within the boundaries of Brazil. Can a true organic community transcending classes be made from such a foundation? I'm skeptical. Brazil is not even a nation, it's more like America but even worse, an amalgam of nations and mongrels. Integralist-chan doesn't belong to a fictional Brazilian nation in truth, but to whatever Amazonian tribe she descends from.
>>12726 I'll never understand the fetishism of Native women and Asian women in general. >>12759 >That makes me wonder if it can really even be considered Fascism. Fascism is about the unity of everyone within a society working together for the sake of the themselves and the nation. Ethno-pluarism could be something fascists advocate, but it would only end in diaster and turn everything into a multi-cultural shit hole, but without the liberalism. One of the major problems I have with fascism is that there are advocations of nationalism rather than ideas just localism. The way I see it is that NS is the ultimate or peak form of fascism along with Julius Evola's belief of what fascism should also be.
>>12761 Pic related
Open file (503.89 KB 490x322 ClipboardImage.png)
>>12761 >>12762 >I'll never understand the fetishism of Native women It's based off of heavily romanticized and idealized pictures of natives in heavy make-up and with with flawless bodies, when in reality we know that they look like your pics, have saggy tits and are just in general filthy savages. Kuruminha images aside, almost all of the "cute native girl" pics are just mestizos in cosplay, not real natives.
>>12757 Integralist chan is already mixed and there's nothing wrong with that >she would have to breed White based
Open file (3.00 MB 498x451 trump wrong.gif)
>>12764 >Integralist chan is already mixed
>>12761 >Fascism is about the unity of everyone within a society working together for the sake of the themselves and the nation The question though is whether the idea of a "multinational nationalism" is even coherent, though. To me, at least, it's not a coherent concept, especially if we're thinking of a nation in its truest sense, i.e. a Volk, not just a group of people, no matter how heterogeneous under a single government. That's of course not necessarily a single nation even if administered by a common government and common set of laws. Like you kind of hint at, it's more likely that it will either end up a mutted-up mess or will tear itself apart over its national differences than truly come together as a people. Even in states positively hostile to the idea of national identity such as the Soviet Union, in the end national identity has triumphed and reasserted itself against globohomo, I can only imagine that this would happen much, much quicker in a fascistic state not hostile to such ideas in the slightest. It would be a mess, and this is why I agree with you that National Socialism is the highest and most true form of Fascism, something far beyond a political doctrine or "ism". Anything else is just authoritarian civic nationalism
>>12763 In the end it's cringe as fuck, I don't mind Kurhumina-"chan", but fetishizing racial mixture because you think native women look like that is mental retardation. >>12764 >Integralist chan is already mixed and there's nothing wrong with that There is everything wrong with mix racing and creating mutt children. You sound like a kike, intregalist chan is pure a icon and your image is a fetish. Look at Brazil and other mutt nations and try telling me that they're perfectly fine. >>12769 >multinational nationalism" is even coherent, though I believe that it isn't, I think even Mussolini himself also talked about the importance of blood, but not race for say. I think he and other fascist believed that accepting those who are outside of the DNA of a German or Italian will only destroy ethnic and national identity.
>>12774 >the importance of blood, but not race for say See, I think these are basically synonymous for the most part. There can be minor variation within the nation genetically, but nothing on the level of races that are of completely different skin colors, facial structure, genetics, etc. It just doesn't work, it brings harm and disrupts societal harmony. With Italy, which has a degree of variation within its population from north to south, genuine nationalism is still possible, but this is rendered increasingly difficult the wider the gap. I think we basically agree though from what I'm reading here.
Open file (30.82 KB 287x300 tom metzger.jpg)
Press F to pay respects
Is it ever not ok to drone strike brown people? Or are they fine if they stick to their own soil?
>>12805 >are they fine if they stick to their own soil In theory yes, but in reality sooner or later it will turn into a repeat of our current situation.
Are there any DNA-test websites that are trustworthy? 23andme is run by a kike (her sister is the CEO of Youtube, her Jewish husband is the co-founder of Google, so their company obviously has some hidden motive) and is known to give bullshit results. Is there any website that I can trust, both in the accuracy of the results and in knowing that they won't do anything weird with my genetic samples?
>>12813 if you get your dna sequenced by some third party you can analyse it yourself using open source data and tools
>>12805 >Is it ever not ok to drone strike brown people? Obama did his drone strikes in the service of Israeli foreign policy, so that makes it less okay in my book. >>12813 I wouldn’t trust any of them. It would be more worth your time to look into your actual family tree rather than selling your genetic info to corporations that we have no idea what they do with the information after they gather it, or who they share it with (law enforcement, etc).
Thoughts on slavery? Are you anons for it or against and if you are for it, how would you practice it?
