/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

More

(used to delete files and postings)


Open file (78.34 KB 305x304 ClipboardImage.png)
QTDDTOT - Questions That Don't Deserve Their own Threads Blackshirt Board owner 09/06/2020 (Sun) 16:20:51 ID: 1e72a1 No.7682
If you have a one-liner question that won't generate much discussion and isn't related to moderation or requests, or want to post something of interest to /fascist/s but doesn't deserve a thread, post it ITT. That last thread went super fast. OLD THREAD >>5128 https://archive.fo/BiRxm
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/07/2020 (Mon) 04:46:06.
How many pictures do you have for QTDDOTDOQOTSODTTGQOTTQS fredz? :)
>>7687 I was going to make a special image for this one like I did with making that edit for the last one, but I didn't really know what to make so I just was lazy this time. I think I will prepare in advance for the next one and try to make something nice. The last thread was really quick compared to the first anyways.
What books would you recommend concerning power, leadership, and war?
How do I go about understanding how the economics in a fascist society work? Capitalism and communism seem to make a point of explaining their economic philosophies but I find things like Italian fascism and German national-socialism to be much more obtuse, at least at first glance.
It seems that Christianity is in a massive decline, what do you speculate could be the reasons for this?
>>7689 Don't forget the Archive.
>>7725 I think this is one area where we can apply what Giovanni Gentile said in “Origins and Doctrines of Fascism” on the topic of thought and action. In section 10 of this essay he says that Fascism is “not an explicated and definitive political doctrine, articulated in a series of formulae”. He goes on to say in the same section that Fascism — >”did not arise with a precise and determinate program. Often, having settled on an immediate goal to be attained, a concept to be realized, a course to be followed, it has not hesitated, when put to the test, to change direction and reject as inadequate, or violate of principle, just that goal or that concept. Fascism sought not to bind the future.” Of course, this does not mean that Fascism is utterly void of positive content, it means that we are flexible and do not see ourselves utterly bound by this or that alternative such as between so-called “capitalistic” and “communistic” measures. We have values we hold to, and from these proper economic measures can be made clear to us through experience, among these being the well-being of the nation as a whole in terms of national security, environmental health, unity of the nation, continued sovereignty and the like, the well-being of the families, workers, etc. With such values we would hardly want to introduce measures that undermine our own native industries or control over vital resources, so various forms of economic nationalism (protectionism and self-reliance to varying degrees, etc) follow almost as a matter of course. All of this is why Hitler said that his main concern was not to nationalize property, but to nationalize the minds of the people. Hitler did not hesitate to nationalize the property of capitalists who refused to serve the national interest. A good example of this is Junkers Aircraft and Motor Works. Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament and was removed from his position and the company was taken over by the state. It’s also worth checking about books like Mosley’s “Fascism 100 Questions Asked and Answered” or “Tomorrow We Live” for good overviews of the idea of the corporative state, where different industries and areas of expertise are harmoniously reconciled and represented in bodies of experts. >>7729 Good catch I’ll do that now and edit it in
>>7730 >rearmament I guess I understood why Hitler had to do that but if keys say Germany was not in a war, would Hitler allow Hugo to do whatevrr he wanted to?
>>7728 In reality it’s been dying for centuries, especially since the “Enlightenment”. More recently though I’d argue that the atomization and destructive of communities caused by the Industrial Revolution led to much of the decline. The individual found themselves disembedded from all norms and they were a law unto themselves, and as the masses at large became politicized for basically the same reasons and stressed over modernization, it gradually became discovered that norms, governments, social issues and the like could be questioned, changed or outright abolished. I’d also argue that autistic literalism from some Christians drove some away, and all of this was made worse through Jewish influence, who obviously see religion ultimately as a hindrance to their ultimate goals. Christianity is an instrument outliving its usefulness. Popsci and irreplicable sociology studies are their main tool today. What is has taken its place is leftism, which is essentially an even more cucked form of Abrahamic slave morality. Along with this we are left with wishy-washy stuff like “Moralistic therapeutic deism”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralistic_therapeutic_deism It will keep dying though. And something will have to fill the void. People are lacking meaning, and egoistic materialism does not provide it. >>7743 Within the confines of the law and so long as he is acting in the national interest, then yes I would assume that there would be much more leeway.
Should I pay attention to crop circles? Over the last 15 years, they have become more elaborate and cleaner but I cannot know if they aren't mere photoshops. If they are true, what could be behind this? Looks like giant printers could do that lel.
>>7696 Stuff Julian the Apostle read. He went from inoffensive bookworm to Emperor, winning battles against Germans.
>>7725 Try Feder.
>>7728 It sucks, that's why. It was ill minded and abusive.
>>7730 >Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament Traitor. He deserved much worse.
What the fuck is with the Chink shills done by (((White nationalists))) and (((nationalists))).
>>7757 If you're talking about just pictures you've seen online I wouldn't trust them at all. >>7762 What is your criteria for a "chink shill"
>>7764 People who think China is le based and redpilled and is going to save the world from muh liberalism.
>>7762 Likely case they are (((Duginists))) Jews and /or mutts who think that China and Communism is the ultimate case agaisnt "American or Anglo liberalism" or liberalism in general, despite the fact that liberalism and communism has been working together since World War I.
>>7765 In that case, I have to agree with >>7766. If you haven't read it already, check out this long article which covers China shills, Duginists, crypto-Communists and all other people of this ilk https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/05/18/alt-right-duginism/
>>7764 >What is your criteria for a "chink shill" Someone who thinks the Xi is either going to save the west or the world from ZOG and pozzed ruining the fucking world right now. I've seen these cucks on Twatter, 8kuck and nu/pol/ and they have been shilling China and make retarded excuses such as "Oh well they're just using them for economic resources and power that's all has nothing to do with the Jews establishing their government goyim." Or " muh china isn't a communist country." these niggers are annoying. >>7766 >Likely case they are (((Duginists))) Jews and /or mutts who think that China and Communism is the ultimate case agaisnt "American or Anglo liberalism" or liberalism in general Funny because aren't there reports of China literally accepting and sucking off the Jews giving them some power within the state and LGBT, BLM being supported by Chinkland?
Open file (448.98 KB 1250x954 china and israel.jpg)
Open file (317.70 KB 1242x1686 israel china.jpg)
Just show this to Chink shills.
>>7769 You forgot the the degeneracy going on within China such as the LGBT and niggers fucking chinks in chinkland.
>>7768 >>7769 The people who worship china only do it because e-celebs told them to do so. Right wingers are pretty cucked and retarded especially the ones who came from cuckchan /pol/, considering they are willing to believe anything at told to them by someone who claims to be a fascist or on their side or if it boosts their fragile and useless egos. The reliance and love of e-celebs and lying about Communism being "based" will not resolve our current trending issues it only makes us incompetent, ignorant, and weak. Anyone who thinks China, Iran, and Russia are on our side is a dishonest fool.
>>7779 The behavior of many people towards ecelebs has to be the clearest demonstration of the truth of the lemming phenomenon. Many of these ecelebs have certain terms that they are known for using, and they quickly spread among places like Twitter and Cuckchan. I'm sure there are other examples, but the one that comes to mind for me first is terms used by Keith Woods such as "racist liberal" and "cultural capitalism"
>>7781 >The behavior of many people towards ecelebs has to be the clearest demonstration of the truth of the lemming phenomenon. Yes, and depression along with constant everyday browsing of the internet and thinking that being "blackpilled" is a personality has contributed to this as well. If these fools would learn to think for themselves and take actions into their own hands then we probably wouldn't be in this situation today. >Many of these ecelebs have certain terms that they are known for using, and they quickly spread among places like Twitter and Cuckchan. I'm sure there are other examples, but the one that comes to mind for me first is terms used by Keith Woods such as "racist liberal" and "cultural capitalism" Ah yes I know of the infamous racist liberal strawman, but it's nothing but a buzzword to make you feel idiotic and that you aren't a true "fascist" or "White nationalist". In reality people like Keith don't understand what liberalism truly is and what it even means, they desperately need a scape goat, so they can continue to control the minds of idiots.
>>7785 Exactly, I've said the same thing in regards to being blackpilled. They're overly passive and emotional, and what they are lacking is a proper unity of thought and action. If they attempted even to a small extent to live out their beliefs, improve themselves, redpill others and do whatever they think should be done, I highly doubt they would be so blackpilled. The response to degeneracy and anti-White rhetoric should not be impotent anger, but growing determination. I used to be demoralized, but since I stopped caring what lemmings think, and since I have realized that waiting for a savior is cuck behavior, I have been overdosing on Whitepills, especially with the chaos going on in America.
A few questions and apologies if I come across as a retard (I am one). I was wondering if some anons could spoonfed me or other newfags when it comes to fascism and other stuff. What is Fascism? It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Is communism and Fascism the same thing and why do people like to say they're the same? What is wrong with libertarianism? And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. Again sorry I'm a retard.
>>7801 1/2 >What is Fascism? See >>5737 for one attempt at providing a concise definition of Fascism. I wrote that definition myself so I can try to elaborate if needed. >It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? A British Fascist who lived in the same era as Adolf Hitler, Mussolini and many other great Fascists named Oswald Mosley wrote in his book "Fascism 100 Questions Asked and Answered" that there is one Fascist movement, though it manifests in different expressions in each nation as a result of different cultures, conditions and racial characteristics. I don't think many here with disagree with that characterization, but with National Socialism the difference is the link with race. I don't want to say that the other Fascist movements weren't racially-based to an extent since they weren't Civic Nationalists who thought that just anyone could join the nation like one can a club, but in National Socialism we start to see an application of biological and racial science to the political and social realms with laws preventing miscegenation, positive and negative eugenics (elevating good elements and removing the bad), etc. Many of the ideas more particular to National Socialism can be found in German science at the beginning of the 20th century, such as the idea of Lebensraum, eugenics, etc. So Fascism and National Socialism overlap, but they are not identical. >Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Hitler was not a leftist. In Mein Kampf he frequently talks about hierarchy, and how ideas such as abolishing private property are insane. He acknowledges the plight of the working class at his time, but he realizes that their movement for better conditions was co-opted and used as a weapon against the state and society at large. This co-opted workers movement didn't strive towards social harmony and a united community of people bound together by blood, but social conflict, leveling egalitarianism and other destructive and unworkable ideas. Hitler wanted to reconstitute his people into a harmonious society of functionally differentiated people working together as an integrated, organic whole. Hitler was a socialist, but this was not meant in the sense of how leftists use the term today. The Socialism of National Socialism refers more to a communitarian-minded worldview. In a speech on July 28, 1922 Hitler said the following about how he envisioned Socialism: >Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation; whoever has understood our great national anthem, "Deutschland ueber Alles," to mean that nothing in the wide world surpasses in his eyes this Germany, people and land - that man is a Socialist. >Is communism and Fascism the same thing Not in the slightest. Communism is a materialistic political ideology which stands on the principles of materialism (everything is just matter bouncing around in the void), atheism, internationalism and the abolition of unjust hierarchies and exploitation. They view history as progressing towards some sort of moneyless, stateless utopia from the internal contradictions of capitalism. If you have ever heard a leftoid say that we're in "late stage capitalism", this means that they are saying that capitalism is about to implode due to its internal contradictions and issue in socialism, a stage which comes in Marx's historical scheme before communism. Gonna split this post up.
>>7801 >What is Fascism? It is the same as National Socialism? Do they go hand in hand or are they separate? Fascism is different from National Socialism. I view NS as being something that uses Fascism as tool to reach it's goal of creating and sustaining a society based upon the Laws of Nature which directs us to preserve and if possible improve our race and to preserve its homogeneity. It does not use Fascism directly, just something akin to it, politically and government wise, they are based on similar foundations, as they arose at around the same time. Ultimately they are separate but related ideologies, Fascism is a system of the state without any inherent goal. National socialism has a goal, an endless and perpetual goal, first and foremost with the totalitarian state seen as a necessity and means to an end to preserve your people and promote their freedom, without letting them descend into degeneracy. >Was Hitler a socialist? is he considered a leftoid? Hitler was a socialist, defined as one who puts the common good and thus, the happiness and betterment of his people, before all else. This is completely separate and in opposition to Marxist Socialism because Hitler, and Nature, viewed and dictate, respectively that private property is a necessity, as is the principle of free exchange on the economic front, though only if it doesn't conflict with the interests of the Nation. Hitler was never a leftist, as he viewed himself and his movement as above and wholly separate from the Left-Right False Dichotomy, as any true national socialist does. We are Third Position not on either the left or the right. If you tried to quantify NS within that dichotomy, not only are you boiling the ideology down to essentially nothing, you are discarding more than 90% of it's philosophy and meaning. 1/2
>>7801 2/2 > why do people like to say they're the same? Retards who don't read anything just throw terms around without knowing what they mean. This is why dumb boomers can simultaneously call Antifa thugs "communists" and "fascists". If one even scratches the surface they will see an ocean of difference, but for the average NPC this is too difficult. >What is wrong with libertarianism? It's too individualistic. Most libertarians spurn community and societal well-being for their selfish ends. We Fascists and National Socialists certainly do not tolerate parasites, but we are not against helping our fellow man when he needs it, and helping him back up on his feet. In contrast to libertarians we realize that society is made up of interdependent groups of people, and that the well-being of the society as a whole is good for the well-being of the vast majority of individuals. A balance of egoism and altruism needs to be found, and today we have strove far too far into egoistic individualism. Collective physical and mental well-being of society effects everybody alike. One's fortunes are dependent on the success of failure of the society at large. >And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. I'd say no to the first in light of what I have said above, but in regards to "nice guy NatSoc" I'm not entirely sure what you mean. If you're meaning "NatSoc who isn't a skinhead screaming about niggers constantly" than yes, there is such a thing and many people here would probably want to distance themselves from such a stereotype as well. If you mean a NatSoc that is compatible with the dominant sensibilities of the current society, than no, that will never be a thing and that is a good thing.
