>I note that >>1 states that board meta discussion should take place on the boards concerned.
That is correct. This thread will be locked a few days from now.
That said, we understand that users' discussion of /christian/'s meta matters are being deleted from /christian/, and we understand that they're left with no other option than to discuss it elsewhere. We'd suggest that in this case, the dissatisfied users might want to take themselves to >>>/shelter/
and create a thread for /christian/ refugees.
>some of the global volunteers need to look in to this situation
We can see what's going on, but it is not our role to intervene in /christian/'s board matters unless it disrupts the site as a whole or otherwise leaves the global staff with no option but to intervene. All of this is a matter for /christian/'s Board Owner, whom we note remains active but has chosen to remain silent. Given their frequency and number, we will take as given that the Board Owner has seen the complaints about this board volunteer, and has chosen to maintain his volunteer status.
>hopefully if enough people report his posts and make a stink about it the moderators will get fed up and do something about this degenerate swine
We do not operate Anon.cafe on the principle of squeakiest wheel; spurious global reports only serve to annoy us. Please direct /christian/'s internal matters to /christian/'s Board Owner.
You should not be redirecting /christian/'s board meta discussion to /meta/. Please stop directing /christian/ users whom you have banned for complaining to instead post in /meta/. It is almost never a good idea to annoy us.