>>12822 I have no moral problems against it, but there is a great risk with slavery in compromising one's own race - the biggest risk is becoming too dependent on a subject population. If anything, they should never be physically brought into White territories, we have seen what this has done with America. It's also worth noting that some "slave-making" ants in nature have degenerated into helpless parasites. It's not completely analogous, but it raised some eyebrows for me: >>11925
>>12628 And I've heard and seen people with diluted jude blood who were more orthodox in their application of Jewish culture than their parents and grandparents. They are too much of a problem to take any risk. At the very least we must opt for a containment option such as Madagascar, but I loathe giving kikes such a nice and fertile land. Why should we waste our time and tech to filter the good from the bad? It's so tiring and wasteful. We must therefore generalize and not be emotionally moved by collateral damage. >>12630 >Kiddo, anything above 1/16th non-european blood is too much. Get off your high horses. I've met 1/8ths who were Whiter ein mind and flesh than so called White nationalists. Wodensson settled that rather swiftly and it's a good rule of thumb, so allow me to paraphrase: if it looks White, if it behaves like a White and fights for the Whites, then it's White. We also know that such cases would be minorities and if any worry remained, then a mere follow up on the individual's life and roots would allow the society to decide if this person would be allowed access to all types of assets in our society or if for good measure, this person's liberty should be restrained to certain ranks, jobs and areas. In the case of a risk, I think a true blood pact would solve this too, assuming we had a proper religion to support such a rite. >Mongoloid DNA skewed my cousin's phenotype from a germanic to a Slavic appearance, all because my degenerate uncle liked Blondes with high cheekbones. They are much more pressing issues right now than knowing if a Slavic fuck toy has too high a cheekbone. Nothing that a soft Lebensraüm wouldn't solve (organized spread of quality Nordic blood all over Europe over centuries and more). >Small amount of non-White DNA does not delete someone from White per se, but it does ruin the genetic potential of a population if the admixture is widespread. From experience, these cases are rare and we have certainly no interest in taking in whitish people from -stan countries because they'd happen to have some White admixture and old pre-christian customs and beliefs. >The only way the Slavs and Meds could keep up with Germanic and Celtic Whites is if they practiced a stringent eugenics program for IQ and beauty, to select out the Moorish and Mongol traits. This I agree with and in all likeliness it would have to be forced unto them. >>12631 >Mischlings are a coin flip really. They either manifest the Eternal Jew to the highest degree, or the Aryan spirit will shine through. Bobby Fischer is a good example. Absolutely but you cannot know how the kids would look like or behave. Genetics can skip one or two generations and one case like Fischer is not seeing the forest for the trees. Unfortunately many Whites base their own experience of Jews from these liberal Jews living on the edge of their ethnogroup, which is perverted because by definition these Jews will need a tolerant society to be accepted. There is no way to win with this premise. >measures You're not thinking straight. Stop wanting to mommy these kikes by changing their ways. At best they shall all be put into one big country-camp and sterilized. They'd become the last generations of Jews and horrible mischlings. >>12632 It's true, it's the Halakah but it's frankly retarded especially in light of genetics. >>12635 Yes, the NL are the bare minimum and might be improved upon, especially from the experience we have garnered about Jews or even simply using technology to measure the genetic material of individuals presenting complicated cases. >>12643 10% is less than 1/8. We would need to be cautious but the individual could stand a good chance. >>12644 >only science The character of a person should matter too. Those with too much of a politically divisive, degenerate or criminal background should be filtered out immediately on top of their unsatisfying genetic purity. >>12645 >Thoughts on Huey Long and the concept of Every Man a King? Like? >>12657 > the ease with which I tan. Doesn't mean much. Many Swedes can tan easily and the Alpine type has this natural ability perhaps due to a higher exposure to ultraviolet radiation at higher altitutes. >>12678 Whether true or not, what matters is that he got elected. That didn't land him much power though, he still had to get approved by the older clique. >>12698 So the argument now is that he pulled a Biden? See: >>12700 Who needs other parties when you destroy democracy anyway? For the better or the worse, it's at least coherent with the ultimate fascist principle of Natural Law.
>>12703 >>12704 There come the shills trying to pass as fascists. You can know that by their championing of the strangest shooters there is. In this case a mere background check on Crusius' family and friends settles the matter very quickly.
>>12718 >Not really, the position here is pro-Ethnoglobe. No, it's pro ethno-lands. Regardless of opinions, facts are facts and only a fringe minority argues for the complete removal of other races (globe means world, ergo totality). >>12722 I think too. Most of them be lurkers IMHO. Very near 100% White. Other races don't even care or they post elsewhere. They're not exactly racially threatened like Whites are. >>12724 >Union of all races and all peoples >Be Brazil Troll post, right?
>>12759 Doomed to fail. A fire's flame shall rise, shit shall fall. Otherwise you'd need something like India, but happening in reverse. Only possible in a post-Kali Yuga world, with the divide between castes and races widening over time. That is, that each racial type would settle as its own racial strata and progressively isolate, but if the whole society would need to remain whole, a stringent caste system would need to be put in place. Then, as the logic goes, the higher race would then reach the point where, in the past, Aryans came and dominated Dravidians so that in this case the Whites who would have managed to isolate themselves in Brazil, survive and take power, would actually flee the shithole. As you probably guessed, it's a completely unfeasible and wholly demented scenario. >>12763 Yeah, the noble savage thing that was quite popular in Anglo-Saxon literature at some point. Cringe af.
>>12814 Let's open a thread on home-made DNA sequencing, if you're not shitposting, because this is quite interesting. No need to give your DNA code to some (((third party))).