>>7801 >Is communism and Fascism the same thing and why do people like to say they're the same? This the other guy addressed. >What is wrong with libertarianism? And is there such a thing as a libertarian fascist or nice guy NatSoc. Libertarianism is wrong, because it's basic assumption of the world is faulty, or rather is an exercise in wish fulfillment rather than a way to live or something observable in nature. It's most basic component is the concept of the Non-Aggression Principle which, if violated, would somehow, with no or a minimal state, kill, or otherwise deal with, any who violate this Principle. It is essentially based on the faulty assumption of equality, it presumes all people want peace first and foremost and will avoid aggression upon anyone else. A simple glance at nature disproves this assumption at its core from the microbaterial level where all life is killing all other life in a constant struggle on up to the macro. Where plants fight a ceaseless battle for survival and nobody sees it, leading, finally to us, and other animals. Outside of our specially created enclaves that are as seperate from nature as possible,(which is bad in and of itself) and even within them, in many respects, we must struggle for existence, every day. So there is no libertarian Fascist or rather National Socialist, in this respect. Fascism and Libertarianism are similarly contradictory as few libertarians care about or for a state, and even among those who do, there is no tangible common bond between those who exist under their imagined state that can prevent conflict from occurring or create common ground upon which to mediate conflicts within the society. There is no nice guy Nat Soc, A True National Socialist is a revolutionary who seeks to uproot what we live under now and build something better and more natural in its place.
>>7768 It's the differential effect of Eastern Europe and China being less utterly cucked giving off the impression they're the solution. The secret sauce being that the most corrupt countries are actually going to be the first to rise. To stop this, kikes will throw Eurasia against us. Reminds me of one of the many prophecies about the Great Monarch who will fight against Russia.
>>7807 >There is no nice guy Nat Soc, A True National Socialist is a revolutionary who seeks to uproot what we live under now and build something better and more natural in its place. Well said, I like that much better than my attempted answer to that.
>>7771 Got memes?
>>7789 >overly passive and emotional Women.
>>7820 They might as well be women.
>>7802 >Many of the ideas more particular to National Socialism can be found in German science at the beginning of the 20th century, such as the idea of Lebensraum, eugenics, etc And influenced by French theories on race too, which is totally at odds with the egalitarian obsession pushed by Jews. I wonder what a Fascist France would have looked like. I admit, it's very hard to mentally project that kind of alt-history. Perhaps something very close to a kingdom closely tied to the Church, but did that ever work well considering the inner essence of Christianity? >German Socialism For US people it's a strange concept because Socialism is quickly associated to statist leftism with massively legalized theft and redistribution to all based on egalitarian values of which the essential function is the unrelenting advent of the dysgenic society. >Communism is a materialistic political ideology which stands on the principles of materialism (everything is just matter bouncing around in the void), atheism, internationalism and the abolition of unjust hierarchies and exploitation Yes, they sell it as social justice but the truth is that like all system that stem from Jewish minds, they purport to destroy just (legitimate and functional) hierarchies through a straight and rigorous application of collectivism, which is a socially and economically structured form of egalitarianism. >>7803 NS seems to be a Fascism with a solid racial foundation and a properly organized economical scheme. >>7804 >This is why dumb boomers can simultaneously call Antifa thugs "communists" and "fascists" And on the same fucked up trope, with antifas who call the ZOG's oligarchs "fascists". Every form of power is abuse to them, so it all goes into the fascist bag. Their reading is totally broken and they could never ever explain what fascism is. They just know that "it's bad". I'm not even making this up. >>What is wrong with libertarianism? >It's too individualistic. It's also too unaware of the working of money. When it comes to banks, they just step back into the past with a profusion of small banks, while pointing fingers at the "fiat money" or the evil "central banks", not even knowing that shit started to get real with Hitler entirely nationalized the German one. It was the final straw that broke the Jew's back.
>>7824 NS is far more complex than that though, as I see it. Fascism is an umbrella term for Totalitarian states, as well as an ideology in and of itself. Simply through a similar state structure NS falls under "fascism" but NS is greater than that alone it is more complete and has a goal and underlying principles that will ensure there is no, or at least minimal, tyranny within the state, for those it represents and protects while being overtly tyrannical and destructive to those outside of it's protection that attempt to harm or are harming those it's protects.
>>7824 >I wonder what a Fascist France would have looked like. There was a fascist France, although I would of loved to see a National Socialist France instead.
>>7824 >with antifas who call the ZOG's oligarchs "fascists". Exactly. For commies literally everything is fascist. The good thing though is that thanks to people like this who can't help but throw this term around willy-nilly, I was led to look into Fascism myself to learn what it really was, particularly due to the endless application of the term to ZOGnald
>>7764 A chink shill is one who says china numba one. The problem is that China is fucked up thanks to proxy kikes installing communism in their government. If Chinese people stop supporting the government and not have insectoid mentality and have some empathy for their fellow kin, then you can say that they're based. But remember, they're not.
Just got hit by another spambot attack. Fixing it now. Captcha is per post right now.
>>7824 >They just know that "it's bad" This is the result of decades of indoctrination following WW2, in which children since cradle are taught that the concept of totalitarianism and fascism are synonymous.
>>7827 So fascism is some kind of RPG summer kampf with no real plan? Twinkies for boudoirs? Or is it a cleaning tool that paves the way to the more organized NS system? >>7828 >F#FR Really? Please clear me up on history anon. >>7837 You're asking gooks to be non-gooks. Niggaz will send something into space before that ever happens. >>7885 Yep, noticed that. The power of Captain Tsha has been increased too. There's a problem though because the new code is not displayed in the floating window.
I saw an article on cuckchan archives that claimed that 80% of females preferred dark skin Whites because they found them attractive but unfortunately I couldn't save the article and can't find it do to the archive being completely gone for some reason. Is there any truth to this at all?
>>7828 >>7898 There never was a fascist France, the closet thing they ever got to that was the Nazi occupation and Vichy France, but Vichy wasn't fascist, they only took some fascist elements and idea and ideals and just became more authoritian.
>>7901 White women are loyal, don’t fall for Jewish sexual D&C.
>>7904 I'm not referring to blacks, I'm referring to medcucks who think they're a master race due to their we wuz kangzing Indo European civilizations. It specifically said "dark skin Whites".
>>7906 Oh, now that I read your post again I see my mistake. The only thing I have is this, but note that Match.com is owned by (((Gary Kremen))) so there is likely an agenda here
>>7907 Ok so how can I find this article, because I highly doubt this is even true and that this is further proof that Mediterraneans are just as retarded as niggers.
>>7909 I just put the headline in quotes and can’t find anything like that and I found the exact pic on iFunny. I think it’s medcucks making a bait pic here
>>7909 The article can't be found anywhere, but it's no surprise medniggers think that they're attractive when in reality the only think attractive about medcucks and specific groups like Italians are there women, while the men look ugly as fuck. Also match.com is not a good example of finding results considering it's pozzed and the site has reportedly have had two cases of sexual assault or rape. So, I'm thinking that this is fake and that Italians are struggling with the fact that they haven't been considered attractive since the 1910s.
>>7911 Correct if I'm wrong, but aren't Eastern and Northern Europeans considered the most attractive? This isn't said to boost our ego, because I generally don't care what women think what comes to attraction, but I think I heard from one Italian claiming that a lot of the women in the South preferred Northerns overall, but again he could be full of shit considering he got dumped for a man that lived in Milan.
>>7912 All I know is that most women prefer their own in group races and ethnicity, I don't know anything about Italians getting cucked. All I know is that Southern European are no way in hell attractive and that meds only knkw how to use male models to struggle with the fact that their race does not look like plastic surgery 101.
>>7914 >All I know is that most women prefer their own in group races and ethnicity I’ve heard both. I’ve simultaneously seen data that supports the fact that most people prefer partners of the same race, but I’ve also seen claims that Whites are universally more desirable as partners, such as this: >But of the 90% of the reported racial preferences, 89.9% are preferences for White people. So . . . that is bad. And I’m not just talking about White-on-White preferences. I’m talking about all my clients, only 55% of whom identify as White. https://theestablishment.co/yes-your-dating-preferences-are-probably-racist-e58ae2fd625d/index.html
>>7898 Fascism is a blank slate onto which you can project any ideal or ideology you want, it has no inherent end goal save perhaps the existence of the state and all within it, NS is fascistic but has a separate foundation and one closer to the truth.
>>7945 I've had similar thoughts. There is a lot of good in Fascism, but it has always felt like it is missing purpose or soul
>ordered a pinephone >it was a couple days late Was it intercepted by the NSA? Asking here so I don't have to explain to normies why the NSA would want to target me. How might I be able to verify the hardware hasn't been modified?
>>7968 I'm guessing it was delayed because of corona nonsense. But, I am sure anons in the security autism thread can help.
What do we do if this site dies? It's been super rough the last day or two. I think Neinchan would be bad for /fascist/
If we ever create a NS state would things like anime and Vidya be banned?
>>8007 Doubtful that those would ever be outright banned. At the very least we hope to make a society where young men are not *completely* wasting their lives away on soulless escapism and shitty video games.
>>8008 I don't want waste my time or my life on these things solely of course, but I would still like to watch them on my free time when I have nothing else to do.
>>8010 I really don't care, as long as it doesn't go agaisnt and supports NS ideals or is safely apolitical, but I would much prefer all entertainment being European and National Socialist.
>>8010 That’s basically my view of it. I have noticed an undeniable trend between obsessive interest in anime and degeneracy, but even I occasionally watch a show or play a game. It all depends on how much, and what type of shows one is watching. Wasting ones life is certainly a bad thing. I have nothing but regret when I look back and realize that I spent almost the entirety of my teen years sitting alone in my basement playing Xbox or PC shit, with no benefits gotten from that.
>>8011 Also this.
>>7999 No idea if BO has already a clearweb bunker in place. In case he did not, Neinchan is the only available bunker, and it's a good place to regroup. Stop spreading discord among our communities, that's what our enemies do.
Thoughts on making a /fascist/ film thread?
>>7904 Explain the first chart please, the one with red, orange, yellow and green squares.
>>7945 It's not so bland and we could refine it though. Fortunately Evola deeply criticizes the Italian version and provides a system that fits better with typical European culture. Its wide range opens up to a changes on a greater scale which lead to kingdoms and empires. Unsurprisingly, a pinch of more biological racism and a clearer and practical economical model brings it very close to NS.
>>8033 What did he had in mind for a better state?
>>8028 Go for it. >>8032 It is trying to represent the reply rate by females of various races to females of various races. I assume it refers to percentages. So looking at the chart it would say that White women respond to 29% of White men who send them a message on whatever dating site this is taken from. This graph seems to show that non-White females see White males as far more desirable than other males
>>8038 More Sol. >>8043 If that's the way it's meant to be read, then I don't see how the numbers show wywymen being particularly more racist than men. Their replies to White males is just 8% above them replying to niggers. That chart does not even show White males always getting the better scores in chances of replying by any women of any race.
>>8051 Whites are still the gold-standard on this chart with an average of 29.2% for their reply rate, compared with the worst, which to no ones surprise is poojeets 20.8%. I'd have to dig into the study though if there's anything deeper to it. Apparently it's from OkCupid.
Will /liberty/ and /monarchy/ ever come the webring?
>>8059 I hope they do. I think they'd be better off here on the Cafe in terms of both traffic and long-term stability.
Are Nazbols unironically gay?
>>8079 I think they've proven themselves subversive time and time again, truthfully.
>>8080 Yeah but are many of them homosexuals?
>>8082 Admittedly I don’t spend very much time in areas where NazBol types frequent, but I think there is an almost undeniable correlation between the more left-wing nationalists and various forms of sexual devinacy such as being a tranny or a homosexual. This is all in reference to online people only course.
>>8083 For Strasserists see: >>7102 Of course they’re not really Nazbols in a proper sense but there is enough overlap in their circles.
>>8079 >>8082 There was some Nazbol tards who openly admitted they were gay or a tranny, Also I think there was this one time on Twitter were this hashtag for spics referred to Nazbols openly admitting to be gay, and there might been some discords of Nazbol nigs doing degenerate shit despite hating on muh racist liberals. In reality Nazbol is gay and any idealology that comes from nu/pol/ or twitter is 100% going to be filled with faggotry, so don't be suprised.
>>8085 It almost seems like the more obscure and off-the-wall a given ideology is, the more likely it is to attract attention seeking gays and trannies who adopt it as yet another “identity”. What a surprise.
When one's main identity is solely based on one's anus, it begs to acquire a stronger one that seems based on political and principled motives. A certain level of absurdity mixed to edginess makes it a safe place but also something exotic and dangerous.
Is starting an argument the best way to disrupt productive discussion on an anonymous imageboard?
Open file (7.94 KB 250x232 soyboy wojack.jpg)
>>8219 >Is starting an argument the best way to disrupt productive discussion on an anonymous imageboard? No, posting soijacks and strawmanning everyone is
>>8220 Soijack is honestly the worst meme to exist, considering it ended up validating retarded man childs.
>>8227 I mostly hate it too, especially with what it evolved into. It was funny when it only get applied to certain types of posts (i.e. literal soyboy-tier stuff) but soon it get extended onto literally everything and every thread on Cuckchan is now greetexting some word in your post with a soijack attached to the reply. I hate "cope" and "seethe" as well.
