>Well first off, America is a nation of immigrants.
and europeans immigrated from the fertile crescent, who immigrated from africa, etc. If everyone is an immigrant, nobody is.
>I'm pretty sure several featherniggers have won high court lawsuits for this very reason when they tried to force English on the post-1930s reservations.
this is a false comparison. it's different for the injuns because they don't have anywhere else to go and their numbers are a fraction of what they used to be. russia spans two continents and has millions of people, they are in no danger of going extinct.
>Well then we are past words and you can laugh as Ukraine becomes a failed state.
ukies are a large enough population group to warrant their own country. even ignoring the west's propaganda, there is a significant historical precendent for the ukrainian people to be self-determined.
>Good thing the Russians are pushing half-baked Poles back into Poland and out of Russian territory then.
indeed. go to bed in poland, wake up in east germany, these things happen. but then once that border comes rolling back it'd be best for everyone involved if you went back to your people.
>That actually is pretty much what USA did to German Americans back in the day. So yes.
again, if you don't like it, then go back. however if the country is actively preventing you from going back and trying to exterminate you, then that's a different issue that would warrant a special military operation.
>It might be for Spanish, due to Latin Americans, and German, due to the Amish, but the inability to teach a language in school or have schools which primarily speak that language were part of the genocide against Cajuns in Louisiana and against German-Americans during the World Wars, especially the first. Similarly, Bretons in France were faced with persecution for even speaking their language in schools and still face stigma.
see above, unless you're saying that these new offshoots of other cultures form an entirely new culture on their own (i.e. french cajun), however that culture should still make an attempt to integrate with the broader society. obviously as an american this is a unique/difficult case since there is such a massive gap in culture/way of thinking here and there is no unison beyond a vague idea of civic nationalism which doesn't work
compared to ethnic nationalism. we'd be a lot berret off today if lincoln had sent the nogs back.
>Diplomats act as their country to other countries when their leader isn't present. Even if it wasn't their official stance, the outrage it caused, as well as being proof that even their diplomats, people handpicked based on their thoughts and relationships with the country and its people, were hostile to Russia, were enough.
i will admit that they fucked up this one, proof that the west are wired machines that repeat what their masters tell them without any logical thinking. i don't trust putin in the slightest but at least i have legitimate reasons for hating him beyond "russia bad because cnn say so"
>Settlements can have hundreds of years of existing as a certain culture and with certain families.
your ancestral clay may be important but what really matters is if your people are still alive or not. it's better to be stuck with a few dozen of your kind in the slums of some big city than being the last one standing in a holdout on muh rightful clay, since then you still have a chance to carry on your heritage in the only way that matters: your bloodline.
>Similar to Biden's gaffe openly suggesting regime change in Russia, its something that cant be fully taken back
similar to the bong diplomat incident, this blind russian hatred is going to bite the west in the ass
see above, the injuns are the exception and not the rule.
>The point isn't that the UK actually meant its stance is to demand Russia to cede its own territory to Ukraine. The fact that they said something so obviously wrong and ridiculous is proof of the UK's real stance, its level of hostility to Russia, and its absolute disdain for the diplomacy it superficially preaches.
also above, i was wrong.
>They did try to leave. Kiev spent seven years shelling them because of their attempts to leave, since they refused to let them.
"Leave" means "get your things and go back across the border", it does NOT
mean "declare yourself an independent state, steal the land, resources, cities, and other peoples that doesn't belong to you then cry to daddy russia when they tell you to give their fucking land back"
>Hungarians in Ukraine live in a few km wide strip on the Ukrainian-Hungarian border, and they have been there since the 10th century.
in that case it might as well just be in everyone's best interest to give that strip to hungary. a lot of these rightful clay situations should be solved on a case-by-case basis, as well as how far back you would want to consider land ownership and if the ethnic minority is significant enough to stir shit up in the future.
>If you want erase a people cut out their tongues. They did it to the French and Germans as others have pointed out.
again, that's on them. in the case of america, integrate or go back. if i wanted to move to Germoney i would spend at least a few years learning their culture and becoming fluent in their language and customs, while also ensuring that i can give something to the community through my personal skills.
>Borders change, land doesn't.
Borders and land change, ethnic groups, cultures, and customs don't.