>>12872 You can't sequence it yourself but you can analyse it yourself. Still need it sequenced by a third party
>>12868 >>only science >The character of a person should matter too. Those with too much of a politically divisive, degenerate or criminal background should be filtered out immediately on top of their unsatisfying genetic purity. Oh, of course, that goes without saying. Science can be helpful in many matters by providing us information on genetics and the like, but how exactly we choose to apply the science, and choosing what individuals we want in society is something beyond science, but something that cannot be ignored at all. Science doesn’t provide all the answers, unlike what bugmen think
>>12869 >In this case a mere background check on Crusius' family and friends settles the matter very quickly. What are you going to say, that his father was involved in New Age shit? This doesn't prove much of anything. You don't even have to like mass shootings, but I don't see anything that shows that El Paso was a false flag.
>>12894 >What are you going to say, that his father was involved in New Age shit? Stop. Don't even try. You know it's not just about the "New Age shit". >You don't even have to like mass shootings, but I don't see anything that shows that El Paso was a false flag. Who spoke of liking anything?
>>12896 >You know it's not just about the "New Age shit". No, I don't know, so if you have information, post it instead of just appealing to "come on, anon, we all know this"
>>12870 No, the position is pro-"Ethnoglobe" by default, if Aryan Whites do win the coming Hot war and establish our own nations, how long do you think it will be before we need more territory? with every family being encouraged through a similar program to the third reich to have 4 or more children, we have at most 20 or so years, if we seek to create communities and cities in accordance and harmony with nature. Within a few hundred years, at most, more likely about a century, we will have a racial ethnoglobe and then "Brother wars" will resume until the best of the best has been decided and we truly have a real Ethnoglobe.
Anyone know what happened to meguca and where the refugees went?
>>12871 The only savages that ever existed were Germanic, Slavic, and Celtic pagans.
>>12945 *noble*
>>12870 Might is right and Nature is characterized by eternal struggle. Like the other anon said, once we're back in control of our lands we're going to start pumping out White children like you'll never believe. We're not going to remain confined within our borders. Borders are mutable and subject to change, and a healthy population:land ratio is essential to a healthy Volk. A healthy, numerous Volk requires living-space, the more people you have, the bigger living-space you need. This is straight out of Mein Kampf. Ethnoglobe is the Völkisch doctrine updated to a 21st century reality. See pic related, which lays out the foundations of ethnoglobe theory on /fascist/. It has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is fringe now, but it is going to become mainstream. Ecofascism will lead to ethnoglobe.
>>12762 I don't get why members of our race fucked non-Whites, like Amerindians. They are just Chinks and Gooks, but more primitive. The only attractive Gooks, Negresses, and Amerindians have either undergone heavy plastic surgery or are heavily mixed with White DNA. Most, if not all of them, are fucking ugly, obscene evolutionary throwbacks that would have went the way of the Dodo bird, had the White Man not been domesticated by the Jewish slave morality known as Kikestianity. I swear I've seen some of the worst arguments for racemixing on Cuckchan, ever. They usually follow these lines of thinking. >Big bubble butt. Plenty of White women have nice, big asses. >Big Jewish milkers Plenty of White broads have big tits. >High cheekbones. Plenty of White women have that, and they're not so wide their face is flat, like with mongoloids. If someone is willing to flush fifty to a hundred thousand plus years of evolution down the toilet for a nice pair of breasts or a nice ass, then they may as well be a negro wearing a White phenotype. If you are a White man planning on racemixing, take a good look in the mirror. Every one of your facial characteristics are recessive. Your offspring will inherit none of your physical characteristics. If you want to figure out how a partner is a good, eugenic match to mate with. Does she have a similar eye color? Does she have the same hair color? European facial characteristics that are similar. Well congrats, you have bedded yourself a Eugenic partner. In my case that would a green eyed scottish or Irish lass from the British Isles. Phenotype is a very accurate way to determine racial purity, since non-White genetics are inherently dominant and White genetics are inherently recessive. If someone looks entirely White and acts White, the only non-White DNA they may have is mitocondrial DNA or Y-DNA, both of which are negligable. Based on my observations, if someone's phenotypically White, they either have no non-White ancestry or inherited no autosomal DNA from said ancestor, if they even have one. Plus, the stories of throwbacks, or more specifically, niggers being born to White couples are little more than fiction, concocted by soft-hearted doctors to save the marraiges of racemixing whores who slept with non-White men behind their husbands' backs. There's only so much genes our chromosome can store. Humans have 30,000 genes in all 46 chromosomes, almost all of which coding for phenotype. It is a genetic impossibility for an etirely phenotypically European individual to produce a nigger with a partner that looks entirely White. It is just Jewish fiction. Pure and simple. Pic related is a prime example of what I mean. The husband being a cuck assumes, "It mus be my Southern ancestors who fucked their slaves." When in reality, his wife is cheating on him, he knows, and is too much of cuck to do anything about it. Thus, his brain creates a throwback fiction to cope.
>>12822 once youve understood the nature of Whites vs the nature of niggers slavery imo becomes a moral and ethical alternative to genocide. knowing the types of cultures and activities they create in the absence of Whites its not ethical to stand back and let that happen even if its on another continent, and trying to integrate them into our ways is horrible. slavery is the most ethical and moral solution to the existence of niggers. the problem is is that Whites have proven themselves to be a bad combination of stupid, unintuitive, and soft hearted such that niggers infiltrate and pollute the blood too much. the ultimate and final example of this happening is seen in the end result of vedic culture. niggers do have feelings and they are beings, but knowing their inherent natures and having seen the play before, its best to just get rid of them. completely. >>12868 >if it looks White, if it behaves like a White and fights for the Whites, then it's White. perhaps, but when you take into account its ancestors and its eventual children, is it going to make White children, or is the proposed specimen a one off? >>12643 >Take Ivanka for instance, married a kike but her genes are still 100 percent Nordic if she left the tribe tomorrow, look up chimerism. was an ancient belief but was confirmed to exist by modern science at least in fruit flies. women retain the dna of every man that fucks them. so no, she is permanently no longer 100% nordic after fucking a jew. knowing that jewishness is ultimately determined by matrilineal line...... >>12951 >I don't get why members of our race fucked non-Whites they couldnt find brides back home.