>>8229 It was funny when we were mocking actually soyboys, but now it has become nothing more, but mockery of others who don't agree or like what you like. It's further proof that cuckchan is shit and ruins everything to exist.
>>8235 > It's further proof that cuckchan is shit and ruins everything to exist. They're stagnate at this point in creativity. They've been mentally enslaved by Pepe and Wojack. /pol/ is the saddest part. It's literally just a Trump cheerleading squad at this point. Thank God for places like /fascist/ and Nein.
>>8227 Especially on /tv/ chan. If you aren't a contrarian by their standards, it's instant soyboy. And yes I acknowledge the irony, but at least I know is Jew propaganda. Most people don't.
>>8243 No one cares what /tv/ thinks because it's filled with nothing, but retards who just cry about movies being shit without explaining why, or being vague with their reasonings. I remember when an anon posted a screenshot of the retards shilling Joker as if it's a movie that was made by White people and not faggot niggerpillers who act as if society has done all the worst evils to them.
Hi /fascist/. I just wanted to get your opinion on this video here: https://youtu.be/odGk84Uq1ws sorry if a bit too off-topic there are not many political boards as of now.
Is islam really the ultimate anti-liberal religion or is this another massive shill.
Open file (264.03 KB 720x867 islamic state.png)
>>8286 I admire a lot in Islam. This will trigger the spergs, but I think out of all the major religions out there today it has the most dedicated followers (on average) and the best social policies, many of which align with my own views already. They're bad on race though, of course.
>>8284 First time seeing this it looks interesting will give it a watch. >>8286 Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal nor is being anti-liberal a cool thing. The whole muh liberalism crap is to deflect that abrahamics and communism have both fucked over the world with their retarded beliefs and ideals. Islam is a universal religion that plays pretend to be against the Jews and Liberalism if it means they can't continue to create more inbreds and profit. Islam is no better than Judaism and the whole it's anti-Jewish is a big lie.
>>8287 >Best social policies Anon, Islam is not safe from western democracy nor is it's inbreds who fight for Allah just because a good example of social policies or outcomes coming from Islam. Places like Albania, Turkey, Tunisia, Cyrus, Guinea, and even the Ottoman Empire were all interested and devolved into the philosophies of Western democracy and liberalism. Is there any other good legitimate reason that isn't a made up fable?
>>8288 >Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal Are we really going to pretend that Islam is concerned with the consent of the governed, human freedom or stuff like equality before the law? Of course there are Islamic liberals here in the US especially since Muslims overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, but if people actually followed the doctrine it'd be completely incompatible with liberalism it seems like. >>8288 is right though, too weak on race, which is what matters most.
>>8288 >Anyone who claims that Islam is anti-liberal is a moron, Islam is not anti liberal nor is being anti-liberal a cool thing. Why is Islam not antiliberal? I agree that the liberalism thing is quite misunderstood, but Islam is not liberal either, but it doesn't mean we should take inspiration or larp as them. >The whole Islam is anti-Jewish is a lie How so? A lot of people were shilling that it was anti-Jewish, but now we're say it's not?
>>8291 >Are we really going to pretend that Islam is concerned with the consent of the governed, human freedom or stuff like equality before the law? Islam is anti-equality when it comes to their patarichies and loyal zealots. It is still universal, just because you hate equality and humanism does not mean you're le based" China is against human rights and yet they still managed to create nothing more but Chinese bugmen. Also Muslims in the US are not the libshit or humanists faggots, North Africa and Iran has these faggots as well. >>8292 Islam is not anti-liberal, because it's way too universal, it's basically that whole idea that as long as they claim to be Islamic. look and act Islamic, then it's halal. Let's not forget that Islam is basically a Arabiac nationalism. >How so? A lot of people were shilling that it was anti-Jewish, but now we're say it's not? Because Muslims have protected and been more friendly to Jews since the Crusaders took Jersualem. They took pride of "liberating" it from the Christians and giving the lands back to the Jews. Hell, let's not forget that goat fuckers also were working with the kikes when they've invaded Spain and enslaved Europeans.
>>8290 I'm talking in an abstract sense here. What I praise is doctrines, not how actual sandpeople or non-Whites conduct themselves. Being against usury, alcohol, fornicators, adulterers, homosexuals, feminists is all based. I would punish many of these things in my ideal society as well. >>8292 The weakness with kikes is that they're able to convert. I've lurked in a few places over the years and listened to some lectures by radicals and they hate kikes and use triple parentheses just like us, but there's no racial side to it. An ethnic Jew who takes shahadah and practices Islam faithfully is a good Muslim brother in their eyes. Same issue as with Christianity.
>>8291 >too weak on race, which is what matters most. Wrong, it's not just race, but it's also their spiritualism as well. Dharma nation explains this perfectly on why Islam or any abrahamic religion is against concepts that fascist and the Aryans believed which is the natural law/order of the world is what should we should follow behind, which is something religions like Islam are completely against with their idea of dominion over nature, universalism, and race mixing. Islam is no friend to Europeans nor is it something we should admire at all considering the Aryans have done something that Islam has done as well, but in more contrast with natural law.
>>8293 >Islam is not anti-liberal, because it's way too universal Universalism predates liberalism as an ideology. You can be anti-liberal and universalist at the same time. Just look up some definitions of liberalism. They're irreconcilable if we're talking in ideal senses of the two systems. >Let's not forget that Islam is basically a Arabiac nationalism. How are you claiming that it is simultaneously universalistic and Arab nationalism at the same time? It's just typical universalistic cuckery: >Ahmad (22978) narrated from Abu Nadrah: Someone who heard the khutbah of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on the second of the days of at-Tashreeq told me that he said: “O people, verily your Lord is One and your father is one. Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab, or of a red man over a black man, or of a black man over a red man, except in terms of taqwa. Have I conveyed the message?” They said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has conveyed the message.
>>8296 >>8296 >Universalism predates liberalism as an ideology. You can be anti-liberal and universalist at the same time. Just look up some definitions of liberalism I don't think you understand that the problem wrong with liberalism is that it is universal. Universalism leads to concepts such as there is no such thing as race and that religion or what the elites what of you is the only thing that matters. Universalism has lead to things such miscegenation. You can't be truly anti-liberal without being anti-universal. >How are you claiming that it is simultaneously universalistic and Arab nationalism at the same time? Because Arabic nationalism and univeralism do not contracdict each otrher. The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam. but there is just an exception that no one should face prejudice for being different as long as they are Islamic and speak Arabic. Are we really going to forget that when the Arabs invaded Iran they literally enforced that Iranians had to speak Arabic along with the colonization of Egypt?
And more specifically I'm talking about moral univeralism which is the plague that affected the old world and the new.
>>8297 >You can't be truly anti-liberal without being anti-universal. If you hold to a belief system that aims to convert the entire world to anti-liberal principles, you are anti-liberal. >The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam That's not nationalism. >are we really going to forget that when the Arabs invaded Iran they literally enforced that Iranians had to speak Arabic along with the colonization of Egypt? Barely anyone in Iran speaks Arabic as a native language. CIA World Factbook lists Farsi, Azeri and other Turkic dialects, Kurdish, Gilaki, Mazandarani, Luri and Balochi before Arabic. Even Wikipedia says that native Arabic speakers are like 2% of the population They adopted the alphabet but kept their native languages.
>>8300 >If you hold to a belief system that aims to convert the entire world to anti-liberal principles, you are anti-liberal. Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? How can you claim to be so called anti-liberal when you accept liberal one of the major liberal principles? Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. >That's not nationalism. How is calling yourself a great people and upholding that everything Islamic that exist must contain Arabic influence not an example of Arabic nationalism within the Quran? >Barely anyone in Iran speaks Arabic as a native language. CIA World Factbook lists Farsi, Azeri and other Turkic dialects, Kurdish, Gilaki, Mazandarani, Luri and Balochi before Arabic. Even Wikipedia says that native Arabic speakers are like 2% of the population They adopted the alphabet but kept their native languages. Iran's language is heavily inspired by the Arabic language along with fact that the Quran and their government make it a requirement that the Quran must be read. Also Iran has something like 20% Arabic blood so your point make zero sense.
>>8301 >Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? How can you claim to be so called anti-liberal when you accept liberal one of the major liberal principles? Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. It's more of the fact that liberalism sees that individualism is something that is upmost important than anything else and Islam only sees that their religion is what is upmost important. This is when a cuckchanner would say "based" because Islam or any nation state rejects individualism, but in reality it does not mean you're setting yourself on the right path and Islam is most certainly not on the right path of anything.
>>8301 >Iran's language is heavily inspired by the Arabic language along with fact that the Quran and their government make it a requirement that the Quran must be read Heavily inspired? No. It’s clearly an Indo-Iranian language, and therefore classified together with Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, English and other languages. There’s undoubtedly some Arabic influence in vocabularly, but this should surprise no one. Through contact with other cultures and ideas vocabularly is exchanged, especially from a dominant culture to a lesser one. This is how English got inundated with French borrowings, and of course Latin and Greek ones as well. >Then what is anti-liberal principles, buddy? Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. To state the obvious, anti-liberalism is the opposite of this. Islam values the family, liberals obviously do not given how they’ve paved the way towards its ongoing dissolution. >Liberalism isn't the main reason why the world has gone to shit. Obviously. Scientific Naturalism, the Enlightenment and Jews are the main causes. >How is calling yourself a great people and upholding that everything Islamic that exist must contain Arabic influence not an example of Arabic nationalism within the Quran? Islam may say that Arabs have a good lineage or whatever nonsense, but they simultaneously say that Arab is not superior to non-Arab, black to White, etc – the only difference that matters to them is devotion to Islam. There’s no privileges, and the Islamic Ummah is more like a transnational civcuck nation than anything else, and there is nothing preventing Arabs from marrying whom they please. Even the most hardcore Salafist sites will affirm this. Some nationalism.
>>8079 It has nothing to do with them being Nazbols, it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. No wonder most of them identify as "transbian", turning their entire body to resemble women to use it as a glorified dildo/ona-hole for maximum « « C O O M » ». On the topic of troons, do you anons think it is possible to use troonery to curb shitskin populations?
>>8308 >it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. No wonder most of them identify as "transbian", turning their entire body to resemble women to use it as a glorified dildo/ona-hole for maximum « « C O O M » ». This. Trannies are creepy fetishists who get off on imagining themselves as a woman or looking like one. But regarding incels, there’s definitely an overlap. There’s the term “transmaxxing” for a reason. I think Cuckchan’s /r9k/ is the clearest demonstration of how inceldom can quickly degenerate into full on homosexuality, crossdressing and pinkpill-nonsense. That’s basically the entire board at this point. Anime to is likely a contributory factor as well, as there is substantial overlap in interests here. The idea that women live on “easy mode” or “tutorial mode”, and that they have it so much better and are constantly orbited by betas and fucked by alphachads can easily propel an incel to trannydom if he is particularly resentful of how women have it and blackpilled on his masculinity.
Open file (86.24 KB 635x645 1593069345-2.jpg)
Open file (133.48 KB 899x748 1589404312-0.jpg)
Open file (418.26 KB 1806x787 1593069345-3.png)
Open file (189.20 KB 1024x898 1589076112-0.jpg)
Open file (123.85 KB 1080x938 1589256237-0.jpg)
>>8309 >But regarding incels, there’s definitely an overlap. It's not a mere overlap, there is one thing in common with all troons, fags and Incels that is obsession with { [ ( S E X ) ] } and making sexual intercourse the centre of their identity. >Anime to is likely a contributory factor as well There is a reason why certain anons refer to it as tranime, that childish ADHD ridden garabge is designed to rot your brain and hook you up like drugs. Not to mention the androgynous appearance of many anime characters like Link. >The idea that women live on “easy mode” or “tutorial mode”, and that they have it so much better and are constantly orbited by betas and fucked by alphachads can easily propel an incel to trannydom >comparing life to video games You're right but i must ask, do you have Aspergers or happen to be from mexico?
>>8312 If he's from Mexico, can't blame him. Third world men also have the same problem. Their own women also gave up on third world men.
>>8314 Cope harder pajeet, your women were always massive sluts. How does it feel that they're cucking you for literal niggers >>8312 >>8309 >>8308 >Muh incels Who let the cucks and foids in
>>8315 How is he wrong? Third world women want other men from other races while White women are also doing the same. We just need to improve ourselves as men. Unless I misread the context.
Open file (222.73 KB 800x583 tutorial mode.png)
>>8312 >>comparing life to video games >You're right but i must ask, do you have Aspergers or happen to be from mexico? I didn't invent those terms, they're from /r9k/ memes. There's a reason why I put them in quotation marks, I was discussing how if one holds such views they can easily shift towards other more degenerate ones.
>>8304 >Heavily inspired? No. It’s clearly an Indo-Iranian language, and therefore classified together with Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, English and other languages. There’s undoubtedly some Arabic influence in vocabularly, but this should surprise no one. Iran's lanaguage is inspired by Arabs it's been diluted, many of the vocabs and words come from Arabic along with the fact that Islam changed the culture of the Iranians to something more Abrahmics than indo-European. Iran today is not like Persia was before Islam invaded. >Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. To state the obvious, anti-liberalism is the opposite of this. Islam values the family, liberals obviously do not given how they’ve paved the way towards its ongoing dissolution. Islam favors inbred and fucking animals, stop with this muh family shit it doesn't validate your religion or ideals. >Obviously. Scientific Naturalism, the Enlightenment and Jews are the main causes. Yes it was also the abrahamics who brought these ideas to the world. Non abrahamics completely rejected these type of viewpoints. Islam is not even agaisnt the ideas of univeralism, so this shill for muh based Islam needs to fucking stop. All abrahamics are bad period. >>8308 >It has nothing to do with them being Nazbols, it is the INCEL Ideology that turns people tranny. It's both, Nazbols aren't Incels, they're just communists who pretend that they're traditionalists. Incels and Nazbols are both degenerates. >nime to is likely a contributory factor as well, as there is substantial overlap in interests here. Anime isn't the contributing factor, it's depression, social media, and parenting issues. They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. The whole femboy shit is only encouraged by gays and trannies who run pedophile discords. >>8317 >How is he wrong? Third world women want other men from other races while White women are also doing the same. White women aren't doing the same.
>>8328 >Anime isn't the contributing factor, it's depression, social media, and parenting issues. They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. The whole femboy shit is only encouraged by gays and trannies who run pedophile discords. I'll never understand why /fascist/ or /pol/tards think that getting rid of anime is going to stop the issue. The crossdressing and tranny shit has been encouraged by gays for a while now even before they discovered anime in the masses. Nazbols and incels are gay, because they're depressed and sexually frustrated faggots who seclude themselves at home 24/7 browsing social media and porn without spending anytime in their life going outside and meeting others, so they can get rid of their anxiety that is setting them back. I wouldn't be surprise if fascists struggling with issue of anxiety and depression.
>>8328 >Iran's lanaguage is inspired by Arabs it's been diluted, many of the vocabs and words come from Arabic Stop embarrassing yourself. Iran is linguistically diverse, so when you say "Iran's language" you're not saying anything of substance at all. The vast majority of the population speaks languages which are easily identifiable as non-Semitic, typically Turkic or Indo-Iranian. No one denied Arabic influence in vocabulary, this was not even contested in the last post, what is dumb is calling it "inspired". >Islam favors inbred and fucking animals Hadith prescribe the death penalty for bestiality. This, again, is extremely easy for anyone to research. The only issue is with cousin marriage. If you're going to argue against something, you should at least know what they themselves say. https://sunnah.com/urn/1268810
>Stop embarrassing yourself. Iran is linguistically diverse, so when you say "Iran's language" you're not saying anything of substance at all. The vast majority of the population speaks languages which are easily identifiable as non-Semitic, typically Turkic or Indo-Iranian. No one denied Arabic influence in vocabulary, this was not even contested in the last post, what is dumb is calling it "inspired". Iranian cultures, because of Islam are not the same is what he is trying to say or should be saying. Islam has completely fucked over a lot of Iraniac lanauages and traditions due to the mass conversions of Persia and Central Asia. Today many of the beliefs, ethics, traditions, etc mostly come from Islam which also comes from Arabia. End of the story Islam fucked over Iran, just like they did with India bring their abrahamics beliefs and completely diluting what Dharma and the Vedic spirtualities were all about. >Hadith prescribe the death penalty for bestiality. This, again, is extremely easy for anyone to research. The only issue is with cousin marriage. If you're going to argue against something, you should at least know what they themselves say. It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ and its quite sad that you think that your desert religion that supposed tries to claim to be moral and ethic fails on every occasions in doing so. Islam still has an inbreeding problem cousin marriage or not there are Islamic countries with over 50% inbred rates soaring in their respective nations. Laws don't mean shit when it comes to Muslims who don't follow their own laws, just like how Saudi Arabia tried to claim they were banning child molestation, when the shit is still happening. https://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/bestiality.htm
>>8338 >It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ Seems like a stretch desu
>>7898 Anybody got that Picture that shows who all Hitler and the NSDAP considered Aryan?
>>8353 Are you talking about those Nuremberg Laws charts? Here’s a good reproduction of the German language one. The one thing to keep in mind with it though is that this is only for how Jews were to be distinguished under the law from Germans based on ancestry. I once read that Hitler was presented with two or three versions of the Laws. One that lax, one that was medium-strictness and one that was even more stringent than the one that we have today. Hitler chose the medium-level one. I will have to find the source sometime.
>>8355 No, it had a map, the background was blue, showed all of europe on it, in different shades, and had Questions and their answers on it. first and foremost being What europeans did the Nazi's think were Aryan?
Open file (638.14 KB 4000x2700 Aryan.jpg)
>>8356 It's this but apparently I saved the thumbnail not the whole image.
>>8356 Oh shit, is it this? The first one is what I think you may be looking for. The second one is by Madison Grant, and I included it mostly for comparison.
>>8359 The images posted in the wrong order.
Also have this, I see it’s on the thumbnail. I just don’t have the exact compilation you do.
>>8361 >tfw Ostisch-Nordisch-Ostbaltisch euromutt At least I’m not Dinarisch or Westisch honestly.
Open file (1.51 MB 4000x2700 Aryan.jpg)
>>8361 >>8362 Found it and replaced it in my folder
>>8364 Also related what proof do we have that the NSDAP did not murder slavs like the narrative claims, I have a lot of shit to sift through in my computer to find what I do have and figure it's a good place to ask here
>>8366 It’s lazy, but ask them what proof they have that Germany DID plan to mass murder all Slavs. They will be at a loss. Best you’ll get is “muh Generalplan Ost”, for which I’ve never seen any evidence like what Wikipedia describes, which describes mass-genocide and complete enslavement of all Slavs. Best to ask in response to that “where are the documents describing this?” It’s like with the Holocaust — where’s the order from Hitler or any higher up? It doesn’t exist. Best you’ll get is “muh Wannsee Conference” Another classic response will be “muh Hunger Plan” and stuff about Herbert Backe. Backe’s directives called for nothing but the favoring of the Germany Army in food supplies and requisitioning grain. They were in a total life-or-death war in hostile territory, why should they care about feeding civilians in cities? It’s not intentional murder, it’s directing and concentrating resources where it’s most vital for the Germans. It’s undeniable that Hitler planned to expand into the East, into Russia. This is said in Mein Kampf and his Second Book, and Germany desperately needed Lebensraum for a host of different reasons. In a “might makes right” world, there will be winners and losers, but nowhere did Hitler say that all Slavs should be killed. From everything that I’ve seen he favored relocation and deportation, especially beyond the Urals. Even in Table Talk (believe it its authenticity or not), Hitler never talks about mass-extermination. He talks about how Slavs should be made to work for the settlers that would come to the new territories from Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway. They’d be segregated from German towns but would have a use.
>>8368 Could this be said for all non-Whites?
Open file (22.97 KB 558x249 Regal Anarch 0.PNG)
Open file (58.84 KB 817x716 Regal Anarch 1.PNG)
Open file (94.90 KB 589x505 Regal anarch 2.PNG)
>>8364 It's some slavic dude, no idea where he actually lives, who is a "LibertAryan", his own words, on Telegram he delves into Aryan Spirituality and asked me to join his chat but believes somehow that Hitler killed shit tons of Slavs dislikes how he killed the Intelligentsia in places like Poland and unironically believes National Socialism is degenerate even though it took the entire world more than 3 years to defeat Germany under it. pics related.
>>8371 >>8371 As far as I understand it Hitler was only concerned with getting Lebensraum in Eastern Europe. His reasoning for this was that he foresaw that in the 20th century states with huge landbases and amounts of natural resources would come to dominate international politics, and if Germany was going to be independent and sovereign in the future, it would have to expand and get a large amount of land for itself. There were of course other reasons such as the land-shortage among farmers, and a general crowding of people and a lack of autarky, but the one described above was the main one. In the back of my edition of Otto Strasser’s book “Aufbau des Deutschen Sozialismus” there is included a purported dialogue between Strasser and Hitler that took place in the early 1930s that was apparently published by Strasser himself. In it there’s an interesting few lines in which Hitler rebukes Strasser’s anti-imperialism and says that Germany must align closely with England, and what will result from this is in time a Nordic-German dominion (think the word was Herrschaft) over Europe and — in association with America — the entire world. He goes on to say say that the protests in India are a rebellion of the lower Indian races against the superior English-Nordic race. He ends the section by saying that Nordics have the right to rule the world and that this right must be the lodestar of all German foreign policy. I can post the proofs of this stuff tomorrow if I can find the book. I don’t think he’s saying anything bad per se but Otto Strasser’s not trustworthy when it comes to anything Hitler-related.
>>8372 >and that is unforgivable [insert soy face] Unironically could not care less if he killed them all. Cry more is what I’d say >Nazism has proven itself to be a degenerate ideology because by the principles of Social Darwinism which it itself admired, it utterly failed and was conquered and is thus unsuitable for survival This could easily be demolished by pointing out that National Socialism draws from eternal social and biological laws and seeks to apply them to society and politics. So what, the German State got destroyed after years of firebombings and indiscriminate terror bombing and Russian rape gangs, but that doesn’t invalidate the source (i.e. Nature) that the NSDAP (in the sense that it was an ephemeral party) drew from in its doctrines. As Savitri Devi once said, you cannot de-Nazify nature. Racial differences still exist, eugenics still works, Natural Laws still exist, democracy is still a sham, Jews still control the world, might still makes right. One attempted and partial instantiation was destroyed, the creed itself is far, far more than just another “ism” that comes and goes. Not even sure why I responded like he was ITT but it’s at least good to get these things say for others to see.
>>8375 Thats not even the worst of it, he unironically thinks stealing jewesses to breed is a good idea, and there are jews in his chat one of which claims she is returning to the 60% Aryan heritage on average Ashkenazi jews have.
>>8338 >It's quite obvious you are the mudslime that was trying to shill homosexuality on /fascist/ You're the one falseflagging your own board to justify your attacks on /islam/, plus fascists are well known for their homosexuality and pedophilia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom >In 2008, Strom pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced to 23 months in prison, of which he served four months. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_League_(United_States) >The National Socialist League was unique in restricting its members to gay men. The group distributed membership applications declaring NSL's "determination to seek sexual, social, and political freedom" for Aryans.[5] It argued that gay men had a role in maintaining the "White race" and that they were meant to be a military and cultural vanguard. They summarized this position in their 12 point credo.
>>8373 But if Hitler didn't favour the Indians how come he and Bose were allied?
>>8375 Yeah, at the end, it's every man (or race) for himself (or itself). Alliances are in the bag of tricks after all.
>>8377 >y-you're falseflagging on /fascist/ to get people to go attack /islam/! >/islam/ is already as dead as fuck Take your pills
>>8378 I'd have to read up on it more, but it's possible by that time Hitler had unfortunately realized that Britain was never going to side with Germany in the war due to its government. In that case it would make sense to try to stir up shit in their colonies at that point. >>8379 Exactly. >>8376 What a shithole of a group kek
>>8377 Stay the fuck on your inbred board mudslime. Islam is shit and it won't save itself from globohono considering there are already LGBT shit in Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, etc. You can bring up fed and Jews larping as NS all you want, but it won't stop the fact that even Islam can't stop itself from losing against muh liberalism. Also Fascists aren't well known to be gay whatsoever because the globohomo loves to shit on Hitler and NS all fucking day while trying to shill Islam as a gay religion, which tbh they aren't incorrect about when you consider what the Turks did. Entire Islamic countries are becoming homo while feds and Jews need to larp as NS to make it seem that National Socialism is gay.
>>8429 The NS """""movement"""" can't be gay because it doesn't exist.
>>8431 Which is why I said Jews and feds larp as NS. We don't truly have a movement and it's hard to have one without Jews trying to infiltrate it. Most of those "National Socialists" groups are nothing more but pawns of ty government so they can embarrass and mock NS. Mudslime here once against ousted himself as the faggot who was shilling homosexuality on here, how gay do you have to be to do that?
Open file (158.26 KB 813x979 heil girl salute.jpg)
>>8432 >>8431 We desperately need a good National Socialist movement. It shouldn't be that hard to get a good movement founded on these principles that isn't full of completely garbage-tier individuals. Nothing else can fix our problems
>>8437 I'm working on it, Moving to Ohio in a month to begin learning skills I need for self-sufficiency, and hopefully have at least a small group within a couple years then I'm getting my own house.
>>8445 Ohio you say? Well, that's convenient. I'm an Ohiofag actually. I think there are actually one or two others I've interacted with here on /fascist/ alone so it seems like this state is fertile territory.
>>8287 >anti-We We had that too in Europe until Jews and Masons decided that kings had to be a thing of the past and went to kill most of them or ridicule them to such figurative stances that they're now neutralized. Islamic moderates or liberals are watered down Muslims. The problem being that watered down Islam does happen for Muslims, but when it gets hardcore, it conveniently hits all countries but Israel (and some very rich and modern countries like Oman and Saudi palaces). >>8293 >China is against human rights and yet they still managed to create nothing more but Chinese bugmen At least they put their exploding mudslimes in wagons. >>8297 Liberals are best understood as destroyed of sane restrictions. They wrap it in pleasing appeals to more liberty and joy until it's too late and they either eat their own hat or grab the power and turn into tyrants. Now, whether this ties automatically into universalism is another issue even if the usual definitions of universalism carry a heavy amount of denial of hierarchy on things such as race or culture. >>8300 >>The idea that arabia is a holy place and that Arabs are a great people is inbeded within Islam >That's not nationalism. Debatable. It might not be strictly enforced, but clearly alluding to the holiness of a nation (people) and a sacred land really comes very close to nationalism with a hint of theocracy too. >>8304 >Liberal principles are preoccupied with individuality and freeing the individual from subordination to the family, group and state in general. Government is viewed with suspicion but is seen as necessary. On that last part, it really depends on where you live. One's liberal is not the same as an other's. Besides, liberals today actually ask for more laws in favor of individualism and against oppression that comes from systemic racism, patriarchy, etc. They only wanted less laws when these laws still were "trad" enough. They don't care about true freedom at all.