>>12951 >I don't get why members of our race fucked non-Whites, like Amerindians In some places there weren't any White woman brought from Europe. White men unfortunately could not remain disciplined enough to not fuck the native women in these cases, leading to mestizos and other abominations. Especially in South America, some Whites were put in charge of large territories to exploit like Encomiendas were the Injuns were basically serfs or slaves. It was their job to gradually win them over to kikestianity and get them to farm for them. Just like in the US, I'm sure many of them bleached the natives. Evidently it must have happened on a mass scale given what a shithole South America is today. >I swear I've seen some of the worst arguments for racemixing on Cuckchan, ever. They usually follow these lines of thinking. They're thinking with their cocks, don't expect arguments dealing with sound sense or eugenics. This is half the reason lemmings need prevented by law from race-mixing. Not that it's "irresistible" or anything - most people of good instincts avoid it, but some need to be prevented. If I ever find myself looking at a non-White woman, the fastest fix is just to think of the mongrels that result from that match, it works every time.
>>12952 >look up chimerism. was an ancient belief but was confirmed to exist by modern science at least in fruit flies. women retain the dna of every man that fucks them. so no, she is permanently no longer 100% nordic after fucking a jew. knowing that jewishness is ultimately determined by matrilineal line...... Good to see other people talking about telegony / microchimerism here. This is another reason racemixing women are quite literally damaged goods. Virgin or bust.
>>12951 >I don't get why members of our race fucked non-Whites, like Amerindians. They are just Chinks and Gooks Back then the reason for it was, because the Spanish colonists did not bring enough Spaniard females into the colonies and this might of been due to the conquest of the Aztecs and Incas, where males were only needed, so they could fight the native-american civilizations and protect the lands. The second reason for it could be because of pure fetishism. >I swear I've seen some of the worst arguments for racemixing on Cuckchan, ever. They usually follow these lines of thinking. Right, but cuckchan is filled with niggers, spics, and kikes, their opinions on any matter is always retarded, because they're filled with christcucks who fetishize everything based on images. The last time I visited cuckchan after it became a shit hole, I saw anons there claim that they were bisexual or loved to mix raced based on memes that had no sense of reality to it. >Pic related is a prime example of what I mean. The husband being a cuck assumes, "It mus be my Southern ancestors who fucked their slaves." When in reality, his wife is cheating on him, he knows, and is too much of cuck to do anything about it. Thus, his brain creates a throwback fiction to cope. Pic related is not from the time of slavery and this picture is out of pure context so you're not making a point only acting as a schizo. Southern men did mostly fucked niggers, almost half of the niggers in America have a paternal line that comes from European Whites or Jews and that originated within the time of slavery. >>12643 >Take Ivanka for instance, married a kike but her genes are still 100 percent Nordic if she left the tribe tomorrow This make zero sense, blond hair and blue eyes does not mean you are Nordic, also Ivanka is more slavic than Nordic, her marrying a kike is likely because she has already is partially a kike.
>>12954 >I'm sure many of them bleached the natives bleached lmao get out of here with your cuckchan shit more like they were shitted by the natives. If you pour a cup of water into your toilet stew does it look White to you? Does south america look White to you, do mulattos look White to you?
>>12972 if you pour a cup of bleach into it I meant to say
Can you state other false dichotomies that were created by kikes? I've always believed that the Islamic and Christian dichotomy was something created on purpose to prevent Jews from getting caught in their subversions. Islam and Christianity both seem too similar to each other and the whole Islam is a religion of warriors and conquerors along with being generally violent seems to be a meme considering that Islam was not as violent as it was today.
>>12972 >>12973 >sperging this much over one word Obviously racemixing is flushing your genes and heritage down the toilet, no one denied this.
>>12979 Jews operate almost completely by false dichotomies, once one understands this they will begin to spot them quite easily. For example, in America it's just endless Democrats versus Republicans, or liberals versus conservatives. These are two classic examples of a Jewish false dichotomy, as wedge issues aside they often share some fundamental assumptions behind the surface differences. Another major one is Capitalism versus Communism, I discussed this here >>12293 . Also, as you've pointed out, Christianity versus Islam is a false dichotomy. They're both religions which have split off of Judaism and have taken root in different parts of the world. Christianity took Europe and eventually the New World, and Islam focused on the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and parts of Africa. What both of these universal religions do is permeate the consciousness of the masses with a form of proto-globalism that transcends race, nation and states. They are forms of proto-Bolshevism, both of them. The golems may fight with each other, but the Jews remain firmly in control. Both Christianity and Islam acknowledge the Jews as a Chosen People. >considering that Islam was not as violent as it was today. Salafism is the cause of this, which only became a major force in the 20th century, originating in Egyptian universities. Now whether it was (((amplified))) or not, that is real question
>>12980 >using your enemy's words without self awareness Your choice
>>12985 In this context, who would the golems be?