>>8308 So Charlize Testosterone has gone full dyke. Dang. And that thing with adopting gooklets or nigglets FFS. >>8309 >transmaxxing >mfw when spending too much time on webs yet being surprised by new degenerate lexical term >>8312 >There is a reason why certain anons refer to it as tranime, that childish ADHD ridden garabge is designed to rot your brain and hook you up like drugs. Not to mention the androgynous appearance of many anime characters like Link. Yes. Even real males are presented like pretty boys, with pointy chins that girls have too, etc. >pic related, anime DIE Fair criticism, there's a flood of that shit. Globohomo finds its way everywhere. And mouthflaps. >>8322 That one condition on womyn is PATCHEEYAKEE!!!! >>8328 >They use anime to struggle with the fact that they will never be cute as their precious animus. Dude, a lot of anime today is downright terrible and often verging on pedo softporn with insufferable high pitched voices. Many nip girls even think they must emulate these shrieks when having sex. The considerably debased portion of anime contributes one way or another to the problem, even if it's more a symptom than a primary cause. If this becomes successful, it begs for more shit to be produced and that skews the perception people have of a given medium, also as what they will have access to. And obviously Jews will have a field day pushing for degenerate material and pc/neutered translations. >>8338 >End of the story Islam fucked over Iran, just like they did with India bring their abrahamics beliefs and completely diluting what Dharma and the Vedic spirtualities were all about. Pajeets are very resentful about Muslims, all for very good reasons. They should be a culturally and spiritual pushback. >>8355 >Nuberg Laws Anything that says Jews can't lead your country is horribly antisemtic and oppressive and extremely strict and genocidal now gimme those shekels! >>8359 >pic: most of Europe = Alpine Hey, that's a very generalized scheme by Madison Grant. >>8363 So you're Fubarish or what? >>8364 >small text isn't small enough. >>8368 Let's go for some D&C here. Were most Russian greatest achievements accomplished by people who had some non-Slav blood in their veins aside from the Slavic one? In other words, can pure Slavs do something or is the Aryan nigger meme based on some tangible reality? >>8372 >Regarch Anal >Germany was nearly alone against all superpowers it lost so obviously they sucked and their ideas sucked too Is it possible to suck more at real history than that? >>8377 >plus fascists are well known for their homosexuality and pedophilia. leblankface.jpg
>>8377 >fascists are known for their homosexuality and pedophilia Ironic a mudslime calling us pedophiles. but its actually the opposite. Fascism is hated because of how anti-homosexual it is. Instead of coming here and being a massive retard you could read up on what fascism is and what they advocate against. to come to conclusions about fascism based on a bunch of Americans is retarded.
>>8377 Don't muslims have that Bacha Bazi shit going on in the middle east?
>>8474 That’s some Afghan custom. Apparently it’s not uniformly liked: >>7783
>>8447 Yeah near Colombus actually, I wish it were farther out but money is the prime issue here after all. I was going to reach out here once I had been there a few months and see if we could all meet at a gun range somewhere in Ohio, I need to sharpen my skills on that front especially.
I want to know why /islam/ is dead yet we still have fags here constantly shilling for Islam. Are they really that desperate for White converts to purify their inbred gene pool?
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/17/2020 (Thu) 03:31:54.
>>8478 >>8447 >>8445 If this board ever spawns a group it would be extremely based. I’d love to hear Jews kvetch about /fascist/ and a related “hate group”
>>8393 I wouldn't say every race for itself. If we were going down that route, how come this image board is open to other races? It's just a conflict of interest really.
>>8429 Islam may be right on things like usury and whatnot but it literally teaches them to be hostile and radical for fuckall reasons. Even if Islam were to be anti globalist and anti Jew totally, it's a good idea to not make it radicalise it in the White mind. Islam is just kill kill kill.
>>8487 In nature, it truly is every race / group for itself, except for when it is more beneficial for groups with overlapping interests to form alliances against a stronger other. This principle doesn’t really apply to imageboards.
>>8488 Oh the irony of posting this on /fascist/. Besides that you're wrong.
>>8494 How so?
Open file (19.75 KB 1001x334 image.png)
Hey BO, you haven't logged into the bunker for a while?
What are your favorite philosphers and why?
>>8497 Even though I visit Nein a lot, I usually don't log in because there are no new posts or anything. I saw your post when I was there a minute ago though and logged in, so the message should be gone now.
>>8494 >>8496 Definitive answer to this problem: even ideologies or belief systems that are harmful to our people when taken as a complete system contain elements which are objectively good and that have been present in numerous healthy societies, White and non-White throughout history. If one does not follow the Natural Order at all, they will literally die or rapidly degenerate. Everyone follows it to an extent, even Abrahamists. I have elements of shared beliefs with Islam when it comes to usury, alcohol, patriarchy, faggots, adultery and premarital sex, but this is by no means unique to Islam or Abrahamism. We shouldn't settle for following the Natural Order in a way that's merely partial though. There are harmful elements in Islam >>8488 says, and therefore it is a false religion and Whites should never follow it. If one wants a real "based" society that shares many of the same issues, look at the Law Code of Manu.
>>8504 yes, the message is gone. thank you for the reply.
Open file (308.71 KB 732x558 hitler nietzsche bust.jpg)
>>8478 As long as you aren't in Columbus it's not bad. Certain parts of Columbus are a complete shithole full of niggers, or even worse, Somalians. Some of the suburbs are getting blacked. And yeah if lads ever want to do something we could look into it at least. >>8480 It would be entertaining, to say the least. >>8500 I'd like to read more by him when I get time, but I enjoy what I've read from Nietzsche so far, specifically when it comes to slave and master morality, the idea of perspectivism, his attacks on Christianity, life-affirming / life-denying worldviews, etc. I don't agree with him completely though, I'm closer to Hitler than anyone, so it's more a case of me using a lot of Nietzsche-influenced concepts in my posts. I'm also a fan of some of a lot of the Sophists as a group. They disagreed on tons of different points, obviously, but I like their distinction between what exists by nature, and what exists by human convention. I talk about that a lot too.
IWhy would Hitler be the reincarnation of Vishnu when he was a christ-cuck?
>>8513 >when he was a christ-cuck? He wasn't though
>>8516 I mean yes he was, he literally revived Christian faith in the German people and had made agreements and contacts with the pope.
Open file (69.80 KB 780x431 christcuck.png)
>>8522 None of that is evidence of Hitler being a Christian. There's much more compelling evidence that he wasn't a Christian, firstly in that he surrounded himself with anti-Christians like Himmler, Rosenberg, Bormann and like. The whole idea of Positive Christianity in the first only guaranteed freedom of religion within the bounds of the state and so long as it was not viewed as wholly contrary or harmful to the German people. This was pragmatic and he would have gotten nowhere if he had went out against Christianity in full-force. Besides the people he surrounded himself with, there are numerous attestations of Hitler viewing Nature as his source of values, or as divine in some way. This can be seen in Mein Kampf, and this can be seen in some of the quotes below: Christina Schroeder (Secretary of Hitler) >“He had no kind of tie to the church. He considered the Christian religion an outdated, hypocritical and human-ensnaring institution. His religion was the laws of nature.” Goebbels: >"The Führer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay." Otto Dietrich in his memoir said that Hitler "Talked of providence but "personally was sharply hostile to Christianity and the churches" (154) and that Hitler “was convinced that Christianity was outmoded and dying. He thought he could speed its death by systematic education of German youth. Christianity would be replaced, he thought, by a new heroic, racial ideal of God" (156). August Kubizek says the following in reference to Hitler’s Vienna years: >“For the entire period that I knew Adolf Hitler, I do not think he ever attended mass. He knew that I went every Sunday with my parents. He did not try to dissuade me, but said occasionally that he could not understand it of me. [...] one day he came to me in great excitement and showed me a book about the Church witch-hunts, on another occasion one about the Inquisition, but despite his outrage over the events described in these books he avoided making a political statement on the matter. Perhaps he thought I was not the right public for him.” >“He could not imagine for himself a finer existence than that lived by these radiant heroes of early German history. He identified himself with the great men of this vanished epoch. Nothing appeared more worthy of the struggle than a life like theirs, full of brave acts of great consequence, the most heroic life possible, and from there to enter Valhalla and so become an immortal of myth, joining those already present whom he so venerated. This strange, romantic perspective of Hitler’s thinking should not be overlooked. In a world of harsh political reality, the tendency will be to reject these youthful musings as fantasies, but the fact remains, despite everything at this time of his life, that Adolf Hitler’s personality dwelt only in the truly pious beliefs to which the German heroic sagas had introduced him.” Him being an important patron of the Nietzsche archive and posing in pictures with him also says a lot, see >>8508.
>>8525 How is none of this evidence of him being Christian he literally prayed in the church and revived Christcuckoldry in Germany and many NS were Christians as well. He was no way in hell anti-Christian when he only helped the Catholic Church. Table Talks cannot be taken as a fact of Hitler's religious views nor any pagan NS should be taken seriously when they are biased against Hitler. Also liking someone who's anti-Christian does not = anti-Christian. Christcucks love Hellenic philosophers and their ideas, but despise their religion and viewpoints.
>>8528 >Table Talks No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Everyone cited in my post intimately knew Hitler for years in varying parts of his life. And they didn't just know Hitler, they knew and interacted with Hitler out of the public eye. >He was no way in hell anti-Christian when he only helped the Catholic Church >revived Christcuckoldry in Germany and many NS were Christians as well You're just straight up lying at this point. Revived Christianity? Over 61.7% of Germans were Protestants in 1933, 32.5% Catholic. Of course there is going to be tons of Christians in the NSDAP in a country that is 95% Christian in the 1930s. By 1939 records say that 59.4% were Protestant and 33.2% Catholic. We see a decrease in Protestants here due to more becoming non-denominational God-believers of various kinds, Gottgläubig. Gottgläubige were nearly 4% of the population by 1939. Also it's important to remember that Catholics didn't support Hitler. All he promised to do was not persecute them outright in the Reichskonkordat, as had happened in the past under Bismarck. Clearly the Catholic Church was not pleased about what happened in Germany in the years after that due to the fact that "Mit brennender Sorge" was put about by Pius XI in 1937, where the pope cries about racism and confessional schools being closed down by the government. http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/deu/JEW_RELIGIONZUGEHTABELLE_GER.pdf >Christcucks love Hellenic philosophers and their ideas, but despise their religion and viewpoints. Christcucks claim that they were teaching truths in some areas, that's why they appropriated their shit and repackaged it for the goyim to win them over. See Justin Martyr in particular You're laughably wrong.
>No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Table talks is one of the primary sources of Hitler being so-called anti-christian, the other people claiming he's not Christian is based off nothing but mere claims. >You're just straight up lying at this point. Revived Christianity? Over 61.7% of Germans were Protestants in 1933, 32.5% Catholic. Of course there is going to be tons of Christians in the NSDAP in a country that is 95% Christian in the 1930s. Statistics doesn't matter, Hitler revived and built up churches that had a lack of attendees. The NS state increased the amount of attendees during church per citizens which brought back the traditional and old christian household back into Germany which is what Weimar destroyed. Also you're lying out your ass you seem to forget that when Hitler was winning the elections, the vast majority of Catholics voted for him one of the reasons why Hitler almost won the election in Weimar was because of the Catholic church, Hitler wasn't anti abrahamic. Read Hitler and the Vatican, the pope Pius XI literally refused to condem Hitler. >Christcucks claim that they were teaching truths in some areas, that's why they appropriated their shit and repackaged it for the goyim to win them over. Except they didn't repackage of all it, they excluded some of the spiritualities of philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, etc. Some even fully admitted they knew that many of Christianities' early philosophers were non abrahmaic, but they went with it anyway. Hitler was fond of Nitschze and yet he has done nothing to rid of it like Nitschze suggested it in his book, because reading someone book and taking inspiration from then doesn't mean you agree with them on everything.
If I can find that bitchute video, it would fully explain that Hitler widely had connections with the church wasn't anti-christians or not a christian like you buffoons claim.
Once I read godhood do you guys think my animu waifu will finally exist?
>>8533 >statistics don't matter!!11! >statements from multiple people who knew him personally don't matter and can't be trusted!1! Fucking cringe
Open file (38.26 KB 438x263 balliet waifu.PNG)
>>8535 We will find out in time, fren. My gut tells me yes
>>8534 This is the video you're talking about. I don't know why NS pagans and Christians hate each other so much, Hitler honestly doesn't seem anti Christian at all although he does seem to have some sympathy with paganism to certain extents similar to J. R. R. Tolkien. I can understand the Criticism of Christanity, but I still think we should get along to stop international Jewry and bring a place for our people. https://www.bitchute.com/video/kXy43n9IYz83/[
>>8538 >I don't know why NS pagans and Christians hate each other so much Christians are useful idiots for Jewry
>>8536 >>statistics don't matter!!11! Literally over half the users here. Another quarter don't understand how de-contextualization can create misleading statistics abused for political propaganda, incidentally creating a subjective false reality that makes outside communication harder, increasing isolation and group re-enforcement the same way as cults often do on purpose.
>>8540 Wtf I love ethnic replacement and Jews now
>>8522 Those went sour pretty quick and didn't last long. Any concession to Christianity were done in the non-negotiable context of "Positive Christianity", which was likely a last resort attempt at uncucking this religion one more time for the current generation of Christcucks (of then) until they'd be replaced by younger people who would progressively be integrated into a much more kin-centric Pagan worldview.
>>8538 NS Christians don't exist, not one single person who claims to be such can be anything but Christian, and if they are truly NS, they aren't Christian as Christianity denies the Laws of Nature the two positions are contradictory and as such one is either one or the other, So NS hate Christians because they are tools of the jew, and they oppose the rebirth of our original spirituality.
>>8533 >>No one mentioned Table Talks. Is this some sort of canned response, because nothing in post relies on taking Table Talks either as true or false. Table talks is one of the primary sources of Hitler being so-called anti-christian Could you cope more please? Anon posted totally valid sources that have nothing to do with the TT. Drop the red herring at once. >Statistics doesn't matter, Hitler revived and built up churches that had a lack of attendees. Statistics totally matter. >The NS state increased the amount of attendees during church per citizens which brought back the traditional and old christian household back into Germany which is what Weimar destroyed. And that's easily explained as it was much easier to do. The real project on the other hand would be completed over generations. >Hitler wasn't anti abrahamic Yes and his God was YHWH. >Read Hitler and the Vatican, the pope Pius XI literally refused to condem Hitler. What does it prove? Hitler didn't hunt down Catholics nor did he prevent them from holding their faith. >Hitler was fond of Nitschze and yet he has done nothing to rid of it like Nitschze suggested it in his book, because reading someone book and taking inspiration from then doesn't mean you agree with them on everything. That argument can only be stretched that much. A strong support for Nietzsche has far more implications than a cursory appreciation of some ideas. >>8534 Triggered much? Why would Hitler destroy Christianity when it had a strong potential to bring people back into a form of spirituality for the present time? He was pragmatic on this. The strategy was to combine the faith with the racial propaganda. Over time, any conflicting idea within Christianity would be shunned. In a way, they were toning down all the problematic elements by pushing the racial and manly message over a Christianity that had no other choice but kneel.
Open file (209.12 KB 512x512 suit pepe laugh.png)
>yeah guys, the man who put race at the center of his worldview and believed in Darwinian struggle, the Laws of Nature, and eugenics was tooootally a Christian!
>>8547 >Muh cope >Muh triggered Stay the fuck on cuckchan, you stupid niggers are the worst fascist to exist and too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. >could you cope more please? Anon posted totally valid sources that have nothing to do with the TT. Drop the red herring at once. >Anon >Implying you aren't the samefaggot The sources are still retarded and has no validality, a person saying something does mean it's true. I've seen a British christcuck claim NS were gay based off on mere claims are you going to believe that too retard? >Statistics totally matter. Ah so those fake stats about killing six gorillion and 20 billion slavs also matter as well? >Yes and his God was YHWH. >No arugment >What does it prove? Hitler didn't hunt down Catholics nor did he prevent them from holding their faith. If you read the book from Deschner, God and the Fascists: or Stingl, Gott segne den Führer along with the book I just mention it explains why Hitler worked with the church in the first place and that was mostly because he was already a Catholic himself just like most of the other NS were. If Hitler was anti-Christian then why weren't there any plans that came directly from him 100% no bullshit, that he intended to replace Christianity? Over the next 8 years he has only made Germans to be as spiritualistic over Christianity as they were in the Holy Roman Empire. If you seek to rid of a religion you don't build numerous of churches and encourage everyone to go to church. Hell he even banned occult groups such as Thule Society and other pagan groups from within Germany. >That argument can only be stretched that much. A strong support for Nietzsche has far more implications than a cursory appreciation of some ideas. <Christian platoinists had to be Hellenic because they strongly supported his ideas as well. >Triggered much? Why would Hitler destroy Christianity when it had a strong potential to bring people back into a form of spirituality for the present time? He was pragmatic on this. The strategy was to combine the faith with the racial propaganda. Where was your proof for this buddy? You seem to know Hitler so much but literally have offered nothing but your mere mentally challenged assumptions of what Hitler wanted or was.
>>8549 Calvinists and Lutherans believe and practiced eugenics. The United States particularly was filled with Lutherans and Calvinists who openly practiced eugenics in the United States (I think there were some cases in Scotland. England, Sweden, and Germany as well) to obtain attractive, smarter, and stronger children for farming, competitions, military, etc whatever the reason may be. The christcucks can indeed practice and believe in things, usually its just Catholics and Eastern Orthodox who despise eugenics, Darwinism, and the Laws of Nature, because it goes completely against their theologies, but the other sects don't as whole or at all reject these sciences or the idea of the laws of nature.
>>8535 I hope so anon. If I'm correct I think it's possible for a God to make it a reality or I think I heard from someone that it's possible to become beyond powerful than a lesser God and you can maybe become a omnipotent one.
Open file (16.43 KB 917x161 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (336.75 KB 1128x609 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8555 >too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. Maybe you're too retarded to seriously engage. >The sources are still retarded and has no validality Only because they don't fit your shill narrative. If Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer all echoed extremely similar things independently in their writings and testimonies about Adolf Hitler you can't just dismiss them because they don't your fit your head-canon. > I've seen a British christcuck claim NS were gay based off on mere claims are you going to believe that too retard? You try to pull this little trick twice in a row, I see. Someone mentions that statistics matter, and then out of nowhere you say "OH YEAH I BET YOU THINK HOLOHOAX STATS MATTER TOO" or "OH YEAH YOU BELIEVE HITLER'S CLOSEST ASSOCIATES SAID HE WASN'T CHRISTIAN, HA WELL SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER INTERACTED WITH HIM SAY THEY'RE GAY AS WELL. You're a joke, my friend. >Deschner Totally doesn't have an axe to grind. >Hell he even banned occult groups such as Thule Society and other pagan groups from within Germany. Hitler wasn't pagan.
>>8555 >Stay the fuck on cuckchan, you stupid niggers are the worst fascist to exist and too mentally impaired to do anything or say anything constructive. Seethe.
>>8558 >>8555 On the subject of Karlheinz Deschner he also appears to have hated Christianity as he wrote ten volumes on it's Criminal History dedicating most of his life to that work, that still has not been translated into English outside of what I provide here.
Any reason why >>708 is a bumplocked thread?
>>8564 Bump-limit is set at 500 posts. Unlike 8chan I'm unable to anchor threads at will. I'd really have no problem raising it to 750 if people would want it.
Edited last time by FashBO on 09/18/2020 (Fri) 00:36:52.
>>8558 >Only because they don't fit your shill narrative No it's because they're vague and they have no proof whatso ever I also liked how you didn't answer my questions at all. >Only because they don't fit your shill narrative. If Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer all echoed extremely similar things independently in their writings and testimonies about Adolf Hitler you can't just dismiss them because they don't your fit your head-canon. Expect I'm not dismissing them because they disagree with me I'm dismissing them because they are full of shit and don't explain or prove that Hitler was an not a christian. If you're dumbass would learn to read and stop being a stupid mutt nigger maybe you could understand what I'm getting at. >You try to pull this little trick twice in a row, I see. Someone mentions that statistics matter, and then out of nowhere you say "OH YEAH I BET YOU THINK HOLOHOAX STATS MATTER TOO" or "OH YEAH YOU BELIEVE HITLER'S CLOSEST ASSOCIATES SAID HE WASN'T CHRISTIAN, HA WELL SOME PEOPLE WHO NEVER INTERACTED WITH HIM SAY THEY'RE GAY AS WELL. No you fucking imbecile, point here is that the stats come from the fucking shitlibs you believe stats that come from them, why should I believe in the shit they say when they're the same faggots who lie about the NS state today? >Hitler wasn't pagan. Where did I say or implied he was? >>8559 >Seethe If you're going to use buzzwords then don't actually become the word you don't even understand.
>>8567 You have zero reason to reject them. You're really grasping at straws here.
>>8568 >You have no reasons to reject them >Y-y-you're just grasping for straws, >Still hasn't brought any evidence to validate their claims At this point you're just skimming through what I said and acting like a monkey nigger.
>>8555 You just wasted those trips, you complete passive waste. >people who spent a lot of time with Hitler or who literally lived like 24/7 next to him didaint know no shit about Hitler >>Statistics totally matter. >fake stats don't so all stats don't >Hitler cafoli A Catholic follows what the Pope says. Period. >Holy Roman Empire & Christianity Another can of worms. Let's just leave it out for the sake of keeping this discussion focused and simple. >Where was your proof for this buddy? Literally the fact that it's exactly what he did? Allow Christianity to coexist alongside a movement that was not merely political but religious too, which the closer you got to the core of its structure, its elite and topmost elite, was precisely veering towards the folk and pagan. The values defended by the volkish movement were completely at odds with the drivel found in core parts of the Bible. There in the NS comprehension of the world and the needs of the Germans' survival stood the following truths: seek revenge, resist evil, hate and destroy your enemy, protect your land and assets, racial difference does matter and niggers and kikes are terrible creatures. All of that should already give you a strong hint of what was in works if you could just lift your blinders for a minute, christcuck.
>>8556 Pure Christian dissonance. Aside from sodomites, all creatures of God deserve Love.
>>8558 >book review >Constantine and frens were anti-kike HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>8566 >heavy threads that surpass their natural buoyancy do actually sink So we have a physics engine here! Holy sh-
>>8567 >Christina Schroeder, August Kubizek, Otto Dietrich, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer >I'm dismissing them because they are full of shit mysides.jpg
>>8570 >>8574 >No argument >No argument Still waiting for that proof, either prove it or shut the fuck because you're just proving my point that 4cucks are mentally retarded.
>>8570 >Another can of worms. Let's just leave it out for the sake of keeping this discussion focused and simple. Perfect an example of somone who can't fucking read.
>>8575 >>8576 >please rabbi Yeshua save me from this evil anon! Reddit, try it.
>>8575 >>8576 Will you just shut up? you repeatedly did exactly as they have said, Hitler closest confidants came out and directly contradict your narrative, he was thoroughly Anti-christian and his actions ,at the state level, bear it out he was educating the youth of Germany to be in opposition to Christianity, did his goal of reeducating the German people require him to deal with and perhapos help some churches? yes but he also burned a great many within Germany as well as did Himmler, and who didn't stop him? Karlheinz Deschner while an very accomplished scholar was a liberal and while he lived in NS Germany and if I remember correctly was even a member of the NSDAP, he was far from privy to the thought in the inner circles of NS Germany. the people who were all point one fact out that Hitler was Anti-Christian, not that he was violently opposing it, as some, including myself, these days wish to, but that he wished for his people to discard it, as it is not of them, nor is it a healthy religion for them to follow.
>>8578 >Samefagging No they fucking don't you retard, his closet confidants don't mean shit it's not fucking proof. he wasn't anti christian either prove it or shut the fuck up. PROVE IT OR TAKE THE FUCKING LOSS YOU STUPID FAGGOT.
>>8581 >accusing people of samefagging without evidence. A new low
>>8581 Who's fucking samefagging? I've contributed since the beginning of the thread and am but one person and have had no other ID's ITT nor have I used TOR as I couldn't care less what ZOG knows or doesn't they won't stop me from doing what I wish to do. It's been proven beyond a reasonable doubt with the Table Talks on top of multiple confidants of Hitlers outright fucking telling you he was, he was a devoted follower of Nietzsche and required members of the NSDAP and SS Specifically read his works, as well as Alfred Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth century and his own Mein Kampf where he criticizes both Pagans, mostly the intellectualists among them, and Christians quite harshly, but he does spend a good portion of time on specifically Christianity within it. Hitler was Anti-Christian and under the Christian definition definitely a Pagan get the fuck over it, and return home White man or continue to serve your jewish overlords, I care not which just remember that if you do the second, you will be dealt with(in minecraft) like all the others.
Open file (2.48 MB 5064x1440 pagan hitler.jpg)
Open file (3.07 MB 2955x2500 pagan NSDAP.jpg)
Open file (355.84 KB 689x527 natsoc pagan.png)
Open file (285.08 KB 351x750 pagan hitler.png)
Open file (1.37 MB 1904x1672 nazi pagans.jpg)
>>8581 PAGANU BEAMU~
Open file (126.83 KB 943x691 How awake are you.png)
>>8581 Also go read The West's Darkest Hour blog, there's no reason that mudblood should have a better grasp on these things than you and most other Whites, tsk tsk. Don't come back until you're level 11
I actually wanted to post that very article, fuck, am I in good company here!
>>8591 Believing anything under level six is honestly embarrassing in the current year
>>8591 I'm not sure of anyone here who believes in Level 10.
>>8586 >>8588 You made the same retarded mistake of tagging me twice along with the same petty arguments you are two faggots behind one retard who still hasn't offered any proof. >>8591 Holy autism
Open file (37.42 KB 800x450 Hitler.jpg)
>>8591 This looks like a retarded cult lmao
>>8595 Replace (males) with (Anglos) and that should help you along. The last bit is the hardest, but it's the only way to make anime real.
>>8602 > but it's the only way to make anime real. What?
>>8600 I tagged you twice on purpose as I was responding to both of those posts second the proof you asked for is here >>8590
>>8595 I'm almost there, halfway between 9 and 10.
>>8605 Same here
>>8591 Level 11 is true gommunism No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis
The Lion. I cannot simply find the video anymore by using an search engine. Is there anyone here with it?
i mise maguca.org
>>8591 That one is retarded when it gets into the OP edit. Civ bad? Zionism is the Jews' program for world control. The error is to think it's just for nice and poor Jews to have their own little country. No, the National Socialist Reich saw through it and and Mein Kampf deals with this too. Post 6 lvl is also a lot of D&C. 14-88 author Wodensson was literally born in the trashiest of the White trash family one could find. See what he became! You never know whence the next great man will come.
>>8615 >Civ bad It depends what sense this is meant. Current civ is horrible for Whites and humanity at large. It should be destroyed in favor of a more nature-centered society. Basically Vargpill / Ecofascism. And you’re right about Zionism. The true Zionist program is laid out in the Old Testament — “for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.”