>>12992 Golems is the term I use for those who are, knowingly or unknowingly, willing or unwillingly, caring out the Jewish agenda, usually under the influence of a Jewish ideology. So both Christians and Muslims are, 99% of the time, golems. This same idea can be extended to other types of Jewish ideologies. Shabbos goyim might work even better.
Open file (210.24 KB 1204x467 48s1w7odenf31.png)
>>12972 Bleaching is one of the most retarded eugenics concepts I have ever fucking heard of. It works, yes. However, it takes five to ten generations to make a mullato's descendents White, and even then it's a herculean effort. Besides, repairing a mongrel's lineage comes at the expense of the White genepool. We would have to use IVF over many generations to purify those creatures without it effecting us, when it's cheaper to just shoot them. Why bother repairing tainted bloodlines, when you could improve the ones that remain more or less unspoiled through eugenics? It is a lot easier and can be done quicker. Why breed out non-White autosomal DNA in mongrels, when the end result, even after many generations, is a mediocre White person? Easier and quicker to breed overmen in my opinion? If we increased the White population's IQ to 120, we would never succumb to Kike subversion again. We could probably even conquer the Galaxy with an average IQ like that.
>>12944 shamik.ooo
>13000 posts If I'm right, we're now just about as big as the original /fascist/ on 8chan
Thanks for deleting the BitMessage spam, it's fedware.
Open file (18.12 KB 727x374 ClipboardImage.png)
Look at how (((organic))) these posts are. >>13004 Figured as much. Once I saw how it was being spammed on every board here that made it pretty suspect.
>>13004 How is it fedware? I didn't see what was being spammed but it sounds pretty alright. Can be routed through tor and I've never heard anyone complain about its encryption.
>>12948 If the plan is to fuck like niggers, it's possible we will hit bigger problems than taking the lands of non-White population which numbers would have already been reduced to some significant extent beforehand. This is especially true since there's a lot of White waste due to dysgenics, and more will die with the coming large scale conflicts, and I'm not too keen on the idea of reaching billions on a single world. So what is there that has not been refuted exactly?
>>12952 >once youve understood the nature of Whites vs the nature of niggers slavery imo becomes a moral and ethical alternative to genocide. knowing the types of cultures and activities they create in the absence of Whites its not ethical to stand back and let that happen even if its on another continent Ethics? About niggers? So for the sake of ethics we have to enslave them so we have to monitor them? What kind of lunacy is this?? Please. Just reduce their numbers, isolate them in primitive villages inside reserves and that's all. >>12985 >>considering that Islam was not as violent as it was today. >Salafism is the cause of this, which only became a major force in the 20th century, originating in Egyptian universities. Now whether it was (((amplified))) or not, that is real question If you are willing to ignore two major invasions and many other wars of course...
>>13039 >If the plan is to fuck like niggers It’s quite sad that you consider a healthy, high fertility natalist culture something that is akin to “fucking like niggers”. Though, unless we’re doing away with modern medicine and agricultural techniques (the latter is almost certain due to the destruction it brings) we would have to restrict the amount of children per couple by law, only allowing authorized and eugenically fit individuals to reproduce. >I'm not too keen on the idea of reaching billions We won’t. It’s unsustainable. In an ethnoglobe scenario, 95% to all non-Whites are killed off and then we begin to deal with our own people through eugenics and selective euthanasia. Quality must always come before quantity, and we should not seek to live on a planet overpopulated by White people. Utopia earth would consist of a maximum of a billion Whites scattered over the Earth, with most of the Earth untouched by anyone, and left to Nature
>>13041 The two majors wars don't mean anything, anon. The Jews funded the Islamic and invasion and it's possible that the Arabic invasion of Iran never actually happened, but the iranian elites shilled Islam for social change.
>>13046 I'm not impressed by plans of high fertility. That's stupid. For ages the European populations grew slowly. You admit it yourself that aiming for billions is unsustainable. The most obvious way to stay clear of this cap is precisely not to go for breeding like rabbits. Your plan is just so incoherent.
>>13058 I don't care about Iran. The two major invasions actually mean a lot. Why the fuck are you trying so hard to diminish their importance? Are you afraid that of us putting the actions of current Islamist running with knives in our streets into perspective, by comparing them to real wars and invasions? Because for the life of me I wouldn't understand why a White Nationalist or Fascist would dismiss them like you do, unless you're delusional or a Jew? I'm also leaving out the Muslim raids which required that European powers put an end to them, which explain in a large part some of the colonization of Northern Africa.
>>13061 The two invasions don't mean shit, what part of Jewish funding and shilling do you not understand? Are you a mudslime, because Islam isn't a powerful religion nor great religion that knows how to exploit the usage of power, this is an Islamic or nazbol shill in a diluted reality that Islam was a great religion because it knew how to survive or obtain what they wanted, because of muh muhammad or great Islamic conquers. Muhammad himself has been questioned to ever even existed and Islam being known to have stolen pagan customs and traditions along with the Jewish assistance their "conquests". Islam is no different than Christianity. >unless you're delusional or a Jews Nigger you're the fucking Jew thinking this dirt shit religion had any qualities of being le powerful. The mudslime are more of friends with kikes than Christcucks, even a Rabbis admit that the goat fuckers saved them from the Crusaders who hated Jews. Islam needs and heavily relies on rapid urbanization, overpopulation, and shekels to make itself powerful.
>>13060 Hardly incoherent. >remove shitskins >suppress reproduction of bad elements among Whites >encourage reproduction of the best
>>13069 I think it may be time to Archive this and start the next one, right BO? I think we can do more than just one billion, the earth can comfortably support many more than that, and if we are setting our sights for the stars we will need many more than just a billion to colonize any habitable planets that might be found or to terraform something like mars (the slow way, of course until we can figure out another better way). That said I wouldn't be opposed to keeping earth at exactly a billion if we had other places to put people, but my thinking is that until we have achieved our goals and there are no more of any other race we should not limit our own race in its breeding potential.
>>13071 >I think it may be time to Archive this and start the next one, right BO? If you're talking about this thread, apparently the max size a thread can have is 1,000 post before it auto-locks. I have the bump limit for this board set at 750, but if it's just going to be anchored up here, I was thinking of just keeping it up until it maxes out, unless there is some sort of downside to this I'm not aware of. Regardless, since you said it I just archived this thread again, apparently it had been four weeks. https://archive.fo/ltwpD The real issue is finding a global population level that doesn't lead to us destroying the planet at the same time. Apparently the population of the earth was something like one billion in the year 1800, before there had been widespread destruction of the environment and great leaps in agricultural productivity and the like, but I've seen this cited as a maximum number by some people who are very concerned with overpopulation and a healthy environment like Pentti Linkola. Honestly though it's something that would be worth looking into myself to see if I can any more informed figures myself. Concerning colonizing space, I don't think we should put too much faith in that, especially as a solution to overpopulation. To me it seems like there are far too many hurdles and too great of distances for it to become really practical, but I could be proven wrong, I guess. A lot of what people think we could do in space is based 100% of Hollywood movies and sci-fi junk in general, but you cannot find out until you try. The Faustian spirit's not daunted until its literally impossible. Before other planets I would really focus on the moon though, personally. If we can get something there, then it would be worth looking to set our sights even higher.
>>13071 >earth can support more With this line of thinking you can argue for multiplying the current human population many times over. The goal should be to find a balance where the quality of life for the existing population is at it's peak. I think the simplest way to approach the topic is jobs. How many people can you have until every job in the society is fulfilled and the rest have to work at meaningless jobs that don't matter or accomplish anything of value? Someone has to clean the toilets, but even if it's important to do, can you feel satisfied with yourself working at such a thing when there's another 500 people lined up for the job in case you quit? You're not important, and in some sense it's not important that you do it. You could also think of it from another angle; if every location on earth is inhabited, there's no mysteries left, no strange lands, you can explore it but there's probably someone nearby already. I'd argue that this has a negative effect on your mind and spirit; like there's nothing left on earth, no reason to go anywhere. >>13072 I think there's 2 interesting things to gain from space besides a backup in case earth gets fucked; new life forms and new sights (terrain that we have never seen in any book or photo).
>>13086 >I think there's 2 interesting things to gain from space besides a backup in case earth gets fucked; new life forms and new sights (terrain that we have never seen in any book or photo). I'm definitely pretty curious about alien life. I'm almost sure they exist, and likely in numerous forms and places, unless we are fundamentally wrong about everything that we've been told about space.
>>12494 It depends. Since White DNA is inherently recessive and non-White DNA is dominant, you could be 95% White or more due to autosomal DNA, if you express a European phenotype with no discernable non-White characteristics. If that's so, you inherited little or no non-White DNA. Geneology is inaccurate at times when determining someone's race, since phenotype is determined by inherited genes, not your ancestor. For example, if someone has an entirely White phenotype, then they have not inherited the genes for non-White characteristics, as a result of the recessive nature of White genetics. This why a lot of people with a non-European ancestors 3-5 generations prior almost always have a European phenotype. They inherit no non-European DNA, outside of Y DNA or Mitocondrial DNA. Unfortunatley, even if you were genetically White, I would not let you in to my hypothetical White Ethnostate, due to the precedent it would set. If you were let in, every shitskin would apply for entry, since a lot of them, in Central and South America, are predominately White by geneologically. This why people are one-droppers; it's the dangerous precedent it could set otherwise. Four or more generations removed a from a non-White ancestor, due to the fact you can't always make an exception for someone who has a wholly White phenotype, is my rule of thumb personally. If you look entirely White, are a White Nationalist, but have a non-European ancestor, I find it best not to mention it to fellow White Nationalists/Fascists like a White liberal faggot.
Open file (133.63 KB 1170x590 flat earth.jpg)
>>13088 >unless we are fundamentally wrong about everything that we've been told about space.
>>13102 Coriolis effect, and the use snipers put it too debunks flat earth, also the effect the rotation of the earth has on planes moving I think east to west as well, the Earth is an imperfect sphere, and so on. Time to put that shit to rest, it gets us nowhere, and accomplishes nothing.
>>13109 There are many more things which cast doubt on the globe such as the lack of curve drop, the fact that very tall distant objects don't appear to be leaning away with distance, the fact that horizon always rises to eye level regardless of altitude, the fact that there are many objects which can be seen despite the fact that if the numbers were true they would be hundreds of feet below the curve, etc, the fact that physics of water do not function in the level that globe theorists say it does, etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EQXcYYku8U Though, this is not very relevant to Fascism and practical politics.