>>8622 >It depends what sense this is meant. The author doesn't bother with such loops and moves. Without civilization we're not better than niggers.
>>8632 >Without civilization we're not better than niggers We'd still be innately superior to them in many ways, let's be real, not that I am opposed to civilization in total
Anyone recommend which bhagavad-gita I should read? >>8535 Isn't the waifu thing agaisnt karma? Carving the perfect woman to mate with is nothing more but pleasure? Even gods can lose karma you know.
Open file (936.40 KB 441x662 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (514.30 KB 385x588 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8635 >Anyone recommend which bhagavad-gita I should read? You can't go wrong with pic related. I've heard it remarked that Prabhupada's translation is a bit idiosyncratic, but I thought it was a good edition. Not necessary, but I always recommend for texts such as these that people pick up another edition to compare with it if they can afford it.
>>8637 Can you confirm that these aren't teaching any bullshit?
>>8639 What exactly do you mean by bullshit? Like kikery or just general pozz?
>>8640 >Like kikery or just general pozz? Yes, or anything misleading and spouting universalist shit. I can't tell you how many books I've read from modern academics, who are secularists have claimed Hellenism and Norse is gay, because of several mistranslations
>>8643 The first translation is definitely not by a secularist. He's basically a theocrat who's well-known for some very politically incorrect remarks about women, gays, blacks, jews, Hitler and a variety of other topics. The one issue I do have with him though is that it is very obvious that he is angling towards a certain interpretation of the text which aligns with his variant of Gaudiya Vaishnavism and its huge focus on Krishna. I also got a vibe from reading his purports that he puts almost after every verse that he is fairly literalistic about what he says. I've heard a similar criticism in reading about ISKCON in general (which by the way has been totally taken over by Jews and is subverted since his death). My copy of the book includes both the transliterated Sanskrit word-by-word and then his English translation, but sometimes it doesn't match up directly, meaning that he took some liberties in what exactly he was conveying, which is one of the main reasons I own multiple translations. I like the guy and think that he was based, but I definitely have a few issues with him. Maybe some of the people who are better read on these matters could explain these things to me if they are misunderstandings on my part, but what I've said here is just the general vibe that I have gotten. For the other translation, it seems fairly straight forward and academic (in the good sense of the term). Some footnotes are provided in the back but besides that it's just straight Bhagavad Gita. The introduction was pretty good too. It discussed the meaning and implications of Dharma, the three gunas and other stuff that are discussed throughout the Gita. I have not detected any noticeable pozz. Now, when you say universalism, I assume you're referring to universal applicability. Hinduism is universal in the sense that they believe that what they believe is true for the entire world, but there's no real imperative to spread it to every nigger and shitskin on Earth. Even with this said though, the Bhagavad Gita is extremely clear that the castes were created by Vishnu, and along with the fact that it doesn't take much of a stretch to see that the Gita warned against race-mixing (see >>8354), many of the worst side-effects of spiritual equality are avoided. Since this is what is put forth from the idea of the self as a sort of spiritual core, as seen in 5.18: > The truly learned, with the eyes of divine knowledge, see with equal vision a Brahmin, a cow, an elephant, a dog, and a dog-eater. This doesn't mean equal treatment, it refers to the fact that this "truly learned" individual recognizes that all of these things mentioned above are atman at their most fundamental level. The physical natures are still extremely diverse and not identical in any way, and have different dharmas. It's not as bad as Christkikery, but it's worth pointing out that we can find stuff such as this even within Hinduism. That's one of the main reasons that I don't believe it.
>>8644 I see, thank you
>>8635 >Isn't the waifu thing agaisnt karma? Carving the perfect woman to mate with is nothing more but pleasure? I don't think it's goes against karma and not all pleasure will ruin your karma. Some pleasures are acceptable. but all I know is that hyper-sexualization and too much lust will indeed lower your karma.
>>8635 >>8647 >Even gods can lose karma you know. >lower your karma Careful, anons, all karma refers to in its true sense is "action". There is no good or bad in this sense, and it applies to all actions with ethical awareness, good or bad. Where good and bad come into account is when we start discussing the fruits of karma, or karma-phala. These can manifest either in one's same life, or in future rebirths as higher or lower forms of life, or on a more hellish or heavenly realm of existence. Ultimately though, the goal is said to be to transcend all karma and achieve moksha. The Gita says that one can and should act in the world but now in pursuit of rewards (2.47), not to cling to the fruits, positive or negative. Basically, Krishna is a pussy for seeing inaction as a solution for the problems of action that he foresees in the battle ahead of him. All of this is why he says that one should act, but with insight into the nature of clinging, the fruits of the actions, etc. Arjuna should fulfill his dharma as a kshatriya and slaughter his enemies, acting in yoga the entire time. One who performs duty without attachment is unaffected by sinful actions. This is what Savitri Devi is referring to when she talks of the detached violence of the Man Against Time, who is a yogi
Is it possible to become equal and Godly as Vishnu, Brahma, and/or Shiva?
>>8659 Considering Vishnu, Brahma, and Shiva are gods I think it's only possible to become Godly, but not become God yourself. There is a mantra for them I think that can make you as equal as them, but I don't that it makes you as Godly as them.
>>8678 >Are gods Meant are God
>>8633 In potential maybe, but if you're reduced to living in a barely neolithic way, your weapons will not give you an edge over what the apemen will use against you. Bronze age is already a good background for nascent and strong civilizations. That's a stage apemen cannot even get into by themselves. As I used to say, Whites are civilization. Denying this is denying a fundamental aspect of what we are.
>>8678 >Equal to god but not as godly as them Please, may you explain this apparent contradiction?
>>8681 What he is asking is that is it possible to become equal to God. You can become A God, but you cannot become as powerful nor can you be God himself.
>>8678 >>8679 This is my view as well.
>>8683 You can identify with Vishnu who is an omnipotent and omniscient God, but as far as identity what does that mean to identify equal to Vishnu?
Also, do you really have to chant ten million times to obtain the qualities of Gods like Vishnu? Or are there other ways or things you have to do to become like the most powerful Vedic gods?
>>8694 >>8697 I'm just getting into Dharma, so don't rely on me for all the information because a guru or someone here who might have the knowledge of a guru could explain to you how everything works. But I think it means you obtain the qualities of Vishnu, but not his power as a whole, although I could be wrong, but I think the Bhagavad-gita states that you can't really become that powerful.
>>8683 >>8694 You can be reborn as a deva or devi (I'm going to be using these terms because saying God and god / goddess is confusing here, unfortunately), because they are, like humans, said to have the same TRUE spiritual self as human beings, i.e. atman. They're ultimately subject to death and rebirth as well on a grand scale, they too originate from God and are dependent on God for their very existence. There's a hierarchy and it flows from the top. One good example of this is Brahma (never to be confused with Brahman / the Absolute). Brahma is analogous to the Demiurge. He carries out the function of creation, but Brahma too is "merely" a limited, bound jiva (soul) just as are the rest of living beings in the material cosmos. I'm not sure if he is necessarily material, but I have heard him described as "pure intellect". Brahma's said to die. He lives for something like trillions of earth years
>>8700 >TRUE Not sure why that is in all caps, ignore it, there's no special emphasis on that.
https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-become-like-god-Vishnu?share=1 This is only info I could find about what you're referring to anon.
Open file (37.59 KB 655x584 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8702 Good answer from this guy
>>8700 I think what he is asking is that is it possible to be reborn as an all-powerful being.
>>8713 That's what I was trying to deny, albeit in a somewhat roundabout way.
What are your thoughts on the founding fathers of America? It seems that Hitler really admired America and it's foundations the ideas of eugenics, but were the founding fathers really something that fascists can admire? >>8698 >>8700 Eh, you sure? I always thought it was possible to become all-powerful, but just that you couldn't become as powerful as God. You know you have tremendous power, but you can never have as much power or at least rich a level that God is on.
>>8736 The Founders were severely astray. Firstly, they were a pack of Freemasons drunk on Enlightenment memes like autistic rationalism, Christian Deism and the like. Unfortunately their minds were still polluted with Christian teachings. Pure Deism need not be like this. The separation of church and state was also another step in the wrong direction that has led us to where we are at today. Religion is all-encompassing, not some "private" affair. Freedom of speech and press was a mistake as well and has eventually permitted Jewish megacorporations to subvert us. Also whether or not the Founding Fathers wished to apply their egalitarianism to non-Whites isn't important either, all men are created unequal and this is the simple reality of Nature. Not all members of the White race are equal to each other, nor are all humans at large. A little leaven leavens the whole lump. >We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed Literally all pozzed. I wonder how I would even edit this.
>>8618 That's not it. The one you linked was once called "Hitler was right" on jewtewb before the mass aggressive censorship. "the lion, he's the king of the jungle, he doesn't wanna move, so the jackles and hyenas start barking at him" Till one the the lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody
It looks like /monarchy/ finally kicked the bucket since 8moe is dead (good on your part, /fascist/). Not that it matters for me. I left before it happened on self-imposed exile after ban faggotry and didn't feel like dealing with anarcho-monarchists ancaps much. I want to make my own board and post stuff there in peace. Still in exile and want a place to call home and LARP in peace. Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board?
>>8742 I still respect some of Jefferson's influences like Rousseau to a degree.
>>8751 >Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board? Be aware you might get yourself a ghost town, i found that the only way to grow a board is to have a pre-existing community or herd users from other parts, and the latter is a shamefur activity to do. Have a theme easy on the eyes, be conscious you might be the only guy posting for weeks. Although with your theme you probably will get 3 or 4 former posters, moderation should be as off-hands as possible and if you can don't even post with the BO tag, when there's few users someone appearing in control is almost immediately antagonizing unless it's an emergency; public BO personas only work with tons of anons posting.
Open file (766.00 KB 1380x1559 grace stop thinking.png)
>>8751 I swear to God I click on that stupid image every time even here unconsciously expecting a spoiler >Does anyone have experience/advice for making having a board? Luckily there is not too much of a learning curve in operating and running one. When I made /fascist/ originally on 8chan I was clueless, but it didn't take long for me to figure out how to do everything. Regarding advice though, this poster here >>8756 is spot on with a lot of what he says. As BO I generally try to remain behind the scenes and as unobtrusive as possible. Some people might be able to guess who I am, but I'm typically not actively tagging myself as BO or announcing that I'm BO in many other threads. I do this for a few different reasons, (1) I think that people would treat me differently if I was openly posting with the BO tag in every thread, and (2) it's just annoying and you'd feel like you have to be on your toes constantly. Moderation should definitely be pretty laid-back most of the time too. That's what I've done here and I've never really had any major issues with it, though I might get too lax sometimes, so avoid both extremes. Too lax and discussion becomes difficult, and too strict users will get upset and leave if you start running some sort of Stalin-esque /leftypol/ type board. Also it will probably definitely be a little slower when you start off unless you get some /monarchy/ guys in with you. I'm sure some people from /fascist/ would crosspost to so I don't think you'd have to worry about your board being stillborn or anything. I hope you're able to get it.
>>8698 chibi vishnu
>>8713 the kind of god emperor stuff we need now
>>8754 examples? like?
>>8754 Rousseau was right about primitive people, though to think that they were atomized individuals is completely wrong
>>8767 > Rousseau was right about primitive people Just look at Detroit.
>>8736 >I always thought it was possible to become all-powerful, but just that you couldn't become as powerful as God. You know you have tremendous power, but you can never have as much power or at least rich a level that God is on. those are called siddhas (perfected ones), they acquire these powers (called siddhis, meaning perfections) from yoga and austerities (fasting, nofap, meditation, etc). our lives are too short and our environment is too polluted and we are too sinful overall to accomplish that stuff in kali yuga.
>>8776 >those are called siddhas (perfected ones), they acquire these powers (called siddhis, meaning perfections) from yoga and austerities (fasting, nofap, meditation, etc). our lives are too short and our environment is too polluted and we are too sinful overall to accomplish that stuff in kali yuga. Eh. as long I can make my waifu real, but of course I don't mean only for pleasure,
I've been curious about how the Aryans used to bred with someone within their bloodlines just like most royal families did back then to continue their purity or assume a powerful political position for their royal family within a country (diplomacy). How potent is inbreeding and was mating with a relative such as your sister or first cousin acceptable to the Aryans?
>>8776 >no life = powa Not sure if the Kelly Yooga is sole responsible here.
>>8767 Rousseau was right about *White people
>>8788 >no life = powa im not sure what you mean by that. >>8780 i remember reading a story in bhagavata purana bout a lonely yogi in the woods who did just that. he used his powers to create a wife, then he made himself into a young man. the wife wanted a house so he used his powers to manifest a house as well, and then he ended up having children and had to use his powers to fulfill their desires too. eventually almost all his merit was used up on this and he realized he wasnt happy. he abandoned them all and went back to his practice. i forgot to mention, there is a vedic story of a being who did intense austerities for a long time, became extremely powerful and ruled the universe to the extent that he conquered the lower regions, the middle regions, and the heavens and all the gods feared him because he was absolutely unable to be killed. his name was hiranyakashipu, look him up, great story.
>>8797 That story you mention about the man manifesting himself a waifu sounds really funny, it seems like even yogis sometimes had the desire for a waifu. I will have to look have to find it here soon and let anons know where to find for themselves. Everything I've read in the Bhagavata Purana so far (mainly excerpts here and there) has been very enjoyable, I really need to read it in whole some time, I have a some three volume set even.