>>13072 The downside was the reason you started letting these threads fall off the board in the first place retention of information and not knowing when there were new posts because it doesn't bump it up, if that no longer is a problem it's fine by me if it stays. >The real issue is finding a global population level that doesn't lead to us destroying the planet at the same time. Apparently the population of the earth was something like one billion in the year 1800, before there had been widespread destruction of the environment and great leaps in agricultural productivity and the like, but I've seen this cited as a maximum number by some people who are very concerned with overpopulation and a healthy environment like Pentti Linkola. I think in Linkola's mind that was a maximum of one billion humans of any variety, not just us, unless he was an ethnoglobalist who saw that only Nordic Aryans were of merit to keep in existence. I have to be honest I haven't read much beyond the quotes I've seen from him here and there, so feel free to correct me. >Honestly though it's something that would be worth looking into myself to see if I can any more informed figures myself. Yeah it's probably a good idea, to see what exactly could be supported while maintaining a balance and harmony with Nature. >Concerning colonizing space, I don't think we should put too much faith in that, especially as a solution to overpopulation.To me it seems like there are far too many hurdles and too great of distances for it to become really practical, but I could be proven wrong, I guess. Well if we are freed from the Einstein problem in physics and can find testable conclusions and theories, we may see some advancement in that area, and even if not, we have the moon and mars which are reachable conventionally and if they can be established could be places where we can survive even if the earth should be destroyed. >A lot of what people think we could do in space is based 100% of Hollywood movies and sci-fi junk in general, but you cannot find out until you try. The Faustian spirit's not daunted until its literally impossible. Before other planets I would really focus on the moon though, personally. I agree that jewish scifi and shit gets in the way, but I am not willing to let go of that dream until we determine it is absolutely impossible and that even includes not possible by way of suspended animation and long-term colony ships built for that purpose. >If we can get something there, then it would be worth looking to set our sights even higher. I agree.
>>13086 >With this line of thinking you can argue for multiplying the current human population many times over. Duh but a wqorld populated by seven billion Whites trying their damnedest to live in harmonby with nature rather than 700 or so million Whites and 7.3 billion shit skins, thew choice is celar, it is obvious we don't need that many but 2 or 3 is almost certainly manageable especially if they are living in locally supplied self-sufficient communities >The goal should be to find a balance where the quality of life for the existing population is at it's peak. I think the simplest way to approach the topic is jobs. How many people can you have until every job in the society is fulfilled and the rest have to work at meaningless jobs that don't matter or accomplish anything of value? Makes sense to look at it this way but we should have a few layers of redundancy around so that should something happen like a meteor or Yellowstone go boom or another Supervolcano or we start fighting amongst ourselves so that if something takes down one part of our over arching system that there are people around to take up the slack when needed. >Someone has to clean the toilets, but even if it's important to do, can you feel satisfied with yourself working at such a thing when there's another 500 people lined up for the job in case you quit? You're not important, and in some sense it's not important that you do it. I see this as well, it's an important question but no redundancy implies we have reached perfection which is not likely possible, not for a good long time anyway. >You could also think of it from another angle; if every location on earth is inhabited, there's no mysteries left, no strange lands, you can explore it but there's probably someone nearby already. I'd argue that this has a negative effect on your mind and spirit; like there's nothing left on earth, no reason to go anywhere. Perhaps, but this is already happening unless you count exploration of the oceans and the existence of a possible hollow earth, etc. etc.
>>13110 Our understanding of the universe is not perfect there will be always inconsistencies and gaps, but Aryans have known the planet was round since the Hellenes discovered it. Again I have found no purpose to flat earth that serves our cause whatsoever, it means nothing, it changes nothing and it is wrong, is it entertaining to think about sure but that doesn't help us.
Open file (339.24 KB 1600x1200 linkola inside 2.jpg)
>>13112 >The downside was the reason you started letting these threads fall off the board in the first place retention of information and not knowing when there were new posts because it doesn't bump it up, if that no longer is a problem it's fine by me if it stays. The original problem was that I had had the QTDDTOT threads set as cyclicals. We could see how many posts were in a thread so long as the cyclical had not hit bump limit for the board (so 750 posts), but after that it just stayed at 750 and worked as a cyclical, which made it slightly more difficult to see when there were new posts. Not making it a cyclical fixes the problem. Now whether it was really a problem in the first place for anyone beyond myself, I don't know kek. I just use the board a lot throughout the day so I like to know when there's new stuff. >I think in Linkola's mind that was a maximum of one billion humans of any variety, not just us, unless he was an ethnoglobalist who saw that only Nordic Aryans were of merit to keep in existence. I have to be honest I haven't read much beyond the quotes I've seen from him here and there, so feel free to correct me. As far as I know, you are correct about Linkola. I wish more of his writings were in English. He was obviously against mass-immigration into Western countries for a variety of reasons, supported eugenics, and has been noted on the record as supporting the Third Reich due to some of its policies, but I don't think that he can be called 100% /ourguy/. I like the guy though, and what is most valuable about him, I think, is the fact that his ideas can be so easily racialized. As we know, the main location of the population explosions that are happening and that are to come is in places like Africa, India and other third world non-White nations. Though Western countries have their own problems regarding wasteful consumption, it is these non-White countries that are contributing the most to overpopulation. Any policy which is intended to reduce the population of these countries will by necessity be targeting brown people overwhelmingly, working in our interests. So it is more of a twist on Linkola's ideas than a outright adoption of his thinking in all respects. >I am not willing to let go of that dream until we determine it is absolutely impossible and that even includes not possible by way of suspended animation and long-term colony ships built for that purpose. We need a good sense of adventure again too.
What is atheist paganism? Isn't that technically an oxymoron?
>>13125 It's possible to interpret it that way, I'll just say that. There are pagans who are functionally atheistic as far as I can tell, just see those who believe in Jungian archetypes and the idea of the collective consciousness. According to that view, the gods are basically an element deeply ingrained in our unconsciousness corresponding to certain symbols, ideas and the like. There are others who believe that the gods are just their ancestors (particularly heroic ones, I guess) that have had their deeds exaggerated and embellished over time. This is called Euhemerism and was done by some in antiquity even. I think the most common view here on /fascist/ is basically a type of Nature pantheism, whether they consciously recognize that or not. That's not atheistic though obviously.
Open file (1.39 MB 1442x1317 lamp jew pepe.png)
Just some random OC. I had nowhere else to share it.
Open file (435.72 KB 1442x631 lamp pepe.gif)
Neinchan's either fucking slow or not responding at all. What the fuck is wrong fellow neinchads?
>>13187 I’m having the same problem right now too. This seems to happen occasionally, hope it doesn’t go completely down like what happens every now and then
Edited last time by FashBO on 11/17/2020 (Tue) 18:12:58.
>>13189 I wish just for once nein's admin would tell us what causes these hiccups. It's annoying af and never do we get any explanation.
Open file (222.67 KB 742x1186 bt22.png)
>>13187 >>13193 >>13189 fucking up for me too. Have we ever gotten an explanation? i think that any questioning at all just leads people to being slandered as glowniggers when it is just some curiosity regarding the causes.
Why did the axis lose?
>>13209 The Allies had far greater manpower, more natural resources, far more production capacity, etc. Also in the case of allies of the Third Reich like Italy, they were hardly even ready for the war (the Pact of Steel signed in early 1939 even had a promise / provision not to go to war for at least five years iirc). I read in Tooze’s The Wages of Destruction that Hitler was keenly aware that, as things stood, the disparity between Germany and the Allies in terms of armaments would only get worse as time went on, so in many ways 1939 was the best year it could have began all things considered. I think another real problem was getting bogged down with the Soviets. I don’t know if a two-front war was necessarily avoidable, but in retrospect the way it was handled was a mistake – not that I’m any sort of military planner obviously. Many of the disadvantages Germany had would have been fixed if they had secured the Lebensraum required in the East. In Mein Kampf it’s clear that he was keenly aware of such issues. As a side note on Tooze’s book though, though he shows that the Axis was disadvantaged, I don’t recall him ever saying that it was totally irrational and hopeless interestingly. Germany was certainly a powerhouse in its own right and no one could deny it.
Should we have a cringe thread? I think we need to mock and bullying degenerate and spergs as to have quality control for our movements. Some will argue that we should take all the people we can get, however I say that those who might turn to degeneracy will be turned off by it if the degenerates are mocked. Interested to hear your thoughts.
>>13238 Like as in mocking cringey self-proclaimed Fascists and LARPers? It might be a good thread, at least as a reminder not to be this sort of person.
>>13239 >Like as in mocking cringey self-proclaimed Fascists and LARPers? Yes
>>13240 Sounds like it could be a good time, I've at least got a handful of images that I could contribute. If you want to make it I'll post them there, or I could make it, honestly whatever.
>>13241 Idk I'm gonna gather some stuff because I haven't saved all of it yet, it'd be great if you could make it
>>13242 Sounds good, I'll make it now.
Is this the only chan left on the internet with any sentience? All of the alternatives are chock full of kikes, antifa dick suckers and assorted shills. Nothing but bait and poor quality posts. Where did everyone go?
>>13259 It feels like it sometimes. After the fall of 8chan, though, it really does feel like everything is so much smaller nowadays. Some people went back to 4/pol/ and got absorbed into the pozz, others try to use /pnd/ on 8kun, which is also pozzed in its own way. Basically the only good places are here, 16chan and Neinchan. Where people have gone besides that I have no idea, maybe on Telegram, but I'm not familiar with that at all so I can't talk on it. It's really strange though. It feels so empty.
>>13265 > it really does feel like everything is so much smaller nowadays It really does. I frequent 8kun and it's fucking awful. The post are shit, the moderation is pozzed and they delete any useful threads and it's full of shills disrupting any productive conversations. 16chan is dead in the water, nobody even posts there on any board. This is the only good place left and I'm worried it will be ruined by the untermensch kike trash too. Also Neinchan feels too much like a honeypot with the glorification of violence... Something feels off. Not to mention it's ONLY on Tor... I just heard that Telegram has been collecting data on "Nazis" and is attempting to de-platform them. It really does feel empty as fuck... As a result it's hard to get a good source on the "real" news nowadays.
I don't want to sound schizo or anything, but do you anons believe that elves exist? If so, who are they and how come we rarely ever see them?
>>13268 Neinchan