>>8797 Do you happen to know the name of that yogi? I tried to do a bit of searching and read about Kardama and Devahuti, but the main differences are that Devahuti wasn’t created, and that Kardama didn’t turn himself into a young man Unless I missed this. There is a similarity in that Kardama manifests a massive vimana with his yogic powers and eventually returns to meditation and austerities after having several daughters and a son, which was Kapila
Is it worth it to vote for main party candidates when it's painstakingly obvious no one is fascistic by any stretch of the imagination? Does it hurt or help the general cause of Fascism to do such? I'm tempted to not even bother because all you do in this country is vote for people in the hopes they'll do what they say they'll do, rather than voting for actual policy to carry through, but then I read stuff like this https://archive.is/lZSPi If you don't have time to read the article, it's from zerohedge and discussing how Trump desired 5 billion from tiktok to fund education. Stuff like this is what tells me that Trump seems to want to help but ultimately doesn't want to smash the heads necessary to ACTUALLY help. Ergo, I dunno, is it worth encouraging him with a vote until he finally figures it out or should I just write him off as an ultimately lost cause, too nice to do what will have to be done to actually help out?
>>8807 >is it worth encouraging him with a vote until he finally figures it out or should I just write him off as an ultimately lost cause, too nice to do what will have to be done to actually help out? He’ll never be encouraged by votes. Politicians think of you like cattle. You exist to give them votes, and as many votes as possible, this is why they debase themselves in front of every demographic on the planet, and why Republicans will increasingly support homosexuality, trannies, pedos, etc in the future. A single vote is basically a drop of rain in the ocean. Trump is almost certainly a lost cause. He may have pushed rhetoric to a place that we are able to exploit a bit better, but his solutions – solutions he can’t even actualize – are bandaids over a gaping wound of problems. The wall is one example. It’s useless if immigration is not stopped in total. Trump loves third-worlders pouring into America so long as they come LEGALLY. He operates entirely on economic logic and has no concern for race or anything we value. Trump’s speech about this commission sounds like a major improvement from what we have now in our schools and universities, but this here speaks for itself: >The 1619 Project, he said, “rewrites American history to teach our children that we were founded on the principle of oppression, not freedom. Nothing could be further from the truth. America’s founding set in motion the unstoppable chain of events that abolished slavery, secured civil rights, defeated communism and fascism and built the most fair, equal and prosperous nation in human history.” https://archive.fo/T1Are Now there’s obviously the reply that I’m being TOO puritan with my beliefs, i.e. “if Trump’s not a Nazi you’re wasting your time!” and it’s true that if I had to choose one or another I would choose Trump, and would prefer things such as semi-cucked “patriotic education” over the full-on Marxist stuff that we have today. I think both parties are heading towards the same (((destination))) at differing speeds and ultimately they will achieve nothing for us, for fascists, but I won’t actively discourage anyone from voting. I don’t think it makes you a cuck or anything if you want to vote, but don’t be under any illusions about it doing much.
>>8811 Yeah, basically. It's really an argument between (theoretically) turning the heat up faster or slower. Ironically, with the lack of response to the riots, Trump may be the go-to option to turn the heat up rapidly anyways so people will hopefully wake up and see things are real bad faster.
thoughts on Derrida's deconstructionism and can the right and third position use it to their advantage?
>>7728 its not, actually
>>8832 Among White people it is. Church attendance is down, irreligiousness / apathy to Christianity is growing, etc. The place it is really growing is in Africa. https://www.amren.com/news/2018/12/christianity-next-christendom-philip-jenkins/
The only ones who shill Christianity are: A. Niggers, women, opioid addicted flyovers, Beaners, Trump voters. Midwits and dimwits and trash. B. Dishonest atheists who want a tradition to legitimatize their stances so they latch onto shit like We Wuz Hebrews. C. Combo.
>>8805 >Do you happen to know the name of that yogi? he wasnt named in the story. there wasnt a specific forest or region he lived in either. sorry i dont know any names or context clues to make it easier to find the story. defintly wasnt kardama because the story would have named him. there are an innumerable amount of yogis who have practiced in forests and mountains and obtained great powers and strange adventures.
Decent list, but you forgot jews.
>>8886 >>8892 Jews mostly play bad cop while having their golems shill for Christianity. Low-brow antisemites see the Jews as having allegedly "rejected Jesus as the Messiah" and wholeheartedly shill for Jesus thinking that this Jew is the ultimate anti-Jew and incarnate God. The J-woke goy thinks that he has found the ultimate Trump card, but due to the Jews' 4D chess he's really fallen into his ultimate trap. Jews also use Christianity as a form of control over Christian goyim, using the example of their precious rabbi to browbeat them - "JESUS WAS A SOCIALIST AND LOVED EVERYONE!"
>>8883 Thanks, anon, I'm sure I'll run into it eventually and be pleasantly surprised to have run into it.
>>8906 I was kind of speaking historically, and if I recall the pope is an ethnic jew as well.
To you Vedic niggers, are you really going to try to sing a mantra one million times just to become more spiritual for some hindpoo gods?
>>8960 /fascist/ is mostly pajeets so yes.
>>8977 (((1)))
>>8977 No, Whites here have finally begun to take back a long-neglected part of their racial heritage. Pajeets will have it pulled from their poo-stained hands
>>8980 Poo in the loo.
Did the national socialists prefer left or right wind economics? By that I mean did they do more nationalization than privatization? Were they actually socialist or was it just in the name?
Open file (424.93 KB 473x308 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9019 The Socialism of National Socialism refers more to a communitarian-minded worldview. In a speech on July 28, 1922 Hitler said the following about how he envisioned Socialism: >Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation; whoever has understood our great national anthem, "Deutschland ueber Alles," to mean that nothing in the wide world surpasses in his eyes this Germany, people and land - that man is a Socialist. >By that I mean did they do more nationalization than privatization? Hitler said that his main concern was not to nationalize property, but to nationalize the minds of the people. Hitler did not hesitate to nationalize the property of capitalists who refused to serve the national interest. A good example of this is Junkers Aircraft and Motor Works. Hugo Junkers refused to help with rearmament and was removed from his position and the company was taken over by the state.
>>8960 Real Vedic stuff isn't exactly "Hindu", you know.
>>9019 Profit wasn't forbidden as long as you did what you could to support the nation. Abusive behaviors (typical capitalism) was curtailed: problematic companies were partially or totally nationalized. The only acceptable socialism, no matter how this term is irksome to many, could be said to protect the people, the land, the culture and the spirituality (faith for most, Wisdom for a few). The choice of words and socialism itself remain problems to many regardless of political bent.
I'm new here. Is there a very safe way for a Tor user with a vanilla Win10 computer to still start a thread with a dataless picture in the OP? In fact, can Tor users even start a thread at all?
>>9031 Tor users can do anything normal posters here can do, such as posting images, making threads, etc. We have an onion link for Anon Cafe as well: tew7tfz7dvv4tsom45z2wseql7kwfxnc77btftzssaskdw22oa5ckbqd.onion/fascist/ With images I'm less sure though, I'll leave that to a more tech-inclined anon. If you were posting anything that is a picture that you've taken for some reason there are ways to make sure there is no exif data on there
>>8960 Become a Buddhist
Open file (220.20 KB 671x590 Nietzsche 2.jpg)
>>9035 The Buddha was a decadent, his philosophy a product of his own decadent and pessimistic mind. There's a reason why some Japanese nationalists have attacked it for weakening people just like we do with Christianity
>>9037 Transcendentalism is not interchangeable with "decadence". I have some issues with Buddhism myself, but to call Buddha "decadent" is an absurdity. It's also telling of your (lack) of understanding on this issue that you post Nietzsche, who had a rather high opinion of Buddhism. Quoting from memory "Christianity promises everything, and delivers nothing, Buddhism promises nothing, and Delivers everything."
>>9043 >who had a rather high opinion of Buddhism. He says that it was more realistic and truer than Christianity but in The Anti-Christ he says that Buddhism is a religion "for the end and exhaustion of civilization" (section 22). Likewise in The Will to Power he calls Buddhism a form of passive, weary nihilism and a sign of weakness.
>>9035 Or just stay an Astaru, hellenic, celt, etc. If you don't want to sing a mantra for a billion times you can stay a pagan.
>>9050 >If you don't want to sing a mantra for a billion times Why do you guys keep saying this as it's the worst thing about the Vedic? You don't have to chant it ten million times just enough times that you are spiritually enlighten.
>>9049 He called it a religion for races grown old and sensitive, not a sign of weakness per se. There's quite a bit of nuance at play in his interpretation of Buddhism. Becoming old and dying is also part of the natural order. Regardless, referring to any ascetic, self-denying tradition as decadent is flagrantly absurd. That doesn't necessarily mean that tradition is "true", but that is a separate issue.
>>9051 Because it literally is, do you not understand hinduism or the Vedics at all? You literally have to sing it millions of times just to be gifted or come closer to the gods or even become so called spiritually enlighten.
>>8566 >Push bump-limit to 750 I see no issue to this and think it should be done. Threads might be sinking just because people discard anything that is not on the top line in the catalog, even if they're accepting new replies.
>>9033 >picture cleaning tool That could be useful too. Any idea?
>>9055 I have just changed it, but it appears that the bumplocks have not been removed from the already-bumplocked threads. I just asked on /meta/ about this. Unfortunately unlike with 8chan, both here and on Julay I am unable to anchor or un-anchor threads. It's a very strange thing to lack ability to do. >>9056 I know it's possible to do in Photoshop. Maybe Gimp as well but I don't use that as much so I couldn't tell you. A really lazy way to do it if you don't care about quality too much is to just screenshot the image and post the screenshot.
>>9052 It's possible I have a mistaken view. Where I have a problem with Buddhism is when it gets too pessimistic and borders on being anti-life. Sure, a lot of the things mentioned in the first Noble Truth such as birth, aging, dying, feeling pain, loss, etc can result in suffering or make life hellish, but these are not inherently so. It is all in how one reacts to the impressions. The Natural Order simply is, I don't assign good or evil to it. It doesn't seem like the Buddha did necessarily either, honestly, at least from the one sutra I just consulted for this post. I am certainly not against self-control or self-mastery, but when it results in confining the best and brightest away in monasteries never to reproduce, or to cuck people with the idea of karma, is where I see more harm than good. Too much pessimism results in weirdos like Schopenhauer. Regarding Nietzsche again though, this is what he said in The Will to Power in passing: >It's opposite: the weary nihilism that no longer attacks; its most famous form, Buddhism; a passive nihilism, a sign of weakness.
>>9053 You don't say it one million times in one day, you say it 108 times every day. You say one mantra for about an hour then speak it again the next day. Of course you can't speak all mantras throughout your entire lifespan because that's impossible.
>>9059 >It's a very strange thing to lack ability to do. Yes, it's very weird. This anchor attribute might not be hard to find in the thread's file, but that's not something someone should manually fiddle with without knowing exactly what to do with the file, outside of the admin/BO interface. That does not mean it cannot be manually tweaked though. I suppose the admin/BO would need to add a test thread with the anchor attribute on true and see if this can be edited safely without destroying the thread's content. Dunno. >pic edit Ah yes, will have to look into it. I notice that threads here, on the average, have more replies than on 8kun. I hope it won't attract glowniggers and other board wreckers.
>>9061 >You don't say it one million times in one day, you say it 108 times every day. You say one mantra for about an hour then speak it again the next day. No, but you need to still say it up 10-30 million times just to finish a mantra depending on what it is. If you do the math that takes about four years per fucking mantra before going on the next. Imagine having to do the most powerful and known mantras in the each hindpoo theology, you will be over 50-80 years old before you can finish them all or get the ones you want to finish.
>>9064 The fuck are you talking about?
>>9064 I have no clue what you're on about, honestly. I've heard 108 just like >>9061 said.
>>9064 I hope you're trolling because this is not mantras work.
>>9069 Read the above posts >>9072 I'm saying that it takes too long for a mantra and too much practice. >>9073 Then how do they work?
>>9074 You record them on tape, press play and go for the fridge to grab a beer and relax.
>>9074 >I'm saying that it takes too long for a mantra and too much practice. Instant-gratification zoomer with the brain of a goldfish detected
>>9074 You do a mantra for an hour and then repute the next day. You're supposed to feel calm and spiritual from the medidation you fool. You find it too hard, because you're too lazy or probably find it too complicated. Each mantra is not needed to be done for a billion times for you to become a calming and enlighten. Doing it for a month or a year per mantra is enough. >>9077 >Zoomer >>>/cuckchan
Open file (5.38 MB 2480x3508 82931691_p0.png)
Is Kiara Sessyoin a goddess I should pray to?
Open file (450.45 KB 1066x754 tsugumomo kiriha.jpg)
>>9081 Any anime goddess will do! 祈りましょう~
are there any esoteric hitlerists here who are into serrano?
>>9060 I've only read Twilight of the Idols, Beyond Good and Evil, The Antichrist and bits of Thus Spake Zarathustra, so whatever I read must've come there. We pretty much agree, I just see karma as the working principle of the natural order. And I place life-denying but disciplined ways of life in a different category than than ways of life that are both life denying and undisciplined. Though it seems to me that Mahayana and Chen/Zen did much to curb the issues most fascists would have with the original message.
What's your thoughts on autarky and what do you think would be a suitable economic system for NS?
>>9037 Then what form of Buddhism isn't shit? I heard good about Zen or does that suck too, because it's too life denying?
>>9102 I definitely support autarky. A nation which can’t provide for itself in a time of need is a slave to others. This is why small nations will always irrelevant pawns of those with large areas of land and rich natural resources. Hitler understood this, and this is why he wanted to expand east.

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?